Inditex appoints new chief financial officer
Current Chief Financial Officer Ignacio Fernandez Fernandez will take on a new role as Chief Corporate Officer overseeing the financial, sustainability, logistics, transport and infrastructure divisions, Inditex said.
Andres Sanchez Iglesias, currently chief tax officer, was appointed as the new CFO.
"The new appointment is likely driven by the need for greater oversight as Inditex makes progress towards logistics capacity expansion," Citi analyst Monique Pollard said.
Inditex is in the second year of a large logistics investment plan, spending a total of 1.8 billion euros to expand capacity, including its hub in Zaragoza, Spain.
Chief Sustainability Officer Javier Losada Montero is leaving Inditex after 32 years, the company said, and will be replaced by Fernando de Bunes Ibarra, currently head of enterprise risk management.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Fears that London house price fall will spread through UK
Fears are growing that a downturn in the prime London property market may spread across the country as a recent rise in stamp duty forces sellers to lower their asking prices. Evidence suggests the ultra-rich are renting rather than buying mansions in the capital to avoid the hated tax. Stamp duty is paid by buyers when they buy a property and in April two key thresholds were changed – meaning most homebuyers now pay it. Property portal Zoopla found that 83 per cent of buyers would pay stamp duty if they bought a home today, compared to 49 per cent before April. This has led more buyers to negotiate a price cut to compensate for the extra tax. Some 951,000 now pay the levy. That is still below a recent peak of 1.2million but the figure is set to rise sharply as more people are dragged into the tax net. More than a third – or £4.5billion – of the money raised by stamp duty comes from property deals in the capital. In London, where property prices are higher than the rest of the country, it now costs home movers up to £2,500 more than before April if they buy an average house costing £532,449. But the impact of the rise is most keenly felt in central London locations where prices are being slashed by up to 30 per cent to attract foreign buyers. The stamp duty charge on a £20million mansion in Belgravia or Mayfair is £2.3million for a UK purchaser. For a person not resident in the UK, acquiring a second home in the city, the bill is about £3.7million. This used to be seen as the price of admission to the London lifestyle. But now even the mega-rich are baulking at the bill. Property experts say the international set are now preferring to rent not buy in London. 'The annual rent on a £20million pad would be about £570,000,' said Neil Hudson of the Built Place consultancy. 'On that basis, if you were a UK purchaser, you could rent for four years for what you would have to pay in stamp duty alone.' There are concerns the downbeat mood in central London could spread nationwide. 'At the height of the boom in 2015, London's properties became overpriced and have been largely moving sideways ever since,' said Richard Donnell, head of research at Zoopla. 'This is bad news for the whole market since London has been the engine of house price growth, with the effects rippling out to other regions.'
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Australia is suddenly flush with forest-friendly recycled toilet paper firms: what's the state of ply?
The Australian brand Who Gives a Crap (WGAC) has recently launched its toilet paper products in the UK supermarket chain Tesco. Having begun as a home delivery service, its recycled and 'sustainable' products are now stocked in Woolworths, Aldi and independent supermarkets such as IGA in Australia. Despite the growing presence of WGAC and other brands offering recycled products, the supermarket shelves remain dominated by plush, virgin-pulp toilet paper. So what are the prospects for further changes in the market? And what are the ethical and environmental options for consumers? Most mainstream toilet paper is made from virgin pulp – wood fibre sourced from hardwood tree plantations. 'They're grown for single-use products, without any environmental benefit,' says Jennifer Macklin, a senior research fellow at Monash University's Sustainable Development Institute. 'Recycled paper uses less energy and water to produce than virgin or bamboo products,' Macklin says. The head of sustainability at WGAC, Elissa Foster, says globally more than 1m trees are cut down each day to produce traditional toilet paper, citing 2022 research from Edge Environment, commissioned by the organisation. Sign up: AU Breaking News email Planting trees for low-value products such as toilet paper in place of old-growth forests contributes to the loss of habitat for species such as the yellow-tailed black-cockatoo, says Estelle Van Hoeydonck, a conservation campaigner at Zoos Victoria, which runs the Wipe for Wildlife campaign. 'Opting for recycled toilet paper is one tangible action Australians can take to support wildlife,' she says. Recycled toilet paper is made from post-consumer waste paper, diverting material from landfill, reducing demand for virgin pulp and supporting a circular economy, Foster says. Encore Tissue, an Australian company that produces the icare brand, was featured on Dr Karl's How Things Work earlier this year. It estimates its recycling operations save 138,000 trees, 185 gigawatt hours of electricity and 128,000 litres of water a year. But Macklin says it is just one part of the wider picture. 