Late-night noise latest tactic used in LA immigration protests: ‘No sleep for ICE'
All unfolding into the middle of the night outside the Home2 Suites by Hilton in Montebello, California, in late June.
The goal of this latest protest? Make as much noise as possible to try and keep U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers from sleeping and force them elsewhere.
'They were just making noise, playing music, and some people were dancing,' said Verita Topete, a leader of the immigration committee with Centro CSO, who took part in the protest. 'A lot of people were holding signs saying, 'ICE is not welcome here.''
She said she arrived by 8:30 p.m. on June 20, and before she knew it, a crowd began to show up on the sidewalk outside the hotel.
By 10 p.m., dozens more protesters joined the group, and they didn't disperse until 3 a.m. Topete said that the next day, they returned with enough people to take over the two-lane street to block people from going into the front of the hotel.
The protests were part of a nightly 'No Sleep for ICE' campaign in and around Los Angeles County, where protesters gather outside the hotels where ICE agents are staying and make noise to put pressure on the hotel staff to kick ICE out and prevent agents from sleeping.
Topete said the protest is important 'to apply pressure and let city and state officials know that we don't agree with this' at a time when 'ICE agents are hunting down our working class community members as if they're criminals, throwing them to the pavement and taking them away from their workplaces.'
During the second night in Montebello, Topete said a band showed up with drums and guitars and many people were dancing to traditional Mexican songs like "Caballo Dorado" and "La Chona." Others attended with their families. While most people were on foot, others passed by in their cars, waving Mexican flags and honking their horns.
'It was a very peaceful protest, just very noisy,' she said.
An ICE spokesperson pushed back on the protests when asked for comment about the demonstrations outside of hotels.
'This violence is fueled by a disinformation campaign, which includes dangerous rhetoric by local elected officials," the ICE spokesperson said. "Our brave officers are out there every day enforcing the laws set by Congress, removing public safety threats from communities.'
A spokesperson for Hilton Hotels did not return a request for comment.
Other noise protests include one on June 8, two days after ICE began its raids in Los Angeles. Community members rallied outside the AC Hotel in Pasadena, about 10 miles from Los Angeles, to protest ICE agents' staying there. Hundreds of people had shown up outside the hotel in the early afternoon after a photo of ICE vehicles parked outside the hotel circulated on local group chats and social media pages.
When some of the first protesters arrived, they learned that many of the hotel workers had left in fear. They chanted 'Chinga la Migra' and 'Fuera ICE,' and by the evening, the agents were kicked out of the hotel. Since then, protesters have continued rallying together outside hotels every night.
'The point is to drive ICE out of these hotels, and make their existence impossible here,' said Andrew Guerrero, a law student at the University of California, Los Angeles and PhD candidate at Harvard University. 'We don't want them to be able to access these amenities. We don't want our local neighborhoods to be harboring what a lot of us consider kidnappers.'
Guerrero said he has attended multiple protests outside hotels in Los Angeles County, including ones in Hacienda Heights, Downey, Long Beach and Montebello. He said the protests 'let it be known that they cannot sleep peacefully when they're in our neighborhoods.'
He attended a protest outside the Hilton in Montebello the day before Topete. When he got there around 11 p.m., he said there were already dozens of people, significantly larger than some of the other hotel protests he had been to. He said he brought pots and pans, a speaker, and a case of water for the protesters.
'It's like a little community building around it,' Guerrero said. 'Folks are going to multiple protests in one night and sharing resources and knowledge about what's happening and trying to keep each other informed.'
Guerrero said the protests have also drawn support from those staying at the hotel. He said one man who came out of the hotel was nodding at the protesters, and another family going into the hotel gave them a thumbs up. He said that he sympathizes with anyone else staying there who might feel like 'it's creating a hostile environment,' but he believes 'it is a legitimate and just reason that this disruption is occurring.'
'It feels like we're under an occupation, and you just hear back-to-back stories, like, 'They took this person, they took this person,'' Guerrero said. 'They're literally disappearing people.'
Some protests have been met with law enforcement resistance.
When Kuali Aleman, an indigenous organizer and artist, arrived at a protest outside the DoubleTree by Hilton in Whittier, California, on June 11, she saw many people marching up and down the street with flags and signs. Other protesters stood huddled by the entrance of the hotel, chanting 'no one is illegal on stolen land' and 'get the f out of LA.' People were also blasting music through speakers and their cars or revving their motorcycles.
But not long after that, Aleman said the Whittier police came out of the hotel and began launching less lethal weapons into the crowd. She said the protesters ran for cover, but not long after, they came back and resumed the protest.
