logo
House cats with bird flu could pose a risk to public health

House cats with bird flu could pose a risk to public health

Yahoo10-02-2025
.
More than 80 domestic cats, among many other types of mammals, have been confirmed to have had bird flu since 2022 -- generally barn cats that lived on dairy farms, as well as feral cats and pets that spend time outdoors and likely caught it by hunting diseased rodents or wild birds.
Now, a small but growing number of house cats have gotten sick from H5N1, the bird flu strain driving the current U.S. outbreak, after eating raw food or drinking unpasteurized milk. Some of those cats died.
The strain of bird flu currently circulating has not adapted to efficiently spread among people. And there have been no known cases of cat-to-human transmission during the current outbreak of H5N1.
Still, there's always been the risk that cats, which are arguably only semi-domesticated, could bring home a disease from a midnight prowl.
MORE: New York shuts down live poultry markets after bird flu detected
"Companion animals, and especially cats, are 100% a public health risk in terms of the risk of zoonotic transmission to people," said virologist Angela Rasmussen, who studies disease progression in emerging viruses at the University of Saskatchewan's Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization.
This is because we snuggle with and sleep in bed with our cats. When we're not looking, cats drink from our water glasses and walk on kitchen counters. So, cat owners should be aware of the ongoing spread of bird flu. "By reducing the risk to your cats, you reduce the risk to yourself," Rasmussen said.
Rasmussen doesn't think pet owners should be afraid their cats will give them bird flu, but said taking precautions is good for pets -- and for public health.
Signs of bird flu in cats include runny nose and discharge around the eyes, explained Michael Q. Bailey, president-elect of the American Veterinary Medical Association.
H5N1 also causes neurological problems like dizziness and seizures, which are symptoms of rabies, too. Rabies is almost always fatal, and it poses a threat to human health, so any animal suspected of having the viral disease must be euthanized. Bailey encourages people to ensure pets are up-to-date on their vaccinations.
Veterinarian Jane Sykes, who specializes in infectious diseases in cats and dogs at the University of California-Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, said people should not assume it's bird flu if their cat is sick -- even if their animal spends time outdoors or eats a raw diet.
Upper-respiratory illnesses are common in cats, while H5N1 is "still pretty rare."
Sykes gives her indoor cat, Freckles, regular kibble exclusively. She told NPR and KFF Health News she has no concerns about Freckles getting H5N1 because the heating process of making dry or canned pet food kills viruses.
Some people feed their pets raw meat or unpasteurized milk because they think it's a more nutritious or natural diet. The American Veterinary Medical Association's website discourages this due to foodborne pathogens like salmonella and listeria, and now the highly pathogenic H5N1.
By keeping pets healthy, veterinarians play an essential role in protecting humans from zoonotic diseases. The American Veterinary Medical Association says the risk of H5N1 spilling over from a pet to a person is "considered extremely low, but not zero."
State and local public health agencies, including those in Los Angeles County and Washington state, have issued similar warnings against raw food diets for pets.
Concerns for human health are partly why the FDA announced last month it is now requiring cat and dog food companies to update their safety plans to protect against bird flu.
MORE: Dairy cows infected with 2nd form of bird flu for 1st time: USDA
This came after the Oregon Department of Agriculture discovered a cat that was "strictly an indoor cat" had contracted H5N1 and died after consuming a frozen turkey product made by the raw pet food brand Northwest Naturals. It stated that "tests confirmed a genetic match between the virus in the raw and frozen pet food and the infected cat."
Northwest Naturals voluntarily recalled that batch of its frozen turkey-based product. The company told KFF Health News and NPR that the recall involved "a small product run" and that it has concerns about the accuracy of the Oregon Agriculture Department's testing.
Los Angeles County's public health department said five cats from two households tested positive for bird flu after drinking unpasteurized raw milk from the Raw Farm dairy in California's Central Valley.
Raw Farm voluntarily recalled its milk and cream after retail products tested positive for H5N1, but it denies any food safety issues, calling the concern "a political issue."
Veterinarians also warn pet owners not to allow cats unsupervised time outside as there's the risk of them getting H5N1 by interacting with other animals that might carry the disease.
"This is a very scary virus, given that it can infect so many different host species," said Bruce Kornreich, director of Cornell University's Feline Health Center.
At least one instance of a cat infecting a person with bird flu occurred in 2016. As NPR reported, a veterinarian in New York City caught the virus after having close contact with infected cats. The vet experienced mild symptoms and quickly recovered.
