‘I oppose genocide' : Meet the pensioners risking lengthy prison terms to support Palestine Action
She had suffered days of poor sleep in anticipation of this eventuality. Now, an 'aggressive' man was asking her repeatedly if she sympathised with a terrorist organisation, leading her through an extensive list of questions about her politics and who she knew in Gaza.
A few hours earlier, on the afternoon of 5 July, half a dozen officers had handcuffed the pensioner and hauled her off the ground and into a police van alongside her 73-year-old husband.
The couple, who once described themselves as 'small-c conservatives', had travelled to the capital from near Chichester for the protest, declining to tell their children what they were about to do.
It was only a day later that their son realised what had happened after he saw his mother on the news, suspended and flanked by the large group of officers.
Mansfield had been following the conflict in the Middle East since the Israeli invasion of Gaza in 2014, but only became an active protester after former home secretary Suella Braverman described peaceful protests as 'hate marches' in October 2023.
'I have never been political or an activist. I was just an ordinary, middle-England person,' she says. 'But then I became outraged.'
Mansfield says she was 'shocked' by the events of 7 October, when Hamas militants crossed the border into Israel and killed around 1,200 people, taking 251 more hostage. 'But the actions that subsequently followed, where entire families are being wiped out, I had to join those urging for a ceasefire now,' she adds.
More than 60,000 Palestinians are believed to have been killed since Israel launched its retaliatory aerial and ground offensive in Gaza. Humanitarian organisations have warned that, with not nearly enough aid entering the territory, the 2.3 million residents of Gaza are now in effect being starved.
Keir Starmer warned this week that Britain would recognise the Palestinian state if Israel did not end its 'appalling' war in Gaza. He urged Israel to work towards a ceasefire and a two-state solution.
Israel's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused Starmer of 'rewarding Hamas's monstrous terrorism'. Mansfield dismisses Starmer's move as having been 'performative rather than substantial'.
Fighting her own battle for Gaza, the pensioner was arrested under Sections 12 and 13 of the Terrorism Act 2000 for holding up a placard that said: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action'. Being charged under Section 12 carries a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.
The protest group Palestine Action had just been proscribed as a terrorist organisation, after it claimed responsibility for activists spraying red paint on fighter jets at RAF Brize Norton. The proscription means it is illegal to support the group. It puts Palestine Action in the same legal ranks as Isis, al-Qaeda and Hamas, leading critics to accuse the government of heavy-handedness.
Mansfield knew it was possible she would be arrested, but had no idea how the police would actually react when she and dozens of others held up placards in support of Palestine Action outside the Houses of Parliament. It was the first of what would become weekly protests, all of which resulted in arrests.
As the police interview with an exhausted Mansfield drew to a close at around 2am, after more than 60 questions had been asked, the counterterrorism officer made one final remark.
'Look, even if you get hundreds of people, thousands of people, we're 30,000 strong,' Mansfield recalls him saying. 'We'll put all our resources, and not just police forces, into arresting and interrogating you.'
Then he let the 'traumatised' pensioner go free, hundreds of miles from home. She had not been charged with a crime.
A total of 385 MPs voted in favour of the unprecedented move to criminalise Palestine Action. Only 26 dissented.
Announcing the vote, home secretary Yvette Cooper said that while free speech and the right to protest form 'the cornerstone of our democracy', Palestine Action was guilty of 'violence and serious criminal damage' that does not constitute 'legitimate protest'.
As a result, Palestine Action was proscribed alongside a white supremacist, neo-Nazi organisation called Maniacs Murder Cult and a pro-Kremlin ethno-nationalist organisation that seeks to create a new Russian imperial state.
Critics and human rights activists quickly accused the government of infringing on people's right to protest following the proscription of Palestine Action.
In a letter to Cooper, the Network for Police Monitoring said: 'Misusing terrorism legislation in this way against a protest group sets a dangerous precedent, threatens our democratic freedoms, and would be a terrifying blow to our civil liberties.'
Several United Nations human rights experts, meanwhile, said that criminal damage that does not endanger life is not 'sufficiently serious to qualify as terrorism'.
On Wednesday, a judge ruled that Palestine Action would be allowed to challenge the Home Office in court over its proscription, but it could be months until a result.
The outrage over the move has increased as more protesters are arrested.
Private Eye editor Ian Hislop branded the arrest in Leeds on 19 July of 67-year-old Jon Farley, for holding up a printout of the magazine's front page that questioned the proscription, as 'mind-boggling'. Farley has not been charged.
The case was cited by Mr Justice Chamberlain on Wednesday as a reason to allow Palestine Action to fight the proscription. He said it was evidence of the 'chilling effect' the proscription was having 'on those wishing to express legitimate political views'.
