NFLPA executive committee strongly preferred David White to Lloyd Howell
During the process that resulted in Howell being hired, the union was ridiculously secretive. No one knew who the candidates were, including the dues-paying members of the union. The board of player representatives, who had the power to vote on the next executive director, didn't know until they showed up for the meeting.
Now that Lloyd's two-year stint with the union has gone as well as Thurston's three-hour tour on the Minnow, those who refused to say anything about the process are saying plenty.
It started on Sunday afternoon, with the surprise resignation of former NFLPA president and then-NFLPA chief strategy officer JC Tretter via a lengthy interview with Jonathan Jones of CBSSports.com. From the article: 'For the first time, Tretter now reveals that Howell was not the executive committee's top choice. In a straw poll conducted prior to the candidates being presented, the committee voted 10-1 in favor of [David] White over Howell. Members of the committee did not share their preference with the board.'
It's the 'first time' it was revealed because Tretter previously refused to reveal anything. Now that the mop is out for the cleanup on Aisle Howell, Tretter's revelation has a distinct 'don't blame me' vibe to it.
And there's more. Tretter also told Jones that Tretter wasn't the one from the executive committee who voted for Howell. Tretter said he preferred White, because White had labor experience. Howell had none.
'So the idea that I was jamming anybody through was false,' Tretter said.
Making the 10-1 issue even more strange is the fact that, hours after Tretter's on-the-record quotes emerged, the Washington Post reported the same facts as if they were previously unknown, attributing the information to unnamed sources. But Tretter had already said it with his name on it; that fact wasn't mentioned in the lengthy item from the Post.
Regardless, here's the message from Tretter and whoever told the same information to the Post: Don't blame the executive committee for Howell. We wanted the other guy, but the voters never asked for our opinion.
That point was underscored by an 'unnamed union source' to Jones and sprinkled into the Tretter interview: 'Maybe [the executive committee] should have given them a recommendation instead of giving the board a binder of information that they won't read, while they golf and drink, to make a decision.'
It's hard not to wonder whether the unnamed union source is the same guy who was on the record throughout the article. Routinely, people who are being interviewed will say that certain things are off the record. If those off-the-record comments make it into the final article, they get attributed to an unnamed source.
Whether it was or wasn't Tretter, the broader points are these: (1) Tretter seems to be trying to distance himself from the hiring of Howell; and (2) Tretter seems to be blaming the player representatives for picking the wrong guy.
There's one last point to make. Given the possibility if not likelihood that Howell resigned because he knew ESPN was about to report on the strip-club expense-report misadventure, it's also possible that Tretter caught wind that the Post would be dropping something about Howell's hiring on Sunday night or Monday morning. Tretter possibly decided to force the issue by preemptively handing to Jones the '10-1" wrinkle that became the first topic of the Post story — and which has been the subject of at least five tweets from the reporter who wrote it.
To put it as simply as possible, if Tretter knew the Post would be reporting that the executive committee overwhelmingly supported White over Howell and that Tretter, as NFLPA president at the time, didn't convey that information to the players who voted, Tretter may have concluded that he had no chance of becoming the interim executive director.
Which made it the perfect time to declare victory and retreat. After, of course, scooping the Post by handing the biggest news nugget in its story to CBS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
16 hours ago
- Boston Globe
Wu has boosted Boston neighborhoods. But downtown still struggles with post-COVID blues.
