Liberal insiders say Voice triumph confused Coalition's election priorities
Our Four Corners story on the fight inside the Coalition over its future direction revealed something I didn't expect to. Even those who strongly advocated against the Voice believe it gave the party all the wrong messages about how Australians felt about a broader range of issues and established a sense of complacency that ultimately led to its historic belting.
From the conservative to the moderate side of the Liberal Party room there is a growing consensus that the "no" vote fought for by the conservatives created the wrong impression for the party.
Rising conservative star Andrew Hastie told me the Voice gave the Coalition "a false sense of confidence".
"I think Australians are naturally, we're incrementalists," he said.
"So the Voice was a massive change to our constitution, which is why I think it was defeated. But that's very different to who do you want to govern this country? And in order to win people over, you've got to demonstrate that you're fighting for them. And I just don't think we landed that argument."
Asked if fighting against the Voice could have been damaging for Peter Dutton, Hastie answered: "Yes, perhaps. But I think we probably lingered over the voice for too long. Like I said, it was a tactical victory. Things can change very quickly in politics."
That view is shared by former shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who resigned from his opposition portfolio in 2023 in order to campaign for the referendum.
He argued on Afternoon Briefing yesterday that the Coalition's success in defeating the Voice to parliament referendum gave the Liberal party "a false sense of confidence" about its chances of victory in the federal election. Leeser says that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese "seemed to lose his way" after the Voice referendum was defeated and this, combined with what he says was Albanese's poor handling of the local antisemitism crisis, "gave so many in our party a false sense of confidence".
Leeser says he was "shocked" that the internal polling conducted for the Coalition used the number of Labor voters who voted "no" in the referendum in his calculations of a swing against the government, which was instead returned in a landslide.
The government's victory is so big it mirrors John Howard's 1996 election landslide.
"Part of the reason my colleagues were successfully defeating the referendum was in 2023 the issue did not seem to be one of top priority for Australian voters," Leeser said.
"Certainly, in 2025, it was completely irrelevant and I had no idea why the issue kept reappearing in our campaign."
While Dutton regularly raised the Voice as one of several examples to demonstrate that Labor was out of touch, he campaigned in the last week of the campaign on what he said was a "secret plan to legislate the Voice" after Foreign Minister Penny Wong told a podcast "we'll look back on it in 10 years' time and it'll be a bit like marriage equality".
"It indicated we were not in touch with the concerns of ordinary Australians," Leeser said.
"People were not talking to me about those issues until we raised them; they were concerned about paying the electricity bills, their mortgage, about the future of their children and what sort of jobs they would have in a world where AI will present both threats and opportunities.
"We were not talking about any of those enough, and instead focused on esoteric issues and I think it indicated a lack of discipline and real focus."
Despite a deep schism over the future of the party and how to deal with vexed questions including whether to stay committed to net zero by 2050 — many in the party acknowledge that the Voice set them on a path which created false positives that didn't materialise in votes on election day.
That revelation — if listened to carefully — provides warnings on how to rebuild. It is a cautionary tale on what to focus on and where Australians expect their political parties to be focused.
The Liberals are now in negotiations to bring the Nationals back into the Coalition — with Nationals leader David Littleproud denying that his party "flip flopped" on its split with the Liberals.
"There's no flip flopping from the National Party. We did not blink," he told Sky News.
But it's Littleproud whose leadership is under pressure over the shambolic incident and he is on borrowed time according to key members of his own party room.
Opposition Leader Sussan Ley may have a monumental task before her in settling issues that are red lines for many inside her party but her leadership has been strengthened by the recalcitrant junior Coalition partner's overreach.
Her next job is to manage the divergence in her own party room. The Nationals may end up seeming like the easier job compared with managing some of the policy differences inside her own party.
Watch Four Corners's Decimated, reported by Patricia Karvelas, on ABC iview.
