Report: Amazon Fires Drive Unprecedented Global Forest Loss in 2024
Loss of tropical pristine forests alone reached 6.7 million hectares (16.6 million acres), an 80% spike compared to 2023 and an area roughly the size of Panama, mainly because Brazil, the host of the next global climate summit in November, struggled to contain fires in the Amazon amid the worst drought ever recorded in the rainforest. A myriad of other countries, including Bolivia and Canada, were also ravaged by wildfires.
It was the first time the annual report, issued by the World Resources Institute and the University of Maryland, showed fires as the leading cause of tropical forest loss, a grim milestone for a naturally humid ecosystem that is not supposed to burn, Reuters reported.
"The signals in these data are particularly frightening," said Matthew Hansen, the co-director of a lab at the University of Maryland that compiled and analyzed the data. "The fear is that the climate signal is going to overtake our ability to respond effectively."
Latin America was hit particularly hard, the report said, with the Amazon biome hitting its highest level of primary forest loss since 2016.
Brazil, which holds the largest share of the world's tropical forests, lost 2.8 million hectares (6.9 million acres), the most of any country. It was a reversal of the progress made in 2023 when President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva took office promising to protect the world's largest rainforest.
'This was unprecedented, which means we have to adapt all our policy to a new reality,' said Andre Lima, who oversees deforestation control policies for Brazil's Ministry of Environment, adding that fire, which was never among the leading causes of forest loss, is now a top priority for the government.
Bolivia overtook the Democratic Republic of Congo as the second country with the most tropical forest loss despite having less than half the amount of forest as the African nation, which also saw a spike in forest loss last year.
Bolivia's forest loss surged by 200% in 2024, with a drought, wildfires and a government-incentivized agricultural expansion as the leading causes. Across Latin America, the report noted similar trends in Mexico, Peru, Nicaragua, and Guatemala.
Conflicts in Colombia and the Democratic Republic of Congo also boosted deforestation rates, as armed groups used up natural resources.
Outside the tropics, boreal forests, which evolved with seasonal fires, also posted record-high tree loss in 2024, with Canada and Russia each losing 5.2 million hectares (12.8 million acres) in 2024 as wildfires got out of control.
Southeast Asia bucked the global trend with Malaysia, Laos, and Indonesia all posting double-digit decreases in primary forest loss, as domestic conservation policy, combined with efforts by communities and the private sector, continued to effectively contain fires and agricultural expansion.
Another outlier was the Charagua Iyambae Indigenous territory in southern Bolivia, which was able to keep the country's record fires at bay through land-use policies and early warning systems.
Rod Taylor, the global director for forests at the WRI, said that as leaders descend on the Amazonian city of Belem for the next climate summit, he would like to see countries make progress in introducing better funding mechanisms for conservation.
"At the moment," he said, "there's more money to be paid by chopping forests down than keeping them standing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
18 hours ago
- Arab News
Climate change needs smart solutions, not political point-scoring
More than seven months into President Donald Trump's second term, the US is experiencing a sharp federal reversal on climate policy: withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, rollback of clean energy initiatives, and a halt to key climate finance programs. The reaction of Western 'scholars and watchdogs' to the moves was summed up recently by a columnist in the UK's Guardian newspaper who put this way: 'It's an agenda that in only its first six months, has put back environmental progress by decades.' But there is another way to look at the US climate-policy reversal: as a golden opportunity to transform climate change from a First World wedge issue into a universal challenge in which both the global North and South have equal stakes. And to seize it, countries, cities, businesses and ordinary people must adopt an organic, 'whole of society' approach in the form of carbon literacy, lifestyle shifts, technological innovation and international cooperation. It is easy to forget that climate change is neither a political theater nor a liberal luxury, but a human issue. Record heat this summer has once again scorched the Arab world, Europe and Asia, while devastating floods and wildfires have dominated news headlines. The consequences of more frequent hot days, fewer cold days and increased evaporation transcend national boundaries and public concern has reached historic highs across the spectrum. Extreme heat is the biggest climate-change danger facing large swathes of the world. Mild summers in Europe are being replaced by heat waves that are becoming more frequent. Adapting to it is expected to require huge investments and a major shift in attitude toward air conditioning. Instead of dismissing it as a luxury that only Americans and Arab Gulf states can afford, even Europeans are now viewing air conditioning as a necessity to prevent thousands of unnecessary deaths every year. Nevertheless, climate continues to be a politically charged