logo
Israel trying to deflect blame for widespread starvation in Gaza

Israel trying to deflect blame for widespread starvation in Gaza

The Guardian4 days ago
Israel is pursuing an extensive PR effort to remove itself from blame for the starvation and killing of Palestinian civilians in Gaza in the face of overwhelming evidence that it is responsible.
As dozens of governments, UN organisations and other international figures have detailed Israel's culpability, officials and ministers in Israel have attempted to suggest that there is no hunger in Gaza, that if hunger exists it is not Israel's fault, or to blame Hamas or the UN and aid organisations for problems with distribution of aid.
The Israeli effort has continued even as one of its own government ministers, the far-right heritage minister, Amichai Eliyahu, appeared to describe an unapologetic policy of starvation, genocide and ethnic cleansing that Israel has denied and said is not official policy.
Amid evidence of a growing number of deaths from starvation in Gaza, including many child deaths, and shocking images and accounts of malnutrition, Israel has tried to deflect blame for what has been described by the head of the World Health Organization (WHO) as 'man-made mass starvation'.
That view was endorsed in a joint statement this week by 28 countries – including the UK – which explicitly blamed Israel. 'The suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths,' the statement said. 'The Israeli government's aid delivery model is dangerous, fuels instability and deprives Gazan's of human dignity.
'We condemn the drip-feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food.'
Some Israeli officials have been marginally more cautious in public statements, including the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, who has promised vaguely that there 'will be no starvation' in Gaza.
But a recent off-the-record briefing for journalists by a senior Israeli security official has pushed a more uncompromising position, stating that there 'is no hunger in Gaza' and claiming that images of starving children on front pages around the world showed children with 'underlying diseases'.
David Mencer, an Israeli government spokesperson, told Sky News this week: 'There is no famine in Gaza – there is a famine of the truth.'
Contradicting that claim, Médecins Sans Frontières said a quarter of the young children and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers it had screened at its clinics last week were malnourished, a day after the UN said one in five children in Gaza City were suffering from malnutrition.
Israel's attempts to deflect blame, however, are undermined by its single and overarching responsibility: that as an occupying power in a conflict, it is legally obliged to ensure the provision of means of life for those under occupation.
And while Israel has consistently tried to blame Hamas for intercepting food aid, that claim has been undermined by a leaked US assessment, seen by Reuters, which found no evidence of systematic theft by the Palestinian militant group of US-funded humanitarian supplies.
Examining 156 incidents of theft or loss of US-funded supplies reported by US aid partner organisations between October 2023 and May 2025, it said it found 'no reports alleging Hamas' benefited from US-funded supplies.
Israel has also recently intensified efforts to blame the UN for the problems with aid distribution, citing a 'lack of cooperation from the international community and international organisations'. Israel's claims are contradicted by clear evidence of its efforts to undermine aid distribution.
Despite international warnings of the humanitarian risks posed by banning Unrwa, the main UN agency for Palestinians and the organisation with the most experience in Gaza, from Israel, its operations were closed down, complicating aid efforts.
Instead Israel, backed by the US, has relied on the private, inexperienced and controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation; its sites have been the focus of numerous mass killings of desperate Palestinians by Israeli soldiers.
Israel's attempts to hamper with aid efforts have continued. Last week it said it would not renew the work visa of Jonathan Whittall, the most senior UN aid official in Gaza; and a UN spokesperson, Stéphane Dujarric, told reporters on Thursday that Israel had rejected eight of the 16 UN requests to transport humanitarian aid in Gaza the previous day.
He added that two other requests, initially approved, led to staff facing obstruction on the ground as he described a pattern of 'bureaucratic, logistical, administrative and other operational obstacles imposed by Israeli authorities'.
All of which has injected a new sense of urgency into the catastrophe in Gaza as UN agencies warned that they were on the brink of running out of specialised food needed to save the lives of severely malnourished children.
'Most malnutrition treatment supplies have been consumed and what is left at facilities will run out very soon if not replenished,' a WHO spokesperson said on Thursday.
More starvation deaths appear inevitable.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Has Trump just become the very model of a modern liberal leader?
Has Trump just become the very model of a modern liberal leader?

The Independent

time12 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Has Trump just become the very model of a modern liberal leader?