Patricia Karvelas is presenter of ABC TV's Q+A, host of ABC News Afternoon Briefing at 4pm weekdays on ABC News Channel, co-host of the weekly Party Room podcast with Fran Kelly and host of politics and news podcast Politics Now.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
23 minutes ago
- ABC News
Tony Burke had a busy week with a cyber hack, arts backpedal and immigration detention debate
Welcome back to your weekly federal politics update, where Brett Worthington gets you up to speed on the happenings from Parliament House. The minister walked into a studio. Add in his three portfolios and on the surface it's classic joke structure. A man walks into a familiar environment and hilarity ensues. Tony Burke, the minister for home affairs and immigration, cyber security and the arts, was the man walking into the ABC studio this week. But once he started talking, it was clear that there wouldn't be a laugh anywhere in sight. Burke is one of the most senior figures in Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's government. When the parliament is sitting, he runs the House of Representatives and is among the names thrown around as could-be prime ministers one day (though, in fairness, there are no shortage of names that get thrown in that category). His hefty workload is a sign of the trust Albanese puts in him but it also means, as was the case this week, he's a man trying to put out many fires on many fronts. Burke's week started with a Sunday morning interview on Sky News, in which he conceded nobody in the so-called NZYQ cohort had come close to meeting the threshold to be re-detained. The cohort consists of hundreds of people released from immigration detention after a landmark High Court ruling found their detention was unconstitutional. The ruling prompted a raft of legislative responses rushed through the federal parliament at breakneck speed, including ankle monitoring, curfews and mandatory jail sentences for visa breaches. There was also the establishment of a preventative detention regime, which allows authorities to apply to a court to have someone re-detained if they were deemed a threat to the community. "No-one has come close to reaching the threshold that is in that legislation," Burke told Sky News. The minister's comments prompted Coalition cries that the laws need to be re-written, not that the Coalition was rushing to offer up any suggestions on what that might look like. Burke, instead, has other plans. "I keep meeting with the department and keep asking, 'OK what people do we have at different thresholds that we can run a case …' I'm not giving up, I'm going to keep doing it, but I'll tell you, to be honest, I would much prefer the individuals out of the country," he said. Given the whopping majority the government commands in the parliament, Coalition demands can be easily dismissed. Labor backbenchers furious that the party breached its platform kept stayed quiet when the government rushed mandatory sentencing laws through parliament last term. At the time, the spectre of a Peter Dutton-led Coalition government spooked those who might otherwise speak out against their party. But with Dutton now vanquished and another election years away, quietening concerns on the backbench will become a much harder feat. By Wednesday, Burke was walking into the ABC's studios in Melbourne, where another scandal was engulfing another portfolio. Hours earlier, Qantas admitted it had fallen victim to a massive cyber hack on a third-party platform that held the records of 6 million customers. The airline confirmed names, email addresses and phone numbers had been accessed, but credit card and passport details were not. Burke, wearing his cyber security hat, said he'd spoken with the acting chief executive twice earlier in the day and that the airline was fully co-operating with the government. "I know that Qantas have been doing a lot over time to uplift their cyber security," he said. "But, you know, any vulnerability is unacceptable." The interview was only just getting started and Burke was suddenly having to account for another scandal that had engulfed another of his portfolios. As he reached for his arts minister hat (you can decide what that might look like), he told the ABC that 20 minutes before he'd entered the studio he had taken a call from Creative Australia chief executive Adrian Collette. Collette was was ringing to tell Burke that Khaled Sabsabi had been reinstated as Australia's representative at the 2026 Venice Biennale. It's been a rollercoaster few months for Sabsabi, who was commissioned for the prestigious art event in February, only for him and curator Michael Dagostino to have their invitation rescinded a week later when the Creative Australia board intervened. Their initial announcement prompted criticism in the federal parliament, with Liberals condemning works from decades earlier that depicted former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, and a 2006 work depicting the September 11 attacks. In the months since, there's been a review of the initial decision that found "no single or predominant failure of process, governance or decision making that resulted, ultimately, in the decision to rescind the selection of the artistic team", but instead "a series of missteps, assumptions and missed opportunities". Burke told the ABC that all decisions had been at arms-length from his office but that he had continue to support the board throughout. "When they made the decision to appoint, I said I supported it," Burke said. "When they made the decision to terminate, I said I'd support that." (The whole description sounded a lot like Pauline Hanson in 2018 when she insisted she hadn't flip flopped: "I said no originally, then I said yes. Then I have said no, and I've stuck to it." But we digress) The saga has seen prominent departures from Creative Australia. Burke insists the organisation retains his confidence. There's no doubt Burke, a guitarist, is a lover of the arts, particularly live music. But with everything else already on his dance card, the sector is closely waiting to decide if the portfolio needs to go to someone who can dedicate more time to the role given the dire outlook for parts of the $64 billion sector. Politicians are often accused of being out of touch and detached from the issues of real people. Anyone watching Sunrise on Wednesday morning got to see just how human they can be. Speaking about a horrific story that emerged from Victoria a day earlier, Housing Minister Clare O'Neil wiped away tears as she spoke of the panic she was struck by when she frantically checked if her children attended a centre linked to an alleged child sex offender. The incident prompted the state government to urge infectious diseases testing for about 1,200 children. Inquiries were launched, there were calls for a royal commission and the federal government quickly vowed it would cut the purse strings to centres that put child safety at risk. It's been a decade since a royal commissioner recommended working with children checks should be streamlined and standardised across the country, and federal education minister Jason Clare this week conceded implementing that change had taken too long. He conceded the system wasn't up to scratch and that change "can't happen soon enough". Like O'Neil, there are no shortage of parents of young children that sit around Albanese's cabinet table. The public has seen the outrage they felt following the revelations from Melbourne. They're also now watching to see what the government does to stop it happening again.