'Recycled toilet paper is a positive option when feasible – but we don't want people to feel guilty. Choices like reducing food waste have far greater environmental value than switching toilet paper brands.' Bamboo is often marketed as an eco-friendly alternative – including by WGAC – because it grows rapidly, reaching maturity in three to five years compared with 10 to 40 years for other trees commonly harvested, Foster says. She says it is 'a great alternative to wood-based paper', but agrees with independent experts that recycled paper is the more sustainable option. 'Bamboo is a substitution strategy,' Macklin says, 'less preferable than reusing existing materials.' Nevertheless, Macklin says she chooses bamboo for my household. 'After testing several options, that was the compromise that worked for us.' One reason is that recycled toilet paper is still not as soft as virgin or bamboo. It may also disintegrate less effectively, affecting plumbing. The consumer advocacy group Choice warned in its 2025 toilet paper review that some recycled brands did not break down quickly enough. Yes – for both online and in-store brands. WGAC reported a 21% year-on-year growth in Woolworths over the past 12 months, with rising interest beyond early adopters. The icare products, which are sold exclusively through supermarkets, have also consistently increased sales over the past few years. Experts agree that the more consumers embrace recycled options, the more likely it is supermarkets will expand their ranges. But availability is still patchy. Woolworths carries several recycled brands, including from WGAC, icare, Naturale and Emotions (online only). Coles lists just one icare product. Aldi does not stock recycled toilet paper year-round but has sold limited editions of WGAC products. Foster says WGAC has helped raise awareness and meet demand for recycled toilet paper in a more convenient way. 'We witnessed this demand rise in 2020 due to #toiletpapergate [the panic buying spree when Covid hit].' An icare spokesperson said WGAC's rise had not negatively affected its shelf presence. 'We try to match pack sizes, quality and prices with non-sustainable brands like Quilton or Kleenex.' Other home-delivery startups like Yarn'n, Oo Bamboo, About a Dog and Emotions, have followed similar models, often linking each purchase to a 50% charitable donation.
Times
6 hours ago
- Times
HMRC made a mistake — but won't give us our £15k back
My mother died last year and I have been settling her estate with help from my brother-in-law. It was relatively simple: she had some investments and a mortgage-free house. But it has been time-consuming. Filling in all the paperwork took us an entire day, and we are professionals (he is an accountant and I am a retired judge). Even then we had problems because HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) gave us different information about what tax we should pay. After probate was granted in October, we spoke to two estate agents who estimated that the house was worth £550,000. We told HMRC this was the probate value and we also put it up for sale at that price. Several months later we ended up selling the house for £627,000. We sent a form to HMRC to correct the probate value to the sold price. We then calculated the inheritance tax (IHT) due as roughly £27,800 and immediately paid HMRC to avoid any interest charges. But then HMRC wrote to us to say that we should pay capital gains tax (CGT) instead. We were convinced that this advice was wrong, so we each called HMRC separately, but were both told that we should pay CGT. HMRC then sent a CGT calculation saying we owed £14,965, which we paid. We then asked HMRC to return the IHT payment. Twice we were told that the refund was in progress but that was weeks ago and we still don't have it. After chasing HMRC for a third time we were told that we should have paid IHT after all. It said an IHT calculation would be sent, but we are still waiting for that. We are so confused. We just want to pay the correct tax and get a refund on the other and address supplied I was so sorry to hear how painstaking the probate process had been for your family. It sounded emotionally and practically difficult enough without HMRC adding to your burden by giving you conflicting information. An estate is exempt from IHT on the first £325,000, which increases to £500,000 if the person who has died passes on their main home to children or grandchildren. Married couples and civil partners can leave assets to each other free of tax, and also inherit each other's tax-free allowances. Your father died in March 1990 when the IHT allowance was £118,000. But he had left this amount to you and your sisters on his death, which meant that his tax-free allowance had already been used up and could not be inherited by your mother. The good news is that even though he died before the residence allowance was introduced in 2017, your family could claim this extra £175,000 allowance from his estate because his wife had died after this date (yet another example of how complex the rules are). This meant that up to £675,000 of your mother's estate was free of tax. When her house was sold for £627,000 and combined with other taxable assets in her estate of nearly £117,000, she was put over the tax-free threshold by more than £69,000. IHT is charged at a rate of up to 40 per cent, leaving £27,800 to pay. If a property is sold for a lot more than the estimated value when you inherited it, HMRC might ask questions and expect you to pay extra tax. I spoke to Stefanie Tremain from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg who said that HMRC will usually get the district valuer, which is a government service, to review property valuations