MORE: As bird flu spreads, what is the risk from eggs and milk?
In that case, the strain of bird flu was H7N2, not the H5N1 that is now circulating in the U.S.
H7N2 is a very different type of virus, Sykes explained. But she said it shows that cat-to-human transmission of avian influenza is theoretically possible.
There isn't a lot of research on transmission of bird flu from companion animals like cats or dogs to humans, though Rasmussen agreed it's definitely a concern: The more infections you have in animals, "the more your luck is potentially going to run out."
Most people who have caught H5N1 are agricultural workers who had direct contact with infected poultry or cattle. Of at least 67 confirmed human cases of H5N1 in the U.S., there's been one fatality in an immunocompromised person who had contact with birds.
In general, zoonotic disease researchers want more H5N1 surveillance in companion animals of all types. Even if the human death toll of H5N1 remains relatively low, it remains a public health risk.
Part of the concern with this H5N1 outbreak is that bird flu viruses change. Just a few mutations could make this strain adept at spreading between people. And the more people who catch H5N1, the more likely it would adapt to be more efficient, said Suresh Kuchipudi, a virologist at the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health who researches zoonotic diseases. Kuchipudi has studied H5N1 in cats.
Another concern is something called reassortment. If an animal or person is infected with two viruses at once, the viruses can trade genetic material, creating something new. This is common in influenza, so virologists are on the lookout for a case in which the bird flu reassorts to make a virus that's far more contagious, and potentially more virulent.
Virologist Rasmussen is way more worried about this happening in pigs. Human respiratory physiology is more like that of swines than felines. So far, the current outbreak of H5N1 has not reached commercial hog operations. Rasmussen hopes it stays that way.
Kuchipudi said that reassortments are relatively rare events, but the outcome is completely unpredictable. Sometimes the results are benign, though it was likely a reassortment that involved an avian virus that led to the 1918 flu pandemic, which killed an estimated 50 million people. In the century since, virologists have established a global surveillance network to monitor influenza viruses. Scientists say continued investment in this network is key to preparing for and hopefully preventing another pandemic.
Winter is "reassortment season" because of all the influenza viruses circulating, Rasmussen said. A reassortment in cats could technically be possible since these pets occasionally get seasonal flu, but it's highly unlikely. Rather, Rasmussen said, it's more likely that a cat would pass H5N1 to a human who already has seasonal flu, and then a reassortment happens in the sick person. While the risk isn't zero, Rasmussen doubts this will happen. It would depend on how ill the human was, and how much virus they're exposed to from their cat.
"Unless the cat is really shedding a ton of virus, and you're kind of making out with the cat, I think it would be hard," she said.
Rasmussen and Kuchipudi caution there isn't enough research to know for sure how much virus cats shed, or even how they shed the virus.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was poised to release a new study about H5N1 in cats, but that was delayed when the Trump administration paused the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. That investigation, revealed through emails obtained by KFF Health News in a public records request, found that house cats likely got bird flu from dairy workers.
Scientists and public health agencies should question previously held assumptions about bird flu, Kuchipudi urged. He noted that 20 years ago nobody would have predicted that bird flu would infect dairy cattle the way it is now.
The FDA says other domesticated animals, including dogs, can get bird flu infections. There are no confirmed cases of H5N1 among dogs in the U.S., though in other countries they have died from the virus.
There's some disagreement and an overall lack of research on whether cat biology makes them more susceptible to H5N1 than other mammals, including humans, pigs or dogs.
MORE: Here's why eggs might not be on store shelves right now
But cat behaviors, such as their love of dairy and predation of wild birds, put them at higher risk, Kuchipudi said. Also, living in groups might play a role as there are more feral cat colonies in the U.S. than packs of stray dogs.
There's very little people can do about the H5N1 circulating in wild birds. As Rasmussen explained, "It's flying around in the skies. It's migrating north and south with the seasons."
But she said there's a lot people can do to keep the virus out of their homes.
That includes limiting a pet's exposure to H5N1 by not feeding them raw food or unpasteurized milk, and trying to keep them from interacting with animals like rodents and wild birds that could be infected with the virus.
This article is from a partnership that includes NPR and KFF Health News.
House cats with bird flu could pose a risk to public health originally appeared on abcnews.go.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Unpasteurized vs. pasteurized: What to know about food safety
Unpasteurized vs. pasteurized: What to know about food safety

