Scottish Government names date for ditching two-child cap
The two-child limit denies child allowances in Universal Credit and tax credits to third or subsequent children born after April 2017 and has been kept in place by Keir Starmer's Labour UK Government.
An associated so-called 'rape clause' grants exemptions for a child born as a result of 'non-consensual conception', which has remained highly controversial since it was put in place.
The Scottish Government pledged to mitigate the policy in its Budget.
READ MORE: Swinney: Independence the 'defining choice for this generation'
Under the SNP's mitigation plan, payments could work out at nearly £3500 for children affected.
Somerville has said the plan will mean there will be 20,000 fewer children in relative poverty next year.
She added it would be the fastest a Scottish social security benefit had been delivered.
She said: 'The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all.
'The Two Child Limit Payment will begin accepting applications in March next year. At less than 15 months from when we announced this in the Scottish budget, this will be the fastest that a Scottish social security benefit has been delivered.
'This builds upon the considerable action we have taken in Scotland, including delivering unparalleled financial support through our Scottish Child Payment, investing to clear school meal debts, and continuing to support almost 10,000 children by mitigating the UK Government's Benefit Cap as fully as possible."
READ MORE: UK must 'constrain Israel' after attacks on Iran, John Swinney says
Somerville added that the UK Government was still "holding back" Scotland's progress.
"Modelling published in March makes clear that if the UK Government act decisively on child poverty, they could help to take an estimated 100,000 children out of poverty this year," she said.
In April, analysis showed the cap has dragged 30,000 more children into poverty since Labour took office.
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) carried out research which also suggested 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty instantly at a cost of £2 billion, while the depth of poverty would be reduced for another 800,000.
The organisation says 109 more children a day are pulled into poverty by the policy.
Due to the fact the two-child limit applies to third or subsequent children born after April 2017, it is effectively still being rolled out, with more and more children affected every day.
The number of children affected by the policy will continue to increase until 2035 when the first children born under the two-child limit turn 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Migrant can stay in UK after ‘far-fetched' claim he was shot by lover's father
An Iraqi asylum seeker has been allowed to remain in the UK after 'far-fetched' claims that he was shot by his married lover's father in an attempted honour killing. The unnamed migrant claimed that he was gunned down and left in hospital by his girlfriend's family following a secret affair. The Iraqi, in his late 20s, said he was outside his home in Iraq when his lover's disapproving father and brother shot him in the shoulder. He claimed the woman's father was a 'powerful' and 'influential' man who had connections with the Iraqi government. After arriving in Britain, he is now trying to claim asylum on humanitarian grounds by arguing that he cannot be deported because he is at risk of becoming an honour killing victim. A previous ruling at an asylum court dismissed his case, finding that he was not 'credible' and casting doubt on his 'far-fetched' story. However, the man has won an appeal after a new ruling said the original judge made legal mistakes. The case, disclosed in court papers, is the latest example uncovered by The Telegraph in which illegal migrants or convicted foreign criminals have been able to remain in the UK or halt their removal from the UK. Ministers are proposing to raise the threshold to make it harder for judges to grant the right to remain based on Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects the right to a family life, and Article 3, which protects against torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. The Iraqi man, of mixed Arabic and Kurdish ethnicity, lodged his asylum claim in September 2020, having arrived in the country. On his way to Britain, he spent time in France and had an asylum bid rejected in Denmark. 'The basis of the [Iraqi's] claim is that he cannot return to Iraq as he fears he is at risk of an honour killing from the family of a woman with whom he had an extra-marital relationship,' the tribunal said. 'He claims that [her] father is a powerful person with connections to the Iraqi government.' The Iraqi said he was in a 'secretive' relationship with the unnamed woman and was not aware of her father's 'rank, power and influence' before he began the relationship, only finding out later from her and a friend. The woman was married and 'forced to return to her family home', according to the man. He said he never met the woman's family but was able to recognise them after seeing photos at her home. He alleges that her father and brother shot him outside his own home and that he had to be treated in hospital for a gunshot wound to his shoulder. Account 'not credible' When the Home Office tried to deport him, he appealed against the decision. However, a lower-tier tribunal ruled that his account was 'not credible' and that 'he does not face a real risk of suffering serious harm in Iraq'. The judge at the time cast doubt over whether he was able to recognise the father and brother during the shooting, saying it was 'far-fetched' that he recognised them during the 'moment of heightened anxiety'. The judge also said the Iraqi gave 'confusing' and 'varying' accounts of who had shot him while in hospital. There was also no direct evidence of the injury, with his medical notes merely stating that he had a 'historic shoulder injury'. However, after a further appeal to an upper immigration tribunal, a judge has ruled the lower tribunal made mistakes in law that meant it could not be said the Iraqi's account about being shot was not credible. The panel concluded that the legal mistakes 'cast sufficient doubt on the overall approach to the credibility assessment'. The case will be reheard at the first-tier tribunal.