The impact of Wu's strategy can be felt on last year far surpassed 2019 levels, according to credit-card data tracked by the Boston Planning & Development Agency. To many small business owners in these thriving districts, City Hall's influence made a crucial difference during the pandemic and the rocky years that followed. Advertisement 'The city of Boston has provided me, provided our restaurant, with the help to stay open,' said Fernando Rosas, owner of Bono, a Latin American restaurant and caterer in East Boston. 'Without that help, I don't think we would be open.' Advertisement In January, city officials held a ribbon cutting at Jadu, a new cafe in Jamaica Plain that received a city storefront grant and was one of the first businesses to receive one of the new 225 liquor licenses the state created for Boston. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff But that same BPDA research also highlights the downsides of Wu's approach. small businesses that remain say they're struggling to survive. 'We are fighting for customers,' said Julie King, co-owner of Villa Mexico Cafe on Of course, much of this stark reversal of fortune is spurred by economic forces beyond any big city mayor's control. The post-COVID shift toward hybrid work has buildings near King's restaurant — have decamped from downtown entirely. That has created an emptier central business district. While foot traffic has improved since 2020, Related : Advertisement And it's not just downtown retailers that feel the impact. High vacancy rates are because commercial property tax, much of it from downtown, fuels a lion's share of the city's $4.8 billion budget. Indeed, the city's third ward, a slice of downtown that includes the Financial District, has a taxable real estate value of $43.7 billion, according to the Boston Municipal Research Bureau, while properties in Jamaica Plain and Roslindale together are valued at $6.6 billion. So when it comes to the city's budget, even small declines downtown can have big implications. Business leaders have criticized Wu for not using her bully pulpit — as some other big-city mayors have — to prod employers to bring workers back to the office. And even as the Fernando Rosas is the owner of Bono Restaurant and Catering in East Boston. Suzanne Kreiter/Globe Staff Still, Wu notes, major companies have continued to come to Boston, such as 'You can't have one without the other, especially today when office buildings don't exist on their own as magnets for activity,' Wu added. 'When we make every neighborhood a destination, when we make every neighborhood exciting and safe and activated, that also means that residents, people, employees are staying in Boston." Advertisement Mayoral challenger Josh Kraft hasn't released a plan for small business or for downtown, but has said he wants to make Boston more business-friendly in general and that Boston is hardly alone in the struggle to revive its downtown, cities from Washington to San Francisco are wrestling with similar trends. And shops and restaurants outside commercial cores of cities are flourishing everywhere, observed Jesse Baerkahn, president of Graffito SP, a Boston real estate advisory firm. 'People are shopping and dining less near where they work than where they live,' he said. 'From a community economic development to retail real estate ... there's really just one thing you need — which is human beings.' Yet at the same time Wu is trying to boost small businesses in residential neighborhoods, she is also trying to spur more people to live downtown. The city closed down Summer Street downtown for a "Boston Blooms" event to celebrate spring and a lull in the COVID-19 pandemic in April 2022. Lane Turner/Globe Staff In 2023, the city began offering 'It's just a question of how realistic is it to bring that idea to scale. Is there enough demand?' said Poftak. 'Can you do it quickly enough to make a difference?' Wu has also stepped up events that aim to to bring people downtown, from Advertisement Those have helped boost foot traffic at Boston Public Market, which houses about 30 vendors on Congress Street near City Hall Plaza. The market draws about 1.7 million visitors a year, said Boston Public Market CEO Cheryl Cronin, but that's still down 25 percent from before the pandemic. 'This is what everyone downtown needs to bear in mind,' Cronin said. 'You need to work harder to get the same people here.' The nonprofit market has weathered the downturn, Cronin said, thanks largely to state funding and philanthropy. But downtown business owners don't have that kind of safety net. General manager Elias Khoury at Pita Thyme in downtown Boston. David L Ryan/ Globe Staff Pita Thyme, Business has improved slightly year over year, Khoury said, but is still down 40 percent compared to before the pandemic. He doesn't think Wu can do much to convince more workers to return to office, but she could make the area safer and cleaner. Khoury points to how a nearby restaurant that shuttered months ago was broken into recently, and had to be boarded up. When he gets in at 6 a.m. to prep food, he often finds homeless people sleeping in stoops and stairwells. 'Let's say I own a company and I want to move into Boston, and I come and see that in the morning. It's just makes you think twice,' said Khoury. Advertisement A homeless person slept in the doorway at the shuttered 2Twenty2 bar on the corner of Liberty Square and Water Street. David L Ryan/ Globe Staff Yet in business districts that ring downtown, the optimism is palpable, despite broader headwinds such as inflation and tariffs. At Latino Beauty Salon in Egleston Square, owner Rosana Rivera said she's busier than ever. Her client base has doubled since she got a Rivera bought new furniture and invested in other upgrades that she believes attracted new customers. Noting that before the mayor got into politics, Wu had opened her own tea shop, Rivera said, 'She knows what it's like to have a business.' In Jamaica Plain, restaurants such as Tres Gatos, Casa Verde, and The Haven have expanded and seen their businesses grow since the pandemic. Meanwhile, new spots are opening, like coffee and wine bar Even Jason Waddleton, owner of the Scottish pub The Haven, plans to offer a gameday shuttle to the stadium in Franklin Park, just 1 mile away. 'I anticipate us being a hub for supporters,' said Waddleton. 'I want to get that same vibe pre-game that you see in European cities.' And up in East Boston, Rosas is hopeful, too. He first Business has been good, Rosas said, though on days there are immigration raids customers stay home. More than anything, he's bullish about the future of East Boston. 'I imagine East Boston in 10 years it's going to become the new, probably Back Bay,' said Rosas. 'You're closer to the city, you have a train. You still can find the same amenities in a condo here that you probably have in the Back Bay at a much lower price.' People played soccer at LoPresti Park in East Boston. Craig F. Walker/Globe Staff Shirley Leung is a Business columnist. She can be reached at
