
Thousands of Brits had ‘organs removed unnecessarily' while cancers were missed in major hospital errors, NHS says
The County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust said it was "truly sorry" after it was revealed that some women under its care had "more extensive surgery than was clinically necessary at the time".
4
4
The probe also found that some patients' tumours were missed after they received the wrong kind of biopsy.
Others weren't offered chemotherapy or had lymph nodes removed when it wasn't clinically necessary.
The review has so far identified 200 cases where errors in care might have occurred.
But the trust said thousands of cases dating back to 2019 could come to light and that a number of deaths were also being looked into, according to the BBC.
Patients affected mainly received care at the University Hospital of North Durham, one of the hospitals the trust operates.
Kathryn Burn, executive director of nursing, said: 'We know that some patients have not received the standard of care that we would want for them, or that they deserve.
"We have identified areas where improvement was needed – including how surgical decisions were made, how our multidisciplinary teams worked and where some outdated practices were still in use.
'For some patients, this may have resulted in more extensive surgery than was clinically necessary at the time.
"We fully recognise how distressing this is to hear, and we are truly sorry."
Kathryn said changes were already being made to improve breast cancer care in the trust's hospitals.
Jessie J breaks down in tears in heartbreaking hospital video as she has surgery after breast cancer diagnosis
This includes appointing two new consultant breast surgeons and investing in more modern equipment.
County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust launched a review into its breast cancer care services in February 2025 after "a patient safety incident", it said in a statement published on its website.
It also commissioned an external review conducted by the Royal College of Surgeons (RCS).
This followed a Northern Cancer Alliance peer review completed between April and June 2024, which suggested the trust was "an outlier in some aspects of breast care delivery".
4
The RCS team visited hospitals in January this year and published their report in April.
It revealed that some patients had mastectomies that may not have been necessary.
Some received the wrong kind of biopsy - procedures that check if a tumour is cancerous.
In one case, RCS said clinical records showed this led to "a small breast cancer" being missed and "subsequent delays in diagnosis and treatment".
The report also identified incidents where chemotherapy should have been offered to patients when it should have and "there was no documented reasons in the surgical or multidisciplinary team notes as to why it was not received".
In addition, some patients had surgery to remove lymph nodes when not clinically necessary.
The RCS made 21 recommendations for improvements in its report.
The trust also conducted its own "look back exercise" into breast cancer care at its hospitals, which is still ongoing.
What are the signs of breast cancer?
BREAST cancer is the most common type of cancer in the UK.
The majority of women who get it are over 50, but younger women and, in rare cases, men can also get breast cancer.
If it's treated early enough, breast cancer can be prevented from spreading to other parts of the body.
Breast cancer can have a number of symptoms, but the first noticeable symptom is usually a lump or area of thickened breast tissue.
Most breast lumps aren't cancerous, but it's always best to have them checked by your doctor. You should also speak to your GP if you notice any of the following:
a change in the size or shape of one or both breasts
discharge from either of your nipples (which may be streaked with blood)
a lump or swelling in either of your armpits
dimpling on the skin of your breasts
a rash on or around your nipple
a change in the appearance of your nipple, such as becoming sunken into your breast
Source: NHS
It found "two cases in which patients were initially discharged from the service following a diagnostic test but later re-represented with cancer that was missed on the first occasion".
It also flagged instances of "excessive surgery, unnecessary invasive surgery and a failure to consider all options, including breast
reconstruction".
Areas where improvements were needed included how surgical decisions were made and ending the use of outdated practices, the trust said.
Kathryn said: 'Over the past four months, we have been reviewing the care of patients who had surgery through the breast service in 2024.
"Where we have concerns about the care a patient received, we are contacting them directly and personally about this.
"Patients whose care has been reviewed and found to be appropriate are also being contacted to provide reassurance.
"Since February, we have reviewed – with the support of external experts – 123 individual cases of care.
"We have spoken with more than 80 patients to openly discuss elements which could have been done differently and been improved.
'This work is not yet complete, and we continue to review patient notes.
"We have also set up a patient call line and email address where any patients who have questions or concerns about their care can get in touch with us to share their experience.'
4
Kathryn told the BBC that the trust was looking at the investigation"from a clinical urgency perspective" and it had made "a lot of improvements".
"We are looking back systematically through clinical priority where we feel there might be more risk to our patients," she said.
She added: 'We are incredibly grateful to the patients who have taken the time to speak with us, to share their experiences and to raise concerns.
"Listening to these experiences has been a vital part of learning and improving.
'The review is still ongoing and we remain committed to speaking directly with any patient whose care warrants follow-up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Doctors say 20,000 women a year - some as young as 30 - may need their healthy breasts removed to avoid cancer. Here's how to find out if YOU are one of those facing an agonising dilemma
It is a difficult decision that, until now at least, relatively few women have been forced to make: having their healthy breasts removed to prevent breast cancer. Their options are stark – face the prospect of a disease that has likely affected and even killed women in their families, or undergo a surgery described by doctors as 'medieval' and 'mutilating'.


