India shifts to damage control after Trump ramps up threats
NEW DELHI - India is racing to contain the economic fallout from President Donald Trump's threatened tariffs, which has left officials in New Delhi feeling shocked, jilted and unsure of how to respond.
Mr Trump's harsh language - calling India's economy 'dead,' its tariff barriers 'obnoxious' and its people indifferent to the plight of Ukrainians - has been akin to a verbal slap in the face, according to an official in New Delhi said, who asked not to be identified as the discussions are private.
Officials have no template to deal with these kinds of public assaults, the person said, adding that the latest turn of events has put a strain on India's relationship with the US.
Mr Trump said on Aug 5 he will
increase the 25 per cent tariff on Indian exports to the US 'substantially over the next 24 hours', citing the Asian nation's high barriers to trade and its purchases of Russian oil.
India was 'fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, I'm not going to be happy,' Mr Trump told CNBC.
India's government is now bracing for higher tariffs and seeking to limit the possible economic damage. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been urging Indians to buy more local goods to offset any slump in global demand.
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry is discussing ways to help exporters who would be hardest hit, such as in the gems and jewellery and textile sectors. And officials say they will continue to seek back-channel talks to help ease the tensions.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore 25-minute delay on East-West MRT Line between Boon Lay and Buona Vista due to track point fault
Singapore Finding hidden vapes: Inside ICA's mission to uncover contraband at land checkpoints
Singapore Sorting recyclables by material could boost low domestic recycling rate: Observers
Singapore SM Lee receives Australia's highest civilian honour for advancing bilateral ties
Asia Trump's sharp India criticism on tariffs, Russia oil corner Modi as rift deepens
Singapore More train rides taken in first half-year, but overall public transport use stays below 2019 levels
Singapore BlueSG needs time to develop software, refresh fleet, say ex-insiders after winding-down news
Asia Cambodia-Thailand border clash a setback for Asean: Vivian Balakrishnan
India has been a target of Mr Trump for weeks now because of its economic ties with Russia. The US president has given Mr Vladimir Putin
until Aug 8 to reach a truce with Ukraine, and wants to ramp up the pressure by targeting energy purchases from countries like India and China that are helping to keep Russia's economy afloat.
Mr Modi's government is so far holding its ground, saying it is being unreasonably targeted by the US for its ties to Russia – its biggest supplier of oil and military equipment. Officials have signalled they would not instruct refiners to halt Russian crude purchases.
For months, Indian trade officials had been negotiating with the Trump administration on a deal that both sides said was close to being finalised, with a tariff rate possibly below 20 per cent.
The US president's tone appeared to change in July, when he threatened India with higher duties alongside others in the Brics bloc of nations for what he said was the group's anti-US stance.
He then followed up several days later with warnings about financial penalties on countries like India for buying oil from Russia.
India has been buying Russian crude at a rate of about 1.7 million barrels a day so far in 2025, all of it from seaborne imports, while China has purchased an average of about 2 million barrels, comprising both seaborne imports and oil transported via an inland pipeline.
To offset the tariff hikes, officials in New Delhi are now considering expediting an export promotion plan, first outlined in the February budget, which set aside 22.5 billion rupees (S$329 million) to support exporters.
The budgeted amount may be increased to help businesses offset potential losses resulting from greater competition with regional rivals, who have secured lower tariff rates of around 15 per cent to 20 per cent, a person familiar with the matter said.
The discussions are still ongoing and the government has not made any decision on what kind of support it will provide, the person said.
India's Ministry of Commerce and Industry and Ministry of Finance did not immediately respond to emails seeking further information.
New Delhi is also weighing easing some dairy market access rules for the US in order to placate Mr Trump, officials familiar with the matter said. The government is discussing whether it can allow limited imports of some dairy products, such as cheese not made in India and condensed milk with clear labelling of the animal feed used in manufacturing, they said.
India maintains tariffs of as high as 60 per cent on dairy products to protect its local industry and enforces strict rules to ensure imported dairy goods are not from cattle fed with animal-based products in order to adhere to religious sensitivities.
Any easing of restrictions in the dairy sector would represent a significant concession by India, which did not grant the UK any similar market access in a recently concluded free trade agreement.
Economists estimate that a 25 per cent tariff could cut India's gross domestic product growth by 0.3 percentage point. Mr Pranjul Bhandari, chief India economist at HSBC Holdings, said an additional penalty would curb growth further, resulting in lower capital inflows and investment.
