Bad Bunny's ‘NUEVAYol' Video Arrives on Fourth of July With Pro-Immigrant Message: ‘Together We Are Stronger'
In the video, which celebrates Latin culture in New York, the global superstar pays tribute to the Puerto Rican diaspora and delivers a sharp critique of Donald Trump's anti-immigrant policies.
More from Billboard
Bad Bunny Posts Video Slamming ICE Raids in Puerto Rico: 'Sons of B–ches'
BLACKPINK Is 'Ready to Jump' in What Looks to Be a New Music Teaser: Listen
Katy Perry & Orlando Bloom's Reps Address Split: They've 'Been Shifting Their Relationship'
One of the most striking moments in the video happens when a voice that sounds like Trump echoes through a vintage '70s radio. The message is clear and direct: 'I made a mistake. I want to apologize to the immigrants in America,' says the AI-powered Trump voice. 'I'm in the United States. I know America is the whole continent. I want to say that this country is nothing without the immigrants. This country is nothing without Mexicans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, Colombians, Venezuelans, Cubans…'
Aside from being an artistic gesture, it is a Fourth of July statement at a time when immigrant communities in the United States are the target of an aggressive deportation campaign. Just Thursday, Congress passed Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill,' which bolsters ICE's power with 10,000 new agents and 100,000 additional detention center beds.
This is not the first time Bad Bunny has spoken out against the inhumane treatment of immigrants. In June, the artist slammed ICE in a video recorded in Carolina, Puerto Rico, where officers are seen detaining several people in the streets. 'Those mother—-ers are in these cars, RAV4s. They came here… sons of bi—es, instead of letting the people alone and working,' Benito says in the video.
In the 'NUEVAYol' video, directed by Renell Medrano, Bad Bunny not only critiques anti-immigrant policies, but also proudly celebrates his Puerto Rican heritage. In one standout scene, the Statue of Liberty's forehead is draped with a massive Puerto Rican flag. The video closes with a powerful message in Spanish: 'Together We Are Stronger.'
Watch the video for 'NUEVAYol' below:
Best of Billboard
Chart Rewind: In 1989, New Kids on the Block Were 'Hangin' Tough' at No. 1
Janet Jackson's Biggest Billboard Hot 100 Hits
H.E.R. & Chris Brown 'Come Through' to No. 1 on Adult R&B Airplay Chart
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Barbara Kay: How Islamists hijacked leftist oppression narratives
In March 2008, revelations surfaced of past anti-American and antisemitic rhetoric by Barack Obama's longtime pastor and friend Rev. Jeremiah Wright, including Wright's accusation that the U.S.'s own terrorism helped motivate al-Qaida's 9/11 attack. Knowing his political credibility depended on it, Obama abruptly severed ties with Wright. Post-inauguration, Wright blamed 'them Jews' for Obama's continuing frostiness. Seventeen years on, Zohran Mamdani, newly-elected Democratic contender for New York's upcoming mayoralty race, appears to have (correctly) calculated that public allyship with an imam who lionizes Hamas, reviles Jews and Christians, and encourages anti-American pedagogy would not be a political liability in America's most Jewish city. Apart from smartphones spreading an oil slick of disinformation across Gen Z, strongly supportive of Mamdani, what explains such a momentous change in our political culture between the two campaigns? Principally, the symbiotic merger of three already active ideological streams that swelled into an impassable river: multiculturalism (all cultures equally deserving of respect), Islamism (Islamization of the West is inevitable) and intersectionality (all oppressed identity groups must stand together against a common enemy of white imperialism). Islam is a religion, not a race. Nevertheless, the merger allowed the Muslim Brotherhood — Islamism's C-suite in the West — to exploit the ideological overlap to align Islamist claims for oppression with Black Lives Matter, bestowing 'racialized' status on Muslims. The crossover permitted Islamists to promulgate false notions that are widely accepted as true: that 'brown' Palestinians are the world's most oppressed people, that 'white' Israel represents a uniquely evil form of colonialist oppression meriting violent elimination ('Globalize the Intifada') and that Islamophobia — a trope popularized in 1994 by a Runnymede Trust report, but almost invariably associated with the Organization of Islamic Cooperation — is, allegedly, a far greater problem than the actual global scourge of Islamism-driven terrorism. Since then, combatting an alleged 'Islamophobia industry' has been a principal focus of all Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated advocacy groups, as well as some academics and political actors. Their campaign of 'perception management' to ensure a reflexive, society-wide association between Muslims and victimhood has succeeded. I plucked the strikingly apt trope 'perception management' from journalist and Muslim Reformer Asra Nomani's enlightening 2023 book, Woke Army: The Red-Green alliance that is destroying America's freedom. In it, Nomani argues that the partnership between the hard left (red) and