EXCLUSIVE Revealed: How 'pregnant people' ended up in Martine Croxall's autocue - as BBC bosses back newsreader for correcting wording to 'women' live on air
There were concerns amongst colleagues that Martine Croxall could be disciplined after Justin Webb was told he partially breached BBC guidelines for describing trans women as 'males' during a Radio 4 debate.
But Martine's bosses are said to have been 'intensely relaxed' after her intervention and have also decided there is no need for a probe into how the phrase 'pregnant people' ended up in her script.
They have already concluded it was an innocent mistake - rather than act of defiance on behalf of the trans community following the Supreme Court's ruling in April.
MailOnline can reveal that Ms Croxall couldn't hide her 'shock and frustration' when she was forced to change an autocue line from 'pregnant people' to 'women' live on air.
'Most people didn't need a Supreme Court ruling to tell them what a woman is – but based on what happened to Martine Croxall, it seems someone at the BBC might', a senior figure at the corporation has claimed.
Martine Croxall's message for supporters after after she was praised for rejecting woke gender-neutral language live on air
The BBC is blaming a press release on heat waves from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine for the blunder.
It quoted an academic who used the phrase 'pregnant people' instead of women and this was pasted into Martine's autocue script by another BBC journalist - but Ms Croxall spotted it mid-broadcast.
The presenter has the full support of her bosses for her on-air heroics.
'Martine is not in any trouble. She has the full backing of the BBC because she got it right', MailOnline's insider said.
'She was stating a fact and correcting a mistake'.
The source said that Ms Croxall, 56, and other presenters will often change words on the autocue without viewers noticing.
'But this time I think she couldn't hide she was shocked and frustrated by the mistake'.
Martine has won a legion of new fans, including JK Rowling. The broadcaster's Twitter followers have jumped from 56,000 to 127,000 – and doubled in the first 24 hours after she changed her BBC script.
JK Rowling had been in direct contact with Martine to ask is she was 'in trouble' over the incident.
'She has not had a single negative comment from her colleagues and the overwhelming response from the public has been positive', the BBC source said.
In February last year Today programme presenter Justin Webb was found to have broken BBC impartiality rules after he said 'trans women, in other words males' on air.
Mr Webb's comment was found to have fallen foul of guidelines because he 'gave the impression of endorsing one viewpoint in a highly controversial area', the corporation said.
He made the remark during a discussion about new International Chess Federation (FIDE) guidelines, which had looked at whether being biologically male held an advantage in the game.
But a listener complained that during the interview in August 2023, with Dominic Lawson, the Today presenter had given 'his personal view' on a 'controversial matter'.
But following the Supreme Court's ruling this year - it appears that the BBC has shifted its position.
Martine has supported women on TV before - and behind the scenes also stood up with female colleagues in their fight for equal pay at the corporation.
Famously she also got tough with a transgender wannabe politician who said she felt attacked when Ms Croxall questioned her claim that the Supreme Court's April ruling that trans women are legally male and trans men are legally female might need further 'clarification'.
There have also been lighter moments, including when she winked and joked that she was a 'beautiful creature' and also the times she was wasn't in her seat as cameras began rolling.
She also appeared tearful when she announced the death of Prince Philip in 2021.
Heather Herbert, a trans campaigner and former Labour MSP candidate, provoked a furious response from Croxall after declaring: 'I feel like I'm under attack' when they discussed the Supreme Court's ruling on gender
In April the broadcaster was praised when she challenged a transgender activist who claimed the Supreme Court 's ruling that the definition of a woman is based on biological sex may still need 'clarification'.
The BBC veteran firmly told ex-Labour MSP candidate Heather Herbert that the landmark ruling made it clear 'sex is binary and immutable'.
Leicestershire-born Ms Croxall repeatedly challenged Herbert after she called for further 'clarification' on single sex spaces, at one point reminding her: 'The ruling is that woman means biological sex.'
She spearheaded a legal case against the BBC over pay, with the corporation settling the case in March.
Martine, Karin Giannone, Kasia Madera and Annita McVeigh launched an employment tribunal against the BBC in a bombshell case, which included the claim they had not been paid equally compared with their male counterparts.
All four claimed they lost their roles on the BBC News Channel following a 'rigged' recruitment exercise when it was merged with BBC World. The case was settled by the BBC in the spring of this year.
The row meant the women were all off for 12 months, which Martine chronicled on social media. Instead of being in the studio she enjoyed trips to Mexico, Bulgaria and Thailand.
During her time off, she went swimming with whale sharks and sea lions in the Gulf of California, zipwired over a canyon in Mexico and fed elephants at a sanctuary in Phuket.