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
‘Should I pay my final salary pension into a Sipp to drop a tax band?'
However, when the lifetime allowance was abolished, anyone who already had fixed protection before March 15 2023 (the date of the Budget announcement) could resume paying into or getting pension contributions and keep their protections. So, although one part of the rules relaxing means you might be able to start paying in again, the tax relief rules might still get in the way of you achieving your goal of minimising your higher-rate tax, or mitigating it completely. Tax relief and earnings You can claim tax relief on the greater of 100pc of your UK earnings, or £3,600 in any tax year. For most personal pensions, including Sipps, contributions are typically taken from pay after tax and topped up by basic-rate (20pc) tax relief returned from the Government, which is paid directly into the pension. If an individual paid in £4,000, this would be topped up by £1,000 basic-rate relief, meaning £5,000 goes into their Sipp. A UK resident with no earnings can pay in up to £2,880 a year, which is topped up by pension tax relief to £3,600. You've mentioned that you receive income from a final salary pension scheme. Although pension income is taxed under income tax in the same way as salary or bonuses earned in your working life, it is not classed as earnings when calculating how much you can pay into a pension for tax relief. The same goes for investment income like dividends, savings income or property rental income, even if you are paying higher rates of tax on these sources. I'm afraid that unless you have earnings from another source, your ability to make pension contributions for tax relief is going to be very limited, meaning your strategy is unlikely to work. The full list of what counts as relevant UK earnings can be found in the Government's pension tax manual. Your question does raise some important points about how pension tax relief works, and the interaction with the personal savings allowance, so I've taken the chance to explain this below and it should help if you do have some earnings after all. The second lever the Government uses to limit the value of tax relief is the annual allowance. This allowance is £60,000 per tax year for most people, and applies to the total gross pension contributions made by or for you across all your pension schemes. So your own payments, the automatic government top-up and any employer contributions. The allowance is lower for people with very high incomes (usually £200,000 plus), or those who have already accessed a pension using a flexible income option, like pension drawdown. How pension tax relief works I've mentioned that schemes like Sipps automatically top up money you pay in personally by 20pc tax relief. So, for every £800 you save, £1,000 in total ends up in the pension pot. But people who pay more than 20pc tax on their earnings can claim more relief by contacting HMRC directly. This includes Scottish taxpayers paying intermediate tax (21pc) and above, and higher-rate (40pc) and additional-rate (45pc) taxpayers in the rest of the UK. The amount of extra tax relief on offer will depend on someone's earnings, and how much falls into those higher rates of tax. As you've pointed out, making a pension contribution and claiming that extra tax relief has the effect of expanding the basic-rate band, bringing all or some earnings out of higher rates of tax. For people earning between £100,000 and £125,140, the tax-free personal allowance is gradually removed, resulting in an effective tax rate of 60pc – or up to 67.5pc in Scotland. It's possible to use pension contributions to reduce taxable income, claw back personal allowance and boost retirement savings, if someone's UK earnings allow. Personal savings allowance You also mentioned the personal savings allowance. If someone can move out of a higher tax band thanks to pension contributions, it can help them get more of their savings interest tax-free. This is because the amount of personal savings allowance someone has depends on your tax rate. Basic-rate taxpayers get a £1,000 allowance, but the allowance is halved to £500 for higher-rate taxpayers and lost completely for those paying additional-rate income tax. How to claim extra tax relief The Government has recently introduced an