The Hill

time3 days ago

  • The Hill

Unpasteurized vs. pasteurized: What to know about food safety

A long-practiced food processing method has been up for debate in recent years, with some opting to drink and eat without sterilizing it first. The polarizing process is pasteurization — a heating process that kills the microbes behind common foodborne illnesses. Prominent pushes for 'raw milk' consumption are growing, whether it's Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. or Gwyneth Paltrow. While still on the 2024 campaign trail for his failed presidential bid, Kennedy said he only drinks unpasteurized milk. In April, he suspended a quality control program for testing the nation's dairy supply. All the while, experts and researchers are advocating for Americans to only consume pasteurized milk. Pasteurized vs unpasteurized: What's the difference? Pasteurization is the process of heating a food product for a certain amount of time to destroy bacteria and viruses present, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Dairy products, eggs, juices, canned food, flour, honey and alcohol, among others, are typically pasteurized. Unpasteurized products don't undergo the heating and germ-killing process. They can include milk, artisanal cheese, juice, meat and more. Benefits, drawbacks of pasteurization By getting rid of harmful microbes, pasteurization can prevent foodborne illnesses like listeriosis, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria, Q fever, and brucellosis, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Pasteurization can also change the nutritional value, flavor and appearance of food, though only minimally, per the National Library of Medicine. 'Pasteurized milk offers the same nutritional benefits without the risks of raw milk consumption. Since the early 1900s, pasteurization has greatly reduced milk-borne illnesses,' the CDC says. Are unpasteurized foods safe? What are the risks? Some believe that so-called 'raw milk' and other unpasteurized products are a healthier option, since they are straight from nature. Some champion positive health returns from drinking unpasteurized milk, including raw milk farmer Cliff McConville: 'I can tell you that I used to get sick like three times a year, like, you know, with colds or flu, and I almost never get sick anymore.' But most medical bodies and independent experts say the benefits of unpasteurized food don't outweigh the potential health problems. The CDC and the FDA have warned that raw milk is unsafe because bacteria in it can cause illness or even death. The bird flu virus can remain infectious in raw milk for over a day at room temperature and more than a week when refrigerated, according to a non-peer-reviewed study from a group of UK scientists. The study, published in medRxiv, examined the stability of the H5N1 avian influenza virus in raw cow and sheep milk, with researchers simulating storage conditions common in dairy settings. 'High viral titres were detected in milk from infected cows, raising concerns about onwards human infections,' the authors wrote.

Immigration crackdown could stymie efforts to fight bird flu outbreak, experts fear
Immigration crackdown could stymie efforts to fight bird flu outbreak, experts fear

Los Angeles Times

time4 days ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Immigration crackdown could stymie efforts to fight bird flu outbreak, experts fear

