logo
Have lost their tax edge: Expert sounds the alarm on ULIPs

Have lost their tax edge: Expert sounds the alarm on ULIPs

India Today6 days ago
For years, Unit Linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs) were sold as the ideal financial product, offering insurance, market-linked returns, and tax-free maturity benefits. But recent changes to tax laws have reshaped the picture in ways many investors are still catching up with. According to tax expert Sujit Bangar, ULIPs no longer offer the sweeping exemptions they once did, especially for those paying higher premiums.advertisementUnder Section 80C of the Income Tax Act, ULIP premiums are eligible for deductions up to Rs 1.5 lakh a year. But that deduction is conditional. It's allowed only if the annual premium doesn't exceed 10% of the sum assured, for policies issued after April 1, 2012. And the policy must be held for at least five years—otherwise, the deduction is reversed. 'Policy must not be surrendered within 5 years,' Bangar cautions.The bigger change, though, came in Budget 2021. ULIP maturity proceeds, which were previously tax-free across the board, are now taxable if annual premiums exceed Rs 2.5 lakh. This applies to all ULIP policies issued on or after February 1, 2021. And the threshold isn't per policy, it's cumulative. If the total premium paid across all ULIPs crosses Rs 2.5 lakh, the tax exemption is gone. 'ULIP maturity proceeds are tax-free only if annual premium Rs 2.5L,' says Bangar.
For those who breach this threshold, the tax treatment begins to resemble that of mutual funds. Gains from ULIPs held for more than 12 months are taxed as long-term capital gains at 12.5%, but only on the amount exceeding Rs 1,25,000. If the holding period is shorter, the gains are taxed at 20% as short-term capital gains. The old assumption that ULIPs always offer tax-free returns no longer holds.Even fund switches within ULIPs, which were once exempt from tax, are now taxable events if the policy exceeds the premium limit. If the ULIP doesn't qualify for Section 10(10D) exemption, any switch between equity and debt is treated like a withdrawal. 'Tax-free if ULIP qualifies for Sec 10(10D),' Bangar notes. 'Taxable as redemptions if it doesn't.'One area that remains untouched is the death benefit. The amount received by a nominee upon the policyholder's death is fully exempt under Section 10(10D), regardless of how much was paid in premiums. 'No premium cap applies here,' Bangar affirms.There's also a warning for early exits. If a ULIP is surrendered within five years, the tax deduction claimed under Section 80C is withdrawn and the entire surrender value is added to the policyholder's income. This can mean a significant tax hit if not accounted for in advance.advertisementThe motivation behind these changes, Bangar explains, was to close a loophole that allowed high-net-worth individuals to gain tax-free equity exposure through insurance routes. 'ULIPs with premium > Rs 2.5L/year are taxed like mutual funds,' he points out. Before Budget 2021, all maturity proceeds from ULIPs were tax-exempt. After the changes, the playing field was levelled.The result is that ULIPs have lost much of their appeal as tax-saving instruments, especially for those paying large premiums. Bangar offers a clear comparison: mutual funds are now more transparent, more flexible, and more cost-effective. 'ULIPs lost their tax edge at higher premiums. Mutual funds are more transparent & cost-effective,' he says. That leaves ULIPs best suited for those looking for long-term insurance and forced savings, rather than aggressive tax planning. 'Choose ULIPs only if insurance + forced savings is your priority.'As investors weigh their options, it's worth remembering that the tax benefits of a ULIP can quietly slip away with just a few extra rupees in annual premiums. What once looked like a dual-purpose product—offering safety and returns—now comes with more fine print than ever. And for many, the promise of tax-free income may end up being an illusion.advertisement(Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers are encouraged to consult a certified financial advisor before making any investment or financial decisions. The views expressed are independent and do not reflect the official position of the India Today Group.)- Ends
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tribunal raps ED for ignoring due process in launching probe into Pune land deal
Tribunal raps ED for ignoring due process in launching probe into Pune land deal

