logo
I Am A USAID Worker Who Lost My Job. Here's What Trump And Musk Aren't Telling You About The Cuts.

I Am A USAID Worker Who Lost My Job. Here's What Trump And Musk Aren't Telling You About The Cuts.

Buzz Feed12-04-2025
Hot Topic
🔥 Full coverage and conversation on Politics
My father grew up in Berlin during World War II — picture shelling, scarcity, chaos, terror, death. The American boss of one of my grandmother's friends — a complete stranger to my father and grandmother — used to send them care packages from Chicago during the war. Who knows why.
Sometimes, these packages contained luxuries like chocolate for my 7-year-old father and stockings for my grandmother. Other times, they contained cooking lard, which my father said kept his mother and him alive. Dad never forgot this man, whom he met after my father and grandmother settled in Chicago. I remember being 4 or 5 years old and accompanying my father to visit him in a nursing home. Dad wanted to pay his respects to the man whose generosity had saved him and my grandmother from starvation.
Until late January 2025, the U.S. Agency for International Development used to provide this same kind of lifesaving aid and development assistance in about 130 countries. Working through a vast network of implementing partners, subcontractors, and grantees, it connected babies to emergency feeding in Sudan; it built treatment centers and trained health workers to fight tuberculosis in Ethiopia; it supported women to open microbusinesses in the Dominican Republic; and it helped rural communities access clean water in Ecuador.
Doing this work for six decades has built the kind of trust and goodwill necessary to conduct medical research and experimentation in the fields of HIV, cancer, malaria, cholera, and malnutrition treatment worldwide.
Many of USAID's activities foster resiliency, not dependency. Development assistance includes activities to advance democracy-building and human rights, which make developing countries such as Moldova, Armenia and Bosnia attractive to private sector investment. Currently, 11 out of the United States' top 15 trading partners used to be recipients of U.S. foreign assistance. These trading partners, like South Korea, in turn partner with USAID to provide humanitarian and development assistance in other countries pivotal to the U.S.'s geostrategic interests. But a slew of executive orders canceling contracts, imposing a freeze on foreign aid, and furloughing thousands of USAID contractors and direct hires eviscerated all that hard-earned trust and goodwill.
Until February, I was a USAID institutional support contractor, hired as the strategic communications adviser to the Democracy Delivers initiative, set up by former USAID Administrator Samantha Power. I had been so damn lucky to get my job. It took four rounds of interviews over three months and another three months waiting for a security clearance for me to land my dream role. My colleagues had several years of experience in government, the foreign service, the military, and/or campaign politics. Everyone had advanced degrees, mostly in international relations or regional studies, from elite universities and spoke multiple languages. I felt like the street mutt in a family of pedigree show dogs — a former actor/waiter/teacher/writer/humanitarian aid volunteer with a master's in creative writing, not international relations. Certainly not a Ph.D.
In his book Wishful Thinking: A Seeker's ABC, theologian Fred Buechner posits that we find our true vocation where our deep gladness meets the world's great need. I am grateful that I have found my true vocation in mission-driven organizations — first in education in conflict/post-conflict zones, and later for humanitarian aid organizations — for close to 20 years. Hearing and reading maligning of USAID is a sucker punch. I won't rehash facts versus fiction because research by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace shows countering disinformation with fact-checking seldom has the desired effect.
Instead, I want to tell you what the last two months have been like for me and probably for a lot of folks who work for USAID. During the weeks between the 2024 president election and Donald Trump's inauguration in January, a sense of foreboding cast a long, dark shadow over the agency. We speculated whether remote work would continue, and several of my teammates suggested I move to D.C. so I could remain employed, but I didn't trust the new administration not to fire me for my political views. Attending open office hours held by senior leadership, I wondered what colleagues' questions such as, 'The President has immunity, but that immunity does not extend to us. What happens if we are asked to do something illegal?' pertained to. We waited to see who would be named the new USAID administrator as Trump's transition team descended on Washington, not recognizing an early warning sign. Why name a new administrator when there was no intention of keeping USAID intact?
Inauguration Day set the tone for the new administration: punitive and devoid of empathy. Eliminating pathways for legal migration at the southern border made me think of my late father. He and my grandmother had immigrated to the U.S. after WWII on board the USAT General Henry Taylor, a military transport ship, with support from the International Refugee Organization, a precursor to today's United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. I used to work for organizations providing support to migrants and asylum-seekers at the U.S.–Mexico and the Mexico–Guatemala borders. Closing the CBP One app put already vulnerable people at more risk for trafficking, sexual assault and extortion.
By early evening on Inauguration Day, Trump had rescinded remote work. No one on my team knew if this applied to contractors or only direct hires. I would turn 58 in a few weeks, and I didn't have enough money saved to retire, nor did I want to. What if I couldn't find a job? I didn't want to dismantle my life in Tulsa, Oklahoma, but I changed my yearly lease to a monthly one just in case.