issue. Some see it as the be-all and end-all of human existence; others regard it as a symbol of out-of-touch American and European elitism. As the Trump administration dismantles industrial policies that many Americans consider economically damaging, the op-ed pages of US and European newspapers are unsurprisingly full of doom and gloom these days. It is high time to refuse to frame climate change as a culture war between left and right or between Global North and South Arnab Neil Sengupta It is true that the Trump administration is seeking to cancel tax credits for electric vehicles and relax emissions standards. It has reversed federal clean energy incentives, blocked new authorizations for renewables on public lands, and ended major resilience and adaptation grants. But the objective is not to flout the Paris Agreement and fill the atmosphere with heat-trapping carbon dioxide. In keeping with his 'America First' ideology, Trump is trying to level the playing field for domestic coal, oil and natural gas producers, who were at a severe disadvantage because of federal government support for wind farms, solar panels, hydrogen production and other clean energy technologies under previous Democratic administrations. Moreover, accelerating the low-carbon transition is not without risks. As Wall Street Journal columnist Andy Kessler pointed out last week, 'Spain (56% renewables) has so much wind and solar power that fluctuations caused a massive blackout in April, taking parts of Portugal down with it. Central planning kills. The US uses 21% renewables.' Not just that, at the grass roots, state and local governments, American businesses and communities are showing what is possible without the heavy hand of politically motivated federal agencies. They are focused on solutions such as energy efficiency, municipal resilience, fast-tracked permits for renewables, and job creation. State and corporate policies are picking up the slack, keeping the EV market and retrofits alive. Across the US, private developers and cities have been switching to solar panels, heat pumps, insulation and mass transit because of rebates and practical incentives. The US may have stepped back to take stock and make sure that the mantra of decarbonization does not turn the country into an economic laggard, but the global energy transition, powered by economic incentives and private-sector leadership, seems to be moving on, anchored increasingly in pragmatism, economics and common sense. While Trump has moved to suspend US climate finance, COP28's global consensus is pushing forward with financing for vulnerable countries and adaptation funds. At COP28 in Dubai in 2023, world leaders operationalized the Loss and Damage Fund and called for tripled climate finance. China is aggressively expanding its solar and EV industries. The EU is pushing forward with ambitious green finance, and both Africa and Southeast Asia welcome clean energy investment. Likewise, business and innovation are receiving prominence. As seen at COP28, even major oil and gas producers can take the lead on the next phase of clean energy. Saudi Arabia and the UAE's strategy of investing in carbon capture, solar, green hydrogen and electric mobility is not a contradiction but realism. Elsewhere, oil companies are diversifying into hydrogen, sustainable aviation fuel and grid resilience when policies point the way. With the right signals from states and the market, private investment is growing rapidly and following global demand. Public engagement matters more than ever. Recent polling shows widespread concern, even among Republicans, about climate impacts as extreme heat, crop losses and wildfires intensify. What the last seven months have shown is that Americans are pragmatic: they want sound environmental and energy policies, not rhetoric. They are interested in practical outcomes, not ideology. That said, without the right politics, progress will stall. The world needs the support of ordinary people who stand to gain or lose the most from climate-change mitigation. This will happen through local jobs, tax relief, cleaner air and healthier citizens. 'Green transition' will not sell in the developing world if it looks like an American or a Franco-German vanity project. It has to deliver flood-proofing in Africa, rural broadband powered by solar in South Asia, and training for wind-turbine assembly in North Africa. The international community must focus on building trust through collaboration, biodiversity management and shared climate research while the US federal government steps back to restore some balance. Climate mitigation and adaptation is a project that needs Africa's ingenuity, Latin America's biodiversity, India's workforce and Gulf Arab entrepreneurship, plus moving away from a mindset fixated on reducing energy use. Time is of the essence. Every year of unchecked warming raises the cost in the form of public health crises, agricultural losses and mass migration. The effects are already visible in small communities. Be it in New Orleans or Kenya, no one wakes up hoping for dinner by lantern light or rolling brownouts. People want reliability in the form of affordable energy supplies and cleaner air. Summing up, global climate action is not about virtue signaling or panic mongering but common sense and patience. Slowly but steadily, the world must pivot to fuel efficiency, clean power, resilience, job training and global cooperation from the ground up. It is high time to refuse to frame climate change as a culture war between left and right or between global North and South.