In total, more than 200 people have been detained since the ban. Not a single person in England or Wales has been charged.
The large majority are over 60, according to Tim Crosland, a former government lawyer who now campaigns for Defend Our Juries, an organisation that is supporting many of the detainees. He says some of the protesters are 'well into their eighties'.
The police are aware of these optics. Mansfield claims that her male counterterrorism interrogator even asked her at one stage: 'Was this a conspiracy to make the police look bad?'
The reality, she says, is simpler: the seriousness of terrorism charges is a significant disincentive to younger protesters at the start of their careers; for pensioners determined to take a stance, it is the perfect opportunity to step up.
Robert Lee, 61, another protester arrested on 5 July but not charged, who later went to support demonstrators in Bristol, says he remembers one 83-year-old woman gleefully telling him that police were afraid to arrest her 'because they are terrified I might die in custody'.
But the crowds of pensioner protesters are nonetheless peppered with younger demonstrators, a reality they say nods to the broad spectrum of opposition to the proscription of Palestine Action.
For Zara Ali, 18, who is among the youngest to have been arrested, her involvement felt especially high-stakes. She was already on bail for conspiracy to cause public nuisance after blocking a road in March. She has not been charged.
'I was told to prepare myself for prison,' she says, admitting that she was very 'anxious' when she arrived in Parliament Square for the protest on 19 July. 'But at the end of the day, I had it in my mind that this is not about me but about Palestine, and about every single political prisoner who is being held.'
The Independent spoke to half a dozen protesters for this piece, all of whom said that their 'disgust' at Israel's war on Gaza was the primary motivation for their involvement. Claims that the proscription pointed to a 'dystopian' future in Britain were also commonly cited as a key motivation.
The Home Office declined to comment.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As two men charged with raping girl in Nuneaton, what details can police reveal?
The Nuneaton case has prompted a backlash as Reform council leader accuses police of cover-up over asylum status of suspects. Two men have been charged with the rape of a 12-year-old girl in Nuneaton. Ahmad Mulakhil, 23, was arrested on July 26 and charged the next day with rape, according to Warwickshire Police. He appeared at Coventry Magistrates' Court on Monday and has been remanded in custody. Mohammad Kabir, 23, was arrested in Nuneaton on Thursday and charged with kidnap, strangulation and aiding and abetting rape of a girl under 13, the force added. Warwickshire County Council leader George Finch, a member of Reform UK, claimed that the two men were asylum seekers from Afghanistan; however, this has not been verified. Police have not commented on whether the two men are asylum seekers. 'Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status,' they said in a statement. What are police required to share about suspects and when? Police do not name suspects on arrest, unless under exceptional circumstances (largely to avoid unfair damage to their reputation if they are released without charge). However, on charge it is common practice to name a suspect unless there are reporting restrictions (eg a suspect is under the age of 18) or there is a policing reason not to do so. Along with people's names, police tend to release details including: the suspect's name, age, address, what they have been charged with and when the date of their court appearance. On some occasions, the occupation of the suspect may also be released if it is relevant to the crime that has been committed (for example, a doctor accused of assaulting patients). Why are there accusations of a cover-up? Accusations of a cover-up emerged after Reform councillor George Finch claimed that Mulakhil and Kabir were Afghan asylum seekers. The claim was also reported in the Mail on Sunday. Police have not commented on the immigration status of the suspects. In a letter posted to social media on Sunday (3 August), and addressed to home secretary Yvette Cooper as well as Warwickshire Police chief constable Alex Franklin-Smith, and Warwickshire council chief executive Monica Fogarty, Finch said: "Residents of Warwickshire can see that they have not been told the full story". "I am disgusted one year on from the social unrest that we saw in parts of the UK in 2024, the Home Office and the police have clearly not learned any lessons from the handling of similar incidents last year," he said. "I strongly believe that the only risk to public order from this case in Warwickshire comes from the cover-up itself." He added that there was "appetite" locally for protests to take place outside migrant hotels and houses of multiple occupation (HMOs) in the county, but said he did not want to see such action take place. He did, however, demand the home office remove all HMOs in Warwickshire. Speaking at a press conference on Monday, Reform leader Nigel Farage claimed it was "a cover-up that in many ways is reminiscent of what happened after the Southport killings last year". In Southport, riots broke out following the murders of three children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class after it was falsely claimed that the perpetrator was an asylum seeker who had come to the UK on a small boat. Far-right groups had at the time accused the police of failing to share adequate information about the suspect (who was under 18 at the time of the attack), while the force was later accused of failing to recognise the threat of disorder from far-right groups. What have police said? The force acknowledged there had been "some questions" about it decided to release as part of such a "high-profile investigation". However, it insisted it was following "national guidance" when someone is charged with an offence, which does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status. It said: 'Where relevant, sensitive information around locations, details of the crime and policing activity to catch offenders can be shared, with a warning that this is sensitive or confidential information and disclosure by those being briefed could affect future court hearings. 'We work to hold offenders to account and will always do everything in our power to present a robust case to the courts and protect the integrity of court proceedings. 'Once someone is charged with an offence, we follow national guidance. This guidance does not include sharing ethnicity or immigration status."