An hour or so later came the hiring freeze, and we learned that the Department of Government Efficiency would submit a plan to reduce the size of the federal government's workforce within 90 days. My skin felt like a million ants were crawling on the underside of it. I called my best friend on the Democracy Delivers team, and we speculated how many weeks of employment we had left as DOGE conducted its evaluations of programs. We assumed that USAID programming would continue through the evaluation process. How naïve we were.
By the blue light of my computer screen, I read about another executive order freezing foreign aid. A carousel of students' faces from Iraq, the West Bank, and Ukraine spun in my mind. USAID directly or indirectly funded gender equality, religious tolerance, and English-language education projects in Iraq. When Israel allowed aid caravans into Gaza, USAID paid for food, medicine, water and hygiene products. It helped rebuild Ukraine's power grid every time Russia's drones bombed it. Millions of people were going to suffer a lot more than they already were because of an election they couldn't vote in.
On Tuesday, Jan. 21, I worked on a positioning paper justifying the necessity of the Democracy Delivers initiative so the new administration wouldn't get rid of it. At that point, I didn't realize the president was determined to gut the agency and kill almost all of its programming. I reframed Democracy Delivers as a tool to further 'America First' rhetoric, rather than an approach to prioritize democratizing countries for development assistance.
Across the agency, other communications practitioners were doing the same for their projects. On Wednesday, an email urging me to report colleagues disguising diversity, equity and inclusion efforts or face disciplinary actions plopped in my inbox. I had been editing the Democracy Delivers webpages to remove words like 'inclusive' and 'sustainable' and replacing them with 'market-led' and 'self-reliant.'
On Friday, the Treasury froze congressionally approved payments to USAID. By 5 p.m. D.C. time, thousands of contractors including me received a stop-work order. I called my cousin who works for a subcontractor of the National Institutes of Health to see if she had received one, too.
'I just yelled at my aging, cancer-surviving mother,' she said. 'I am so mad. I don't understand how she voted for Trump. Where does she think her cancer treatments come from?'
USAID funds the clinical trials and research that lead to new treatments. Trials and research had been put on hold, possibly obliterating the usefulness of incomplete data. In the near future, someone just like me would probably lose someone just like my aunt because the richest man in the world spent $260 million to get Donald Trump elected.
The following Monday, I was furloughed. Numb, I completed the workday, ran to my pharmacy to refill prescriptions, ordered extra sets of contacts, and made an appointment to get my teeth cleaned before my health insurance expired. I functioned on autopilot for two days before an overwhelming sadness kicked in.
My role as the strategic communications adviser had been newly created, so there had been no blue print on how to do it. In those first 90 days of probation, there were more than a few times of curling over my desk with a burning stomach. The learning curve was steep — how USAID worked, navigating the politics between the State Department and USAID, getting past gatekeepers so I could do my job, learning the geopolitics of each of the 10 countries in my portfolio, and figuring out how to be additive to the partner governments without having a pool of resources from which to implement projects. I threw a lot of spaghetti against the wall, but after 10 months of hard work, I finally felt confident in my role, and now it was over.
Courtesy of Alex Poppe
On Feb. 26, the U.S. government ended nearly 10,000 USAID and State Department contracts and grants — about 90% of the agency's work. The gutting of USAID has destroyed the entire development sector. I know more people who are out of work now than during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are countless implementing partners, subcontractors, nonprofits, and grantees here and abroad who rely on USAID for sizable chunks of their operating budgets. One of my former employers lost 40% of its operating budget for 2025. Other organizations have already spent congressionally approved money obligated to them, and now Trump is refusing to pay them for past work and is terminating contracts.
Like Humpty Dumpty, the development sector will not be easy to put back together again. Many development organizations won't financially survive; institutional knowledge will be lost as people change careers; and everyone will have less trust in the U.S. government to keep its promises.
Learning English at night school, earning a degree from Northwestern University, and volunteering throughout his life, my father embodied the self-reliance, personal determination, and commitment to service underpinning the American cultural character. Because USAID is the agency that unites our humanitarian values and our national interests, it exemplifies our American identity. After WWII and until Trump took office in 2016, every U.S. president used his inaugural address to champion foreign aid because it reflected our ideals of decency and generosity.
By eviscerating USAID, Trump and Elon Musk are redefining what it means to be American. Musk thinks empathy is ruining Western civilization. We need to ask ourselves if we want to be seen as small-hearted or generous. Do we want to be known as a nation that cares about those in need? A nation that does the right thing because it is the right thing? Or do we want to be known as a transactional country, willing to betray our long-standing allies, inflict intense suffering on the world's most vulnerable, and embrace those who trample human rights? Who are we as Americans?
Having worked in conflict zones such as Iraq, the West Bank, and Ukraine, Alex Poppe writes about fierce and funny women rebuilding their lives in the wake of violence. She is the award-winning author of four works of literary fiction. Her newest book, 'Breakfast Wine,' a memoir-in-essay about her near 10 years in Iraq, will be published by Apprentice House Press on June 10.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democrats bow to nuclear-energy reality — but the left won't give up their delusions
Democrats bow to nuclear-energy reality — but the left won't give up their delusions