'We just continued to protest and raise our voices because we don't like what's happening,' Aleman said. 'We demand answers because our friends or their relatives, neighbors, kids, adults, everyone of all ages, of all backgrounds, are being abducted.'
The Whittier Police Department did not respond to requests for comment.
Aleman said the decision to send federal agents to hotels in Los Angeles is a waste of resources that could otherwise have been put into community resources.
'It just doesn't make any sense to concentrate all our resources and manpower or people power on capturing hardworking people, people who are just trying to survive, selling fruit on the street or working in construction or on the fields or working anywhere, just not committing any crimes,' Aleman said.
Topete said it is 'crazy to see how many cities are allowing ICE agents' to stay in their hotels. However, she said she is proud to see people taking to the streets to protest peacefully.
'I love seeing that the community is coming out and speaking up for undocumented community members that are being kidnapped,' Topete said. 'We have power over authority if everybody were to unite and come together, they just need to be fearless and not be scared to stand up for our people.'
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Los Angeles immigration protests: Noise outside hotels latest tactic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
U.S. Should Confront Non-Tariff Attacks Against American Tech Firms
I recently explained in Forbes that Trump trade negotiators could leverage the planned TOPSHOT - US President Donald Trump smiles during a phone conversation with Mexico's President ... More Enrique Pena Nieto on trade in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on August 27, 2018. President Donald Trump said Monday the US had reached a "really good deal" with Mexico and talks with Canada would begin shortly on a new regional free trade pact."It's a big day for trade. It's a really good deal for both countries," Trump said."Canada, we will start negotiations shortly. I'll be calling their prime minister very soon," Trump and Mexican negotiators have been working for weeks to iron out differences in order to revise the nearly 25-year old North American Free Trade Agreement, while Canada was waiting to rejoin the negotiations. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images) withdrawal of anticompetitive federal regulations to obtain a cutback in foreign anticompetitive market distortions (ACMDs) that harm American firms and consumers. A July 2 nonpartisan letter to senior Administration officials from the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF), joined by senior policy scholars, strikes a similar theme in calling on the Administration to target foreign governments' non-tariff attacks (NTAs) on America's leading technology companies. The letter recommends a 3-pronged negotiating approach to counteract NTAs. Administration initiatives along the lines suggested by the letter could bestow substantial benefits on U.S. producers, workers, and consumers. The NTA Problem As the letter explains, a new form of trade restriction is emerging that existing legal frameworks fail to address: non-tariff attacks (NTAs). NTAs are a specific type of ACMD that is growing in significance. Unlike traditional tariffs or known non-tariff barriers (NTBs), NTAs are disguised as legitimate domestic policies. Their true purpose is to target leading U.S. technology firms, undermine innovation, extract financial and intellectual assets, and weaken America's strategic position in the global tech race. Three features distinguish NTAs from traditional NTBs: As the U.S. seeks to rebalance trade relations, rolling back these unfair practices should be a top priority in negotiations. The ITIF has documented over 100 cases where U.S. trading partners have adopted policies aimed at limiting American tech firms' operations or siphoning their revenues. The European Union led this effort with its Digital Markets Act (DMA) and Digital Services Act (DSA), which targeted major U.S. firms while largely sparing local competitors. In 2024 alone, regulatory fines on American companies in the EU totaled nearly $6.7 billion. Other countries are following suit: Brazil with similar regulations, India targeting U.S. firms under its data protection law, and Japan restricting dominant U.S. smartphone platforms. Although often framed as consumer protection, privacy, or digital sovereignty, these policies impose selective burdens that disadvantage American firms and empower foreign rivals. They also often harm the enacting countries themselves by disrupting ecosystems that support small and medium-sized businesses dependent on global platforms. These attacks also pose national security risks. U.S. tech firms are vital to innovation and defense sector competitiveness. By diverting investment from R&D, mandating tech transfers, or exposing sensitive capabilities, NTAs erode the strength needed to compete with China's state-led technology push. The consequences are severe: This problem is most pressing in the U.S.