Senate, House GOP poised for clash on green energy tax credits
The Freedom Caucus, a powerful right wing bloc, has said it will 'not accept' any changes that 'water down' the dramatic cuts to the tax credits passed by the House.
And while draft legislation from the Senate this week does still deliver significant reductions in these subsidies, at least one key Freedom Caucus leader is already saying it's not good enough.
'Yeah, I will not vote for this,' wrote Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) in a post on X, referring to the Senate bill's tax credit provisions.
On a call with reporters on Tuesday afternoon, Roy indicated that he was willing to play hardball.
'They either fix it or they don't have my vote,' he said. 'The president rightly campaigned on terminating the Green New Scam subsidies. It's destroying our grid. It's subsidizing China.'
He added that he wants to end 'not just the solar and wind credits, but all of them,' including credits for emerging technologies such as carbon capture and sequestration. Roy did say he'd be open to a 'possible exception' for nuclear, given the level of regulation faced by that industry.
'The only reason I voted for the House bill in the end was that we got those significant wins on the Inflation Reduction Act Green New Scam subsidies. You take those away and water those down, and I'm out,' Roy said.
With the House version of the bill passing by just a one-vote margin, any further fractures in the lower chamber could jeopardize the bill's future.
Both Senate and House moderates have argued that the House bill goes too far in its repeal of the Biden-era tax credits for climate-friendly energy sources.
Despite the push from House moderates, Roy and his Freedom Caucus colleagues successfully pushed the bill rightward in the lower chamber.
It's not entirely clear who would win out between the House conservatives and the Senate moderates who have themselves warned against a 'full scale' repeal of the credits.
The issue is one of several that threatens to hold up passage of President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' GOP gulfs over Medicaid and federal tax deductions in areas with high state and local rates also persist.
The House took a sledgehammer to the green energy tax credits, including by stating that only renewable projects that begin construction within 60 days of the bill's passage would remain eligible.
The Senate version extends this timeline, allowing projects that begin construction this year to get full credit while projects that start construction next year would get 60 percent.
It also axes House language that would have required energy projects to start producing electricity by the end of2028 to get the credit.
Freedom Caucus member Rep. Josh Brecheen (R-Okla.), also raised concerns about the changes in a text to The Hill.
He cited analysis from fossil fuel advocate Alex Epstein, who said on X that basing the credit solely around a project's construction rather than energy production could mean that companies are able to claim the credit for years longer, including after President Trump's term is up.
Brecheen said he's 'hopeful those in [the] Senate and the American people realize over 10 different times since 1992 …Congress promised to phase out the Production Tax Credit, and every time Congress has not kept [its] word,' referring to one of the tax credits for low-carbon energy sources.
'We have to ensure we do this while President Trump is president to ensure it happens. Any promise to end beyond his term as president will turn out to be a mirage,' he added.
While conservative Republicans have sought as drastic as possible cuts to the incentives for climate-friendly energy sources, their more moderate counterparts have argued that doing so could be disruptive for U.S. companies that are trying to make investments in domestic energy production.
Sen. Thom Tillis, who was part of the group that called for a 'targeted, pragmatic approach to the credits,' told E&E News this week that he was 'generally satisfied' with what the Senate put together.
The language in the Senate bill is still expected to represent a massive cut to green subsidies, just not as dramatic a cut as in the House.
'The Senate Republican bill does almost 90 percent…as much damage as the House proposal did,' said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), the architect of the tax credits Republicans are now seeking to dismantle, during a Tuesday webinar.
'Let's not get too serious about this new Senate bill being a kinder, gentler approach,' he said. 'Projects all over the country are being canceled.'
Trade groups representing renewable energy companies also said that the legislation would still significantly harm the renewables sector.
'Despite modest improvements on several provisions, this legislation does not go far enough to remove the threat to one of the greatest economic success stories in American history. As drafted by the Senate Finance Committee, this proposal would pull the plug on homegrown solar energy and decimate the American manufacturing renaissance,' said Abigail Ross Hopper, president and CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association, in a written statement.
