Is Labour is losing Wales to Reform?
Could Reform UK get their first taste of government next year? They're the biggest party for Welsh voters, according to exclusive polling from More in Common ahead of the Senedd elections next year.
But what does this mean for Labour? The party was founded in Wales and since devolution in 1999, they've run the government there. Are they now scared of Reform?
So in this extra episode of Electoral Dysfunction, Beth meets Wales's first female First Minister - Labour's Eluned Morgan. She's also been taking the temperature with a group of Welsh voters.
They talk about the "Farage surge" in Wales ahead of the Senedd elections next May as Baronness Morgan admits the threat from Reform is "very serious" and that Labour have got "a lot of work to do" to stay in power.
Also - the first minister attempts to swerve rating the Keir Starmer's first year... but Beth's not letting her get away with it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
22 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
James McMurdock says he will not return to Reform UK after Covid loan questions
The MP for South Basildon and East Thurrock 'removed the party whip from himself' last week pending the outcome of an investigation relating to allegations around 'business propriety during the pandemic'. The Sunday Times published a story on Saturday which alleged two businesses connected to Mr McMurdock took out Covid-19 loans totalling £70,000 during the pandemic, one of which had no employees. On Tuesday, the MP said he 'had a chance to take specialist legal advice from an expert in the relevant field' since the loans came to light. Writing on social media site X, he added: 'In light of that advice, which is privileged and which I choose to keep private at this time, I have decided to continue my parliamentary career as an independent MP where I can focus 100% on the interests of my constituents.' Further to my statement tweeted on 5th July 2025. I have now had a chance to take specialist legal advice from an expert in the relevant field. In light of that advice, which is privileged and which I choose to keep private at this time, I have decided to continue my… — James McMurdock MP (@JMcMurdockMP) July 8, 2025 According to Companies House, Mr McMurdock is listed as the current director of Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, and a former director of J A M Financial Limited, a position he resigned in 2021. Both firms are shown to have overdue accounts and confirmation statements, and both have an 'active proposal to strike off'. Mr McMurdock insisted when the Sunday Times news story broke that 'all my business dealings had always been conducted fully within the law and in compliance with all regulations and that appropriately qualified professionals had reviewed all activity confirming the same'. He said he had asked for the Reform whip to be suspended temporarily as a 'precautionary measure'. The chairwoman of the Labour Party said Nigel Farage 'sat on his hands' over the allegations and that the Reform UK leader should 'come clean with the public about what he knew and when'. 'After these serious allegations surfaced, Nigel Farage sat on his hands. He took no action against James McMurdock and instead outsourced the problem – that's not leadership,' MP Ellie Reeves said. She added: 'Farage's Reform has proven once again that they simply cannot uphold the high standards expected in public life.' Of the five MPs elected under the Reform UK banner in July 2024, two now sit as Independents. Rupert Lowe, who represents Great Yarmouth, was suspended earlier this year following allegations about his conduct which he has denied. Sarah Pochin won the Runcorn by-election in May, meaning that Reform now has four MPs.
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer faces fresh rebellion over welfare benefit cuts
Sir Keir Starmer faces another Labour rebellion on Wednesday over his remaining welfare cuts. More than two dozen of the Prime Minister's backbenchers are urging him to sustain the health element of the Universal Credit (UC) benefit at its current level. The new rebellion threat comes as the Welfare Bill – which was heavily watered down last week in the face of a major Labour revolt – returns to the Commons for its final parliamentary stages. Currently, people claiming the health element of Universal Credit receive £432.27 a month. This would be roughly halved to £217.26 from next April under the new proposals. The cut is the only substantial benefit reduction to survive the rebellion of the past fortnight during which more than 120 Labour MPs had braced to defy the Prime Minister and vote down his plans. The Government reacted by promising that all existing disability claimants will keep their benefits. It also dropped changes to who can claim personal independence payments (PIP). But 49 Labour MPs voted against the Bill regardless and 26 of these now have backed a new amendment calling for the health element of UC to remain at its current rate of £432.27. It has been tabled by Richard Burgon, a prominent figure on the Left of the party who served as shadow justice secretary under Jeremy Corbyn. Mr Burgon warned Labour MPs against thinking that the 'worst parts of the Bill' had already been watered down and called on them to oppose Sir Keir's changes to UC. In an article for the Labour List website, he said: 'Those losing out will include people facing some of the most distressing and difficult circumstances. 'That includes people unable to turn the pages of a book with either hand, those who cannot bring food or drink to their mouth without help of someone else, those who cannot communicate a simple message such as the presence of a hazard, and those with debilitating incontinence. 'No Labour MP should be backing any of that. That's why I have tabled an amendment to prevent this cruel and unnecessary cut – and the damaging two-tier system it would create.' The Government has a working parliamentary majority of 165 after Sir Keir's landslide last July and Mr Burgon's amendment is well short of the 83 rebels needed to inflict a defeat. But Downing Street could still find at least two dozen Labour MPs once again voting against its flagship legislation despite last week's climbdown opening up a £5 billion black hole. Mr Burgon's amendment has the support of both Mr Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, the former Labour MP, who is planning with him to launch a new hard-Left party to challenge Sir Keir nationally. A separate backbench mutiny is also brewing as ministers consider whether to scrap the system which ensures special needs pupils are entitled to personalised support at school. Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, is considering ditching the bespoke plans under a wholesale review of the current model. On Tuesday, Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister and Communities Secretary, was asked by a Commons committee to guarantee no child with special needs would lose out. Ms Rayner, whose son Charlie is registered blind and has additional needs, replied: 'We're absolutely clear that the legal right for additional support is absolutely the right thing to do and that SEND [special educational needs and disabilities] children need that support. 'And as somebody who's been through that system very recently I understand that the holy grail of the ECHP plan, even though it has its limitations, I understand why parents are really concerned even though that still doesn't deliver what parents want for their children.' Ms Rayner went on to declare that 'huge sums of money' were going towards SEND provisions 'but the outcomes are not getting better'. She told MPs: 'Something has to change. And what we're trying to do is collaborate to find out what isn't working, what is working and how to make the system better.'
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
On the road to ruin
It is difficult to think of a better summary of Britain's difficulties than that offered by Richard Hughes, chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility: 'the UK cannot afford the array of promises that it has made to the public'. This observation was backed by dismal forecasts showing debt on course to reach 270 per cent of GDP by 2070, and the note that challenging global and domestic circumstances risk further shocks to the public finances. Yet at Westminster there is little sign that MPs have realised the precarious position Britain finds itself in. Indeed, Labour's 2024 intake of MPs seem to believe that the Government's finances are limitless in their depth. The rebellion that recently rocked the Government was over a £5 billion cut in a health and disability benefits bill set to reach £70 billion a year by 2030 – a fraction of the forecast spend. The result was another U-turn in attempts to arrest rising spending, going alongside the failed attempt to reform old-age benefits. This, in turn, suggests that Britain's finances will continue towards what Mr Hughes calls an 'unsustainable position' until we are jolted from our complacency by the vigilance of the bond markets, or an even less desirable intervention. It would clearly be preferable to rein in the growth of spending now, voluntarily. The older meaning of the word 'crisis' as a turning point in a malady is apposite here. The British disease – welfarism, an elite class unwilling to reckon with the need for change, a state that strangles entrepreneurial activity and investment – is reaching its peak. Whether the patient will recover before extraordinary measures are necessitated is unclear.
