Social and economic factors having negative influences on health in North East
Previous reporting has highlighted alarming statistics on life expectancies and the average weekly earnings per council area.
According to the NHS's presentation, not one council area in the LA7 (Gateshead, Northumberland, North Tyneside, South Tyneside, Sunderland, Durham, Newcastle) matched the national average weekly earnings of £566. In addition, only Northumberland matched the national average life expectancy for women, 83.3 years. All council areas fell below the national life expectancies for men.
READ MORE: Gateshead supported housing scheme to help those at risk of homelessness
READ MORE: New kind of bacteria found in Gateshead park that could help clean up rivers and treat disease
Councillors were informed that health can be influenced by wider social issues, including environment, employment and economic success.
Medical director at North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB), Dr Robin Hudson said: 'I trained at Newcastle University medical school a long time ago, and one of the things I realised over the last ten to fifteen years, is my medical qualifications are useless when it comes to poor housing, pollution, diet.
Our ChronicleLive Daily newsletter is free. You can sign up to receive it here. It will keep you up to date with all the latest breaking news and top stories from the North East.
'With lifestyle we can have a bit of influence with smoking and healthy weights, but actually the tools in my tool box are very limited. If you look at health outcomes, only about 20% of the time it is related directly to the quality of care people receive at hospital or GPs. 30% is to do with lifestyle, so alcohol, smoking and healthy weights.
'50% is to do with wider social determinants, like employment. Good employment. All those things which we know make people happy and feel involved in their communities.'
However, Dr Robin went on to say the work of social prescribers can often help patients where a strictly medical response is not appropriate. Such prescribers can offer help and advice on societal influences on people's health and wellbeing.
Dr Hudson continued: "Social prescribing has been really popular over the last eight-nine years, they work in GP practices. So when I have a prescription pad that is useless, because I don't know anything about debt management, a social prescriber does.'
The presentation also went on to highlight the work of the Voluntary Organisations' Network North East, in helping to combat wider inequalities that affect patients' health in the region.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Here's how much NHS doctors get paid compared to other countries
The British Medical Association (BMA) has insisted its 29% pay rise demand is non-negotiable. Dr Tom Dolphin, the BMA's new leader, told The Guardian on Friday: "If we picked a different number, that wouldn't achieve the pay restoration. So that's why it looks inflexible.' Earlier this week, the union announced resident doctors – formerly known as junior doctors – in England would strike for five consecutive days from 7am on 25 July. The union has said resident doctors need a pay uplift of 29.2% to reverse 'pay erosion' since 2008/09. This figure is based on Retail Prices Index (RPI) inflation, the measure of average changes in the price of goods and services used by most households. Dr Dolphin said it is "reasonable because it's based on the loss of value that we've had", but health secretary Wes Streeting labelled the strikes 'unnecessary" as the government is "eager" to improve resident doctor working conditions. So, amid the row, how much do resident doctors get paid compared to in other countries? As of February, there were 77,287 resident doctors (i.e. those in the process of training toward a speciality) working for NHS England. Resident doctors are supervised by a more senior doctor, but as they gain experience some may also begin to supervise their more junior colleagues. Essentially, resident doctors have different levels of seniority and pay. In terms of basic pay, resident doctors are set to earn between £38,831 and £73,992 a year for a 40-hour week, as recommended by the pay review body in May. The new rates will be a rise of up to 6% on last year. And, with resident doctors able to earn more if they work extra or unsocial hours, the below chart shows average earnings depending on level: Here are reported resident doctor salary ranges in some of the most popular countries for UK doctors (of all levels of seniority) to move to, as per a survey in a General Medical Council (GMC) report published in April last year. According to recruitment agency Medrecruit, resident doctors are paid between £29,000 and £49,000. Medrecruit says house officers, as they are known, earn between £31,000 and £38,000. This varies depending on which province the doctor is working in. Salaries range from £27,000 to £59,000, according to Scotiabank. Between £38,000 and £61,000, according to recruitment company IMG Connect. Allocation Assist Middle East says junior doctors can be paid up to £8,000 a month, which would equate to an annual salary of about £96,000. As these salary ranges demonstrate, moving abroad doesn't necessarily equate to higher pay. But pay isn't necessarily the main reason for working in a different country: the GMC found the most common reason for leaving the UK was seeking a better quality of life, followed by feeling undervalued. Pay was the third most-cited factor. Last year's GMC report also found 30% of UK-based survey respondents said they were likely to relocate abroad within the following year. Meanwhile, a third - 33% - said they are likely to do so "at some point". Yahoo News UK approached the BMA, which called this month's resident doctor walkout, for comment on this trend and what can be done to stop doctors moving abroad. It declined, but said in response to the report last year: 'That so many doctors say they are looking to leave for overseas is not surprising... when