Giving an all-important green light to Keir Starmer for the UK to recognise Palestine… rejecting Netanyahu's claim that there is no food crisis in Gaza by saying there is 'real starvation'…giving Russia a '10 to 12 days' ultimatum over Ukraine… Was this the week that Donald J Trump became the kind of leader that liberals dream of? One day we may know the full story of this remarkable transformation – and, while there are many caveats, doubts and, very likely, disappointments to follow, we should at least cherish such unexpected developments as this. 'We have to get the kids fed' is as simple and powerful an instruction as we could possibly hope to get from the leader of the free world. No moral equivocation there, no 'both sides' – and no room for delay, is not a coincidence that, grudgingly and still inadequately, Israel is allowing humanitarian aid into Gaza, and, as a result, lives will be saved. Trump isn't asinine enough to pretend that there is no starvation in the Gaza Strip, and, loyal as he may be, neither is he so beholden to his friend BiBi that he is going to be taken in by the most audacious and shameful attempt at gaslighting to that effect in the history of the State of Israel. We can maybe see what is happening here, both with Israel and with Russia, where Trump's patience with Vladimir Putin, another strong man he wished to build a partnership with, has also been exhausted. First, there is that decision where Trump decides he wants to build that rapport with a counterpart. Usually, this is a strong guy – Putin, Netanyahu, even Kim Jong-un in the first term. Let's not forget that he has even tried to get on terms with the ayatollahs in (oil-rich) Iran, much to Israeli alarm. Starmer, unusually, is someone Trump should despise, but instead declares that he just can't stop praising and liking the guy. It surpasses human understanding. Second, there's usually some sort of distant private deal on the side, maybe real estate or raw materials, maybe with US interests as well as family ones mixed in. Hence his partial rapprochement with Zelensky, built on rare earths. Notice also how Trump used to fantasise about building a golf course on the North Korean coast, or the bizarre plan to turn Gaza into a beach resort. When he basically told the world he had given up on Putin's sincerity, Trump could surely have wept about how Russia could be such a rich country… if only Putin had allowed Trump to get involved in the economy, he didn't quite add. Netanyahu, who was taken by surprise by the US-administered Gaza resort idea, may not be proving as useful in this enterprise as Trump first assumed he would – but that is certainly a more confusing picture. You may recall that in that unusually candid interview Trump recently gave to the BBC's Gary O'Donoghue, the president admitted that he trusts 'almost nobody', but that he wasn't yet 'done' with Putin. Well, now he is because, as Trump himself says, they are these nice, long, respectful conversations in which Trump listens sympathetically to Putin's case and Russia's wartime sacrifices – and then the Russians bomb a nursing home in Kyiv or something. The truth is that Trump has at times seemed too inclined to trust people he shouldn't, and all too ready to make enemies of natural allies – Justin Trudeau in Canada, Ishiba Shigeru in Japan – but when he finally works out that he's been played along, he will act accordingly. Hence the abandonment of Putin and the distancing of Netanyahu, whose policies, which Trump indulged, have destroyed Trump's plan for a lucrative new economic zone in the Middle East from the Gulf to the Mediterranean, based on his Abraham Accords programme. There is now no chance of Saudi Arabia normalising relations with Israel, greatly to Trump's annoyance. Last, Trump may not be the one-dimensional monster he is satirised as, though he's no one's idea of a hero. Prompted by First Lady Melania Trump, he seems to have been, at last, genuinely moved by the savagery that Putin has inflicted on Ukrainian civilians; and the same compassion about the starving children in Gaza seems to be impelling him to act with an unusual moral intensity. He can be driven by the humanitarian impulse in the same way anyone can. Of course, we need not get carried away. The United States is boycotting the UN two-state solution conference on the future of Palestine. The plan for a Gaza beach resort is still, apparently, Trump administration policy, with the prospect that the Palestinians will be driven from their homes; reports suggest the Americans have been looking for places where refugees could be resettled, which would be near enough to a forced displacement as to be a crime against humanity. Trump is not going to switch sides again and have America support the restoration of full Ukrainian sovereignty – and the Trump White House will continue to deny climate change, and launch trade wars as it fancies. Yet these last few days have seen some extremely welcome signs that Trump is capable of doing some good every now and again. Trump says he's stopped wars between India and Pakistan, Rwanda and the DRC, and Cambodia and Thailand. Exaggerated or not, the United States is playing the right sort of role. If it is now pursuing ceasefires in Ukraine and Gaza, in each case a peace that passeth all understanding, we should just take the wins – even if it means Trump takes the Nobel Peace Prize.