That's on top of taking a hot balloon over the pyramids in Mexico and venturing on two ski trips, including one where she was seen relaxing in a massive hot tub after spending a day on the slopes.
Croxall joined the corporation in 1991 following work experience with her local station, BBC Radio Leicester.
She grew up in the countryside, attending an independent school before graduating from the University of Leeds.
In 2022, she was briefly taken off air after breaking the corporation's impartiality rules.
She also winked on an occasion and joked she was a 'beautiful creature' on a feature about sealife
The blunder happened on October 23 after Boris Johnson ran out of the leadership contest that Rishi Sunak went on to win.
During the Sunday night edition of The Papers, where press members discuss the main stories of the day, she said in the wake of Johnson's departure: 'Well this is all very exciting, isn't it? Am I allowed to be this gleeful? Well I am.'
Later in the show she also admitted that she was 'probably breaking' some of the BBC's impartiality rules when she laughed at Tony Grew's mocking of Johnson.
The corporation later ruled that Croxall had made 'several remarks and reactions' that caused 'significant risk' that the audience could believe 'opinions were being expressed' on the Conservative leadership race. She returned to air after 11 days off.
Following the death of Prince Philip, Ms Croxall was close to tears as she interrupted the broadcast to break the news to the country.
Now she is in the headlines again after standing up for women.
The clip from a recent BBC News episode saw Ms Croxall introduce new research on the number of heat-related deaths expected amid Britain's current heatwave.
But as the autocue prompted her to warn 'pregnant people' to take care in the heat, she first read the term out before overriding it, with a smirk and eyebrow raise.
She said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people - women! - and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.'
Ms Rowling reposted the clip on X, captioning it: 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter.'
It is understood the phrase 'pregnant people' was the term used in the research the presenter was reporting on, rather than the BBC having written it.
Ms Croxall herself soon responded to a commenter who had praised her move as 'brilliant' by saying: 'I hope you don't get hauled before the BBC News beak.'
The broadcaster simply replied: 'Braced x.'
The original clip was first reposted to X by campaign group SEEN In Journalism, which says it 'seeks to restore accuracy and impartiality to media coverage of sex and gender'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Farage repeats ‘no idea' six times over Reform mayor's 600% allowance hike
Nigel Farage has responded that he has 'no idea' six times in an interview with the BBC 's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. The Reform UK leader was asked about Scarborough Town Council increasing its mayor's allowance by 600 per cent, despite his party promising to cut costs for taxpayers. Asked about the rise, from £500 to £3,500, Mr Farage said: 'I have no idea… whether what you say is true or not, I have no idea.' Asked whether it is the right thing to do, Mr Farage again said he has 'no idea', before saying he has 'no idea' whether Thomas Murray, Reform's mayor of Scarborough Town Council, does the role as a full-time job. He went on to say he has 'no idea' how much humans have contributed towards climate change.
The Independent
25 minutes ago
- The Independent
Riverdance creator Michael Flatley teases Irish presidential bid
Riverdance creator Michael Flatley has indicated he is open to seeking a nomination for Ireland 's next president. An election for the largely ceremonial role is expected towards the end of October, as it must take place in the 60 days before outgoing President Michael D Higgins 's term ends on 11 November. Flatley, who is eligible to run as an Irish citizen, said he had not made a final decision on the matter but is consulting with a "team of advisers". Speaking to RTE Radio One about newspaper speculation on a potential bid, the Irish-American said he is stopped on the street "everywhere" he goes and asked if he will run. He clarified, however, that the speculation stemmed from his previous appearance on the show with host Brendan O'Connor. The choreographer and dancer said: 'I take it seriously but no, I have not made a decision'. Pressed on the matter, Flatley said: 'I have a huge business to run, I have an army of dancers counting on me to make a living. 'I have a whiskey company, a beautiful young wife and son that I want to spend time with. 'If I thought that I could be of benefit to the Irish people and – maybe more importantly – if I thought I could be a voice of the Irish people' He added: 'Right now, I don't think they have a voice – not a true proper deep voice that you know that speaks their language.' Flatley said he hears the concerns of 'average person on the street' and they are not 'happy right now', adding: 'Somebody has to speak for the Irish people.' He said he was not sure the role needed another politician, adding that he had spent three decades promoting Ireland and Irish culture. He said he had not been approached by any political party, but had been contacted by some 'people in the know'. 'It's certainly not something that I've made any decision on, but it does get frustrating when you see the hardworking Irish taxpayer working as hard out and having no say in things.' Asked if he was leaning more in favour of running, he replied: 'Let it be said that I stand for Ireland and the Irish people.' To be eligible to run, a candidate must be an Irish citizen who is 35 or older. They must be nominated either by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas or at least four local authorities. Former or retiring presidents can nominate themselves. So far, two candidates have secured sufficient backing to enter the race. Mairead McGuinness, who was a TV presenter and farming journalist before becoming an MEP and EU commissioner, is the nominee to become Fine Gael's presidential candidate. Catherine Connolly, Independent TD for Galway West, has received the backing of the Social Democrats and People Before Profit, as well as independent TDs and Senators. Fianna Fail, the party with the most TDs in the Dail, has not clarified if it will run a candidate and is to make a decision in the early autumn. Sinn Fein has also not indicated a final decision on the race.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Minister pressures water boss to refuse rise doubling salary to £1.4m amid furious row over exec pay and sewage leaks - but rules out nationalisation
