logo
Break down budget expenses, Government told

Break down budget expenses, Government told

Daily Express19 hours ago
Published on: Wednesday, July 09, 2025
Published on: Wed, Jul 09, 2025
By: Sisca Humphrey Text Size: 'Is this another case of political interference over contracts? If that's what's happening here, then the public is being short-changed,' Darrell said. Kota Kinabalu: The State Government must explain how it plans to spend the mid-year supplementary budget, especially when longstanding issues remain unresolved, said Moyog Assemblyman Datuk Darell Leiking. He said the revised allocation under the Chief Minister's Office for temporary Community Development Leader Unit (UPPM) appointments amounts to RM24 million, an increase of RM13 million from the previous figure. 'That's a lot of money, and it needs to be justified in writing,' he said when debating the Supplementary Supply Bill 2025 tabled by State Finance Minister Datuk Seri Masidi Manjun at the State Legislative Assembly. He directed sharper criticism at the State's water supply problems, pointing to the Telibong II Water Treatment Plant as a key example. 'Although the plant was reportedly completed two or three years ago, the contract for the piping works was only issued last year and they are still ongoing. 'That means the water crisis isn't due to infrastructure limitations, but administrative delays,' he said. 'Ordinary people are the ones left dealing with the consequences.' He suggested the delays might stem from internal disputes, comparing the situation to the stalled Pan Borneo Highway project where contract and political issues were widely blamed. 'Is this another case of political interference over contracts? If that's what's happening here, then the public is being short-changed,' Darrell said. He also raised concern over the RM5.87 million allocation for official air transport for the Head of State and Chief Minister. Instead of relying on State-funded flights, he said the Government should opt for more economical alternatives, citing his experience as former Minister of International Trade and Industry (Miti). 'I used travel warrants and credit cards. We booked online and saved tens of thousands on each trip,' he said. He noted that business class flights from Kuala Lumpur to London could cost up to RM50,000 through official channels, while online bookings could bring the cost down to RM15,000 or less. 'This is not about comfort, it's about responsibility,' he said. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The silence of 'digital bystanders' amplifies hate online
The silence of 'digital bystanders' amplifies hate online

New Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • New Straits Times

The silence of 'digital bystanders' amplifies hate online

IN my work at the intersection of content regulation and media ethics, I've come to believe that the most dangerous element in an online space is not always the person posting hateful content. It's the silence that surrounds it. To the algorithms curating our online experiences, silence on harmful content suggests engagement or approval. No reports, no objections, no friction? It must be fine. And to people within those digital communities, silence can feel like social permission. If no one's saying anything, maybe it isn't that bad. Maybe it's even true. This is how hate gets normalised — not with a bang, but with a shrug. The phenomenon is known as the digital version of the bystander effect — where the more people witness harm, the less likely any one person is to intervene. Online, that passivity is multiplied and masked by anonymity. Research shows that in extremist chat groups, more than 80 per cent of users never post anything themselves. They don't initiate hate, but they're there — watching, clicking, sharing. In doing so, they help keep those ecosystems alive. In Malaysia, research by The Southeast Asia Regional Centre for Counter-Terrorism has found that radical content spreads fastest not on public platforms, but in private or semi-private spaces — unmoderated Telegram groups, closed chat rooms and fringe forums. These aren't necessarily echo chambers of hardened extremists. They're often filled with regular people; friends, colleagues, acquaintances who may disagree with what they see, but stay silent nonetheless. It's no surprise then that many countries have turned to deplatforming as a response. Takedowns, content moderation, algorithm tweaks — essential tools in any regulatory arsenal. But they're not silver bullets. And, without thoughtful communication, they can backfire. Remove extremist content too swiftly, and its creators are recast as martyrs. Ban a channel without explanation, and you leave behind a vacuum that quickly fills with conspiracy theories. Kick bad actors off a platform, they don't disappear — they just migrate to more opaque, harder-to-monitor spaces. Simply removing content doesn't remove its influence. This is where counterspeech becomes not just useful, but necessary. Counterspeech means responding to harmful content with facts, empathy, questions or alternative narratives. It works best when it's fast, authentic and comes from peers, not just authorities. The idea is not to out-shout hate, but to interrupt it — early, calmly and effectively. And there's data to back it up. In Sri Lanka, a PeaceTech Lab pilot found that engagement with hate content dropped by 46 per cent when counterspeech was introduced early. In Germany, civic volunteers who replied to hateful YouTube comments within the first hour helped reduce hate-driven threads by 17 per cent. These aren't massive interventions. They're small, consistent disruptions, and they matter. At the Content Forum, we're building on this idea in many of our initiatives — from suicide content guidelines to training with influencers, and in ongoing efforts to educate children and parents about digital friction and media literacy. The goal is to give more people the tools and confidence to speak up before harm escalates. Still, the question remains: why don't more people do it? In every training I run, I hear the same three reasons: "I don't want to be attacked", "It's not my place", and "It won't make a difference". Truth is, counterspeech doesn't require you to win the argument. You don't need to craft the perfect reply or go viral with your response. You just need to say something. Even a simple, "Are we sure this is okay?" is enough to interrupt the flow. It breaks the momentum. It breaches the echo chamber, and often, that's all it takes. Whether we realise it or not, silence online isn't just abstinence — it's influence. It tells the algorithm: this is fine. It tells the community: no one minds. It tells the extremist: no one will stop you. But that doesn't have to be the message we keep sending. If harmful beliefs thrive in silence, then perhaps disruption begins not with noise or outrage, but with clarity, courage and consistency. We don't need everyone to be loud, social media is loud enough as it is! We just need more people to stop being quiet.

