Ontario officially cancels Starlink contract, won't say how much that cost taxpayers
Energy and Mines Minister Stephen Lecce did not answer numerous questions Wednesday about the kill fee the province will have to pay Elon Musk's SpaceX.
"I can confirm we've cancelled the contract at this point, and we look forward to bringing forth alternatives to the people of Ontario so we can get people connected," Lecce said at an unrelated press conference.
Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma announced the deal last year to deliver high-speed internet to 15,000 residents in rural and northern Ontario.
The deal, which was set to go live in June, would have covered hardware and installation costs but not monthly fees.
It would have also included Starlink access for remote First Nations, after a promising test run in 2020 in Pinkangikum First Nation saw high-speed internet working within 15 minutes of hardware delivery.
SpaceX won the contract after a "robust and transparent and competitive and fair technical and financial evaluation of multiple qualified parties," Michael Lindsay, the former CEO of Infrastructure Ontario, said last year.
Ontario Premier Doug Ford threatened to cancel the contract in February if U.S. tariffs on Canadian goods were imposed. He killed the deal in March when U.S. President Donald Trump moved ahead with tariffs.
"It's done, it's gone," Ford said at the time. "We won't award contracts to people who enable and encourage economic attacks on our province ... and our country."
Musk supported Trump's bid to become president and was brought into Trump's inner circle after his inauguration in January.
Not long after that, Musk glommed on to Trump's threats to annex Canada.
In February, a petition signed by several hundred thousand Canadians demanded the federal government remove Musk's Canadian citizenship. Musk became a Canadian citizen because his mother was born in Canada.
"Canada is not a real country," Musk posted on X at the time.
Musk and Trump have since fallen out of favour with one another.
Ford's cancellation of the deal came as part of a suite of measures in retaliation to Trump's tariffs.
He pulled American booze off the shelves of Liquor Control Board of Ontario stores in March and has said the U.S. booze ban will be kept in place until Trump removes his tariffs on Canada.
Ford also banned American companies from bidding on $30 billion worth of procurement contracts the province awards each year.
He also banned U.S. companies from bidding on contracts related to his $200-billion infrastructure plan to build highways, tunnels, transit, hospitals and jails.
"We are standing up for Canada," Lecce said Wednesday.
Ford should have secured an internet deal by now for those in northern and rural Ontario, said New Democrat and Official Opposition Leader Marit Stiles
"What is the premier's plan to deliver on this promise to Ontarians? Handing over hard-earned tax dollars to Elon Musk's company was never the right approach," she said.
"Months have passed and we still don't have a plan or even a process that's calling for home-grown solutions."
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 30, 2025.
Liam Casey, The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Top Dividend ETF I Can't Wait to Buy More of in August
Key Points The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF holds 100 top dividend stocks. The fund offers a blend of yield and income. It has produced strong total returns over the long term. 10 stocks we like better than Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF › Dividend stocks are powerful investments. They've outperformed nonpayers by more than two to one over the past 50 years. The strongest results come from companies that steadily increase their dividend payments. They've delivered a 10.2% average annualized return, according to Ned Davis Research and Hartford Funds. Invest in Gold American Hartford Gold: #1 Precious Metals Dealer in the Nation Priority Gold: Up to $15k in Free Silver + Zero Account Fees on Qualifying Purchase Thor Metals Group: Best Overall Gold IRA One of the easiest ways to capitalize on this powerful total return potential is to invest in an exchange-traded fund (ETF) that focuses on dividend-paying stocks, such as the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (NYSEMKT: SCHD). Here's why I can't wait to buy more shares of this top dividend ETF this August. High-quality, high-yielding dividend stocks The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF employs a straightforward strategy to invest in dividend-paying stocks. Its goal is to closely track the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. That index aims to measure the performance of 100 top high-quality, high-yielding U.S. dividend stocks. It tracks companies that have consistent records of growing their dividends and strong financial profiles. The index screens for companies based on four dividend quality factors: Cash flow to total debt Return on equity Indicated dividend yield Five-year dividend growth rate These characteristics allow these companies to pay stable, rising dividends. At its annual reconstitution last March, the index's 100 holdings had an average dividend yield of 3.8%, and had increased their payouts at an average annual rate of 8.4% over the past five years. This blend of yield and growth positions the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF to deliver attractive total returns in the future. Cream of the dividend crop The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF is a who's who list of top-tier dividend stocks. Chevron (NYSE: CVX) currently clocks in as its top holding at 4.4% of its net assets. The oil giant has a 4.5% dividend yield, several times higher than the S&P 500's (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) 1.2% yield, and has increased its dividend for 38 consecutive years (and by a peer-leading pace over the past decade). That spans multiple commodity price cycles, demonstrating the durability of its dividend. The oil company backs its high-yielding payout with the lowest production costs in the sector and one of its strongest balance sheets. Meanwhile, it has plenty of fuel to grow its dividend after closing its needle-moving Hess acquisition, which enhances and extends its growth outlook into the 2030s. PepsiCo (NASDAQ: PEP) is another top holding, at 4.2% of the fund's assets. The beverage and snacking giant currently has a 4% dividend yield. It raised its payment by 5% earlier this year, extending its growth streak to 53 years in a row. That keeps it in the elite group of Dividend Kings. The growing demand for its iconic brands, combined with acquisitions such as its recent deal for healthier soda brand Poppi, should support continued dividend growth. Strong returns SCHD's portfolio of