
‘Grenfell: Uncovered' interview: ‘This community lost so much and got so little back'
The biggest residential fire since the Blitz broke out in Grenfell tower on June 14, 2017. Few Londoners can have shaken off the memory of the North Kensington high-rise blazing through the night as firefighters worked desperately – and fruitlessly – to subdue it.
'I was on holiday in Thailand at the time,' remembers Grenfell: Uncovered director Olaide Sadiq. 'The news [chyron] had 'fire in London' on it, but I didn't think it was real. I didn't understand how it was even possible that this had happened.'
When she got back to the UK, the filmmaker discovered that she knew one of the victims of the fire – 'Her face was popping up in group chats as missing' – which added a personal dimension to the disaster.
Eight years on, her documentary about the fire is both poignant and enraging. None of the responsible parties is let off the hook – cladding manufacturers like Arconic, bureaucrats like Hammersmith and Fulham Council, and politicians alike – but the deeper story is one of resilience and misplaced trust. 'This was the biggest residential fire in Britain since the Blitz,' says Sadiq. 'You expect this kind of devastation at war, but you don't expect it in the middle of the night when people are sleeping.'
You speak to a lot of traumatised people in the film. How did you approach those interviews?
With respect and care. A lot of the Grenfell community have been poked and prodded for a long time, and there's a lot of trauma in everyone that's been affected by the story. We had to make it as safe a space as possible. The interviews were still the hardest I've ever done.
You interrogate the companies behind the cladding products. How challenging was that aspect of the film?
Yeah, the corporate side of things was complicated and eye-opening. A lot of people didn't want to speak to us, and understandably so, but everyone was given an opportunity to respond. But I'm very aware there's an ongoing criminal investigation, so I wasn't expecting anyone to welcome us with open arms.
Are you concerned that a fire like this could happen again?
Yeah, I think I am. We've had cladding fires since Grenfell: there was a fatal cladding fire in Valencia last year, and another one in Dagenham, where luckily there were no fatalities. I have to think that it's possible that it will happen again. Hopefully, the response will be different.
The Prime Minister at the time, Theresa May, famously failed to meet Grenfell survivors. How did you get her to talk in the film?
The decision to talk to us was quick; the decision to be on camera was slower. Regardless of people's political affiliations and opinions, I think it was quite brave [of her]. She wanted to own what she did and didn't do. She was happy to own that on camera, and we gave her the opportunity to do that. I respected that.
What does this story say about the country that we live in?
Great question. That we place a lot of trust in those that are meant to look after us. It showed me that this country is sometimes hesitant to change, but hopefully this film will spark real conversations about change. It's what the people affected by Grenfell want. Accountability, as well.
You must have had two audiences in mind: the Grenfell survivors groups and those who were less familiar with the story?
The story is not finished for [the Grenfell groups]. They are still waiting for what the Met Police decides to do. They're hoping [the film] brings more awareness to their story. We want it to ignite real conversation about what happened and what people want to happen next. There's still a lot of buildings with flammable cladding on them.
What did you learn about Londoners making this film?
I felt a sense of closeness within the community, but a sadness to it. I've always felt relatively safe living in London. What working on this showed me is that there's times it isn't safe – but in a way that you're not expecting. If you go down a dark alley in the middle of the night, you might expect something bad to happen to you, but they went to bed and woke up in the middle of night with their building on fire. That's the biggest violation of safety most people could experience.
What binds the survivors together?
Resilience. We spoke to very young people, we spoke to grandparents, and across the board there was a sense of resilience that I was astounded by. I was breaking down just reading the witness statements – it was harrowing. I couldn't imagine how people could get up and go after that. There was such resilience and strength in the community that lost so much and got so little back.
The community lost so much and got so little back
How do you cope with watching this harrowing footage, day after day?
