Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know
Last Updated: July 28, 2025, 20:10 IST
News18
Is the United Kingdom considering having a Sikh regiment in its forces? Several media reports have emerged recently hinting that the British Army is considering a proposal to induct a Sikh regiment.
However, the UK's Ministry of Defence has denied, saying there are no such proposals in this regard. 'We want to do something to recognise Sikh contributions in some way, but not through a Sikh regiment," sources in the defence ministry told Times of India .
The issue came into the limelight after Lord Sahota, a member of the House of Lords, asked UK defence minister Lord Coaker in the House of Lords on July 7 regarding the progress on having a Sikh regiment in the British Army.
Coaker said, 'Let me consider that request from my noble friend. I am quite happy to meet him and see what more we can do to recognise the contribution of soldiers such as Sikhs."
Coaker's remark led to media headlines like 'UK considering to have Sikh Regiment."
Lord Sahota's grandfathers have served in the British Indian army, including the 15th Punjab Regiment.
Speaking to TOI , he said he does not think this proposal will not against the UK Equality Act, highlighting the Staffordshire Regiment, Brigade of Gurkhas, the Royal Yorkshire Regiment, Royal Welsh and Royal Regiment of Scotland.
As per the TOI report, there are around 200 Sikhs in the British Armed Forces at present.
Swipe Left For Next Video View all
The Sikh Regiment's origins are found within the British East India Company Army. Sikh soldiers were notably recruited following the First Anglo-Sikh War (1845–46) and even more extensively after the Second Anglo-Sikh War (1848–49).
Serving with distinction as part of the British Indian Army, the Sikh Regiment played a significant role in both World War I and World War II. During the First World War, over 100,000 Sikhs were part of the British Indian Army, with a number of Sikh soldiers receiving the Victoria Cross, the highest British military honour. For the Second World War, more than 300,000 Sikhs served in the Indian Army. Saurabh Verma
Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for News18.com as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter --twitter.com/saurabhkverma19
Saurabh Verma covers general, national and international day-to-day news for News18.com as a Senior Sub-editor. He keenly observes politics. You can follow him on Twitter --twitter.com/saurabhkverma19 view comments News world Sikh Regiment In British Army Soon? Here's What We Know Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Allow Sikh students to carry articles of faith to exam centres: Rajasthan govt
The Rajasthan government has reiterated that Sikh students must be allowed to appear for competitive examinations while wearing articles of faith such as kirpan, kada, and pagdi. A fresh directive in this regard was issued on July 29, in the wake of widespread outrage over a female Sikh student being denied entry to a civil judge recruitment examination while wearing a kirpan, or ceremonial dagger. The recent directive referred to a 2019 circular issued by the previous Congress-led administration, which had asked all concerned to permit Sikh candidates to wear religious symbols during examinations conducted by the Rajasthan Public Service Commission and Staff Selection Board. On Sunday, Gurpreet Kaur, a candidate from Punjab's Tarn Taran district, posted a video on social media alleging that she was barred from appearing for the Rajasthan High Court Civil Judge examination in Jaipur on July 27 for carrying a kirpan, a mandatory article of faith for amritdhari (baptised) Sikhs. The incident sparked criticism from the Sikh community and religious bodies. Giani Kuldeep Singh Gargajj, officiating chief priest of Akal Takht, condemned the incident. "Denying entry to amritdhari candidates in the Rajasthan High Court Judge Exam is a major constitutional violation and anti-Sikh discrimination. Shiromani Akali Dal and SGPC should form a joint delegation and raise the matter with the Government of India and the Government of Rajasthan for permanent resolution," Mr. Gargajj said in an X post. "National Commission for Minorities chairman Iqbal Singh Lalpura must take up the issue with the Prime Minister and Home Minister and send a detailed report to Sri Akal Takht Sahib," he added. The Rajasthan State Minority Commission has also written to officials, citing repeated complaints from Sikh candidates and stressing that failure to enforce the existing policy has caused resentment within the community. Additional Chief Secretary (Home) Bhaskar A Sawant, in his directive, acknowledged the lapses in enforcing the 2019 instructions and emphasised the need for compliance. He noted that candidates may be instructed to arrive an hour early for security checks, but added that religious symbols should not be a ground for denial unless a suspicious device is detected during screening. The directive also referred to a Delhi High Court ruling, which permitted the carrying of religious items to exam centres, provided the security protocols are met. Welcoming the reaffirmation of policy, BJP MLA from Sadulshahar, Gurveer Singh, said in an X post that the chief minister has responded to the issue with "clarity and sensitivity." He urged the Sikh students to uphold the dignity of their faith while following examination guidelines.