New York Post

time15 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democrats bow to nuclear-energy reality — but the left won't give up their delusions

The Biden-era climate-activist class may be the last to accept that there's no clean energy future without nuclear power. At least some politicians — even in the bluest corridors — are conceding. Reliably progressive New York Gov. Kathy Hochul has instructed the state's public power authority to build no less than one gigawatt of advanced nuclear power. Her announcement came just weeks after President Donald Trump issued a series of executive orders to bring back America's nuclear-energy dominance. Site assessments, private-sector partnerships and labor support are already in motion. Hochul and Trump come from opposite political universes, but both understand that nuclear delivers what wind and solar never will. It's the only zero-emission energy source that can power today's energy requirements reliably at scale. Modern life depends on uninterrupted electricity — AI computing, chip manufacturing, electric vehicles and data centers can't run on 'weather permitting' power. Storage for excess energy from wind and solar resources is still too expensive. Sunlight and wind are still too unreliable. Nuclear is the only clean option that runs 24/7. Trump's directives reflect that reality: They speed up permitting timelines, reauthorize shuttered reactors, rebuild domestic uranium supply chains and fast-track next-generation reactors for military bases and AI infrastructure. The goal is 300 gigawatts of new capacity by 2050, ensuring that nuclear power is the center of American competitiveness and security. Hochul, for her part, recognizes that New York can't meet its electrification targets without nuclear, either. The state's phase-out of fossil fuels has created demand spikes the current grid can't handle, made worse by the premature shutdown of plants like Indian Point in Westchester. She may never admit it publicly, but her plan rests entirely on the foundation Trump laid over the past months. His leadership — combined with streamlined Nuclear Regulatory Commission reviews, rebuilt supply chains and rising bipartisan support — cleared the way. But while some Democrats have begun to evolve, the institutional climate-activist left has not. Groups like the Union of Concerned Scientists, the Sierra Club and the Nuclear Threat Initiative have cycled millions of dollars through projects meant to thwart nuclear power. They reflexively oppose every new reactor proposal, every licensing reform and every effort to restore fuel production on American soil. UCS has spent years pushing climate litigation to 'hold bad actors accountable' for 'climate change,' recover 'damages' and 'limit future climate harms,' while taking money from far-left donors like the Tides Foundation and the Energy Foundation — which has longstanding links to the Chinese Communist Party. Edwin Lyman, a UCS director and frequent critic of nuclear power, has shockingly urged the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission to disobey Trump's executive orders. The Sierra Club, once a conservationist group, now donates millions almost exclusively to Democratic campaigns, and supported President Joe Biden's push to ban gas stoves. NTI, co-founded by CNN's Ted Turner and run by former President Barack Obama's energy secretary, is bankrolled by the Rockefeller Brothers Fund and Arabella Advisors' dark-money network. These groups are increasingly out of sync with global science, public opinion — and now, even the Democratic officials they once helped elect. They portray themselves as scientific, civic-minded watchdogs, but their only function is to spend millions injecting a radical, unpopular left-wing agenda into American politics, one that benefits America's adversaries more than the environment. The rest of the world is advancing its nuclear energy capabilities: China is developing small, modular reactors to export globally, while Russia is financing nuclear plants across Africa and Eastern Europe. These countries are not paralyzed by activist lawsuits or donor-driven campaigns, so they are free to invest in the most powerful tool available to cut emissions and expand growth. Finally, thanks to an increasing groundswell of support, so is the United States. The future of energy is nuclear, whether the climate lobby likes it or not. America is fortunate to have a president who understands this fact and is willing to lead. The alternative is to let out-of-touch donor-backed litigators and left-wing dark money behemoths dictate US nuclear policy, just as they did in the Biden White House. The country can't afford that kind of nostalgia. Steve Forbes is chairman and editor -n- chief of Forbes Media.

Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'
Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'

The Hill

timean hour ago

  • The Hill

Lutnick: US ‘going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing'

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday that the public is 'going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing' as the administration promises forthcoming breakthroughs on tariffs. 'Well, you heard in our polling some of the perceptions of the economy,' CBS News' Margaret Brennan told Lutnick on 'Face the Nation.' 'Sixty-one percent of Americans believe the administration is putting too much focus on tariffs, 70 percent say the administration is not doing enough to lower prices and 60 percent oppose new tariffs on imported goods.' 'This is a centerpiece to your policy plan. How do you reverse public opposition?' she asked. 'Oh, they're going to love the deals that President Trump and I are doing. I mean, they're just going to love them. You know, the president figured out the right answer, and sent letters to these countries, said this is going to fix the trade deficit,' Lutnick responded. 'This will go a long way to fixing the trade deficit, and that's gotten these countries to the table and they're going to open their markets or they're going to pay the tariff,' he added. Trump's whiplash approach to threatening and imposing tariffs has at times rattled the markets. The president has sent letters to dozens of countries warning of tariffs ranging from 20 to 50 percent to be imposed beginning Aug. 1 unless new deals are reached. 'For 80 years, America's leaders let countries put tariffs on our products and we did nothing,' Lutnick said Tuesday in a post on the social platform X. 'Now under President Trump's leadership, American consumers and businesses are going to be competing on a level playing field. America will come out ahead,' he added.

Marco Rubio's sanctions on a key UN antisemite may already be paying dividends
Marco Rubio's sanctions on a key UN antisemite may already be paying dividends

New York Post

time2 hours ago

  • New York Post

Marco Rubio's sanctions on a key UN antisemite may already be paying dividends

The sanctions Secretary of State Marco Rubio slapped on leading UN antisemite Francesca Albanese this month already may be paying handsome dividends. Just a week later, all three members of a UN Commission of Inquiry set up specifically to clobber Israel — Chairwoman Navi Pillay, Miloon Kothari and Chris Sidoti — quit. That makes the horrific stink at Turtle Bay a bit less awful. Advertisement Albanese certainly deserves Rubio's sanctions. As the UN's Human Rights Council special rapporteur, her job is specifically to slap Israel for its supposed wrongdoing in the Palestinian territories — and she's done that with zest. (Even when the wrongdoing is fake, which is essentially all the time.) She's smeared the Jewish state as a perpetrator of 'genocide,' called Gaza a 'concentration camp' and compared Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Adolf Hitler. Advertisement She's spread antisemitic tropes, belittled the Holocaust and pushed to unseat Israel from the United Nations itself. She blasts the 'Jewish lobby' for ginning up support for Israel — a clear sign of her intolerance for democracy. Indeed, her hatred of Israel runs so deep that she's even vilified American businesses, such as Microsoft and Amazon, that dare to partner with Israel. And accused US tech companies of profiting from Israel's 'genocide,' demanding the International Criminal Court pursue prosecute them and their bosses. Advertisement The three members of the bash-Israel commission were no better. Pillay, a former UN high commissioner of Human Rights, has called Israel an 'apartheid' state and demanded sanctions on it. Kothari worked on a report meant to whitewash Palestinian terrorism as 'resistance' and falsely accuses Jerusalem of 'massacring' and 'ethnically cleansing' Palestinians. Advertisement Alas, their departure won't spell the end of the commission or its antisemitic raison d'être. Nor will it put much of a dent in the UN's pervasive, monomaniacal bias against Israel, from Secretary-General António Guterres on down. But if Rubio's sanctions mean that at least some of the world body's antisemites are beginning to pay a price, they're well worth it.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store