It was very difficult. It was really hard to watch some of the footage – some of it was too harrowing to use. I went for walks and listened to cheesy music, but there were people there to support us as well. I had to make sure I wasn't always sitting with the images.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Metro
20 hours ago
- Metro
We tried Google's new AI video to see if it's as mindblowing as it seems
You've probably seen the highly realistic AI video saturating social media. That Stormtrooper building a snowman? Made by Google Veo 3. The surfing unicorn passing ice floes while penguins rave under the northern lights? Also AI… we assume. If you can dream it, you can create it, which is incredibly exciting – but also incredibly unsettling, in terms of what it means for creative industries as well as misinformation and fact checking. A quick rundown: Google now allows you to create a cinematic video clip, just from typing in what you want to see. It includes realistic voices and sound, which sets it apart from other models. Given I've never had skill as a filmmaker, I was amazed to be able to make a clip of something you'd previously need Hollywood special effects teams to conjure up, just from writing a couple of sentences on my computer. The video below shows the three videos we made at Metro to test out the new tech, which Google launched in the UK on May 30. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video First off, we thought we'd boost morale in the team by looking at what Londoners really think of Metro. We used this prompt: Starts off with a wide shot. A glorious sunny day. Quiet roads. Tracks into an excited crowd gathered on High Street Kensington in London, with majestic buildings all around, including a Whole Foods. The crowd is young, cool and full of anticipation. A red London bus pulls into shot and a door opens. A brown Lakeland Patterdale terrier scampers off the bus, barking excitedly, and leaps into the arms of a nearby man, tall, tanned wth curly hair and short tidy beard, very handsome, wearing a navy three piece suit. A statuesque woman with a chignon emerges from the bus with a stack of Metro newspapers in her arms. She distributes them to an ecstatic crowd who immediately start reading with great enthusiasm. 'Long live Metro', they all cry in unison. On first glance, it's pretty realistic (no?) But you don't need to be Sherlock Holmes to notice that buses don't usually open through the front windscreen, the shop sign reads 'Whole Foobs', or that the editor rather inconsiderately drops the dog as soon as he gets outside. Also, the crowds we imagined would represent multicultural, cool London were all quite similar young white men in shirts. It's well known that AI can contain the biases of data it is trained on, so it's possible that this is related. After trying to refine the prompt by making it more detailed, we still didn't get a diverse crowd, but we did get 'Long Live Metro' pronounced with 'live' rhyming with 'dive'. I wanted to test how easy it would be to create something which could be spread as false information, inciting tensions by looking realistic. So I asked for the video to look like it was shot on a phone, like most witness footage of public incidents is. It should look as though it is shot with a phone camera, with slightly shaky footage. The scene is a typical British high street, with shops including Boots, Primark and Tesco. A young man wearing a balaclava runs into view holding a hammer, and begins smashing all the shop windows, shouting 'you're going to pay for this'. A woman with shopping bags tries to stop him but he pushes her aside. Thinking of the recent riots which affected towns across the UK, I wanted to produce something with the potential to go viral on social media and incite some angry reactions about law and order. On this occasion, I don't think anyone would be fooled. The video came back without sound (an issue that has affected quite a few videos, which I'll come to later), and the assailant's balaclava vanished from his face mid hammer swipe, quite a giveaway that AI had a hand in it. Shot with a glossy, high definition feel, it definitely didn't look like grainy user generated content either. After writing about the fiery 'Gate of Hell' crater in Turkmenistan finally starting to burn itself out, this came to mind as a potentially cinematic backdrop. Night is falling near the 'Gate of Hell' Darvaza Crater in Turkmenistan. The light from the fire within makes the dark sky glow. A woman, in her forties, wearing a protective suit but with her hair down, looks into the depths, seeing flames flickering inside. She says: 'They say this pit will burn itself out soon. Before that happens, I will take the fire home.' Then she clambers over the edge. This one was my favourite and the most successful prompt, even though I didn't go into too much detail. I didn't see any immediately obvious AI flaws (maybe because with just one person, it was less complicated to create) and I think the special effects could even belong in a blockbuster film. I suppose I shouldn't be too pleased with myself, as I literally did nothing requiring talent to create it. But opens up new pathways to explore whatever you can imagine, so I'm not surprised the feature has gone viral. We asked Google where they see this tech heading in the future, given that