UPI
17 hours ago
- UPI
Board recommends White House official Jeffery Clark be disbarred
Aug. 1 (UPI) -- An attorney disciplinary board is recommending White House official Jeffrey Clark be stripped of his Washington, D.C., law license over his involvement in efforts to overturn the 2020 election for President Donald Trump. A majority of the nine-member Washington, D.C., Board on Professional Responsibility recommended Clark be disbarred on Thursday, stating Clark "was prepared to cause the Justice Department to tell a lie about the status of its investigation" into the 2020 general election. "Lawyers cannot advocate for any outcome based on false statements, and they certainly cannot urge others to do so," the panel said. "Respondent persistently and energetically sought to do just that on an important national issue. He should be disbarred as a consequence and to send a message to the rest of the Bar and to the public that this behavior will not be tolerated." Of the nine members, seven voted for Clark to be disbarred, while two recommended he be suspended for three years and required prove his fitness to practice prior to reinstatement. The D.C. Court of Appeals will have the final say in the matter. "The fight continues," Clark said in response to the ruling on X. Clark is the acting administrator of the White House Office of Management and Budget's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, but was previously acting assistant head of the Justice Department's Civil Division during Trump's first term and a supporter of his boss' false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. The letter at the center of the ruling is one that Clark drafted in late December 2020, after Trump lost the general election to then-Democratic candidate Joe Biden. In the letter to Georgia officials, he said the Justice Department had "significant concerns" about the state's election, despite the federal department being aware of zero issues. The letter recommended that Georgia's governor call the state's legislature into special session to consider replacing electors that supported Biden with those that were in favor of Trump -- a plot that is now widely referred to as the fake electors scheme. After being warned against sending the letter by two superiors, Clark, whose job at the Justice Department was not involved in elections, continued to advocate for it to be sent. Trump also considered replacing then-Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen with Clark but later declined to name him head of the department after being informed that doing so would ignite mass resignations.
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Elon Musk gives millions to Republican super PACs ahead of the midterms
Billionaire Elon Musk may be gone from President Donald Trump's White House, but he's not done with Republican politics. Musk made a pair of $5 million donations on June 27 to the main super PACs backing House and Senate Republicans. That made Musk the largest individual donor to both groups in the first six months of 2025, according to new campaign finance reports filed Thursday. The new contributions are further proof of how Musk can make a big splash in politics by putting his signature on just one check. And they raise the question of how much more there might be before the midterms, despite Musk's messy post-White House breakup with Trump and his statements about starting a third party in July, after the donation. Musk's June 27 donations supporting Senate Leadership Fund and Congressional Leadership Fund, the two GOP super PACs, came about a month after leaving his official post as an adviser to Trump and days before he began publicly discussing the idea of starting a new political party. Meanwhile, other new campaign finance reports show Musk pumped $45.3 million into his own super PAC in the first six months of this year. The tech billionaire gave nearly $17.9 million directly to the group and sent another $27.4 million in in-kind contributions, with Musk covering funds for million-dollar prizes to voters who signed petitions. America PAC spent $47.3 million in the first six months of the year, including $15.5 million through the first week of April, when the group was heavily involved in the April 1 elections for the Wisconsin state Supreme Court and special House elections in Florida. The group reported spending $6 million on canvassing and field operations, as well as a few million dollars on digital ads, mailers and phone calls. The full scope of Musk's giving in the first half of 2025 isn't clear yet — super PACs will continue filing fundraising reports with the Federal Election Commission Thursday ahead of a midnight filing deadline, and many other groups involved in politics never have to disclose their donors. Musk spent approximately a quarter-billion dollars in the 2024 election, giving largely in support of Trump's campaign. Thursday's America PAC filing covers fundraising and spending from January 1 through June 30. It's unclear whether Musk used his super PAC for anything related to his July pledge to start a new political party, which came after the period covered by the new report. Musk spent about five months in the White House as an adviser to Trump and the public face of the president's 'Department of Government Efficiency' initiative. But he's had a rocky relationship with Trump since the final days of his official tenure, repeatedly criticizing the White House's signature tax cut and spending bill and even attacking Trump for his past personal ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
