Royal Navy shadows Russian warships through Channel
Type 23 frigate HMS Somerset and minehunter HMS Cattistock, supported by RFA Tidesurge and naval helicopters, were involved in the operation to follow the vessels as they returned from Syria.
The Russian ships included destroyer RFN Severomorsk, landing ship RFN Alexander Shabalin and two transport ships, MV Sparta IV and MV Siyanie Severa.
A spokesman for the Royal Navy said: 'As the Russian ships sailed east through the Channel and the North Sea towards the Baltic Sea, the Royal Navy ships deployed powerful sensors and launched the Merlin and Wildcat helicopters to report on every move.'
Luke Pollard, the defence minister, said: 'Russia should be in no doubt that the UK will defend our waters. I'm grateful to all the personnel who shadowed this Russian convoy.
'National security is a foundation of the Government's plan for change and ensuring freedom of navigation contributes to our economy.'
Commander Joel Roberts, commanding officer of HMS Somerset, said: 'Over the last few days HMS Somerset has escorted Russian ships through UK waters in resolute support to our national priorities.
'As ever, the ship's company have shown great professionalism whilst conducting the operation that involved the integration and coordination of other ships, helicopters and maritime patrol aircraft, including those from our Nato allies.
'There is strength in a coordinated Nato response, and our unity and ability to deliver integration of air and maritime operations remain some of our greatest assets.'
The operation was the third time in six weeks that the Royal Navy has shadowed Russian task groups returning from Syria.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Labour's border chaos is fuelling public fury and fear as dangerous foreign offenders vanish into thin air
Labour's not smashing it IT is little more than a year since Labour came to power promising to smash the people-smuggling gangs. Instead they have smashed the economy — with inflation up, unemployment up and business confidence at a record low. The only significant growth is in the number of illegal migrants coming here in small boats. Already over 25,000 have arrived this year — a 50 per cent rise on the 2024 figure by this stage, which was shocking enough. That number is dwarfed by the UK's astonishing 700,000 population increase in just a year — almost entirely due to legal immigration — which itself is utterly unsustainable. The arrival of thousands of mostly undocumented illegal migrants is symptomatic of just how badly Britain has lost control of its borders. It's not just the millions of pounds it costs taxpayers every day to shower the migrants with handouts and put them up in hotels, nor the fact that so many of them find black market jobs. Most of the arrivals are young men of fighting age — yet the authorities seem to have little idea who they are, even if they end up in court. National emergency We discovered earlier this week that the number of foreign sex offenders and violent criminals in prison in England and Wales is at a record high, and that 40 per cent of people charged with sex attacks in the capital were foreign nationals. Now we learn foreign criminals are simply walking free mid-trial and disappearing under false names because of a dangerous 'disconnect' between prosecutors and immigration enforcement. It is little wonder that people — not least mothers — worry about migrant hotels on their doorsteps, or that protests are growing, or that polls show immigration is the number one issue concerning voters. So what is the Government doing about this national emergency? Reform UK's rising star Laila Cunningham It seems to have no plan, beyond a sketchy one-in-one-out deal with France and setting up a spy unit to track anyone on social media discussing anti-migrant sentiment or two-tier justice. While Britain continues to house soaring numbers of uninvited guests in four-star hotels, America has seen a massive drop in illegal border crossings because tough detention centres and deportations await those who do. President Donald Trump has shown the problem CAN be tackled, if only the political will exists. The Government, which ditched the Rwanda scheme — the only viable deterrent — as its first act in power, has shown precious little will so far. It's about time Sir Keir Starmer realised the urgency of the situation... and started taking tough action of his own. 1
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Trump's reckless nuclear performance is high-stakes but low cost