AI is already accelerating at unnerving speed (mocking it for not being able to count fingers already feels hopelessly out of date). Matthieu Lorrain, Creative Lead at Google DeepMind, told Metro: 'We're already seeing Veo 3 used for everything from making a quick clip for socials, to turning an inside joke into a moving meme, or visualising a cool concept quickly. These are some of the main use cases that we've seen since the feature launched on Gemini.' Some of the clips they produced to showcase the feature are below: To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For now, one of the annoying parts of making a video is that you can't edit it; I can't ask it to refine the clip and ask for the animal-loving editor not to drop his dog, for example. It would just come up with a new clip entirely. Mr Lorrain said: 'Adding the ability to more easily refine and finesse a prompt or generated video is definitely something we're working on. For now, it's a case of experimenting with the wording to try and get the video to generate as you'd like, which is trial and error, but it's also part of the fun!' Google is currently testing the ability to generate video from an image, which is one of the most in-demand as well as potentially concerning possibilities of AI video. If you could upload an image of a real person, you could make a convincing deepfake with the potential to spread misinformation. But there are also legitimate reasons you might want to do this. Reddit founder Alexis Ohanian recently shared a tweet of a video generated from a photo of his mother hugging him, using another AI software Midjourney. Explaining he lost his mother 20 years ago and that the family could not afford a camcorder, he had no moving images to remember her by so created the short animation to better imagine what happened either side of the shot. Damn, I wasn't ready for how this would feel. We didn't have a camcorder, so there's no video of me with my mom. I dropped one of my favorite photos of us in midjourney as 'starting frame for an AI video' and wow… This is how she hugged me. I've rewatched it 50 times. — Alexis Ohanian 🗽 (@alexisohanian) June 22, 2025 People might also understandably want to imagine themselves in James Bond-like situations, or more boringly, for more polished content on their socials. For now, you also cannot specify a famous person in the written prompt and make a video of them using publicly available images, even though this would technically be possible (there are both legal and ethical reasons for this). I asked Gemini for a video of Keir Starmer giving a speech outside Downing Street to warn of an invasion of glowing, radioactive hamsters just to see, but sadly was blocked from bringing this into technicolour. It is currently only available to those with a subscription, which costs £18.99 a month. Once you have access, you can simply type your prompt into Gemini, the company's rival to ChatGPT, or use Flow, which is designed for more serious AI filmmaking, and allows the use of consistent elements such as a particular character across clips. Users can make three clips a day, to prevent servers being overloaded. To make the film, you simply write a paragraph about what you want it to show, detailing the style and camera work as well as the subject and script. Google gave a list of tips for a successful prompt here. Google warns users on Flow that audio is still an experimental feature and so videos 'might not always have sound' (so if this happens to you, it's not a problem with your speakers). They said speech does better with slightly longer transcripts, is muted for minors, and can trigger subtitles. 'We're working on it,' they said. It's a safe bet that AI will be shaking up filmmaking, just as it is every other industry. More Trending You can already generate a realistic-sounding 'podcast' on any topic just from uploading information about it, and I wouldn't be surprised if you could generate your own feature films soonish on any topic you like too, without having to log into Disney Plus or Netflix at all. Admittedly, the quality would probably be mixed, and there could be copyright issues if you just uploaded a manuscript of the latest bestseller. Mr Lorrain said: 'With regards to the future, as with any groundbreaking technology, we're still understanding the full potential of AI in filmmaking. We see the emergence of these tools as an enabler, helping a new wave of filmmakers more easily tell their stories. By offering filmmakers early access to Flow, we were able to better understand how our technology could best support and integrate into their creative workflows — and we've woven their insights into Flow. 'Veo 3 represents a huge step forward in quality, with greater realism, 4K output, and incredibly lifelike physics and audio. Like any powerful creative tool, it rewards practice—the more descriptive your prompts, the better your video. When it comes to getting the most out of Veo 3, think of prompting as learning to speak Veo's language—the more fluently and descriptively you articulate your vision, the better the video will be.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Games Inbox: Is AI going to ruin video games? MORE: Front Mission 3: Remake updated its graphics with AI slop and fans are not happy MORE: UK watchdog could force Google to make changes – what are they?