India Today

time21 minutes ago

  • India Today

Tribunal raps ED for ignoring due process in launching probe into Pune land deal

An appellate tribunal came down heavily on the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for making a land parcel in Pune a subject of their investigation without following due process and Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act (SAFEMA) Appellate Tribunal quashed the ED provisional attachment orders on land in Pune's Hinjewadi purchased by a trading land, intended for development by Hindavi Swarajya Trading Company, was linked to an ED probe, without the knowledge of the cooperative society and its The tribunal highlighted negligence on the part of the ED and collusion of the investigating/enquiry officer in keeping the director of the company in the case involves land acquisition by Hindavi for a group cooperative housing society, which houses 126 flats. Homebuyers had secured extensive loans from banks to fund their tribunal noted that negligence by the ED has risked public money in the form of home loans from government and private banks to the tune of approximately Rs 30 crore. Despite due diligence by the company, the ED did not inform the director about the attachment tribunal also rapped the ED over its failure to disclose the attachment status during the land purchase diligence, stating, "At this belated stage, when the land is already sold, developed and constructed into flats, and thereafter, the said flats were sold to a large number of owners, the situation cannot be reversed at this stage. Otherwise, it will prejudice the interests of the appellants and buyers of the flats".The tribunal underscored that both the company and the banks had conducted thorough verification processes, and during the intervening period no steps were taken by respondent ED to restrain the development and sale of flats to the counsel for the appellants, Faraz Khan, welcomed the ruling, and said that the decision draws a constitutional boundary by punishing launderers and not honest citizens."Due diligence is not a game of hide and seek. When the State attaches property, it must shout it from the rooftops—register it, publicise it, mark it. The ED's failure to follow this process almost destroyed the lives of 126 families," Khan said."Freezing and de-freezing crores of suspected laundered funds while concealing attachment from an innocent purchaser is not just carelessness, it is institutional failure. This ruling sets a template for all such cases where third parties unknowingly buy into attached properties. It's a victory for every ordinary home-buyer," Khan added.- EndsTune InMust Watch

Suraj Estate Developers launches Rs 120-cr project in Mumbai
Suraj Estate Developers launches Rs 120-cr project in Mumbai

The Print

time23 minutes ago

  • The Print

Suraj Estate Developers launches Rs 120-cr project in Mumbai

Mumbai, Jul 14 (PTI) Suraj Estate Developers has launched a luxury residential project with potential gross development value of Rs 120 crore in the financial capital of the country, according to an exchange filing. 'Strategically located in Prabhadevi – one of Mumbai's most sought-after residential neighborhoods – the project has an estimated gross development value of Rs 120 crore,' the filing stated.

Jane Street deposits Rs 4,843 cr in escrow account; requests Sebi to lift curbs
Jane Street deposits Rs 4,843 cr in escrow account; requests Sebi to lift curbs

The Print

time23 minutes ago

  • The Print

Jane Street deposits Rs 4,843 cr in escrow account; requests Sebi to lift curbs

In an interim order on July 3, the regulator found Jane Street (JS) guilty of manipulating indices by taking bets in cash and futures & options markets simultaneously for making massive gains. The watchdog is examining the request, Sebi said in a statement on Monday. New Delhi, Jul 14 (PTI) US-based hedge fund Jane Street, which allegedly made handsome gains through market manipulation, has deposited the mandated Rs 4,843.57 crore in an escrow account in favour of Sebi and requested it to lift certain restrictions. Sebi barred the hedge fund from accessing the market and impounded over Rs 4,843 crore in gains. The probe found that JS made a profit of Rs 36,671 crore on a net basis during the probe period from January 2023-May 2025. In compliance with the interim order, a sum of Rs 4,843.57 crore has been credited to an escrow account with a lien marked in favour of Sebi, the regulator said. 'Jane Street has further requested Sebi that, following the creation of this escrow account in compliance with Sebi directions, certain conditional restrictions imposed under the interim order be lifted and that Sebi issue appropriate directions in this regard,' the statement noted. 'This request is currently under examination by Sebi in accordance with the directions of the interim order,' it added. The regulator said it remains committed to following due process and ensuring the integrity of the securities market. PTI SP ANU ANU This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store