-China context. While America applies overt targeted measures like export controls, other nations exploit NTAs to undermine U.S. firms more subtly and effectively. These tactics distort markets far more powerfully than tariffs and shift global leadership toward China just as the U.S. needs unity and strength. Policy Recommendations Addressing NTAs is essential for preserving U.S. technological strength, protecting national interests, and maintaining U.S. leadership in the global digital economy. Current trade negotiations present a golden opportunity to confront the growing NTA threat and reinforce the foundations of American innovation and security. Keep in mind that NTAs do more than just harm American industry and national security – by harming our high tech companies, they present broad threats to overall American welfare. High tech firms are hugely beneficial to the American consumer. They provide high-quality, low-cost services to Americans (think Google or YouTube), are a huge sector in our economy, create jobs and wealth for Americans at large, and drive innovation that improves lives and the American consumer experience. In sum, countering NTAs is key to maintaining a dynamic, innovative U.S. economy. Appropriately, the ITIF letter highlights 3 vital criteria for confronting the NTA problem: 1. Make NTAs a top agenda item in all trade negotiations. 2. Secure binding agreements to block discriminatory digital regulations. 3. Set up systems to detect and respond to emerging NTAs. The Trump administration may wish to consider making these suggestions key features of its trade negotiating strategy. Success in rooting out NTAs would be a 'win-win-win' for American firms, workers, and consumers.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
ICE flips script on Los Angeles mayor after telling authorities to 'go home'
Immigration and Customs Enforcement clapped back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass after she suggested that federal immigration authorities "go home." "We would like for the ICE raids to stop. We would like the array of federal officials or civilians dressed as federal officials to go home," she said at a news conference on Tuesday held in response to the Department of Justice's lawsuit against the city's sanctuary policies. When asked if there could be a deal made between ICE and the Department of Homeland Security, she doubled down. "I don't know if there's a deal to be made. Like I told you, the deal that needs to be made is for them to go home," the Democrat said. ICE directly responded, noting that they will continue their operations in the city and in the region. "ICE isn't going anywhere and will continue to do what Mayor Bass has utterly failed to do – protect the citizens of Los Angeles. If she wants distance from federal law enforcement, I'm sure there is an upcoming diplomatic trip to Ghana," Emily Covington, assistant director, ICE Office of Public Affairs, said in a statement to Fox News. The comment hearkened back to the mayor's controversial visit to the African country earlier this year, which she visited to attend the country's presidential inauguration. She returned from the trip as fires were ripping through the city of Los Angeles, which destroyed significant portions of the beach-side community of Pacific Palisades. The National Weather Service warned about the fire risk before she left on the trip, and the Los Angeles Times reported that her staff were aware that fires were possible. Bass later expressed regret over the trip, saying it was a mistake to travel at the time. "Absolutely it is, and I think that I have to demonstrate that every day by showing what we're doing, what is working, what are the challenges," Bass said in an interview with NBC Los Angeles in February. The mayor re-entered the national spotlight in June as anti-ICE protests and riots broke out in the city, amid news that the agency was conducting illegal immigration sweeps in the area. President Donald Trump then deployed the National Guard, which resulted in a legal challenge from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. Bass said ICE and the National Guard served as instigators for the civil unrest, which she condemned the violent elements of while encouraging peaceful protest. "Last Thursday, ICE entered our city and provoked the city by chasing people through Home Depots and car washes and showing up at schools and, today, showing up at emergency rooms and homeless shelters," Bass said last month. "ICE intervened as a pretext to federalize the National Guard, and then, in the White House, the National Guard was complimented for the work that they did to keep peace in the city Saturday night. But I will tell you, the Guard didn't even arrive here until Sunday. They used this as a pretext to send the U.S. Marines into an American city, which will target our own citizens," she added.

Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Legality matters less and less in increasingly aggressive immigration enforcement
To the editor: In Monday's Los Angeles Times, a letter writer asserted that her Latino housekeeper and gardener aren't afraid of Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids because they came here legally ('Letters to the Editor: Two readers disagree over claims of racial profiling in ICE raids,' June 27). In the same issue, there was a story about a Korean-born man who also came here legally and is a U.S. citizen ('L.A. Army veteran with Purple Heart self-deports to South Korea under threat of deportation,' June 27). He deported himself because he was under threat of deportation due to nearly 20-year-old drug convictions. No doubt the letter writer would point out that her housekeeper and gardener haven't broken any laws. But that misses the point. The point is that in the current climate, if someone in authority decides that they want your housekeeper or gardener or you out of the country, they'll find a way to do it. Grinnell Almy, Los Angeles .. To the editor: OK, I confess that my ancestors were illegal immigrants. They squatted here without permission on land that was not their own. They brought deadly diseases the locals had never seen before. They claimed to be refugees, but never registered with anyone, never got a green card and absolutely refused to leave. When did they come? In 1620 on the Mayflower. Gee, maybe I should self-deport. I hear England's nice this time of year. Katharine Waitman, Los Angeles