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
For hope on climate change, follow the money, UN chief tells AP
NEW YORK: For nearly a decade, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has been using science to warn about ever more dangerous climate change in increasingly urgent tones. Now he's enlisting something seemingly more important to the world's powerful: Money. In an exclusive interview with The Associated Press, Guterres hailed the power of market forces in what he repeatedly called 'a battle' to save the planet. He pointed to two new UN reports showing the plummeting cost of solar and wind power and the growing generation and capacity of those green energy sources. He warned those who cling to fossil fuels that they could go broke doing it. 'Science and the economy show the way,' Guterres said in a 20-minute interview in his 38th-floor conference room overlooking the New York skyline. 'What we need is the political will to take the decisions that are necessary in regulatory frameworks, in financial aspects, in other policy dimensions. Governments need to take decisions not to be an obstacle to the natural trend to accelerate the renewables transition.' That means by the end of the autumn, governments need to come up with new plans to fight climate change that are compatible with the global goal of limiting warming and ones that apply to their entire economy and include all greenhouse gases, Guterres said. But don't expect one from the United States. President Donald Trump has pulled out of the landmark Paris climate agreement, slashed efforts to boost renewable energy and made fossil fuels a priority, including the dirtiest one in terms of climate and health, coal. 'Obviously, the (Trump) administration in itself is an obstacle, but there are others. The government in the US doesn't control everything,' Guterres said. Sure, Trump pulled out of the Paris accord, but many states and cities are trying to live up to the Biden administration's climate-saving goals by reducing the burning of coal, oil and natural gas that release heat-trapping gases, Guterres said. Invest in fossil fuels, risk stranded assets? 'People do not want to lose money. People do not want to make investments in what will become stranded assets,' Guterres said. 'And I believe that even in the United States, we will go on seeing a reduction of emissions, I have no doubt about it.' He said any new investments in exploring for new fossil fuel deposits 'will be totally lost' and called them 'just a waste of money.' 'I'm perfectly convinced that we will never be able, in the history of humankind, to spend all the oil and gas that was already discovered,' Guterres said. But amid the hope of the renewable reports, Guterres said the world is still losing its battle on climate change, in danger of permanently passing 1.5 degree Celsius (2.7 degree Fahrenheit) warming since preindustrial times. That threshold is what the Paris agreement set up as a hoped-for global limit to warming 10 years ago. Many scientists have already pronounced the 1.5 threshold dead. Indeed, 2024 passed that mark, though scientists say it requires a 20-year average, not a single year, to consider the threshold breached. A scientific study from researchers who often work with the UN last month said the world is spewing so much carbon dioxide that sometime in early 2028, a couple years earlier than once predicted, passing the 1.5 mark will become scientifically inevitable. Guterres: 'We need to go on fighting' even as it looks bleak Guterres hasn't given up on the 1.5 degree goal yet, though he said it looks bad. 'We see the acceleration of different aspects of climate change, rising seas, glaciers melting, heat waves, storms of different kinds,' he said. 'We need to go on fighting,' he said. 'I think we are on the right side of history.' Guterres, who spoke to AP after addressing the UN Security Council on the Israeli occupation of Gaza, said there's only one way to solve that seemingly intractable issue: An immediate ceasefire, a release of all remaining hostages, access for humanitarian relief and 'paving the way for a serious political process leading to the two-state solution. Some people say the two-state solution is now becoming extremely difficult. Even some saying it's impossible. But the question is, what is the alternative?' Gaza, Ukraine and Sudan are all crises, Guterres said, but climate change is an existential problem for the entire planet. And he said people don't realize how climate-caused droughts and extreme weather can feed poverty and terrorism. He pointed to the Sahel as an example. 'We see that people live in worse and worse conditions, less and less capacity to grow their crops, less and less capital,' he said. 'And this is largely due to climate change.' 'Everything is interlinked: Climate change, artificial intelligence, geopolitical divides, the problems of inequality and injustice,' Guterres said. 'And we need to make sure that we make progress in all of them at the same time.'