—Mychael Schnell contributed to this post, which was last updated at 5:03 p.m. EDT.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
With Trump's Policy Bill Teetering, Johnson Is in a Familiar Pickle
Speaker Mike Johnson on Wednesday found himself in a familiar pickle: teetering on the edge of failure as he worked to win over the regular holdouts in his party — and ultimately relying on President Trump himself to push legislation over the finish line to deliver his agenda. In the past, this formula has worked for Mr. Johnson. He has used it to clear multiple steep hurdles despite his inexperience and the lack of trust he inspires in some rank-and-file Republicans who privately believe he is in over his head. In Mr. Johnson's deeply divided Republican Conference, the margins are always too slim, the bill is always teetering on the brink of death, there is always more trouble looming for the next step of the process and mini-rebellions are always flaring up. Quashing them often involves sessions at the White House, where Mr. Trump plays the magnanimous host, sometimes offering photographs in the Oval Office or signing merch, to seal the deal. That was the case on Wednesday, as Mr. Johnson worked to put down multiple revolts in his party and bring the G.O.P.'s marquee legislation slashing taxes and social safety net programs to the floor for a final vote. 'This whole process has relied on a sense of inevitability that this will get done, no matter how steep the hill,' said Brendan Buck, a former top adviser to two Republican House speakers, John A. Boehner and Paul D. Ryan. 'And this will get done, someway, somehow. And when it does, Mike Johnson will deserve all the credit in the world for keeping an even keel, and Donald Trump will deserve all the credit for being the muscle standing over the speaker's shoulder.' Mr. Trump has been the muscle, but also the flatterer. That method has yielded favorable results. 'It's cool that the president knows my first name, I dig that,' Representative Tim Burchett, a hard-line Republican from Tennessee, said in March, just before he caved and voted for Mr. Trump's budget plan that he had originally opposed. On Wednesday, Mr. Burchett, one of many ultraconservatives raising concerns about giving final approval to the domestic policy bill, seemed giddy in a video he posted on social media after leaving yet another meeting with Mr. Trump. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The ‘big beautiful bill' would supercharge Trump's immigration crackdown. Here's how, in 6 charts.
Republicans are on the brink of handing President Trump an enormous injection of money to fund his hard-line immigration agenda. The 'big beautiful bill,' which is facing what could be its final legislative hurdle in the House of Representatives, includes roughly $170 billion in additional funding to supercharge Trump's mass deportation efforts and ramp up border security. While there are ongoing debates within the GOP over what should go in the final package, none of those disagreements have centered around immigration funding, which was virtually unchanged between the Senate and House versions of the bill. The mega-bill would empower the Trump administration to build new immigration detention facilities, hire thousands more immigration officers, construct new sections of Trump's long-promised border wall and pour billions of dollars into other aspects of immigration enforcement. Here are the details of what the bill would mean for the American immigration system. One of the signature promises of Trump's first presidential term was his pledge to build an 'impenetrable, physical, tall, powerful, beautiful southern border wall' across the full length of the U.S.-Mexico border. Legal challenges, logistical snags and funding shortfalls prevented him from delivering on that promise. During his first term, his administration replaced more than 400 miles worth of existing barriers, but only built 47 miles of new wall where none had existed before — at an estimated cost of $15 billion. The new bill provides more than three times that amount for an 'integrated border barrier system' that includes a plan to build 700 miles of new walls, 900 miles of barriers along the Rio Grande River, more than 600 miles of secondary barriers and an array of cutting-edge technologies to bolster the physical barriers, according to estimates from the GOP-led House Committee on Homeland Security. Since returning to the White House, Trump has mounted an unprecedented and highly controversial campaign to sweep up and deport millions of immigrants living in the U.S. So far, though, the scope of his ambitions has outstretched the logistical capacity of the agencies tasked with carrying out those orders, particularly Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). ICE is on pace so far this year to more than double the number of arrests that it made in 2024, but is still trending well short of the targets his administration has set. Deportations are up, too, but only slightly above where they were during former President Joe Biden's last year in office. One of the biggest bottlenecks slowing ICE's deportation progress is a lack of space to house all of the people they want to detain. Officially, ICE has enough money for 41,000 beds in detention centers across the country, but the agency reported it was detaining more than 59,000 people as of late last month. The bill includes $45 billion to dramatically increase ICE's detention capacity. According to estimates by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the agency's current $3.4 billion detention budget would more than double next year and gradually increase until it reaches nearly $15 