Fire more tainted ministers or else. . . DA tells Cyril
Image: Supplied/GCIS
President Cyril Ramaphosa's axing of Nobuhle Nkabane as higher education and training minister paves the way for the DA to throw its weight behind the Appropriation Bill set to be tabled before the National Assembly on Wednesday.
The Bill allocates funding to each national department. Ahead of the crucial vote, the DA had threatened to withhold support for Nkabane's departmental budget following allegations of misconduct and misleading Parliament regarding appointments to Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) boards.
DA's spokesperson, Willie Aucamp confirmed on Tuesday that his party would now vote with the ANC in every department, paving the way for the Appropriation Bill to pass without major challenges.
'Our caucus met this afternoon, and we have decided that we will support the other departmental budgets. So the DA will support the total budget. The axing of minister Nkabane came after relentless pressure from the DA on the president to get rid of the minister.'
However, Aucamp said the party would keep applying pressure on the president to get rid of anybody in his government who is implicated in corruption, either by the Zondo Commission or through the VBS Bank looting scheme.
The Appropriation Bill requires 201 of 400 votes in the National Assembly. With the DA's support, the Bill is likely to pass without significant hurdles.
DA leader John Steenhuisen said Nkabane's removal must be the beginning, not the end.
'There are still individuals in the Executive facing serious allegations. If the President is serious about restoring public trust, he must act decisively and consistently, not only when under pressure. The ANC must also accept that it no longer governs alone.
"In a coalition, meaningful consultation with partners is not optional. It is essential to rebuild public confidence and ensure accountable governance. We will continue to engage the GNU parties in good faith to stop corruption and drive delivery in government.'
Cape Times
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
13 minutes ago
- IOL News
Jeffery's Red Scare: The NDR, Manufactured Panic, and the Defence of Racial Capital
Anthea Jeffery warns of a covert socialist agenda in South Africa, framing the National Democratic Revolution as a Marxist threat. This article critically examines her claims, revealing the ideological warfare at play and the implications for democracy and capitalism. Image: IOL Anthea Jeffery has spent much of her career warning that South Africa is on a covert march to socialism. Her vehicle of choice is the so-called National Democratic Revolution — a theoretical construct she treats as hard evidence of an unfolding Marxist programme hidden inside government policy. The ANC's reform proposals, however diluted, are presented as proof of a long-haul conspiracy to unravel capitalism, property rights, and democracy. This isn't analysis. It's ideological warfare crafted for a constituency anxious about redistribution. The National Democratic Revolution in its original conception was a phase-based process towards liberation: political rights first, economic reorganisation later. But what Jeffery refuses to acknowledge is that the ANC never implemented its second phase. The so-called revolution halted at the moment of elite pacting. The language remained. The politics shifted. The ANC's alignment with the SACP and COSATU allowed it to maintain liberation credentials, while its actual policies became increasingly orthodox. By the mid-1990s, the alliance had internalised market logic. Redistribution gave way to stabilisation. GEAR formalised this. Privatisation followed. State entities were corporatised. Public services were costed and commodified. Jeffery omits this history. Or she wilfully misrepresents it. She uses the NDR as a container for all post-apartheid policy that inconveniences capital. Land reform, healthcare expansion, employment equity — these are treated as dangerous incursions into free enterprise. She isolates phrases from ANC conferences or SACP newsletters and holds them up as definitive proof of a creeping totalitarian project, while ignoring the decades-long collapse of anything resembling a radical economic agenda. Her institutional base — the Institute of Race Relations — supports this position through a stream of publications designed to conflate moderate state intervention with revolutionary intent. It claims to stand for classical liberalism. In practice, it operates as a cultural and economic firewall for the beneficiaries of apartheid's economic structure. Its function is not to analyse power, but to secure it. Jeffery's periodic references to 1976 are calculated. She acknowledges the significance of the uprising, but removes it from the insurgent currents that animated it. The student protests were not simply a spontaneous reaction to Afrikaans in schools. They were a political rupture. They revived Black Consciousness, anti-capitalist critique, and a pan-African worldview. Many students were detained, tortured, or killed. Others went into exile and carried their radicalism with them. Some joined the ANC. Others looked elsewhere — to the PAC, to newer formations, or to community organising beyond party structures. The UDF, which emerged in the 1980s, institutionalised much of this activism. But its formation marked a shift away from the militancy of 1976. It embraced the Freedom Charter and sought to build broad-based alliances under its framework. It functioned as a civic force rather than a revolutionary