Scottish Sun
a day ago
- Scottish Sun
Most women don't feel safe walking alone at night, damning poll finds
Experts said the results are 'extremely concerning' NIGHT TERROR Most women don't feel safe walking alone at night, damning poll finds MOST women do not feel safe walking alone at night, a damning poll has found. 75 per cent said they feel unsafe at night, while 27 per cent said they do not feel safe walking along in the day. Advertisement Only a third of women feel safe using public transport at night, compared to nearly 60 per cent of men who feel safe. Half of Londoners feel unsafe using public transport at night, according to the poll by Merlin Strategy. The survey of 2,000 adults last week also found 23 per cent of Brits say Nigel Farage's Reform UK would be the best party at handling crime. 20 per cent say the Conservatives and 19 per cent say Labour. Advertisement READ MORE UK NEWS HIGH-LIGHT I spent the night in the UK's biggest National Park with amazing stargazing Although the Tories were the preferred party to deal with the issue among women. Dr Lawrence Newport, director of campaign group Crush Crime which commissioned the poll, said: 'These results are extremely concerning. 'Governments have given up on voters - they've given up on capturing and prosecuting the criminals that harass and ruin our public spaces. 'When only six per cent of women feel safe walking home at night, government needs to react. Advertisement 'No one should feel unsafe in their local areas - the streets should be owned by the people of this country, not by criminals.' I'm a car expert - my little-known car key trick will help keep women safe while driving


Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
Strictly star injured in horror London street phone robbery
Strictly Come Dancing star Michelle Tsiakkas has taken to social media to reveal she was the victim of a startling mobile phone robbery while out in London in broad daylight Strictly Come Dancing professional Michelle Tsiakkas has recounted being mugged for her phone in the streets of London. The 29-year-old dance expert has appeared on the hit BBC show since 2022. She was paired with EastEnders star Jamie Borthwick in the 2024 contest where they landed in seventh place. Taking to social media at the end of the week, the TV star shared a haunting account of being mugged in broad daylight. She told fans in a video message shared on her main grid: "This was a couple of days ago and I've just about mentally recovered from that. It was quite traumatising on the day. "It wasted my whole day and made me feel awful, scared, helpless and I don't want the same to happen to you. My phone got stolen. My phone got stolen. "I mean I see it happening all the time but it's just one of those things that you just never think it's gonna happen to you. And then it does." She went on to explain that she was simply going about her day when a criminal whizzed past her on an electric bike and snatched her phone from her hand. She recalled: "So it was early morning. I was on my way to the dentist in London. "It was around Covent Garden so the streets were really quiet. I think I was just the only person around so maybe I was an easy target and I whipped out my phone to have a look at the directions to see where my dentist was. "I was on the actual street of the dentist and what happens? A man comes on a bike behind me, sweeps past me and grabs my phone." Revealing she was injured in the incident, Michelle continued: "So he's grabbed my phone. He's on an electric bike and my heart just sank. I tried to I think like reach for it and that made me fall on my knees on the floor and graze my knee. "I think my reflex was just to swear and then scream give me back my phone and clearly you know that didn't work. He just left. He was wearing a mask so there was no way that I could have seen what he looked like and he was going really fast on that electric bike so there was no way on earth I could have caught up with him." She added: "Thankfully there were two really lovely and helpful women there and they'd seen that I was a bit distressed." Unsettled Londoners have been left in disbelief as mobile phone theft has increased at a horrifying rate. New statistics release this weekend have revealed that 231,000 phone thefts and robberies were recorded over the past four years in the city. Analysis by The Times revealed hotspots in London include St James's Park, where Piccadilly and Haymarket meet Pall Mall and Clarence House as well as parts of the West End. Figures released by Scotland Yard figures show a 20 per cent year-on-year increase in robberies - with 81,256 mobile phone crimes were recorded in 2023. The stats also showed that roughly 37 people have their phone snatched on the streets of the capital every day.