in an IHT return. • Will my partner pay tax on the property he inherits from me? Tremain said: 'If the value in the IHT return is accepted, a future sale value should not be queried or cause HMRC to revise the probate value.' But you had applied for a correction, essentially changing the estimated valuation to the price that the property was actually sold for. This meant that technically there had been no increase in the value of the property since you inherited it because you had corrected the value that should be used for the IHT calculation. CGT is charged if you make a profit when you sell a property that isn't your main home. When you inherit a property there is no CGT to pay. It is only when you sell the property at a later date, and it has increased in value since you inherited it, that CGT would be owed. When you changed the value of the property, HMRC was under the impression that the property had increased in value by £77,000 between you inheriting and selling it. After the tax-free allowance of £3,000 and other exemptions, such as estate agent and solicitor fees to sell the property, were deducted, CGT was charged at a rate of 24 per cent on the rest of the gain. Tremain said: 'If you have corrected the IHT return to increase the probate value of the house then you have increased the estate's IHT liability. But as a result you have effectively wiped out the CGT liability.' So in other words, CGT didn't apply to you. It sounds as though there was some confusion during those conversations with HMRC that caused it to believe that you needed to pay CGT rather than IHT, which wasn't right. The fact that even HMRC manages to get things like this wrong tells you everything you need to know about how complicated our tax system is. After my involvement HMRC spoke to you to apologise for giving you incorrect advice and has finally refunded the CGT payment of £14,965, plus £63 interest. It also finally sent an IHT calculation showing that you had actually overpaid by £52, which has also been refunded. HMRC said: 'We have apologised and confirmed that CGT was not due.' You said: 'We never thought the problem was a particularly difficult one, but we were getting nowhere and would no doubt still be in limbo without your help.' • How to gift property — your questions answered In March last year my husband and I went on the holiday of a lifetime to Chile. We booked several internal flights through All was going well until we tried to check in for our flight from Patagonia to Santiago. It looked like our flight didn't exist. After logging into the airline's website, we discovered that the flight had been rescheduled and we had been reallocated to a flight for the previous day, so we had unknowingly missed it. There was no way we could have caught that flight as we had been hiking in a remote location. told me that it had sent me an email about the change but I have searched my inbox, including my junk folder, and I can't find any evidence that it contacted me about this. We were incredibly stressed when we found out. We were in a remote part of Chile where transport options are limited, so we felt pretty stranded. also wasn't particularly helpful in finding us alternative arrangements, so we requested a refund of £377.91 for the flight we missed. We managed to book a flight for the next day with a different airline for £583.80. Given that failed to tell us about the flight change, we think it should reimburse us for our more expensive replacement flight. But a year on, we now have a six-week-old baby but still no refund. We have contacted many times over the past year but are repeatedly told that it won't refund us until they receive it from the airline. While we have been told the matter has been escalated, we have seen no evidence of address supplied A year is a long time and much can happen, so much so that you had welcomed a new family member, and yet there was no sign of your refund. has a partnership with the travel agent Gotogate which arranges flights. When I spoke to Gotogate's parent company, Etraveli Group, it claimed it had emailed you on February 20 last year to tell you that your flight was leaving a day earlier than planned. I couldn't get to the bottom of why you didn't get that message. Etraveli Group said: 'While we acknowledge the customer's claim that she did not see this message, and understand the stress and consequences this situation caused, the communication was sent and delivered correctly from our end.' • Cancelled flight fiasco on has cost me £3,600 While it did request a refund from the airline, usually when a customer misses a flight the ticket is seen as 'used'. I suspected this was why a refund from the airline wasn't forthcoming. But thankfully after I explained the situation to the airline, it sent a refund of £346.99 to which it then passed on to you. It was odd that you were missing the remaining £30.92 which you had paid for checked-in bags, and it was only after I chased all three companies that you got this payment. said: 'We can see that the airline made a schedule change which is not uncommon in the aviation industry. Our partner, Etraveli Group, informed the customer of the change and provided options to accept the new flight or request a full refund.' As a gesture of goodwill, has given you £189 travel credit to make up for the extra cost of the replacement flight. While this left a shortfall of nearly £17, you were satisfied with this. • £1,495,607 — the amount Your Money Matters has saved readers so far this year If you have a money problem you would like Katherine Denham to investigate, email yourmoneymatters@ Please include a phone number
