logo
Indian shrimp exporters brace for unprecedented challenge in US; volumes to drop 7-9%

Indian shrimp exporters brace for unprecedented challenge in US; volumes to drop 7-9%

Time of India16 hours ago
Indian shrimp exporters are bracing for a tough time in the US market. This is due to new tariffs. These tariffs add to existing duties. Crisil Ratings anticipates a potential drop in export volume. Operating margins may also decline. Exporters are exploring alternative markets. The government supports the sector through schemes like PMMSY.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
New Delhi:: Indian shrimp exporters will face a new, unprecedented challenge in US markets after the imposition of reciprocal tariffs on India, said Rahul Guha, Senior Director at Crisil Ratings "Indian shrimp exporters face an unprecedented new challenge in the US market, which contributes close to 48 per cent of their exports," Guha added.He noted that with the proposed US tariff hike, additional financial penalties, the 5.77 per cent countervailing duty imposed last year, and existing anti-dumping duties, India is set to become one of the most heavily taxed major shrimp exporters in the US market."In contrast, Ecuador, the largest shrimp exporter globally, faces just a 10 per cent tariff and countervailing duties of 3-4 per cent in the US," Guha added."In this milieu, the shrimp export volume could potentially fall 7-9 per cent in this fiscal, even as players look for alternative markets to boost their exports," he anticipated.According to the Crisil Ratings Senior Director, the operating margin will also fall 50-100 basis points due to the added cost burden of tariffs and their gradual pass-through due to competition from Ecuador."Thus, the credit profiles of shrimp exporters, already under pressure, will witness further challenges," Guha stated.During the financial year 2023-24, India exported an all-time high volume of 17,81,602 MT of seafood worth Rs. 60,523.89 crore.Marine Products Export Development Authority (MPEDA), a statutory body under the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, promotes and regulates the export of marine products.The initiatives by MPEDA for boosting shrimp exports are oriented towards production and processing, and not port-specific.To strengthen the export value chain, the government has sanctioned projects adjacent to major ports, namely, modernisation and upgradation of fishing harbour at Visakhapatnam, Chennai, Paradip, Cochin and Mumbai Port with 100 per cent financial assistance under PMMSY in convergence with Sagarmala at a total cost of Rs 651.14 crore.The government, under the Pradhan Mantri Matsya Sampada Yojana (PMMSY) scheme, provides financial assistance to the state governments, Union Territories and implementing agencies for the construction of fishing harbours, fish landing centres, the modernisation/upgradation of existing fishing harbours and the maintenance dredging of the fishing harbours.During the last five years from 2020-21 to 2024-25, Rs 3,490 crore have been allocated under the scheme.The scheme provides for sustainable investment in infrastructure with the objective of enhancing production, productivity, exports and addressing key gaps, including the reduction of post-harvest losses in various components of the value chain.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BJP govt's ‘Swadeshi' call mere rhetoric: Akhilesh
BJP govt's ‘Swadeshi' call mere rhetoric: Akhilesh

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

BJP govt's ‘Swadeshi' call mere rhetoric: Akhilesh

1 2 Lucknow: Taking on the BJP-led govt at the Centre for its call to promote 'Swadeshi' products, Samajwadi Party national president Akhilesh Yadav on Sunday described it as mere 'jumla' (rhetoric) and accused the BJP of touring the world to request countries to enter into trade agreements. "BJP ka swadeshi bhi ek jumla hai (BJP's call for Swadeshi is only rhetoric)," Akhilesh said, adding that in India the BJP is calling upon people to use Indian products while BJP delegations are touring the world urging for trade agreements. "If the BJP had the right intentions, it would never have had 'jhoola' (swing) moments and had not gifted gold chains to those who chained our countrymen," he said. Akhilesh's 'jhula' jibe was in apparent reference to the 2014 visit of Chinese President Xi Jinping and the First Lady who, accompanied by PM Modi during their visit to Gujarat, sat on a swing for a photo op. Similarly, his charge of Indians being chained is being seen in the light of recent deportations by the US where Indians were sent back handcuffed and chained to each other. The SP chief made the comments a day after the PM, during his address in Varanasi on Saturday, called upon the people to use products manufactured in India. The call came at a time when India is involved in a tariff war with the Donald Trump govt in the US which has imposed a tariff of 25% on Indian goods. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like NRIs Living In Estonia Are Eligible For INR 2 Lakh Monthly Pension. Invest 18K/Month Get Offer Undo As a counter to it, the PM called on Indians to buy and sell Indian products only. 'Even British didn't slap FIRs for edu' Lucknow: Taking exception to Pratapgarh district administration lodging an FIR against Samajwadi Party MLA and others for organising a 'PDA Pathshala' on a school campus that was lying locked, party president Akhilesh Yadav described the move as something that did not happen during even the British rule in India. SP functionaries are organising PDA Pathshalas in protest against state govt's move to merge schools which have low enrolment following a call from the party president urging retired teachers and educated youths to impart education to children in villages where schools have been shut. There were allegations that SP MLA from Pratapgarh RK Verma entered a closed school in unauthorised manner to hold a PDA Pathshala for which an FIR was lodged. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Click, buy & regret: Customers in Bengaluru struggle to return wrong & fake items
Click, buy & regret: Customers in Bengaluru struggle to return wrong & fake items