front. COSATU, too, while initially militant in worker organising, had by the mid-1980s begun engaging foreign donors and adopting development project language. USAID funding flowed into union education and policy platforms. The edges of resistance were being managed. The revolutionary demands were being absorbed into programmes. The SACP followed a similar trajectory. From its exile-era anti-capitalist declarations to its post-1994 parliamentary positions, the shift was clear. It offered ideological cover to the ANC's pragmatic manoeuvring, describing every compromise as a tactical delay. But the delays became permanent. The economic structure of apartheid remained intact, with new faces at the table. Jeffery does not mention these shifts, because her narrative relies on exaggeration. She needs the ANC to be a radical actor so she can frame even the mildest policy adjustment as evidence of Marxist capture. Her entire thesis depends on mischaracterisation. Redistribution becomes dispossession. Affirmative action becomes racial engineering. Healthcare equity becomes state control. She constructs an ANC that no longer exists and warns against an agenda that has already been abandoned. Her real objective is to delegitimise any challenge to racialised wealth. She is not defending democratic values. She is defending historical advantage. This is evident in the way she treats land. Expropriation without compensation, a policy with strict constitutional limits and very narrow application, is presented as the first step toward Zimbabwe-style collapse. This ignores decades of failed restitution, government inertia, and the market-driven nature of land policy since 1994. The threat, for Jeffery, lies not in the reality of land injustice, but in the idea that it might one day be resolved. AfriForum echoes this approach. Its spokespeople describe land reform as an attack on white farmers and frame any social policy as a threat to white survival. Their version is more racialised, more openly defensive, but the logic is aligned. Both formations reject historical responsibility. Both see equity as a threat. Both amplify fear to protect capital. Other institutions mirror these concerns in more bureaucratic language. Security think tanks publish briefings about instability. Business forums call for restraint. Liberal columnists urge balance. The message is consistent: do nothing that might disrupt the ownership patterns of the last century. Jeffery's argument about the NDR gives this position an intellectual cover. By citing speeches, strategy documents, and ideological jargon, she creates the appearance of serious critique. But it is a formula. She substitutes policy analysis with ideological projection. She avoids the fact that economic transformation has not taken place. She avoids the structural continuity between apartheid and post-apartheid capital. She avoids the reality that Black suffering in South Africa today is largely the result of state capitulation to business interests — interests that she and her institutional network continue to defend. There is no NDR in motion. There is a collapsed developmental state, a political class aligned with private capital, and a society in which poverty and violence have become structural conditions. The state has outsourced its duty to govern. The mines still poison water. The banks foreclose on homes built on land stolen a century ago. And the IRR tells us to be afraid of communism. The youth of 1976 would not recognise this landscape. They would not recognise the bureaucratised opposition that now speaks in their name. Their courage did not come with conditions. Their rejection of the apartheid order was rooted in the knowledge that legal inclusion without material justice is a performance. Their politics, forged in struggle and sharpened by violence, called for redistribution, for accountability, for dignity grounded in structural change. Jeffery does not engage this legacy. She instrumentalises it. She cites it when useful, silences it when it exposes her distortions. Her entire body of work is premised on protecting a system that never addressed the foundational crimes of this country. To suggest that the ANC, in its current form, represents a threat to private capital is absurd. It has managed capital's interests with discipline. It has sacrificed its own popular base to maintain investor credibility. Its ministers tour the world reassuring markets. Its budgets mirror austerity regimes elsewhere. It has enacted neoliberalism while speaking of revolution. The NDR functions now only as a symbolic reference. It is evoked at party conferences, in commemorative speeches, in SACP resolutions that never materialise. On the ground, it has no programme. What exists is a vacuum — filled by private sector partnerships, donor-driven governance, and a mass population structurally locked out. Jeffery chooses to see danger in the symbolism. She ignores the vacuum. She warns of an ideology whose time has passed, while legitimising the system that replaced it. Her contribution is not neutral. It fortifies the walls around wealth. It tells those who suffer to be patient — or to be silent. History did not vindicate the ANC. Nor did it vindicate the defenders of capital. It left the struggle incomplete. The question remains open — who will finish it, and how? Jeffery offers no answer. She only repeats the warnings of old men who saw equality as chaos. * Gillian Schutte is a well-known social justice and race-justice activist and public intellectual. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.