Ukraine detains Chinese father and son for alleged espionage
Ukraine detains Chinese father and son for alleged espionage

The Star

time8 hours ago

  • The Star

Ukraine detains Chinese father and son for alleged espionage

BU officers detain one of the Chinese nationals in Kyiv on suspicion of espionage related to Ukraine's Neptune missile technology. Photo published on July 9, 2025. - Photo: SBU/Telegram KYIV, (Ukraine): Ukraine's SBU security service said Wednesday (July 9) it had detained a Chinese father and his son who had allegedly tried to smuggle navy missile technology out of the war-torn country. Relations between Kyiv and Beijing, a key Russian ally, are strained. Ukraine and the West accuse China of enabling the Russian invasion through trade and of supplying technology, including for deadly drone attacks. Ukraine also says dozens of Chinese citizens have been recruited by Russia's army and sent to fight. The SBU "detained two citizens of the People's Republic of China in Kyiv who were attempting to illegally export secret documentation on the Ukrainian RK-360MC Neptune missile system to China," the agency said in a statement. The son is a 24-year-old former student of a technical university in Kyiv, it said, adding that the father, who lives in China, had travelled to Ukraine to coordinate his son's "espionage activities". If convicted, they face up to 15 years in prison on espionage charges. Kyiv used the anti-ship Neptune missile to destroy the flagship of Russia's Black Sea Fleet, Moskva, in the early days of the more than three-year war. In April, Ukraine's military captured two Chinese nationals and said it had details of dozens more who were fighting for the Russian army. Beijing rejected the allegations that its citizens were being recruited en masse to fight for Russia as groundless and irresponsible. Moscow and Beijing struck a "no limits" partnership on the eve of Russia's February 2022 invasion, and have since deepened political, military and economic cooperation. - AFP

Sabah passes landmark climate change, carbon bill
Sabah passes landmark climate change, carbon bill

Free Malaysia Today

time8 hours ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Sabah passes landmark climate change, carbon bill

The law passed by the state assembly was designed to safeguard Sabah's status as a 'net carbon sink'. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : The Sabah state assembly has passed the Climate Change and Carbon Governance Enactment 2025, a landmark law aimed at strengthening the state's position as a leader in environmental protection and climate resilience. Assistant minister to the chief minister Abidin Madingkir said the law was designed to safeguard Sabah's status as a 'net carbon sink', one of the few places in the world that absorbs more carbon than it emits. 'This is a strategic economic asset,' he was quoted by the Daily Express as saying. 'We must protect it through sound governance or risk losing our environmental advantage.' Sabah accounts for 36% of Malaysia's total carbon sequestration. He added that while Sabah holds a natural edge in absorbing carbon, it is also one of the most climate-vulnerable regions in Malaysia. The law aims to establish a comprehensive carbon governance framework, promote inclusive climate action, and ensure that the benefits of climate initiatives are distributed to all Sabahans. Abidin said that realising the goals of the enactment would require investment, capacity-building, and cooperation at all levels.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store