SBS Australia
34 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Trump 'keen' to meet Albanese, Wong says, after talks with US top diplomat
United States President Donald Trump is still "keen" to meet with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese although the precise time of a rescheduled get-together is still up in the air, Foreign Minister Penny Wong has said. "I had a really good meeting with Marco Rubio, the secretary of state, and he expressed regret for the [Trump-Albanese] meeting having to be rescheduled," Wong told Sky News Australia on Thursday. When asked about the time and whereabouts of a rescheduled meeting, Wong said the Australian government was "very flexible about those arrangements". "The president is a very, very busy man. But I was pleased that Secretary Rubio made clear that they're keen for a meeting, [and] they want to reschedule it. "It was disappointing as he said that they had to reschedule because the president had to return, as a consequence of what was occurring in the Middle East." At that time, one of Albanese's spokespeople described the postponement as "understandable" considering escalating conflict between Israel and Iran — a conflict that the US would enter five days later, bombing three Iranian nuclear facilities. 'Quite rational' to review AUKUS The two leaders were anticipated to meet and discuss several topics, including US steel and aluminium tariffs on Australian products and the AUKUS deal, which is currently under review by the US. Some of these issues were discussed during a meeting between Wong and Rubio in Washington, where she attended a Quad meeting with other members of the diplomatic partnership: the US, India and Japan. "We had a lot to talk about ... We live in a region, as Secretary Rubio said, that is being reshaped and the future of the 21st century will be defined by that reshaping," Wong said. She said that it is "quite rational" for a new administration in the US to review AUKUS. "This is a multi-decade task [and] governments, foreign ministers, defence ministers ... of all colours will have to deliver this and we're gonna have to work together," she said. After the talks, in a joint statement, the four countries' foreign ministers said they were launching the Quad Critical Minerals Initiative. They called the initiative an "ambitious expansion of our partnership to strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating to secure and diversify critical minerals supply chains". "We do recognise this [critical minerals] is a strategic asset to Australia but also to our partners," Wong said. In response to a question about whether these minerals can play a role in tariff talks with the US, Wong said: "We see the strategic benefit in critical minerals ... We have more work to do on how that might work with the United States. "They are interested and we are interested."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Australian National University announces more job cuts as it seeks to save $250 million
The Australian National University (ANU) is planning to cut another 59 jobs in its bid to save $250 million by 2026. The additional job losses come on top of the 41 proposed job cuts announced last month. The positions are across academic and professional roles from within the College of Science and Medicine, the College of Arts and Social Sciences, and the Research and Innovation Portfolio. The staff now have three weeks to provide their response and feedback to what the university intends to do. Vice-Chancellor Genevieve Bell said that while the job losses were necessary, the proposal was not set in stone and planned staff cuts could be changed. "Last year, for instance, we had multiple change plans and in each one of those instances, the number of staff that was impacted changed and it became a smaller number in those plans," she said. Professor Bell also acknowledged that the impact of the cuts was unclear, but that the broad offering of courses would continue. "It's not yet clear what the impact will be on courses, but the reality is we have programs that we are committed to and we'll continue to deliver those," she said. "It's really important that we maintain a really strong research portfolio and a really strong transformative educational experience." The union representing staff at the ANU says the cuts are eroding the academic stature and reputation of the university. In a statement, Dr Lachlan Clohesy, National Tertiary Education Union ACT division secretary, said the ANU shouldn't be proposing more job cuts. "These job losses lay at the feet of the vice-chancellor," he said. This latest round of cuts to reduce staff and money is part of a broader savings plan the ANU says is necessary to ensure the long-term future of the institution. "In October of last year, we agreed with [the ANU] Council that we needed to take $250 million out of the recurring operating base of the university," Professor Bell said. "Which was a big shift for the university but was the amount we needed so that we were no longer spending more than we were earning." The key aim for the ANU is to break even financially for 2026, and the total savings planned include $100 million less in staff salaries. "We are making strides along that journey for the $100 million we needed to take out of the salary of the university," Professor Bell said. In a statement, the ANU added that "it is anticipated that no organisational change proposals will be released beyond 31 October, 2025 for the 2025 year". But the university said it was unknown at this stage whether further changes or cuts would be required in 2026. The latest proposed savings come just weeks after Federal Education Minister Jason Clare raised "significant concerns" about the ANU with the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency. A "live compliance process" — a review into the concerns raised at the ANU — is ongoing.
