The Royal Train reaches the end of the line after 156 years, as costs bite
Thanks to a boom in revenue from offshore wind leases, the Crown Estate's profits are soaring, meaning royal funds will leap from £86.3 million to £132 million for the next two years.
Chalmers said this money would help pay for the remaining £100 million needed to complete the 10-year repairs to Buckingham Palace and the maintenance of other historic buildings.
The Crown Estate is one of the many relics of Britain's feudal past. The properties are professionally managed and the king cannot dispose of the assets.
King George III, who ruled during the American Revolution, surrendered management of the crown lands to Parliament in 1760 in return for a fixed payment from the Treasury.
Loading
The royal finances remain a topic of public debate, with Charles pledging to slim down the monarchy and cut costs as he seeks to ensure the institution's survival.
Buckingham Palace was quick to point out that while the Sovereign Grant has been unchanged for the past four years, inflation has eroded its value. If the grant had increased in line with inflation, it would have been about £106 million this year, the palace said.
Craig Prescott, a constitutional law expert at Royal Holloway, University of London who focuses on the political role of the monarchy, said funding for the royals was relatively small when compared to the overall cost of the British state and it provides tangible benefits for the country.
'It's something that puts Britain on the world stage in a way that few other things do,' he said, noting that Queen Elizabeth II's funeral was the largest gathering of world leaders in history and the coronation was broadcast around the world.
'It's one of those things that people think about when they think about Britain.'
Anti-monarchists, who say the monarchy's price tag amounts to more than half a billion pounds, said the annual reports were misleading.
'The cost of the monarchy is out of control and these reports receive almost no political scrutiny,' Graham Smith, chief executive of campaign group Republic, said.
Last November, the Sunday Times and a TV documentary accused Charles and his elder son Prince William of making millions from the country's health service, army and schools from charges imposed by the monarch's Duchy of Lancaster estate and the heir's Duchy of Cornwall estate.
William Bax, the chief executive of the Duchy of Cornwall, acknowledged that criticism as he detailed its annual report on Monday, saying they were making changes at a time of 'reflection and evolution'.
Bax said they intended to end or reduce rents charged to some community groups and charities, while the report showed William's personal income from the Duchy had fallen slightly to just under £23 million.
Chalmers said the global significance of the royals could not be underestimated, citing a Global Perceptions Survey which found the monarchy the single biggest influence on perceptions of the UK among international audiences.
Over the past year, Charles travelled to Australia and attended the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa – his first as the organisation's head. The royals also took centre stage at the 80th anniversaries of D-Day and V-E Day, which marked the end of World War II in Europe.
Overall, the royals made 1900 public appearances in the U.K. and overseas. Some 93,000 guests attended 828 events at the royal palaces.
AP, Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
20 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Princess Kate pics at Wimbledon deal new blow to Prince Harry peace deal
In it's 115-year history the Royal Over-Seas League (ROSL) club in London's St James has never gotten more publicity than in the last 24 hours. Yesterday, the Daily Mail revealed it was the setting for an extraordinary peace summit between the trusted lieutenants of King Charles and Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke and Duchess of Sussex. (Has anyone checked on the fiery depths of hell for ice?) Yesterday, the Mail revealed that Tobyn Andreae, the King's communications secretary, Meredith Maines, the Sussexes' communications chief, and Liam Maguire, in charge of their UK PR, had met for drinks at the ROSL for drinks in what been hailed as the beginning of the long slog towards a 'rapprochement' between London and Montecito. 'A channel of communication is now open for the first time in years,' a source told the Mail. 