Committee delays vote on Nebraska bill to define male, female in law for sports, bathrooms
LINCOLN — A Nebraska legislative committee has delayed, for now, a final vote on whether to advance a proposal to define 'male' and 'female' in state law and restrict student-athlete participation by sex at birth.
The Government, Military and Veterans Affairs Committee elected to not yet vote on advancing Legislative Bill 89, the 'Stand With Women Act' from State Sen. Kathleen Kauth of Omaha, over questions from some committee members about whether a proposed amendment would require all students to get a notarized doctor's note of that student's sex to participate in single-sex sports.
State Sen. Rita Sanders of Bellevue, the committee chair, said 'more clarity would provide a better debate' after Omaha State Sens. John Cavanaugh, Dunixi Guereca and Megan Hunt asked whether a a doctor's 'attestation' would implicate the need for a notary.
Hunt said this would increase costs for some families. She asked her colleagues to consider if they lived in the land of the free and thought of all the people who died for the freedom to play sports who would need to find a notary to do so. Cavanaugh said the requirement should lead to a new public hearing.
State Sen. Dan Lonowski of Hastings responded that the committee needed to consider the freedom of other kids, which State Sen. Bob Andersen of north-central Sarpy County echoed.
State Sen. Dave Wordekmper of Fremont said he had talked with Kauth about the amendment because both desired a way to verify a child's sex for participation in single-sex sports. His thought, he said, was that a doctor could document a child's sex during a routine physical.
Kauth told the Nebraska Examiner after the committee's decision that she felt good the one word was the only hold up, which she described as an 'easy fix' to change the word 'attestation.'
'Knowing that it's a term of legal art, we'll pick a word that doesn't mean 'notarized,' and I appreciate them figuring that out,' Kauth said. 'What I'm talking about is a sports physical.'
Sanders said the committee will take a few days to consider possible tweaks to the bill and a path forward before reconsidering Kauth's bill.
Public schools and universities would need to designate all bathrooms and locker rooms for use by males, females or single-occupancy. Restrooms could also be designated for family use.
LB 89 initially sought similar designations for state agency bathrooms, which the amendment would remove. Instead agencies such as the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services and Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services would need to define a person's sex as male or female.
The bill mirrors executive orders from President Donald Trump earlier this year and Gov. Jim Pillen in 2023 that sought to define sex as binary, including for athletics, school bathrooms and state agencies.
The Nebraska School Activities Association, for most K-12 sports, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association have already announced that they would comply with the executive orders.
Kauth said the declaration of a student's sex is important in the case of the NCAA, which said it would determine a child's sex by birth certificate, which Kauth said can be changed in about 44 states, including Nebraska.
She added: 'If we're talking about keeping girls safe on the field and privacy, we need to make sure that we're actually doing that.'
Kauth's bill, with the proposed amendment, would define sex as male or female based on whether someone 'naturally has, had, will or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes' either eggs (female) or sperm (male) for fertilization.
Trump's Feb. 5 executive order pledges to pull federal funds from educational programs that fail to comply with his order.
From 2018 through February, eight students had applied to participate in Nebraska high school sports based on their gender identity under the NSAA's Gender Participation Policy. It offers a path for students to participate on sports teams different than the student's sex at birth and requires medical and physiological testing. The organization has declined to say how many students it approved under the policy.
In December, NCAA President Charlie Baker told a U.S. Senate panel that he was aware of fewer than 10 active transgender student-athletes out of the NCAA's 510,000 participants.
At least a couple of Nebraska school districts have already adopted separate local sports participation policies similar to Kauth's bill and the executive orders.
State Sen. Merv Riepe of Ralston, prior to seeing the latest amendment, told the Examiner this week that he was 'leaning' to not vote for Kauth's bill. He said he wants to protect women's sports but that the NSAA, NCAA and executive orders had already done so.
Legislation seeking to enshrine the executive orders into federal and state law have stalled.
In Congress, a bill passed the U.S. House but stalled in the Senate. Nebraska's congressional members supported the bills.
In Nebraska, Riepe and State Sen. Tom Brandt of Plymouth were the two Republicans to not vote in favor of Kauth's 'Sports and Spaces Act' in 2024 that was limited at the time to K-12 sports and bathrooms.
Kauth has praised the executive orders but has repeatedly said that executive orders can be reversed.
However, Riepe said in February that 'if Trump's executive order can stand for the four years of his term, then LB 89 can wait four years.'
Contentious bills require 33 votes to advance, and Republicans in the officially nonpartisan Legislature hold just enough seats. No Democrats supported Kauth's previous, narrower bill.
State Sen. Jane Raybould of Lincoln on Thursday withdrew a competing bill to Kauth's proposal, LB 605, that sought to largely put the NSAA's now-defunct Gender Participation Policy into law.