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Why thousands of people are missing out on NHS jabs for agonising shingles virus
Widespread confusion over who is eligible for the NHS shingles jab means thousands are going unprotected against the agonising infection, a survey has revealed. The poll found one in five over-65s either did not know what shingles was or were unaware the NHS offered a vaccine to prevent it. Fewer than half said they had been vaccinated, while nearly seven in ten admitted they did not understand who was eligible. More than 50,000 elderly Britons develop shingles every year, and nearly one in four of any age will have it at some point in their lives. The condition is linked to chickenpox – a highly contagious childhood illness that causes itchy, spotty rashes. While chickenpox is usually mild, the virus that causes it – varicella-zoster – lies dormant in the body and can reactivate later in life, especially as the immune system weakens with age. This can cause shingles – a painful, blistering rash that typically appears on one side of the chest or abdomen, but can strike anywhere on the body. Currently, anyone turning 65 is offered a shingles vaccine, and remain eligible until they are 80. But those who turned 65 before September 1, 2023, must wait until they are 70. 'I am not surprised by these findings at all,' said Professor Paul Hunter, an infectious disease expert at the University of East Anglia. 'A combination of confusing eligibility criteria – which even confused me, to be honest – and a lack of promotion of the vaccine campaign means that many people are going unprotected from what can be an extraordinarily painful and debilitating virus.' The jab is available privately at high street pharmacies such as Boots and Superdrug – but the two required doses cost £460 in total. 'I'm part of that group who has to wait until they turn 70 for the vaccine, and I did consider going private because of how painful shingles can be,' Professor Hunter added. 'It is a very effective and safe vaccine, and people should make sure they get it as soon as they're eligible on the NHS.' The study of more than 2,000 over-65s by GSK – the British pharmaceutical firm behind the jab – also found that most respondents wrongly believed they were still eligible for the NHS shingles vaccine after turning 80, when that is the cut-off age. A third of respondents also said they did not trust the Government for information on vaccines. Shingles is often accompanied by headaches, nausea and weeks of severe pain – and in some cases it can prove fatal. Around 50 Britons over 70 die from shingles each year. The vaccine reduces the risk of infection by 90 per cent, yet uptake has historically been low – less than half of all 71-year-olds are vaccinated. The latest figures show fewer than one in five of those who turned 65 this year have received the jab. The current two-dose vaccine, Shingrix, replaced a less effective version in September 2023. But due to high global demand, the Government opted to phase in eligibility. As reported by The Mail on Sunday, campaigners have urged ministers to end what they call 'discrimination' against the three million people aged 66 to 69 who are currently ineligible. Senior citizens group Silver Voices has called on the NHS to scrap the age restriction, warning it puts millions at unnecessary risk. One man who regrets missing out on the jab is 72-year-old Daniel Hill. While on holiday in Majorca he noticed a strange rash of blisters, about four inches wide, on his back. Concerned, but not alarmed, he visited a local clinic, where a doctor diagnosed shingles and prescribed antiviral medication. He was offered painkillers, but he declined them. But he said that moments after leaving, the pain struck 'like someone had taken an axe to my back'. The pensioner spent the rest of the trip in agony, confined to bed. 'You really don't want to get shingles,' he said. 'I wish I'd known the vaccine was available on the NHS – I was eligible but had no idea. 'It's so important to check if you qualify and, if you do, get vaccinated to avoid the terrible impact it can have.'


Sky News
44 minutes ago
- Sky News
NHS figures reveal impact of five-day resident doctors' strike
The NHS has said 93% of planned operations, tests and procedures went ahead during a recent strike that saw fewer than a third of resident doctors walk out. Early data shows the NHS maintained care for an estimated 10,000 more patients than it did during last year's industrial action. Thousands of resident doctors - previously known as junior doctors - took part in the five-day strike, which ended on Wednesday morning. The overall number that walked out was down by 7.5% (1,243) on the previous strike in late June last year, according to early analysis of management information collected by NHS England. There are roughly 77,000 resident doctors working in hospital and community health services, meaning they make up about half of all doctors in the NHS. While most patients received treatments as planned, NHS chief executive Sir James Mackey said: "We should still acknowledge that there were thousands whose care was disrupted." NHS staff are working to ensure cancelled appointments can be rescheduled as soon as possible but "a repeat of this action will be unacceptable" for the patients affected, he added. "So, I would urge the Resident Doctor Committee to get back to the negotiating table and work with us and the government on the meaningful improvements we can make to resident doctors' working lives." 1:26 Health Secretary Wes Streeting said: "I want to again thank staff from across the NHS who have put in an incredible shift to make sure that the NHS was open to as many patients as possible over the five days of unnecessary strike action. "Despite the huge effort made to keep as much planned care as possible going, let's be clear - these damaging strikes still come at a cost to patients, other staff and the NHS." The dispute between the BMA and the government largely centres on pay - but Mr Streeting has repeatedly said there is no money for an increase, adding that it "should be clear to the BMA by now that it will lose a war with this government". He has said talks could lead to improvements in the working lives of resident doctors. 3:22 Earlier this week, the co-chairs of the BMA's Resident Doctor Committee, Dr Melissa Ryan and Dr Ross Nieuwoudt, said they "look forward" to returning to the negotiating table. A statement added: "The BMA has been willing to negotiate throughout this dispute, and we remain committed to finding a resolution. "We are very clear on what is needed to settle this pay dispute, and we hope the secretary of state is now equally clear that a credible offer must be brought to the table to achieve a settlement and prevent further strike action."