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Click, buy & regret: Customers in Bengaluru struggle to return wrong & fake items

Bengaluru: What was once celebrated as a revolution in convenience has turned into a source of frustration for many online shoppers. As e-commerce has become a norm in urban India, a new kind of consumer complaints is becoming prevalent — defective or even fake products delivered, with little to no recourse for the customer. A pattern is evident: when buyers receive wrong or damaged products, their complaints are often dismissed or redirected to the delivery agents. Instead of redressal, many are asked to prove their claims — typically by sharing an unpacking video. In effect, the burden of proving fraud is pushed on to the consumer. Data reflects the scale of dissatisfaction. As of June 2025, the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (KSCDRC) had logged nearly 1.3 lakh complaints related to e-commerce and other miscellaneous categories — nearly 40% of the total 3.3 lakh consumer cases in the state since its inception in 1989. You Can Also Check: Bengaluru AQI | Weather in Bengaluru | Bank Holidays in Bengaluru | Public Holidays in Bengaluru Suneetra Datta, a 45-year-old resident of Kengeri, recounted her ordeal. She had ordered a branded kurta on a well-known online platform for her son, paying Rs 1,298 via UPI. What arrived instead was a bundle of torn cloth. "I was shocked. Every detail — product ID, payment method, invoice — matched. Yet no action was taken after I raised the issue. This is unacceptable," she said. Despite reaching out to the delivery partner and the e-commerce firm, she hasn't received a refund three months on. In another case, Pranay Poradanla, 25, ordered a hoodie from an online fashion retailer, only to have his return request denied on the grounds that the item wasn't officially marked as delivered. "It took 20 days of constant follow-ups just to get the correct product. For one hoodie, I was made to suffer. It's mentally draining," he said. Experts say the problem lies in a systemic lack of accountability. "Online platforms often act like neutral parties when something goes wrong, claiming they are only aggregators," said Shivashankare Gowda, president of KSCDRC. "Consumers trust these platforms thinking the sellers are vetted. But when issues arise, the platforms back away and direct buyers to deal with vendors directly." A Central Crime Branch official noted that while platforms have made shopping easier, consumer vigilance has not kept pace. "Always opt for payment on delivery and try to check the product in front of the agent or record an unboxing. These basic precautions now matter more than ever." Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Energy dept's nod to buy 630MW solar power leads to controversy
Energy dept's nod to buy 630MW solar power leads to controversy

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Energy dept's nod to buy 630MW solar power leads to controversy

1 2 Jaipur: A decision taken by Rajasthan energy department's board on May 26 to buy 630 MW solar power has turned into a raging controversy, with the state energy minister now talking of an investigation and not entering into any power purchase agreement till the probe is over. The 630 MW were auctioned to two private discoms in Delhi by Solar Energy Corporation of India, at Rs 5.06 a unit. However, the two discoms backed out, leading to SECI offering it to some states. Sources said that while many states declined the offer, the energy department of Rajasthan accepted it at its board meeting, for which the power purchase agreement (PPA) is pending. The decision led to widespread opposition by stakeholders who said that when cheaper renewable energy with battery storage was available at Rs 3.18 a unit as per the recently discovered rates through e-auctions, why should the department go for the costlier option. When TOI spoke with state energy minister Heeralal Nagar, he said, "We will seek details about the project, and we are not going to sign power purchase agreements. First, we will investigate the matter and only take a decision after that about signing the PPA." DD Agarwal, director at Samta Power, an energy sector NGO, said, "Two things should have been kept in mind by the energy department. First, rates for battery storage solar power have been declining consistently. Rajasthan just needs additional power during peak hours, and battery storage is not only cheaper but meets the needs." Second, he said, when technology is developing fast, the department should not enter into a 25-year PPA. "During the early days of the solar revolution, discoms bought the renewable energy at Rs 17 a unit. Technology improved, and it is now available at Rs 2.5 a unit or thereabouts. In the case of batteries, too, the rates are coming down fast. The department should not get locked in long-term high-tariff contracts." The 630 MW was an FDRE (firm and dispatchable renewable energy, or round-the-clock) contract, where it combined solar and wind power with energy storage (usually batteries) to provide consistent electricity, even when the sun wasn't shining or the wind wasn't blowing. According to Agarwal, Rajasthan has enough capacity to meet its demand except during peak hours, for which battery storage is sufficient. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store