The bill had not yet received a public hearing, and Raybould's withdrawal motion passed 34-0.
Kauth has designated LB 89 as her 2025 priority, the first senator to do so, which increases the likelihood that her bill will be debated this year. Speaker John Arch of La Vista sets the daily agenda.
Sanders told reporters that Kauth has indicated she is 'very close' to getting 33 votes.
Asked how she would vote, Sanders told reporters: 'I'm not real sure until we have some more clarity on the bill, because how do you debate a bill when you're not sure what exactly we're debating, right? So let's clean up some language so we have a more focused bill for floor debate.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Free childcare crisis as surge in demand leaves Labour with funding black hole
Ministers have been warned the childcare sector is at risk of 'collapse' after a boom in demand for free care left a major government scheme in financial peril. A plan to expand free childcare for British families is set to cost the government an extra £1bn per year at a time when ministers are grappling to fill the gaping black hole in public finances. Labour has not spelled out how the funding gap will be filled, but experts predict the shortfall will create 'substantial pressure' on the government and could put the entire childcare sector under threat. In an exclusive interview with The Independent, Bridget Phillipson insisted the unexpectedly high take-up – a quarter higher than predicted – was a 'good problem to have' and would not leave children without places. But the education secretary could not guarantee that parents would get a space at their local nursery in September, when the scheme expands to offer eligible children aged nine months and older 30 hours a week of free childcare. Industry leaders said parents would be left 'disappointed' while nurseries warned a lack of staff meant they were already struggling to deliver the government's pledge. CEO of the Early Years Alliance, Neil Leitch, told The Independent: 'One thing is absolutely clear: if 80 per cent of all hours delivered are government hours, and those hours are inadequately funded, the infrastructure will collapse over a period of time. 'I can't say it will be one year or five years, but you can bet your bottom dollar if you don't give somebody enough money to deliver a service, at some point they stop.' Figures published in March show the number of people newly entitled to free childcare was 26 per cent higher than originally estimated – 379,000 compared to 302,000. This meant that the Department for Education spent £2bn on the policy last year, up from a planned £1.6bn. But this is only set to grow as further hours of free childcare are rolled out. According to the highly respected Institute for Fiscal Studies, the cost of extending free childcare to under-3s could end up costing £1bn more a year than previously expected, from 2026/7 onwards – up from around £4bn to approximately £5bn. A boost to funding announced in Rachel Reeves's spending review, of £640m, would 'go some way to filling this gap… [but] could still leave substantial pressure from higher-than-expected take-up', the IFS said. IFS associate director Christine Farquharson said the DfE will still likely face 'difficult choices' within its budget and may have to 'trim back' spending in other areas to meet its childcare commitments. 'They have a fixed pot of money. When one thing becomes more expensive, that puts more pressure on other areas of the [education] budget,' she told The Independent. Ms Farquharson said predictions for how many parents would take up the free hours were 'complex' but added: 'It does seem like [the Tories] underestimated take-up pretty systematically.' It is just one of many financial decisions facing the chancellor ahead of the autumn Budget after planned welfare cuts, aimed at saving £5bn annually, were reversed. Ms Reeves is being pushed to bend her rules on borrowing or to raise taxes to keep public finances on track. The free childcare policy was launched in December 2023 with great fanfare under former Tory chancellor Jeremy Hunt. The first stage was put in place from September 2024, when the government extended 15 hours a week of free term-time childcare to working parents with a child aged nine months and over. From September, that will be extended to 30 hours a week. Labour say they were left a 'pledge without a plan' when they entered government. Ministers have been working to massively expand the number of nursery spaces and staff but the task has been made more difficult by the fact that, unlike schools, many nurseries are private providers. Industry leaders warned that, with 8 in 10 of all nursery hours soon to be paid for by the government, the infrastructure was at risk of 'collapse' without more money. The sector has already been forced to absorb huge additional costs in recent years, including April's national insurance rise, it warned. Childcare in the UK is one of the most expensive in the world, according to the OECD. Mr Leitch added: 'What we have to bear in mind is that we've already got a recruitment and retention crisis. The reality is, many settings don't have the people to be able to accommodate those additional hours. So I'm afraid there will be parents that will be disappointed.' Sarah Ronan, the director of the Early Education and Childcare Coalition, said the IFS was right to sound the alarm, adding that if the government did not match demand with funding it is leaving providers with 'no choice' but to limit the number of places they offer – or raise fees. 'The harsh reality is that if providers don't do that, they'll face closure and then we'll have an even worse crisis on our hands,' she said. Purnima Tanuku, executive chair of the National Day Nurseries Association (NDNA), said the government's ambitions 'will be put at risk if there is not sufficient investment in early years'. She added that 'almost 70 per cent of nurseries told us that staff shortages mean they cannot offer the children's places they have room to deliver'. Munira Wilson, the Lib Dem education spokesperson, said providers had been left 'hanging by a thread and parents [are] facing the prospect of childcare deserts'. 