high-quality, high-yielding dividend stocks has delivered strong returns for investors. The fund has paid a steadily rising dividend as the companies it holds increase their payouts: The fund's high-yielding and steadily rising payout has really added to its returns over the years. The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF has delivered double-digit annualized total returns over the past five- and 10-year periods, producing an 11.5% annualized total return since its inception in late 2011. The ETF currently offers investors a dividend yield of around 3.8% -- more than three times higher than the S&P 500. This should provide a strong and growing base return as its holdings increase their dividend payments. Meanwhile, growing earnings from the fund's companies should support continued growth in the fund's value. A top-tier dividend ETF The Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF holds 100 of the best dividend-paying stocks in the country. These companies pay high-yielding and steadily rising dividends supported by high-quality financial profiles. These features put the fund in a strong position to continue delivering robust returns for investors. That's why I can't wait to buy more shares this month. Should you invest $1,000 in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF right now? Before you buy stock in Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $625,254!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,090,257!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,036% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 181% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Matt DiLallo has positions in Chevron, PepsiCo, and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Chevron. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Top Dividend ETF I Can't Wait to Buy More of in August was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
CNN
13 minutes ago
- CNN
A viable Palestinian state remains far off, despite growing international clamor
First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada. Three of the world's most powerful Western nations have added their economic and geopolitical clout to calls for a Palestinian state, an idea already endorsed by more than 140 other countries. The moves have many motives, from a sense of frustration with Israel, to domestic pressure, to outrage over the images of starving Palestinians. Whatever the reason, Palestinians have welcomed the announcements as a boost for their cause. The Israeli government has rejected the calls, describing them as tantamount to rewarding terrorism. US President Donald Trump meanwhile seems increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly over the starvation in Gaza that the Israeli leader denies, but has disturbed Trump. Trump wants regional peace, as well as the accolades – namely a Nobel Peace Prize – for making it happen. He wants Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel, expanding the Abraham Accords he cemented between Israel and several other Arab states during his first term. But Riyadh has been firm that this cannot happen without an irreversible path to a Palestinian state. But the latest moves by US allies France, Britain and Canada – while in many ways largely symbolic – have left Washington increasingly isolated over its backing for Israel. Palestinian statehood could help bring an end to a war that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza since Hamas's brutal October 7 attack killed around 1,200 people in Israel almost two years ago, as well as bring home the hostages still being held in Gaza. But one of the toughest challenges is imagining what it looks like, because a modern Palestinian state has never existed before. When Israel was founded in the aftermath of World War II it quickly gained international recognition. That same period, for Palestinians, is remembered as al-Naqba, or 'the catastrophe' – the moment when hundreds of thousands of people fled or were forced from their homes. Since then, Israel has expanded, most significantly during the 'Six Day War' of 1967, when Israel turned the tables on a coalition of Arab states and gained East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. Palestinian territory has meanwhile only shrunk and splintered. The closest to what a future Palestinian state may look like was hashed out in a peace process in the 1990s which came to be known as the Oslo Accords. Roughly speaking, the Palestinian state envisaged in Oslo, agreed to by both Palestinian and Israeli negotiators, would be based on Israel's 1967 borders. The broad outline of Oslo was to have some land trades, a little bit given in one place for the removal of an Israeli settlement, in a negotiated process. The historic handshake on the White House lawn by Israel's then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat hosted by then-US president Bill Clinton remains one of the triumphs of modern diplomacy. Rabin's assassination by a far-right fanatic in 1995 robbed Israel of its peacemaker leader. And while the framework of Oslo lived on in negotiations and academia, there is little initiative now. What was on offer back then is no longer realistic. In recent years, Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank have expanded massively, often with the encouragement of the Israeli government, threatening the chances of creating a contiguous Palestinian state in the region. Then there is the question of who would govern a future Palestinian state. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is distrusted by many Palestinians who view it as weak or corrupt. Even without all these complications, Netanyahu won't accept a Palestinian state, which he has recently claimed would be 'a launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Some members of his cabinet are far more hard-line, not only refusing to countenance an independent state but wanting to annex the territory. These ministers propping up Netanyahu's government have said they would starve Palestinians in Gaza rather than feed them, and would collapse the coalition if he so much as suggested giving in to the growing international pressure on Israel. Netanyahu has shown no intention of backing down, and will wear whatever France, the UK, and any others force on him as a badge of honor. Without a partner in the Israeli government, recognition of a Palestinian state will fall flat, and could even entrench Netanyahu further. It would be a big price to pay if the outcome were Israel making the possibility of a Palestinian state all the more distant. But at the same time, with a growing number of angry ex-partners in the international community who are likely to increase their pressure on Trump to shift his position, it is Israel that may find itself disadvantaged, however strongly it protests.