An internal assessment by the Ministry of Commerce and Industry shows that a 25 per cent tariff would impact about 10 per cent of India's exports in the July-to-September period.
Mr Modi's rivals have criticised his previously friendly relationship with Mr Trump and
called him out for his silence on the US leader's comments.
'We are receiving threats – that there will be more than 25 per cent tariffs and we are being told that we should not buy oil from Russia. This friendship has turned out to be expensive,' Mr Jairam Ramesh, a senior leader in the main opposition Indian National Congress, told reporters on Aug 5.
Mr Trump's actions will push India to react, although it is unlikely to retaliate and will more likely seek further talks with the US, said Ms Indrani Bagchi, chief executive officer at Ananta Centre, a Delhi-based research group.
'My sense is the government will contain this and will not take this forward, will not escalate,' she said. India will want to continue the trade deal negotiations in spite of Trump's 'personal anger,' she said.
The US president likely wants to have Mr Modi call him and 'fold in the way that other countries have', she said. 'That is not India's style.' BLOOMBERG
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Japan will import ‘beautiful' Ford trucks
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The White House said Tokyo will lift 'restrictions' on American cars shipped to Japan, including accepting US vehicle safety standards. TOKYO - Japan will start importing Ford's chunky F-150 pickup trucks, US President Donald Trump said, as uncertainties surround the two countries' trade accord. Under the deal announced in July, Japanese imports will be subject to a 15 per cent 'reciprocal' tariff , down from a threatened 25 per cent. These will take effect, like for a raft of other countries, from Aug 7. In return, the White House said Tokyo will lift 'restrictions' on American cars shipped to Japan, including accepting US vehicle safety standards. 'They're taking our cars,' Mr Trump told CNBC in a phone interview on Aug 5. 'They're taking the very beautiful Ford F-150, which does very well. And I'm sure we'll do very well there, and other things that do very well here will also do well there.' Japanese firms sell millions of cars in the United States every year, but American vehicles are rare in Japan. Ford exited the market almost a decade ago. American cars are often too big for local roads – the F-150 is 2.4m wide with mirrors – and usually the steering wheel is on the wrong side. Tokyo and Washington, meanwhile, appear at odds over key details of the trade agreement, in particular when the announced lowering of levies on imports of Japanese cars will take place. They now stand at 27.5 per cent – a pre-existing 2.5 per cent plus another 25 per cent added by Mr Trump – and are meant to fall to 15 per cent. Also unclear is whether other levies on Japan will be capped at 15 per cent, or if this would come on top of existing ones. A US executive order released last week indicated that the 15 per cent upper limit will be applied only to the European Union, and not for Japan. Japan's tariffs envoy Ryosei Akazawa left on Aug 5 for his ninth visit to Washington. 'One purpose of my visit is to prompt the issuance of the president's executive order regarding tariffs on autos and auto parts as early as possible,' Mr Akazawa said before leaving. 'I have confirmed with the United States that there are no discrepancies (regarding the reciprocal tariff rates), but keeping in mind the new duties will be implemented on Thursday, I would like to provide a reminder for a thorough response beforehand,' local media quoted him as saying. Further confusion comes from Mr Trump's assertion that Japan will invest US$550 billion (S$708 billion) into the United States, which will retain 90 per cent of the profits. 'That's like a signing bonus that a baseball player would get,' Mr Trump told CNBC. 'That's our money. It's our money to invest as we like.' But the Japanese side has said that this will consist mostly of loans and loan guarantees. AFP
Straits Times
26 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Italy to approve world's largest suspension bridge
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Due for completion by 2032, the government says the bridge is at the cutting edge of engineering. ROME - Italy's government is to give final approval on Aug 6 to a €13.5 billion (S$20.1 billion) project to build the world's longest suspension bridge , connecting the island of Sicily to the mainland. Deputy Prime Minister and Infrastructure Minister Matteo Salvini said a ministerial committee will back the state-funded bridge over the Strait of Messina, marking a 'page in history' following decades of planning. The bridge has been designed with two railway lines in the middle and three lanes of traffic on either side, with a suspended span of 3.3km – a world record – stretching between two 400m high towers. Due for completion by 2032, the government says the bridge is at the cutting edge of engineering, able to withstand high winds and earthquakes in a region that lies across two tectonic plates. Ministers hope it will bring economic growth and jobs to two impoverished Italian regions – Sicily and Calabria on the mainland – with Salvini promising the project will create tens of thousands of jobs. Yet it has sparked local protests, over the environmental impact and the cost that critics say could be better spent elsewhere. Some critics believe it will never materialise, pointing to a long history of public works announced, financed and never completed in Italy. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Asean's quiet diplomacy helped avert escalation in Cambodia-Thailand border conflict: Sec-Gen Kao Singapore Hidden vapes and where to find them: Inside ICA's clampdown at land checkpoints Singapore East-West Line MRT service resumes after delays lasting around 5 hours; track point fault fixed World Meta cracks down on WhatsApp scammers; bans millions of accounts linked to scam centres in S-E Asia Singapore 3 men arrested over alleged offences involving drugs worth over $150,000 Singapore Jail for 2 friends who swopped seats in car to try and evade justice after drinking alcohol Singapore Sorting recyclables by material could boost low domestic recycling rate: Observers Singapore SM Lee receives Australia's highest civilian honour for advancing bilateral ties The bridge has had several false starts, with the first plans drawn up more than 50 years ago. Eurolink, a consortium led by Italian group Webuild, won the tender in 2006 only to see it cancelled after the eurozone debt crisis. The consortium remains the contractor on the revived project. This time, Rome has an added incentive to press ahead – by classifying the cost of the bridge as defence spending. Debt-laden Italy has agreed along with other Nato allies to massively increase its defence expenditure to five per cent of GDP, at the demand of US President Donald Trump. Of this, 1.5 per cent can be spent on 'defence-related' areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure. Rome is hoping the Messina bridge will qualify, particularly as Sicily hosts a Nato base. AFP
AsiaOne
26 minutes ago
- AsiaOne
Musk vs. Modi: Inside the battle over India's internet censorship, World News
BENGALURU/NEW DELHI — In January, an old post on Elon Musk's social media platform, X, became a concern for police in the Indian city of Satara. Written in 2023, the short message from an account with a few hundred followers described a senior ruling-party politician as "useless". "This post and content are likely to create serious communal tension," inspector Jitendra Shahane wrote in a content-removal notice marked "CONFIDENTIAL" and addressed to X. The post, which remains online, is among hundreds cited by X in a lawsuit it filed in March against India's government, challenging a sweeping crackdown on social media content by Prime Minister Narendra Modi's administration. Since 2023, India has ramped up efforts to police the internet by allowing many more officials to file takedown orders and to submit them directly to tech firms through a government website launched in October. X argues India's actions are illegal and unconstitutional, and that they trample free speech by empowering scores of government agencies and thousands of police to suppress legitimate criticism of public officials. India contends in court documents that its approach tackles a proliferation of unlawful content and ensures accountability online. It says many tech companies, including Meta and Alphabet's Google, support its actions. Both companies declined to comment for this story. Musk, who calls himself a free-speech absolutist, has clashed with authorities in the United States, Brazil, Australia and elsewhere over compliance and takedown demands. But as regulators globally weigh free-speech protections against concerns about harmful content, Musk's case against Modi's government in the Karnataka High Court targets the entire basis for tightened internet censorship in India, one of X's biggest user bases. Musk said in 2023 that the South Asian nation had "more promise than any large country in the world" and that Modi had pushed him to invest there. This account of the behind-the-scenes battle between the world's richest person and authorities in the world's most populous country is based on a Reuters review of 2,500 pages of non-public legal filings and interviews with seven police officers involved in content-removal requests. It reveals the workings of a takedown system shrouded in secrecy, some Indian officials' ire over "illegal" material on X, and the broad spectrum of content that police and other agencies have sought to censor. While the takedown orders include many that sought to counter misinformation, they also encompass directives by Modi's administration to remove news about a deadly stampede, and demands from state police to scrub cartoons that depicted the prime minister in an unfavourable light or mocked local politicians, the filings show. X didn't respond to Reuters questions about the case, while India's IT ministry declined to comment because the matter was before the court. Modi's office and his home ministry didn't respond to questions. There have been no immediate signs of souring personal relations between Musk and Modi, who have enjoyed a warm public rapport. But the showdown comes as the South African-born entrepreneur, whose business empire includes EV maker Tesla and satellite internet provider Starlink, gears up to expand both ventures in India. Even supporters of Modi's Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have faced scrutiny of their online musings from police officials newly empowered by the IT ministry to target social media activity. Koustav Bagchi, a lawyer and BJP member, posted an image on X in March that depicted a rival, West Bengal chief minister Mamata Banerjee, in an astronaut suit. State police issued a takedown notice, citing "risks to public safety and national security". Bagchi told Reuters the post, which is still online, was "light-hearted" and that he wasn't aware of the takedown order. The chief minister's office and state police didn't respond to Reuters queries. Of the earlier 2023 post, Shahane, the Satara police officer, told Reuters he couldn't recall the takedown order, but said police sometimes proactively ask platforms to block offencive viral content. 