More than 60,000 people killed in Gaza during Israel offensive, Hamas-run health ministry says
More than 60,000 people killed in Gaza during Israel offensive, Hamas-run health ministry says

BBC News

time13 minutes ago

  • BBC News

More than 60,000 people killed in Gaza during Israel offensive, Hamas-run health ministry says

More than 60,000 people have been killed as a result of Israel's military campaign in Gaza since October 2023, the Hamas-run health ministry said on Monday that the death toll had reached at least 60,034, with 145,870 others injured. At least 112 people were killed in the 24 hours before late Tuesday morning, with 22 people killed while trying to get aid, the ministry saidIsrael launched its offensive in response to the Hamas-led attack on southern Israel on 7 October 2023, in which about 1,200 people were killed and 251 others were taken hostage. The latest figures come as UN-backed global food security experts warn that the worst-case scenario of famine is "currently playing out" in the Gaza Strip. While Israel continues to insist it is not responsible for the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and does not impose restrictions on aid entering Gaza, those claims are not accepted by its close allies in Europe, or the United Nations and other agencies active in Sunday, Israel, which controls all entry of goods into Gaza, began what it said would be daily 10-hour "tactical pauses" to allow for humanitarian aid delivery, and announced the establishment of "designated secure routes" for aid has also allowed aid drops by foreign countries to resume, despite humanitarian agencies warning that the method was ineffective and dangerous.

Labour's non-dom tax raid triggers £700m property sell-off
Labour's non-dom tax raid triggers £700m property sell-off

Telegraph

time13 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Labour's non-dom tax raid triggers £700m property sell-off

Wealthy Emiratis are pouncing on prime London homes left behind by fleeing non-doms, analysis suggests. Some £694m worth of 'super prime' homes sold in London in the first half of the year, according to Beauchamp Estates, a luxury estate agency. The company said 70pc of sellers were so-called 'non-domiciled people' who had fled Britain after Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, ended their tax status in April. The changes, first floated by the Conservatives, but ultimately brought in by Ms Reeves in her October Budget, removed domicile status from the UK tax system, which means new arrivals to Britain must pay the same tax as everyone else after four years. New arrivals will only benefit from 100pc tax relief on foreign income and gains for the first four years of their tax residence, as long as they have been non-resident for the past 10 years. The move has sparked fears of an exodus of wealthy would-be taxpayers to more lenient tax regimes in the Middle East, and reportedly prompted the Chancellor to consider watering down the pledge. Gary Hersham, of Beauchamp Properties, said that a 'fascinating 'house swapping' trend' had emerged in London's property market as a result, with 'a wave of non-doms relocating to Dubai and Abu Dhabi, and a return wave of Emirati buyers purchasing large residences in London'. Jo Eccles, of prime central London buying agency, Eccord, said fleeing non-doms were selling 'some fabulous prime and super-prime homes that rarely come up for sale', presenting unique buying opportunities for wealthy Emiratis. Middle Eastern buyers typically flock to London in summer, lured by the status symbol of owning property in the capital, high-end shopping destinations and the ease of access to Europe. Ms Eccles said: 'Emiratis tend to flood to London at this time of year, and their supercars are a familiar sight on the streets of Knightsbridge until around September. 'As buyers, they're known for their spontaneity, so if they see a property they like, it's not uncommon for them to snap it up on a whim without worrying too much about the price or what else might be out there.' However, Beauchamp Estates found that the number of luxury homes being sold in the capital in the first half of the year had fallen by almost half. The company said the value of deals agreed for 'ultra-prime' homes worth over £15m had fallen by 13pc from £795m since 2024. It comes amid fears Labour could implement a wealth tax on assets worth over £10m as the Government desperately tries to plug holes in the public finances. Left-wing MPs are said to be lobbying the Chancellor for additional taxes on the wealthy. However, Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, dismissed the idea as 'daft', and urged backbenchers to 'be serious'. Meanwhile, analysis by estate agent Savills found that the number of £5m-plus homes being sold was at its second-lowest since 2020, and 15pc lower in the three months to June than the same period last year. However, sales volumes were still 18pc higher than the pre-Covid average, as 'savvy buyers are keeping momentum afloat', said Nick Maud, of Savills. The estate agent found under-30s accounted for almost a quarter of London buyers in the first half of the year, compared to 19pc in 2024 and 12pc a decade ago. Mr Maud said: 'With the autumn Budget approaching, the Government will be examining ways to raise revenue. 'While there will always be a temptation to link taxes to fixed assets such as property, there are also lessons to be learnt from previous ill-fated mansion tax proposals. 'Ultimately, valuation challenges, and failure to distinguish net vs gross wealth, and the risk to asset-rich, cash-poor owners, outweighed the modest revenue potential.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store