In normal times, this would be an extraordinary, epoch-changing and terror-inducing moment. Not even during the Cold War did a US president publicly move nuclear submarines towards Russian waters. Never before has a US leader chosen to engage in nuclear brinkmanship of this kind. True, the Soviet Union famously triggered a nuclear showdown in 1962 by moving nuclear warheads to within 90 miles of the US shoreline during the Cuban Missile Crisis. For 13 days, the world feared Armageddon. But given Donald Trump 's quixotic style of governing, few are panicking today. A Cuban Missile Crisis Mark II, this quite patently is not. Yet, that does not mean that what the US president has just done is risk-free. He has shifted Washington's nuclear posture towards Russia in a way that none of his predecessors dared, climbing – almost casually – the first rung of the nuclear escalation ladder. Should Vladimir Putin choose to respond in kind, a major crisis could follow. That seems unlikely – a calculation Mr Trump has presumably made. In fact, he appears to be borrowing from the Russian playbook. Putin has long used nuclear posturing as a tool of coercion. During bouts of tension with the West, he has deployed Iskander missiles, capable of firing nuclear warheads, to the exclave of Kaliningrad on the border with Poland, a Nato member. In 2023, he stationed tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus – the first time since the Cold War that Russia has placed nuclear weapons outside its own territory. He has also repeatedly hinted at using a tactical weapon in Ukraine. And on Friday, Putin announced that Russia had started producing Oreshnik hypersonic intermediate-range missiles, reaffirming plans to deploy them to Belarus this year. He boasted he had already selected sites for their deployment. In recent days, Dmitry Medvedev, the former Russian president and now Putin's social media attack dog, who has previously rattled the nuclear sabre, warned that Mr Trump's threats could spark war between the US and Russia. Mr Trump, who has recently tempered his admiration of Putin, made it clear that he was calling Russia's bluff. In so many words, he told Moscow he was taking its threats literally rather than figuratively – an inversion of the advice his supporters usually give about him. He wrote in a social media post directed at Mr Medvedev: 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences.' Mr Trump's threat is therefore best seen as performance – high-stakes, reckless performance, but performance all the same. Other motives may be at play. In the coming days, the US president will have to unveil how he intends to counter Russia's continuing aggression in Ukraine, underscored on Friday after an attack on Kyiv killed 31 people. Secondary sanctions on countries buying Russian energy – chiefly China, India, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates – pose a major diplomatic headache. Should Mr Trump choose to retreat on these threats, he can point to the submarine deployment as proof he is serious about Russia – a strategy whose stakes are higher but costs potentially much lower than escalating tariffs on allies Washington needs for goodwill in other arenas.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
WW3 fears as Vladimir Putin is trying to 'justify a Russia war with NATO'
Vladimir Putin could have NATO member states in his sights as he aims to rebuild the old Russian Empire and justify expanding its borders beyond where they are currently World War 3 fears continue to mount as Russian President Vladimir Putin could attempt to justify a war with NATO, experts have warned. Amid the ongoing war in Ukraine, Moscow "continues to promote an informal state ideology centred on Russian nationalism," which officials said "may intend to use in justification of a protracted war in Ukraine and a future conflict against NATO," the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said. The move is designed to "shape and galvanise future generations" in Russia and parts of occupied Ukraine. Kremlin bosses may warn of a future military conflict with the alliance, the ISW added. It comes after Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu 'completely lost it' with angry response to Keir Starmer. It wrote: "The Kremlin seeks to foster national exceptionalism and further isolate Russia from the West, including by portraying the West as the enemy with whom Russia is engaged in an existential conflict." They will use elements from Russian history such as World War 2 which Russians call the "Great Patriotic War." Experts said the Russian government continued to portray the country as being in a "direct geopolitical confrontation with the West in order to generate domestic support for the war in Ukraine and future Russian aggression against NATO." It comes as Russia continues to court Iran, North Korea and China, which constitutes "a growing threat to Western security." The ISW added Russia was "actively pursuing a global anti-Western alliance" and that Moscow's foreign minister Sergey Lavrov wanted to "install an informal sate ideology that perpetuates the idea that the West is in an existential conflict with Russia in order to foster unquestioning support of the Russian government." Foreign analysts have become increasingly concerned about Putin's appetite for war following his invasion of Ukraine and willingness to throw as many Russians into the meat grinder as possible in order to complete its revised war objectives of occupying eastern Ukraine. There are fears he could turn his sights on the Baltic States - made up of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania - in a bid to revise the borders to those of the old Russian Empire. Officials have been "setting informal conditions" to justify potential aggression against Moldova and the Baltic States.