billion by 2029. The bill doesn't call for ICE to build a specific number of beds, but Trump's border czar Tom Homan has said the agency will need a minimum of 100,000 beds to carry out its mass deportation plans. Some experts believe the true total could ultimately prove to be as high as 200,000. With this huge influx of funding, immigration detention would rival the federal prison system, both in terms of capacity and funding. There are currently more than 155,000 people being held in federal prisons nationwide, well above ICE's stated goal but below where some estimates fall. Thanks to a modest funding boost in the bill, the Bureau of Prisons would have an average annual budget of about $9.5 billion over the next 10 years. That would be roughly equivalent to ICE's average yearly detention funding of $9.7 billion, but dwarfed by the $14.9 billion the CBO anticipates ICE to receive in 2029. On top of the extra funding for the wall and detention facilities, the bill would also give ICE an additional $31 billion, with the bulk of that money intended to help the agency hire new enforcement officers. Right now, the agency has 6,000 people on staff dedicated to its Enforcement and Removal Operations. The bill would give ICE the resources it needs to hire 10,000 more. Another $12 billion in the bill would go to U.S. Customs and Border Protection to hire 5,000 new customs officers and 3,000 new Border Patrol agents. The bill allocates $12.5 billion to support immigration enforcement efforts by state and local authorities. It would also provide $6.2 billion for border screening and surveillance technology, 'including artificial intelligence, machine learning, and other innovative technologies.' The legislation would also impose new costs on immigrants hoping to be granted a legal right to stay in the U.S. Applying for asylum, which has historically been free, would now come with a $100 charge. The fee to apply for Temporary Protected Status would increase from $50 to $500, and the price of appealing a judge's immigration order would jump from $110 to $900.
Business Insider
24 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The latest Musk-Trump feud is a 'nail in the coffin' moment for Tesla, investor Ross Gerber says
Elon Musk has returned to bashing the GOP budget bill in recent days, and in doing so, has reignited his fight with President Donald Trump. In one long-time investor's view, it's bound to create even more challenges for the company, which just reported another quarter of weak vehicle deliveries. Ross Gerber, the CEO of Gerber-Kawasaki Wealth Management and an early backer of Musk's car company, said he believed the Tesla CEO's fight with President Donald Trump was another overhang for the company. Tesla shares are down 22% year-to-date. Gerber thinks that while the feud is bad news, the company is also struggling against a lofty valuation and uncertainty in its various business units, including core auto sales, but also initiatives like robotaxis. Gerber speculated that the stock could fall as much as 50% if the market revalues Tesla. The stock was trading around $316 on Wednesday. "People are just, you know, done with it," Gerber said, speaking to Bloomberg about the Musk-Trump feud on Wednesday. "So this is just another, like, nail in the coffin — which I tweeted — that really is going to hurt Tesla, and I'm very upset about it," he added, referring to a post on X where he called Musk's shots at Trump on social media an "absurd attack." Musk reignited his fight with Trump over the Republican tax and spending bill this week. Tesla shares dropped more than 5% on Tuesday after Trump suggested DOGE should look into canceling contracts with Musk's companies. Gerber added he believed Musk had "destroyed" his image. "You're at this kind of point where it's like, 'What is this guy doing?' You know? You're supposed to be selling cars and robotaxis, and instead we're fighting with the President of the United States. Which he enabled and helped empower, but, I'm sorry Elon, President Trump is way more powerful than you." "he said. "So it's just — quite frankly, it's stupid." The damage is coming at a critical time for Tesla. The EV maker reported on Wednesday that its vehicle deliveries dropped 14% year-over-year in the second quarter. Sales have also plunged 45% in the European Union from January to May so far this year, according to data from the European Automobile Manufacturers' Association released last week. Recent price increases on Tesla vehicles have also likely weighed on sales, Gerber said, adding he believed there was a "severe" supply-demand imbalance for Tesla cars. "Making the car more expensive means less people will buy it. It's as simple as that. And they already have a hard time selling the car," Gerber said. Gerber said he believed Tesla's stock price wasn't justified. The company is trading around 150 times earnings, around three to four times the price-to-earnings ratio of other mega-cap tech firms, like Nvidia and Google, Gerber said. Gerber said his firm's exchange-traded fund completely sold its position in Tesla stock this week, though Gerber-Kawasaki Wealth Management still has around $60 million invested in Tesla among accounts it manages for its clients. The firm has been steadily selling its position in Tesla for more than two years, according to regulatory filings. Gerber said he also continued to hold a small personal stake in Tesla, due to the stock being "one of the best trades" of his life as an early investor. "What's the justification for this valuation? Robots and a robotaxi that doesn't really work. It just seems like there's a big disconnect there, and eventually this reckoning will come," he said.