Arab News
2 days ago
- Arab News
COP30 must make good on past climate pledges
In 2015, the landmark Paris climate agreement set the ambitious but necessary goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and ensuring that the increase stays 'well below' 2 C. With the average global surface temperature having already reached 1.1 C above the 20th-century baseline, time is running out to reach this goal. Yet governments so far have failed to agree on a strategy for doing so. At the 62nd session of the UN Climate Change Subsidiary Bodies (SB62) in Bonn last month — the negotiations intended to lay the groundwork for November's UN Climate Change Conference in Brazil — countries got so hung up on the details of the agenda that little progress was made. Such delays have long characterized the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, but they are at odds with scientific reality, which demands rapid and unified action. Building consensus is, thus, a key challenge facing Brazil's COP30 presidency. The task ahead is formidable not only because of the challenges inherent in the UNFCCC process, but also because four interconnected global developments are undermining trust and impeding multilateral cooperation. First, the global-governance architecture, with the UN at its core, is showing signs of disarray. Institutions that were designed to nurture and facilitate cooperation are increasingly hamstrung by bureaucratic inertia and outdated organizational structures. With reform efforts gridlocked, the UN system risks losing its relevance, and multilateralism its credibility. Second, the rise of transactional diplomacy has meant countries prioritize their own short-term interests over collective long-term needs. This approach, based on a narrow conception of national interest, effectively precludes broad-based cooperation, as it erodes the norms that have traditionally underpinned international engagement. Brazil's COP30 presidency must eschew flashy results in favor of pragmatic pathways to deliver on past commitments. Jacinda Ardern, Carlos Lopes, and Laurence Tubiana Third, compromise is increasingly being rejected in favor of 'realism,' leading to extreme polarization and entrenched negotiating positions. Multilateral negotiations frequently come down to the wire, and the results are often disappointing, further encouraging transactional engagement at the expense of cooperation and compromise. Finally, climate change is increasingly taking a back seat to other challenges, with armed conflicts, a global trade slowdown, intensifying growth headwinds, and record debt levels consuming countries' political attention, diplomatic space, and financial resources. Brazil clearly has its work cut out. Above all, it must resist the tendency for COP presidencies to emphasize fresh agreements and ambitious commitments — the kind that grab headlines and make the negotiations look like a smashing success, but often fall short when the hard work of implementation begins. Brazil's COP30 presidency must eschew flashy results in favor of pragmatic pathways to deliver on past commitments. Fortunately, Brazil recognizes this. Its fourth letter to the international community outlines an action agenda aimed at making progress on what the world has 'already collectively agreed' during previous COPs and in the Paris climate agreement. Specifically, the agenda seeks to leverage existing initiatives to complete the implementation of the first 'global stocktake' under the Paris agreement, which was concluded at COP28. This focus on previously agreed outcomes is well-suited to the current geopolitical context, in which any agreement can be difficult to reach. Representatives at the SB62 in Bonn did not achieve a consensus, and last month's G7 summit failed to deliver a joint communique. Rather than perpetuating stalemates, the action agenda invites stakeholders to make progress where agreement already exists. The agenda also charts the way forward. It is organized into six thematic 'axes,' including stewarding forests, oceans, and biodiversity; transforming agriculture and food systems; and building resilience for cities, infrastructure, and water. 'Unleashing enablers and accelerators' in finance, technology, and capacity-building — the final, cross-cutting axis — will accelerate implementation at scale. Since responsibility for the implementation and governance of climate policy is distributed among many actors — which must have some level of trust that others are doing their part — the agenda also establishes 'transparency, monitoring, and accountability' as top priorities. To this end, Brazil's COP30 presidency should seek to deliver a set of shared principles and supportive mechanisms. As COP30 special envoys, we extend our full support to the action agenda. By emphasizing consolidation, rather than spectacle, Brazil is setting the stage for a highly productive COP30 — one focused on bridging divides, building trust, and delivering genuine progress. The task ahead is daunting, but the chance to rebuild momentum is real. Copyright: Project Syndicate.