we consider the immense pressures healthcare staff are under in an overwhelmed service battling huge workforce shortages. "Here, in black and white, we see the main factor driving UK doctors away is pay, and that the majority feel professionally undervalued." However, moving abroad for work isn't extraordinary in the medical profession. The GMC report said just under half, 48%, of UK-based doctors surveyed had previously practised medicine abroad. It found these doctors "were more likely than those who had not previously worked abroad to say they were likely to move abroad in the next 12 months. "That such a large proportion of doctors have worked abroad in the past and intend to do so again in the future, suggests that the workforce as a whole could be described as highly mobile." TV doctor Robert Winston quits BMA over 'damaging' strikes (PA Media) Wes Streeting warns doctors 'the public will not forgive you' as NHS strike chaos looms (The Independent)
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Former EastEnders star James Bye's youngest child rushed to hospital 'screaming' after eating poisonous plant berries
James Bye's son was rushed to hospital "screaming" after he snacked on a poisonous plant The former EastEnders star and his wife Victoria Bye's youngest child Rufus, two, accidentally ate the "seriously toxic", "bright orange" berries that grew on an Italian Arum plant in the couple's garden. Minutes after Rufus ate the berries, his tongue "started to swell", and it prompted James and Victoria to call 999. Following an overnight stay in Accident and Emergency (A+E), Rufus is doing well as he rests up in the family's caravan - which is where the Byes now live after they sold their "forever home" in June 2025 - and Victoria has urged parents to watch their tots when they are playing outside. Taking to Instagram, the concerned mum - who also has sons Edward, eight, Louis, six, and Hugo, three, with James - said: "So. More of a public service announcement than a post really but as we all know, life with kids is anything but predictable.. "So, after spending the night in hospital (I swear they'll start charging us rent soon) after Rufus decided to snack on a plant in the garden — one I didn't even know was dangerous. All hell let loose. "Within minutes, his tongue had started to swell, he was screaming we had to call 999. (As always - NHS heroes, honestly.) "Thankfully, he's absolutely fine now, but it turned out the culprit was Italian Arum, a really common plant with bright orange berries that looks innocent but is seriously toxic if ingested." She continued: "I mean, I had no idea. "And once I started looking into it … turns out there are loads of plants like that quietly minding their own (deadly) business in UK gardens." Victoria initially could not decide whether or not to share Rufus' accident with her Instagram followers. However, she felt it was right to speak about the ordeal to prevent other children from eating berries on plants and to avoid parents getting into a state of panic. She ended her lengthy post with: "I debated whether I should post this serious mum fail ... but if it could help anyone else avoid a night in A+E then share away ... "And maybe double-check what's growing under that trampoline."
Medscape
16 hours ago
- Medscape
AI Outperforms Humans in Mammography Analysis
TOPLINE: An artificial intelligence (AI) tool in mammography showed a high sensitivity and specificity, outperforming human readers in overall performance, a study found. However, the performance of the AI tool was slightly lower at the lesion level than at the breast level. METHODOLOGY: Researchers retrospectively analysed mammograms from the UK's NHS Breast Screening Programme by using a commercial AI tool (Lunit Insight MMG) and human readers to evaluate 882 non-malignant and 318 malignant breasts with 328 lesions. Human readers (n = 1258), including radiologists, radiographers, and breast clinicians, reviewed 1200 mammograms. The same cases were independently reviewed by the AI tool. Human and AI decisions to clear or recall breasts or lesions were compared with real outcomes on the basis of pathology or a 3-year follow-up. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated at both breast and lesion (marked regions of interest) levels. TAKEAWAY: The AI tool outperformed human readers on the basis of the AUC at the breast level (0.942 vs 0.878) and lesion level (0.929 vs 0.851; P < .01 for both). At the developer-recommended recall threshold, the AI tool achieved a significantly higher specificity than human readers at the breast level (87.4% vs 79.2%; P < .01). When calibrated to match the human specificity, the AI tool had a higher sensitivity than human readers at the breast level (92.1% vs 87.5%; P = .051) and lesion level (90.9% vs 83.2%; P < .01). The AI tool failed to localise 4% of total cancer lesions, with a median human error rate of 62.6%. IN PRACTICE: "Our findings support the notion of implementing AI into a prospective screening workflow, where the localisation of malignancies is beneficial to patients and the screening process," the authors wrote. "To improve human-AI collaboration, AI should be assessed at the lesion level; poor accuracy here may lead to automation bias and unnecessary patient procedures," they added. SOURCE: This study was led by Adnan Gani Taib and George John William Partridge, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, England. It was published online on June 25, 2025, in European Radiology. LIMITATIONS: This study could not assess the real-time effect of AI on human decision-making due to its retrospective design. The use of cancer-enriched test sets may have led to an overestimation of human performance. Additionally, prior mammograms were not available for comparison, which are often used in routine clinical practice to aid detection. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Lunit. The authors reported having no conflicts of interest. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.