As authorities brace for a potential resurgence in bird flu cases this fall, infectious disease specialists warn that the Trump administration's crackdown on undocumented immigrants could hamper efforts to stop the spread of disease. Dairy and poultry workers have been disproportionately infected with the H5N1 bird flu since it was first detected in U.S. dairy cows in March 2024, accounting for 65 of the 70 confirmed infections, according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. As is the case throughout agriculture, immigrants make up a significant proportion of this workforce and both industry groups and academics say many of these workers probably entered the U.S. illegally. That could spell trouble for a future outbreak of bird flu, infectious disease experts say, making workers reluctant to cooperate with health investigators. 'Most dairy and poultry workers, regardless of their immigration status, are in no way going to be like, 'hey, government, yeah, of course, check me out, I think I might have H5N1,'' said Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan's Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization in Canada. 'No, they're going to keep their heads down and be as quiet as possible so that they don't end up at' an immigration detention center, such as Alligator Alcatraz, she said. Officials with the U.S. Department of Agriculture didn't respond to requests for comment. Neither did the California Department of Public Health, which has been on the front line of worker testing and safety — offering $25 gift cards to workers who agree to be tested and providing personal protective equipment to farmers and workers. 'To imply that the Trump Administration's lawful approach to immigration enforcement is somehow suppressing disease reporting is a leap unsupported by evidence and dismissive of the real work being done by the agency,' a spokesperson for the Health and Human Services Administration said in a statement. Public health officials say the risk of H5N1 infection to the general public is low. People who work with livestock and wild animals are considered to be at elevated risk. The Trump administration paused immigration arrests at farms, hospitals and restaurants last month, but later reversed course. This month, Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said that there are plenty of able-bodied Americans to perform farm labor and that there would be 'no amnesty' for undocumented farmworkers. Jennifer Nuzzo, director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University, said that there are two big risks with the administration's crackdown. Dairy and poultry workers are on the front line of the virus, handling both diseased and infected animals. If they are too afraid to report symptoms or get tested, 'it increases the risk that someone could die because the medicines need to be given early after onset of symptoms,' she said. Nuzzo said the crackdown also decreases the likelihood that a pandemic could be detected in its early stages. 'The virus needs to change and become easily transmissible between people to cause a pandemic and we need to know about as many infections as possible to track the virus and prevent it from gaining those abilities,' Nuzzo said. '[If] people don't come forward, we can't do that.' In the spring, eight undocumented workers at a Vermont dairy were arrested; four were ultimately deported. The raids sent shock waves through the small, tight-knit dairy industry of New England and sent a message to dairies elsewhere that no place is safe. Anja Raudabaugh, chief executive of Western United Dairies, California's largest dairy trade association, said dairy farmers aren't worried about bird flu, adding that measures are in place to protect workers and to prevent a rapid spread of disease. From a public health perspective, she said, the state is better positioned than it was last year. 'One of the biggest changes in the ground response to Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza (HPAI) is that the occupational health clinics, ERs, and other rural clinics now have access to the testing equipment necessary to detect the virus (where they didn't last year),' she said in an email. In addition, the state's health department has provided the anti-viral medication, Tamiflu, to health clinics 'so the workers feel reinforced that their families can be protected.' The dairy trade group also has no objections to the immigration crackdown. 'America wants this problem solved and dairy farmers are ready to be part of the solution,' Raudabaugh said. 'We do not fear ICE. These are good, full-time jobs and we hire anyone who loves cows and wants to work in a quiet, blue-collar family environment.' Dairy farmer Joey Airoso said the effect on both his workers and cows was minimal when his Pixley dairy was hit by the virus last year. His bigger concern is 'the wide open border that's let a lot of people into are country that are here for the wrong reasons,' said Airoso, who owns about 2,600 head of cattle. But Raw Farms dairy owner Mark McAfee said he and his neighboring farmers in Fresno County are 'freaked out' by the ICE raids and 'want no part of it.' McAfee's dairy, which produces raw milk, was shut down by the virus for several months last year. He's worried not only about the virus returning, but also about immigration agents seizing his workers, many of whom are foreign born. 'Everybody we have is legal, but they (ICE) don't give a damn about that — they're picking them up, too,' he said. 'Legal status doesn't mean a lot, and that's really scary, because that's something we all relied upon for previous 25 years of operation.' One question is whether the state will face another big outbreak of bird flu. There have been only sporadic infections this summer. Detections of the virus in wastewater is low, and in the last 30 days, only two dairy herds — one each in California and Arizona — and one commercial poultry flock in Pennsylvania have reported outbreaks. But most experts agree that's likely to change as migrating birds congregate in fields and around lakes as they journey south later this year — passing virus between one another and infecting young birds with no immunity. 'We have 60,000 waterfowl in California right now,' said Maurice Pitesky, a poultry expert at UC Davis. 'By late fall, early winter, that number will jump to 6 million.' Waterfowl — ducks and geese — are considered the primary carriers of the virus. Since the virus reappeared in North America at the end of 2022, new variants and widespread outbreaks have followed the migrating birds — infecting poultry farms, resident wild birds, wild mammals, such as racoons, mountain lions and skunks, as well as marine and domestic mammals. In late 2023, the virus made a jump into dairy cattle. And in the fall of 2024, a new variant — the D1.1 version of the virus — sparked a new outbreak in dairy cows, poultry and other animals. Andrew Ramey, director of the Molecular Ecology Lab at the U.S. Geological Survey's Alaska Science Center, which monitors for H5N1 in wild bird populations, said one possibility is that the bird flu could return in a more virulent state. 'I think we're all kind of bracing to see what might happen this fall,' he said.

How does wildfire smoke affect birds? This researcher is looking to find out
How does wildfire smoke affect birds? This researcher is looking to find out

Yahoo

time5 days ago

  • Yahoo

How does wildfire smoke affect birds? This researcher is looking to find out

A researcher at the University of Saskatchewan wants to know how birds, particularly songbirds, are being impacted by wildfires and smoke. Catherine Ivy, a bird lover and assistant professor at the University of Saskatchewan college of arts and science, is leading the project. "I've always been interested in how birds are able to conduct their long migratory flights, and was interested in how animals change their breathing to deal with challenging environments," Ivy said. Canada's 2023 wildfire season was the worst on record in terms of area burned. The 2024 season was the second-worst since 1995. Ivy said there is anecdotal evidence that shows birds are being impacted by wildfire smoke, but there has never been research on the effects. One wildfire wouldn't have any adverse effect on birds, but repeated events and repeated exposure could. Ivy said there has been extensive research done on humans and lab animals. "We know from Health Canada and a whole bunch of other health funding bodies that being outside in the smoke is not good for us [humans]," she said. "But the one thing that research is kind of disregarded at the moment is what happens to wildlife that's outside." Ivy said this is important because it could help us be more aware of why bird populations are declining. She said we already know that changes to migratory routes, such as buildings where they didn't used to be, have had an impact. "But we don't know if wildfire smoke also adds on top of that," she said. "If wildfire smoke affects their lungs and affects their ability to migrate, it means that they might get stuck in environments that don't have enough resources for them during their southbound migration." She said the research will track migratory birds who fly long distances, and compare birds who have been exposed to wildfire smoke to those who haven't. "Health Canada tells us to stay inside, only breathe clean air," she said. "But these animals live outside all year round. So unfortunately we have this gap in our knowledge." The project received funding from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) discovery grant program.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store