'Censorship portal' For years, only India's IT and Information & Broadcasting ministries could order content removal, and only for threats to sovereignty, defence, security, foreign relations, public order, or incitement. Some 99 officials across India could recommend takedowns, but the ministries had the final say. While that mechanism remains in place, Modi's IT ministry in 2023 empowered all federal and state agencies and police to issue takedown notices for "any information which is prohibited under any law". They could do so under existing legal provisions, the ministry said in a directive, citing the need for "effective" content removal. Companies that fail to comply can lose immunity for user content, making them liable for the same penalties a user might face — which could vary greatly depending on the specific material posted. Modi's government went a step further in October 2024. It launched a website called Sahyog — Hindi for collaboration — to "facilitate" the issuance of takedown notices, and asked Indian officials and social media firms to get on board, memos contained in court papers show. X didn't join Sahyog, which it has called a "censorship portal", and sued the government earlier this year, challenging the legal basis for both the new website and the IT ministry's 2023 directive. In a June 24 filing, X said some of the blocking orders issued by officials "target content involving satire or criticism of the ruling government, and show a pattern of abuse of authority to suppress free speech." Some free-speech advocates have criticised the government's stricter takedown regime, saying it is designed to stifle dissent. "Can a claim that some content is unlawful be termed as indeed unlawful merely because the government claims so?" said Subramaniam Vincent, director of journalism and media ethics at Santa Clara University's Markkula Centre for Applied Ethics. "The executive branch cannot be both the arbiter of legality of media content, and the issuer of takedown notices." Red dinosaur Court filings reviewed by Reuters show federal and state agencies ordered X to remove around 1,400 posts or accounts between March 2024 and June 2025. [[nid:720755]] More than 70 per cent of these removal notices were issued by the Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre, which developed the Sahyog website. The agency is within the home ministry, which is headed by Modi aide Amit Shah, a powerful figure in the ruling BJP. To counter X in court, India's government filed a 92-page report drafted by the cybercrime unit to show X is "hosting illegal content". The unit analysed nearly 300 posts it deemed unlawful, including misinformation, hoaxes, and child sexual-abuse material. X serves as a vehicle for "spreading hate and division" that threatens social harmony, while "fake news" on the platform has sparked unspecified law-and-order issues, the agency said in the report. The government's response to X's lawsuit highlighted examples of misinformation. In January, the cybercrime unit asked X to remove three posts containing what officials said were fabricated images that portrayed Shah's son, International Cricket Council chairman Jay Shah, "in a derogatory manner" alongside a bikini-clad woman. The posts "dishonour prominent office bearers and VIPs", the notices said. Two of those posts remain online. Jay Shah didn't respond to Reuters queries. Other directives went beyond targeting fake news. X told the court India's railways ministry has been issuing orders to censor press reports about matters of public interest. These included February directives seeking the removal of posts by some media outlets, including two by Adani Group's NDTV, that contained news coverage of stampede at New Delhi's biggest railway station that left 18 dead. The NDTV posts are still online. NDTV didn't respond to Reuters queries and the railways ministry declined to comment. In April, police in Chennai asked X to remove many "deeply offencive" and "provocative" posts, including a now-inaccessible cartoon featuring a red dinosaur labelled "inflation", which portrayed Modi and the chief minister of Tamil Nadu state as struggling to control prices. The same month, police demanded the removal of another cartoon that mocked the state government's lack of preparedness for floods by showing a boat with holes. X told the judge the cartoon was posted in November, and it could not "incite political tensions" several months later, as the Chennai police asserted. The post remains online. The state government didn't respond to a request for comment. When Reuters visited the Chennai cybercrime police station that issued these directives, Deputy Commissioner B. Geetha criticised X for seldom acting on takedown requests. X does not "fully grasp the cultural sensitivities", she said. "What may be acceptable in some countries can be considered taboo in India." [[nid:720886]]