online service to help claim extra tax relief, which makes things much easier for those who don't usually have to complete a tax return and avoids getting stuck on the telephone to the taxman. People who already complete a tax return will need to include their total gross (personal) pension contributions on the pension pages of their return to claim relief. Most of the above on pension contributions also applies to charity donations made under gift aid, except that pension income received does count as income on which gift aid can be claimed. So, if you don't have UK earnings and still want to reduce your marginal rate of tax, you could consider your favourite charity. I hope this has helped to answer your question, even though it might not be the tax outcome you were hoping for. With best wishes, – Charlene
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Ministers fail to rule out cutting Send school plans after campaigners' concerns
Education minister Stephen Morgan insisted parents should have 'absolutely' no fear that support for children with special needs or disabilities (Send) will be scaled back. But he could not guarantee that the current system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), which are issued to give children specialist classroom support, would remain in place. In a letter shared with the Guardian newspaper, campaigners have said that without the documents in mainstream schools, 'many thousands of children risk being denied vital provision, or losing access to education altogether'. On Monday, Mr Morgan told broadcaster LBC the current system of support is 'failing children, it's failing parents'. Asked if concerned campaigners could have no fear that Send support will be scaled back, Mr Morgan replied: 'Absolutely. What we want to do is make sure we've got a better system in place as a result of the reform that we're doing that improves outcomes for children with additional needs.' But pressed whether the reforms could include scrapping ECHPs, Mr Morgan replied: 'We're looking at all things in the round. 'I'm not going to get into the mechanics today, but this is about strengthening support for system.' On Sunday, Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson would similarly not be drawn on whether the plans will be retained. 'What I can say very clearly is that we will strengthen and put in place better support for children,' she told the BBC. The Government plans to publish a white paper in the autumn detailing how it will reform support for Send, according to Mr Morgan. Requests for Send support have risen year-on-year. In total, there were 638,745 EHCPs in place in January 2025, up 10.8% on the same point last year. The number of new plans which started during 2024 also grew by 15.8% on the previous year, to 97,747. Requests for children to be assessed for EHCPs rose by 11.8% to 154,489 in 2024. In a letter to the Guardian, campaigners including the heads of charities, professors, Send parents including actor Sally Phillips, and campaigners including broadcaster Chris Packham warned against scrapping ECHPs as part of any overhaul of support. 'Whatever the Send system's problems, the answer is not to remove the rights of children and young people. Families cannot afford to lose these precious legal protections,' they said. MPs have warned ministers have not been clear about their plans, and could face a rebellion akin to last week's welfare Bill revolt, according to the Guardian. In a signal the Government is willing to square up to its rebellious backbenchers, Mr Morgan told ITV's Good Morning Britain that Labour MPs had 'stood on a platform a manifesto commitment to reform the Send system'. He also would not be drawn into suggestions by Good Morning Britain that the reforms were a cost-cutting measure being driven by the Treasury. 'Well, look at the figures. We've actually put more money into the Send system, the £1 billion for high needs announced last year,' he replied to the question. Amid mounting pressure from MPs to scrap the two-child benefit cap, the minister said 'nothing has changed' in the Government's plans, which will see a child poverty strategy report back in the autumn. Mr Morgan added: 'We're looking at all levers to bring down child poverty, but that's got to be fiscally done well, and obviously we need to grow our economy.'