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Residents left baffled by naked man wearing ‘gimp mask' at night
A quiet seaside town has been rocked by a naked man reportedly wearing a 'gimp mask' stalking its streets at night. Residents across Lytham have been discussing the mysterious person's identity on social media, after he was first spotted just before 1am on 18 July. He was captured on a car dashcam on Westby Street, in the heart of the Victorian resort. Locals say the clip was then posted on the street's WhatsApp group, with more footage from the night also shared. Clips have since been posted on Facebook and have gone viral. The footage shows a young man calmly striding down the street, naked except for his trainers and black mask. 'It's a gimp mask, I've watched the footage,' said one resident, who requested they did not want to be named. 'I've no idea what he thinks he's doing,' he added. 'In the days after, we saw a young man, fully clothed, walking around the streets, looking up and around, seemingly checking for cameras. 'We think it's the same man.' The resident, who was stood alongside his wife, said he knew of no 'alternative lifestyle' establishments locally which may provide a clue to the mystery. Locals also said Lytham, unlike its close neighbour Blackpool, does not get stag and hen parties visiting the town. Lancashire Police said the incident took place on Westby Street, Cleveland Road and Bannister Street. A spokesman said: 'We are aware of a concerning video circulating on social media of a naked male wearing a face covering walking around Lytham in the early hours of the morning. 'This incident was not initially reported to police and has only been brought to our attention after it has been viewed on Facebook. 'Fylde Rural Task Force are currently conducting CCTV and house‑to‑house inquiries and would like to reassure you that we are taking this matter seriously.' Officers urged anyone with information or relevant CCTV to contact FyldeRTF@
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former priest accused of ‘brainwashing' followers in evangelical Church of England cult claims he led on ‘consensus'
A former priest accused of leading an evangelical cult in the Church of England has denied 'brainwashing' his followers as he stands trial for sexually abusing 13 women. Christopher Brain, who led the rave-style Nine O-Clock Service (NOS) in Sheffield in the 80s and 90s, allegedly surrounded himself with women who wore lingerie or revealing clothes as part of his 'homebase team' who kept his house 'spotlessly clean'. Jurors at Inner London Crown Court previously heard the women – sometimes referred to as 'the Lycra Lovelies' or 'the Lycra Nuns' – were on a rota to help then-Reverend Brain get to bed, and this included performing sexual favours. The 68-year-old denies one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault relating to 13 women between 1981 and 1995. Giving evidence in his own defence on Monday, Mr Brain – who was in a Christian band – admitted he became the unofficial leader of a Christian group known as the 'Nairn Street Community', made up of up of around a dozen people who felt they did not fit into a traditional church congregation. This group later became part of NOS, formed after they heard 'charismatic' evangelical American minister John Wimber speak. His preaching included practices such as 'laying on hands' and speaking in tongues, the court heard. Mr Brain admitted he would be described as the leader of NOS, a congregation which met for 9pm services 'shaped around club culture' at St Thomas' in Crookes, Sheffield, but claimed there were other members of a leadership team. Mr Brain said he "rarely" stood at the front of worships and instead played more of a "producer" role. He admitted he may have been 'overbearing' at times as he led the art and direction of NOS services, which featured music and visual effects. 'I think most of the time I lead on consensus,' he told the jury from the witness box, wearing a black suit and shirt. 'It's also my character style. However when it got to music and direction I could be very direct and be very Yorkshire and straight and I think at times I probably was overbearing.' Asked by his lawyer, Iain Simkins KC, if he was at times 'overly direct', he replied: 'Yeah, by today's standards.' However, he denied 'brainwashing' or 'exerting undue control' over congregation members. Asked by Mr Simkin 'did you turn them into robots to allow you to manipulate them for your own sexual desires', he responded: 'No.' The prosecution allege NOS became a 'closed and controlled' group which he used to 'sexually assault a staggering number of women from his congregation'. The former priest appeared in a 1995 documentary and made admissions to the filmmaker of sexual contact with a number of the female members of NOS, jurors were told. Mr Brain, 68, who denies all charges, insists NOS was not a cult. He accepts that he engaged in sexual activity with some of the complainants, but that it was consensual. The eight-week trial continues.