CNN
15 minutes ago
- CNN
A viable Palestinian state remains far off, despite growing international clamor
The Middle East Israel-Hamas war UK Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow First France, then the United Kingdom, and now Canada. Three of the world's most powerful Western nations have added their economic and geopolitical clout to calls for a Palestinian state, an idea already endorsed by more than 140 other countries. The moves have many motives, from a sense of frustration with Israel, to domestic pressure, to outrage over the images of starving Palestinians. Whatever the reason, Palestinians have welcomed the announcements as a boost for their cause. The Israeli government has rejected the calls, describing them as tantamount to rewarding terrorism. US President Donald Trump meanwhile seems increasingly frustrated with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, particularly over the starvation in Gaza that the Israeli leader denies, but has disturbed Trump. Trump wants regional peace, as well as the accolades – namely a Nobel Peace Prize – for making it happen. He wants Saudi Arabia to normalize relations with Israel, expanding the Abraham Accords he cemented between Israel and several other Arab states during his first term. But Riyadh has been firm that this cannot happen without an irreversible path to a Palestinian state. But the latest moves by US allies France, Britain and Canada – while in many ways largely symbolic – have left Washington increasingly isolated over its backing for Israel. Palestinian statehood could help bring an end to a war that has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza since Hamas's brutal October 7 attack killed around 1,200 people in Israel almost two years ago, as well as bring home the hostages still being held in Gaza. But one of the toughest challenges is imagining what it looks like, because a modern Palestinian state has never existed before. When Israel was founded in the aftermath of World War II it quickly gained international recognition. That same period, for Palestinians, is remembered as al-Naqba, or 'the catastrophe' – the moment when hundreds of thousands of people fled or were forced from their homes. Since then, Israel has expanded, most significantly during the 'Six Day War' of 1967, when Israel turned the tables on a coalition of Arab states and gained East Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza. Palestinian territory has meanwhile only shrunk and splintered. The closest to what a future Palestinian state may look like was hashed out in a peace process in the 1990s which came to be known as the Oslo Accords. Roughly speaking, the Palestinian state envisaged in Oslo, agreed to by both Palestinian and Israeli negotiators, would be based on Israel's 1967 borders. The broad outline of Oslo was to have some land trades, a little bit given in one place for the removal of an Israeli settlement, in a negotiated process. The historic handshake on the White House lawn by Israel's then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat hosted by then-US president Bill Clinton remains one of the triumphs of modern diplomacy. Rabin's assassination by a far-right fanatic in 1995 robbed Israel of its peacemaker leader. And while the framework of Oslo lived on in negotiations and academia, there is little initiative now. What was on offer back then is no longer realistic. In recent years, Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank have expanded massively, often with the encouragement of the Israeli government, threatening the chances of creating a contiguous Palestinian state in the region. Then there is the question of who would govern a future Palestinian state. The Palestinian Authority, which governs parts of the West Bank, is distrusted by many Palestinians who view it as weak or corrupt. Even without all these complications, Netanyahu won't accept a Palestinian state, which he has recently claimed would be 'a launch pad to annihilate Israel.' Some members of his cabinet are far more hard-line, not only refusing to countenance an independent state but wanting to annex the territory. These ministers propping up Netanyahu's government have said they would starve Palestinians in Gaza rather than feed them, and would collapse the coalition if he so much as suggested giving in to the growing international pressure on Israel. Netanyahu has shown no intention of backing down, and will wear whatever France, the UK, and any others force on him as a badge of honor. Without a partner in the Israeli government, recognition of a Palestinian state will fall flat, and could even entrench Netanyahu further. It would be a big price to pay if the outcome were Israel making the possibility of a Palestinian state all the more distant. But at the same time, with a growing number of angry ex-partners in the international community who are likely to increase their pressure on Trump to shift his position, it is Israel that may find itself disadvantaged, however strongly it protests.