The South African
43 minutes ago
- The South African
Emma Powell quits as DA's international relations spokesperson amid harassment claims
Democratic Alliance (DA) MP Emma Powell has stepped down from her role as the party's international relations spokesperson, citing ongoing harassment, threats, and intimidation linked to her outspoken stance on South Africa's foreign policy. In a statement posted to her X (formerly Twitter) account on Monday, Powell confirmed her resignation, describing a pattern of targeted pressure that has escalated in recent months. Her decision follows recent allegations that she had been spied on by the State Security Agency (SSA). This development further intensified what Powell described as a toxic and dangerous environment for MPs who challenge government narratives. 'Driven by my commitment to the DA's foundational principles, I accepted these risks as the unavoidable cost of standing up to and exposing the Department of International Relations and the ANC's relationships with authoritarian regimes,' Powell wrote. Powell has frequently clashed with the ANC, most recently alleging that President Cyril Ramaphosa's special envoy, Mcebisi Jonas, was denied a US visa – a claim that was met with sharp rebuke from the ruling party. Her foreign engagements have drawn criticism from the ANC, which accused Powell of acting against South Africa's official diplomatic stance. These included a high-profile visit to the United States in March – a trip linked to the dismissal of DA colleague Andrew Whitfield as a deputy minister – and a sponsored visit to Israel in April, both seen as controversial by senior government figures. The DA confirmed that Ryan Smith, Powell's former deputy, will now assume the international relations spokesperson role. DA chief whip George Michalakis thanked Powell for her service, stating she would soon be reassigned to a new portfolio within the party. 'We are grateful for the work she's done on the international stage and will continue to benefit from her experience in Parliament,' said Michalakis. Powell, who has been a DA MP since 2019, said she would remain in parliament to help empower others – particularly women – to lead in politics. Despite stepping down from the international portfolio, Powell made it clear she will continue speaking out against authoritarianism and advocating for transparent governance. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Lindiwe Nhaca returns as deputy mayor of KwaDukuza amid ANC shake-up
Former KwaDukuza mayor Lindiwe Nhaca ( left) is set to return as deputy mayor. Image: supplied In what appears to be a vote of confidence in all 28 current councillors of the ANC in KwaDukuza Local Municipality, the ANC is set to appoint former Ilembe District Municipality Sduduzo Gumede and former KwaDukuza mayor Lindiwe Nhaca as deputy mayor. The council will hold a special meeting on Thursday to elect a new mayor and deputy mayor after a month-long uncertainty following the provincial leadership's decision earlier this month to sack mayor Ali Ngidi and his deputy Njabulo Cele. The special meeting was confirmed by the regional task team coordinator Nkosenhle Mngadi. The special meeting was necessitated by Ngidi's resignation on Friday after hanging on, which many regarded as defiance, because the ANC had directed that by last week the mayor should have been elected. 'We can confirm that the council will hold a special meeting on Thursday where a new mayor and deputy mayor will be elected. We can also confirm the current mayor tendered his resignation letter on Friday,' said Mngadi. He refused to be drawn into who the party would be fielding as candidates for the positions between Nhaca, Gumede and Dolly Govender as they were selected for the two vacant positions, however, reliable sources within the party, said the party has opted to bring back Gumede for the mayoral position as well as Nhaca for the deputy mayor position, thereby overlooking all 28 current councillors. Gumede was a district mayor in 2016 until 2021 then disappeared into political wilderness. Nhaca was unceremoniously kicked out of her mayoral position in November last year by Mtolo who replaced her with the ousted Ali Ngidi through a vote of no confidence after she defied Mtolo's orders to voluntarily resign. In a surprise move, Nhaca's name was forwarded to the provincial's deployment committee alongside former Ilembe district Municipality mayor Siduduzo Gumede and current KwaDukuza Speaker Dolly Govender to choose the mayor from them. On July 2, ANC provincial task team coordinator Mike Mabuyakhulu summoned the party caucus, where he presented the report and the recommendations of the team that the party had appointed in April to investigate the reported abuse of privileges by both Ngidi and Cele. Besides removing the pair from their positions, the ANC also ordered them to pay back the money they splurged on luxury vehicles since assuming office in November without council approval. The report that was presented to council in April showed that from November to February the mayor had spent R497,180.10 while his deputy had spent R527,720.13 which meant the municipality was paying R17,590 on the vehicle hire. Furthermore, the ANC ordered Ngidi to pay for the fuel used by for mayoral car which was used to transport his family, particularly his children to school. Ngidi will also have to pay for the security firm that guarded his home which was also not approved by the council. It was reported that the Durban-based security company was billing the municipality R173,000 for eight guards that were stationed at the mayor's house day and night. It is not clear for how long the company had guarded his home. [email protected]