'The government need to ensure that the funding for childcare hours matches the actual costs of delivery,' she said. Official statistics released last week showed a 7.2 per cent increase in early years staff, the largest annual rise since the series began. The Department for Education would not be drawn on where any extra money might come from. But Ms Phillipson insisted she was unafraid of the policy's popularity. She urged families to check what they are entitled to, adding: 'I want as many parents as possible to take up the offer. It allows parents to juggle work and family life, but it also sets up children to succeed. And the demand that parents are showing is a good problem to have, because it also brings economic dividends as well. 'If people are able to work, or work a few more hours… that helps us all as a society as well and it gets economic growth going.' Ms Phillipson has previously warned that, as the policy expands again in September, parents in the first wave might not get their first choice of nursery. Asked if she could say that all parents who want a space would get one, she told The Independent: 'What I can't guarantee is that it will be as close to home as they would like or it will be their first choice, but we're confident that the rollout will go well in September.' Ms Farquharson did add that the higher uptake of free childcare could ultimately be a good sign for the economy, even if it is more expensive in the short-term. 'This higher uptake might mean that we're getting a lot more parents moving into paid work because of these entitlements than first predicted,' she said. 'If the goal for this policy is to drive growth, then this would be a fantastic success story.' However, the extent to which that is the case will only become apparent over the next few years, she said. A DfE spokesperson said: 'High-quality, affordable childcare plays a vital role in our Plan for Change, which is why early years funding will rise to over £9bn next year, helping us meet our target of getting tens of thousands more children each year ready for school. 'We're backing families with this record investment including a £75m grant this year to support providers in delivering more places and a 45 per cent uplift in early year pupil premium, building on the real difference this is making for families as highlighted by the Coram survey who say costs for some has halved.'
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
What's An Everyday Aspect Of Living In The US That's Actually Quite Dystopian The More You Think About It?
Listen, I'm an American, and I've read enough dystopian books to know that some things about the US are almost too similar for my taste — especially right now. So, if you're American, what's something considered totally normal in the US but is actually pretty dystopian the more you think about it? To rip the Band-Aid off, maybe you still, to this day, can't wrap your head around the fact that the regulation of women's bodies has been a long-time (and still!) discussed topic among politicians and how it pertains to "the law." To you, the idea of the government dictating what women can and can't do with their bodies is deeply upsetting. Related: Maybe you find it extremely disturbing and repulsive how normalized mass shootings in America have become, and how many shootings Americans have had to grieve through. Related: Maybe you're still shell-shocked when you see how normalized it's become to wear merch of the President, and how some loyalists believe that the current president can do no wrong. Or maybe you literally can't stop thinking about income inequality and how the wealthy and powerful have a lot more access to necessities that should be considered basic — particularly when it comes to healthcare. Americans, how are we holding up? If you're American, what normal aspect of the US do you find is actually pretty dystopian? Let me know in the comments, or you can anonymously submit your thoughts using the form below! Also in Community: Also in Community: Also in Community: Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why does the White House want to redesign gas cans? Explaining the situation
The White House says it wants to 'Make Gas Cans Great Again.' Under a plan announced July 24 by President Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency, the federal government is encouraging manufacturers to add vents to portable fuel containers, also known as gas cans. It would effectively reverse a 2009-rule by federal environmental officials at the time that required portable gas cans - used for lawnmowers, chainsaws, ATVS and stranded vehicles - to have special vents that stop the vapors from escaping. Proponents of that rule - which was finalized in 2007 - said the vapors that escape contributed to ozone pollution. But the 2009 rule created an online market for pre-ban gas cans among buyers dissatisfied with the new cans. Why does Trump want to redesign gas cans? 'Gas cans used to pour gas,' Trump's head of the EPA, Lee Zeldin, said on X, formerly Twitter. 'Now they just dribble like a child's sippy cup.' But many modern designs are often infuriatingly ineffective at actually filling tanks because the vents work so poorly, critics argue. Instead of stopping vapors from flowing out the complicated spouts and relief valves, the new designs often cause gasoline spills, which some critics say are far worse than a tiny amount of vapor escaping from an older design. Some rules for gas cans will still remain in place Other rules for gas cans have to remain in place under federal law, like making sure they're child-resistant and limiting the risk of flash fires. What happens next for gas cans? The EPA's announcement is non-binding for manufacturers and doesn't prohibit the vents. Rather, the EPA is asking manufacturers to redesign the gas cans to have vents 'to facilitate fast and smooth fuel flow.' This article contains material from USA TODAY Daniel Munoz covers business, consumer affairs, labor and the economy for and The Record. Email: munozd@ Twitter:@danielmunoz100 and Facebook This article originally appeared on Gas can redesign considered by Trump White House. Here's why