Southern Water's chief executive should refuse a pay rise that almost doubled his income to £1.4million, the Environment Secretary has said. Steve Reed told the BBC 's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg that Lawrence Gosden's £691,000 salary increase was 'outrageous' and implored the company to 'think about how this looks to their customers'. It comes amid a furious row over the pay and bonuses enjoyed by executives at water utilities which oversaw huge spikes in sewage leaks last year. The number of serious pollution incidents caused by water firms rose by 60 per cent in just 12 months, the Environment Agency revealed on Friday. Asked whether Mr Gosden should turn down the pay rise, Mr Reed said: 'I think it would be right if he did .. I don't think Southern Water has performed well enough for that kind of pay increase to be merited.' He added: 'Trust between the customers and the water companies is at the lowest point probably ever, and by paying their senior executives rises of that kind, what message are they sending to their customers? 'I really would urge them to think about this very, very, very carefully.' The Government is bracing for the release of a landmark review into the water industry, which could reportedly lead to the abolition of embattled water regulator Ofwat. The Independent Water Commission, led by former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, will outline recommendations to turn around the floundering sector in its final report on Monday. The review was commissioned by the UK and Welsh governments as part of their response to systemic industry failures, which include rising bills, record sewage spills and debt-ridden company finances, although ministers have ruled out nationalising companies. The Government will respond to the recommendations in Parliament later on Monday. The review reportedly includes proposals to establish a new system of regulation, which is currently split between Ofwat, the Environment Agency and the Drinking Water Inspectorate. Ministers will announce a consultation that could lead to axing Ofwat, which oversees how much water companies in England and Wales can charge for services, according to the Guardian. Ofwat has faced intense criticism for overseeing water companies during the years that they paid shareholders and accrued large debts while ageing infrastructure crumbled and sewage spills skyrocketed. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Environment Secretary Steve Reed suggested he was in favour of a new model where regional boards managed water in their areas, including representatives from water companies, local authorities and other organisations. He said: 'I think the catchment-based model has a lot to commend it. Because if you can manage what's going into the water better, you can clean up the water faster.' But speaking to the BBC he again ruled out the possibility of nationalising the water industry, saying it would cost too much and take years during which pollution would get worse. The Environment Secretary told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg: 'Nationalisation would cost upwards of £100 billion that we'd have to take away from the National Health Service and schools to give to the owners of the companies that are polluted.' He added: 'If we try to unpick the current model of ownership, it would take years, and during that period, pollution would get worse because the companies wouldn't invest knowing that they were going to be nationalised. The EA report found there were 2,801 sewage leaks last year, up from 2,174 in 2023. Just three firms were behind 81 per cent of the most serious - Thames, Southern and Yorkshire. The agency revealed consistently poor performance from all nine water and sewerage firms in the country despite its expectations for pollution incidents to decrease. Meanwhile, just two companies – Northumbrian Water and Wessex Water – had no serious incidents last year, meeting the Environment Agency's expectations to see a trend to zero serious pollution incidents by 2025. It also follows a report released by the Public Accounts Committee earlier on Friday, in which the cross-bench group of MPs called the level of pollution 'woeful' and recommended an overhaul of the regulation system. Under the Water (Special Measures) Act introduced by the Government last year, the watchdog will have greater powers to take swift action against polluting companies. To boost funding for water regulation, the Environment Agency is also consulting on a new levy on the water sector to recover the cost of enforcement activities, while the Environment Department (Defra) last week confirmed a 64 per cent increase in its funding from 2023/24. A Water UK spokesperson said: 'While there have been some improvements, it is clear that the performance of some companies is not good enough. 'This is finally being put right, with a record £104 billion investment over the next five years to secure our water supplies, support economic growth and end sewage entering our rivers and seas. 'However, fundamental change to regulation is also needed. We hope that the recommendations of the Independent Water Commission next week will ensure the sector continues to get the investment it needs to drive down pollution incidents.'