'It was finally the right time for the two sides to talk.' But before anyone cues up 'We Are Family' on the Clarence House tape deck, events playing out on the other side of London could prove to be a major stumbling block. On Sunday as the Mail was reporting their scoop, Prince William and Kate, the Prince and Princess of Wales were arriving at Wimbledon for the men's finals. Glaringly absent from the ROSL drinks from their office. Whether William and Kate's reps were either not invited or they declined for them to go (their diligent foot soldiers probably too busy for afternoon drinky poos, as the Queen Mother called them, when there are reefs to save and conscious farming manuals to read), the bottom line is the same. Any real and lasting peace would have to involve Team Wales. The problem is that when it comes to loose-lipped malcontent Harry, his father and brother have staunchly different feelings. His Majesty has always stressed his love for his second son and is reportedly 'devastated' by the years-long feud, even despite Harry's blabby proclivities and the duke suing his father's own government. (Dead awkward that.) The prince, however, 'absolutely f***ing hates' his brother, as a Wales friend previously told The Daily Beast's Tom Sykes. The same friend told Sykes this weekend: 'William will never, ever forgive Harry for what he has done. Charles is the king; he can do what he likes. But make no mistake: William believes with every fibre of his being that giving Harry and Meghan back any royal imprimatur is a huge mistake.' And part of the reason that the prince will reportedly not be readily extending any olive branches? Harry's inclusion in Spare of details about Kate such as her encouragement of him to dress up as a Nazi, her 'grimacing' at having to share lip gloss with Meghan, and portraying her as something of a cold fish towards the former Suits star. Such is the froideur, if not ice age, between the brothers and their wives that William and Kate reportedly didn't bother to inform Harry and Meghan about her cancer diagnosis. They found when the rest of the world did. When Sussexes 'reached out privately,' per the Times, the 'contact was unreciprocated.' Which is to say that the King and the Sussexes' staffers can stand each other any number of rounds of drinks but how real and lasting can any healing of breaches and mending of fences be if William, both as Charles' son and the heir to the throne, is not on board? Also, breaking from his elder son comes with the risk of increased tensions between the King and his heir. There is also the question of the possible public cost in Charles burying the Harry hatchet. Would His Majesty doing so make him look like a magnanimous, loving parent or unpopular for welcoming back the person who (some believe) did the UK's beloved Kate dirty? Quite simply, Britain by and large adores the Princess of Wales – and has a dim view of the Duke of Sussex. As of May, 72 per cent of Britons have a favourable view of Kate versus 27 per cent who feel that way about Harry. The depth of feeling towards the future Queen was on show over the weekend. On the same day that the photos of the ROSL meeting were gracing the pages of the Mail, for the second time in as many days Kate was at Wimbledon, her presence being met with the sort of rapturous applause usually reserved for a minor deity or the original line-up of Take That. Fans hung over balconies and photos show her entering the stadium amid a sea of phones held aloft to record her arrival. Then, taking her seat for the women's final, the princess was greeted with a standing ovation. While it's debatable if the King would let public opinion sway things, him embracing Harry and letting the duke back 'in' to the royal fold some way could put him out of step with wider feeling. It's hard to find much sympathy in Britain for the Sussexes in the numbers. A poll done by YouGov in May found that 46 per cent of Brits felt that the royal family had treated Harry 'fairly', twice as many (23 per cent) who said 'unfairly'. On the same day, 97 per cent of readers of the right-leaning Express said they thought Charles should strip Harry and Meghan of their titles. Still, there is something of a deadline looming here. In 2027, Harry's Invictus Games will return to the UK for the first time since 21015 and will be held in Birmingham and it would be a terrible look for the royal family to not do their bit and come out barracking for the military and for veterans. Harry, reportedly, has formally invited the King along. And that in turn would necessitate some sort of patching things up. How to square the circle of Chalres, Harry, Invictus, William and Kate is enough to make anyone's head hurt and that's before we even factor in the question of Meghan and Invictus 2027 too. (The duchess has not missed a Games since meeting her husband in 2016.) What. To. Do. The only sensible, easy part to all of this – that the Charles/Sussex peace summit happened over a stiff drink. There is a time for a nice cup of tea – and situations that demand 40 per cent proof.