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
Trump's Trade War Isn't About Policy—It's About Power
The US's disputes with India and Brazil are purely a result of an arrogant display of power, disregarding the interests of friendly nations It was supposed to be a trade deal between the world's most powerful nation and the fourth-largest economy by gross domestic product (GDP). But there's now a possibility that it may turn into a source of serious geopolitical tension—with Brazil, Russia, India, and China bundled on one side. If that happens, President Donald Trump cannot evade responsibility for causing the greatest harm to the India–US strategic partnership—which had evolved over the last two decades—merely to satisfy his ego. While the US's resistance to Russia and China is strategic and understandable, the disputes with India and Brazil are purely a result of an arrogant display of power, disregarding the interests of friendly nations. The US President wants to be known as a global peace broker. Delhi has no objection to that. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi denied him the pleasure of interfering in India's recent actions against Pakistan. To begin with, India's trade negotiation team had little clue about the US decision to impose a 25 per cent (reciprocal) tariff plus a 10 per cent penalty—on merchandise trade—for buying Russian arms and oil. The penalty component was not even on the table as recently as last week. Delhi has recently entered into a path-breaking Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK, under which India opened 89.5 per cent of its tariff lines, covering 91 per cent of UK exports. India has agreed to reduce import duties substantially on key British interests such as automobiles, Scotch whisky, cosmetics, medical devices, silver, etc. This transition will occur in a phased manner. Delhi had offered a similar, if not better, set of concessions to the USA but refused to open the market to genetically modified (GM) food, dairy, and a few other agricultural products. India has strict policies on these items, and even countries like New Zealand were denied market access for dairy. A separate negotiation was underway regarding the reduction of non-tariff barriers (NTBs). Indian sources say US trade negotiators were 'satisfied" with India's proposals, and the draft agreement had been awaiting the President's approval for over a week. The general consensus in Delhi was that Trump would eventually seek personal credit for 'forcing' India to open its markets. On July 20, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told an American TV channel that the August 1 deadline for new tariffs was sacrosanct. If countries failed to reach trade deals by then, the previously announced reciprocal tariffs would take effect—though trade negotiations could still continue. 'Nothing stops countries from talking to us after August 1," he said. Accordingly, India completed scenario planning as early as last week to prepare for a 25 per cent US tariff until a deal was reached. The 10 per cent 'penalty" was not anticipated. The US accounted for just over one-fifth of India's $371 billion goods exports in 2024–25. A 35 per cent tariff will inevitably affect some of that trade. Apparently, Trump is using this as leverage to pressure India. According to some sources, Trump personally requested Prime Minister Narendra Modi to credit him for stopping the India-Pakistan war—an appeal Modi declined. Meanwhile, Modi clarified on the floor of Parliament that US Vice-President JD Vance had unsuccessfully tried to persuade him to halt Operation Sindoor against Pakistan. 'The US Vice President tried to contact me three or four times, but I was in meetings with the armed forces," PM Modi said on July 29. When he returned the call, Vance warned of a 'big attack from Pakistan," to which Modi responded that any attack on India would be met with a 'much bigger attack". While the prime minister's statement in Parliament effectively ended the debate over US interference in India's response to Pakistan's state-sponsored terrorism, Trump, on the same day, reiterated his 'role' in preventing an India–Pakistan war and hinted at imposing a 20–25 per cent tariff on India. On Wednesday, the US announced a deal to develop Pakistan's 'massive oil reserves". It remains unclear what reserves he was referring to. At best, the US may be aiming to gain control over some of Pakistan's mineral resources, outbidding China. As one Indian official put it: 'We are in a peculiar situation where decisions on trade and tariffs are no longer linked to economic arguments." The submission of Japan, South Korea, and the European Union may have bolstered Trump's ego. But given India's historical defiance—like the 1998 nuclear tests—it would be unwise to underestimate its nationalist resolve. Delhi has a history of resisting foreign pressure. What works in India's favour is that roughly 4–5 percent of its growth is domestically driven. While exports help boost growth figures, India is not as export-dependent as, say, Vietnam, which relies heavily on US markets. In his latest outburst, Trump warned that India and Russia would 'take their dead economies down together". He claimed the US has little business interest in India. We will have to wait and see how American industry—especially giants like Apple—react to such outrageous claims. But one thing is certain: India is in for a few difficult quarters on the export and growth front. A silver lining lies in ongoing litigation in the US challenging the legality of Trump's reciprocal tariffs. The US President invoked an emergency law to take sweeping action, bypassing Congress. Pratim Ranjan Bose is an independent columnist. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views. tags : donald trump India-Pakistan ties pm narendra modi tariffs United states view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: July 31, 2025, 14:36 IST News opinion Opinion | Trump's Trade War Isn't About Policy—It's About Power Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
24 minutes ago
- News18
'This Was A False Case': Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani On Malegaon Verdict
A Mumbai court acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon blasts case, including ex-BJP MP Pragya Singh. Mahesh Jethmalani called it a "false case" and "politically driven." A special court in Mumbai has acquitted all seven accused in the Malegaon blasts case. Reacting to the verdict, senior advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, who had previously represented Sadhvi Pragya, said 'this was a false case." Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur was acquitted of the charges against her, along with six others, by an NIA court. Jethmalani further said the issue was 'politicised" and was 'only to further statement by a leading politician that Hindu terrosism was more dangerous than LET Terrorism." 'I feel sorry for the victims who suffered as the case was politically driven." After 17 years since the bomb blast was carried out in the Muslim-dominated area of Mumbai's Malegaon during the month of Ramadan in 2008. Former BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur, Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit and Retired Major Ramesh Upadhyay were among the seven accused named by NIA in the case. After a long-shelved legal battle, all 7 accused are acquitted today. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) took over the charge of Malegaon attack from Maharashtra Anti-terrorism squad in 2011. As per the court's verdict pronounced today, the prosecution failed to present any concrete evidence linking the seven accused to the 2008 Malegaon blasts. The single-judge bench led by AK Lahoti stated that the use of UAPA in this case was also defective. The court observed no religion teaches violence, the court said. Terrorism has no religion, but the court cannot convict on mere perception. Special judge A K Lahoti, presiding over National Investigation Agency (NIA) cases, while reading out the judgment said there was no 'reliable and cogent evidence" against the accused that proved the case beyond reasonable doubt. What Happened In 2008? An explosive device strapped to a motorcycle went off near a mosque in the town, located about 200 km from Mumbai, on September 29, 2008 killing six persons and injuring 101 others. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