West Australian
21 minutes ago
- West Australian
Opposition says WA's GST might not be safe from Jim Chalmers' secret tax advice
Sussan Ley has assured WA voters she has 'no plans whatsoever' to change GST arrangements, but said a Treasury briefing urging the Albanese Government to raise taxes is proof Labor cannot be trusted. The new Opposition Leader has arrived in Perth for the first time since the May election and praised the 'great state of Western Australia' for 'having a crack', after a tour of mining giant Rio Tinto's operation centre. She seized on a briefing note from Treasury, accidentally released after a freedom of information request, when asked about a new push to reform the GST. 'We have no plans whatsoever to change the GST arrangements. However, when you look at the report that the Labor party leaked that it received, it doesn't make that clear,' Ms Ley told reporters on Monday. 'What it says is that taxes may need to be raised, so the great people of WA need to ask their Treasurer and their Prime Minister what plans they may have when it comes to the GST and, indeed, every other business tax, personal tax, mining tax that might affect the State of WA.' Treasurer Jim Chalmers said his view hasn't changed, since repeatedly promising during the election campaign that there would be no change to the deal that guarantees WA 75 cents for every dollar of GST raised. But he also vowed to keep an open mind, ahead of an economic reform roundtable in Canberra next month. 'We've tried not to artificially limit the ideas that the states or others will bring to the reform roundtable,' he told reporters on Monday. 'We've tried to have a relatively open mind. But you've all heard me talk about the GST before, and you all would have noticed what the Prime Minister said about the GST in the last few days and those views haven't changed. 'When it comes more broadly to complexity in the tax system, of course, we are interested in ways to simplify the tax system.' Mr Chalmers told reporters he was 'pretty relaxed' about the briefing notes that were reportedly sent by mistake, warning that additional revenue and spending reductions were needed, and that the Government's target to build 1.2 million homes over five years will not be met. 'When (Anthony Albanese) gets back to Australia, he's got some explaining to do,' Ms Ley said. Ms Ley is due to meet with WA Liberal Leader Basil Zempilas on Monday afternoon, as the party comes to terms with dismal results in both the State and Federal elections this year. The Liberal party lost the seat of Moore to Labor, leaving the Opposition with only four out of 12 Federal seats in WA, but boosted its numbers to seven MP's in the lower house of State Parliament. Ms Ley said the nation's prosperity depends on WA. 'They represent what the Liberal Party stands for, aspiration, having a crack and backing those Australians who do want to get ahead,' she said. 'But I am worried that productivity is declining, flat-lining to its lowest point in 60 years. 'To improve productivity requires a competitive economic agenda, tough decisions to be taken, less regulation, smaller government, and it requires effort from this Labor Government, and I'm not sure that we're seeing that.' She said she is in WA to listen and identified energy policy as one focus. 'I mention energy because energy is so important in our manufacturing industries, and they play such a vital role in WA,' Ms Ley said. 'The small businesses of WA that I came to know and love over the last three years are doing it really tough because of energy. 'So we're setting clear parameters around policies, but we're also making sure that we do listen, because we accept with humility the result of the last election. 'We will listen, we will stand by our values and, as we develop policy, it will be through the prism of those values. Lower, simpler, fairer taxes, less government regulation.' Ms Ley said projects in WA are 'drowning' in red tape and called the extension of Woodside's North-West Shelf gas project - that was granted provisional approval in June - a prime example, but wouldn't say how she proposes to fast-track approvals. 'I'm not going into the individual details,' she said. 'You have to have a government that's determined to bust that congestion and not bog everything down in bureaucracy.'
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Home truths on housing target in leaked Treasury advice
The accidental release of government department advice which warned Labor was not going to meet its housing target and urged them to raise taxes, has not rattled the treasurer. Independent advice from the Treasury department, which was unintentionally sent to the ABC, reportedly contained subheadings which said the federal government's promise to build 1.2 million homes by 2029 "will not be met" and called for "additional revenue and spending reductions" to achieve a sustainable budget. Though he acknowledged Treasury's advice had been sent "in error", Treasurer Jim Chalmers said such incidents could happen from time to time. "I'm pretty relaxed about it to be honest," he told reporters in Canberra on Monday. "Treasury advises governments of both political persuasions - that advice can't be always adequately captured in the subheadings." A 2025 report from the National Housing Supply and Affordability Council - another independent government advice body - in May warned Labor would fall short of its goal by about 300,000 dwellings. It followed a report in March commissioned by the Property Council of Australia showing the government needed to build another 462,000 homes to meet its 2029 target. Asked if the government regretted putting out a housing target, Dr Chalmers said his government needed to be ambitious. "We'd rather have a big, ambitious, difficult target and work around the clock to meet it ... than to continue the approach of our predecessors, which was to build too few homes," he said. The government has also attempted to address its bottom line by reining in spending on the National Disability Insurance Scheme and proposing an increased tax on super balances above $3 million. Dr Chalmers has pledged to strengthen Australia's economy ahead of a trip to South Africa, where he will meet with his counterparts from other G20 countries as they deal with "extreme global economic uncertainty". Economic ties with countries like Indonesia, Japan, the UK and Germany could be strengthened as leaders discuss capital flows, supply chains, critical minerals and issues within their own communities. But domestically, one of the key focuses of Labor's second-term economic agenda will be to boost productivity. The agenda of an economic reform roundtable, to be held in August, has been finalised with Reserve Bank governor Michele Bullock set to kick off day one, Productivity Commission chair Danielle Wood to lead day two and Treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson to head day three. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley claimed the government was "ignoring some of the very levers that matter most" in the productivity puzzle. While Dr Chalmers acknowledged he could not invite every industry, he said there would be many opportunities for people to contribute.