Islamism (green) exploits America's freedoms to wage disinformation and propaganda campaigns against critics of political Islam. Politicians and mainstream media learned over the years that it was easier, following news of jihadist violence, to acquiesce to the shibboleth that the 'religion of peace' had been 'hijacked' than to endure accusations of Islamophobia by insisting on more objective terms like 'radical' or 'political' Islam. A former Wall Street Journal reporter, Indian-born Muslim Nomani was a friend and colleague of Daniel Pearl, the WSJ's South Asia bureau chief who was kidnapped and publicly beheaded in 2002 by rabidly Judeophobic al-Qaida operatives. Pearl's gruesome death galvanized Nomani to political activism as a Muslim 'Reformer,' a Muslim who supports an interpretation of Islam that is compatible with human rights, gender equality, religious (or atheist) pluralism and secular governance. Irritated by her criticism, Muslim Brothers' machinations drew Nomani into a world of grief orchestrated by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), nominally a 'civil rights' organization but in Nomani's account, 'a front for an extremist form of Islam.' But she persevered, and Woke Army is, therefore, not only an enlightening exposé of the Muslim Brotherhood in America, but the absorbing story of Nomani's personal near-martyrdom and eventual triumph. To silence Nomani, CAIR foot soldiers cooked up a years-long character assassination campaign through 'the deadly underbelly of cyber jihad' — specifically Loonwatch, a GoDaddy website that protected their users' anonymity. Her foes there labelled her a 'Zionist media whore' amongst other slurs, and accused her of being funded by Israel. In 2018, Nomani responded with a defamation suit that halted Loonwatch harassment and permitted her to subpoena internet service providers for the real identities of 48 'John Doe' anonymous stalkers, most of them outed in Woke Army. The 'perception management' campaign found low-hanging fruit in left-leaning political leaders. President Obama, who flinched at Black anti-Americanism and antisemitism, was eager to please on the equally phobic Islamist file. When CAIR issued a statement Nomani described as advocating for 'separating the brutal actions of ISIS from the faith of Islam,' Obama obliged, she writes, with his government agencies giving in to pressure to scrub terms like 'jihadist' and replace them with 'extremist.' Although Nomani's research treats Islamism in the U.S., her themes map neatly onto Canada. Following the Islamism-driven 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, Justin Trudeau, asked to identify the bombing's 'root causes,' reflexively saw, heard, and spoke no Islamist evil, responding: 'there is no question that this happened because of someone who feels completely excluded, someone who feels completely at war with innocence, at war with society.' The Muslim Reform Movement, in which Nomani and Canada's own heroic Raheel Raza play prominent roles, has been stalwart in its resistance to Islamist bullying, but their members are in a David-and-Goliath relationship with what Nomani describes as Muslim Brotherhood's well-funded machine. They get worn down by what Nomani's young son articulated as a 'terrorism of the mind.' It would help if politicians cold-shouldered Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated groups and instead elevated Muslim Reformers' public status, seating them 'above the salt,' so to speak. Active pushback against institutionalized Islamism is in motion in the U.S. But in Canada, alas, 'perception management' rules at the desk where the buck on a threat to our cultural health is supposed to stop. kaybarb@ X: @BarbaraRKay National Post Adam Zivo: With Iran defeated, Israelis look for peace in Gaza Colby Cosh: Mark Carney's unstable environment
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Hard Not To Go There': Echo Sound Candidate For Test After Victory Ride Score
'Hard Not To Go There': Echo Sound Candidate For Test After Victory Ride Score originally appeared on Paulick Report. Gabriel Duignan's Echo Sound stormed home a 4 1/4-length winner in Thursday's Grade 3, $175,000 Victory Ride, a 6 1/2-furlong sprint for sophomore fillies during the July 4th Racing Festival, at Saratoga Race Course. Advertisement Trained by Rusty Arnold, the Echo Town bay pressed the pace through a half-mile in 44.85 seconds on the fast main track and separated from the field down the lane to surge through the wire to win in a final time of 1:15.49. The performance earned a career-best 101 Beyer Speed Figure. Arnold reported Echo Sound exited the strong showing in good order. 'She looks good. She came out of the race good,' said Arnold. 'She's good and healthy, and back in her feed good, with no issues. That was quite a performance. I thought she stepped up, she ran better; it was probably her best race and hopefully she is one on the improve because each race is going to be a little tougher.' The logical next spot would be the Grade 1, $500,000 Test, a seven-furlong sprint for sophomore fillies, on August 2 at Saratoga. Advertisement Interestingly, Arnold trained Victory Ride through a 9-5-1-2 record that included a score in the 2001 Test over eventual Hall of Famer Xtra Heat. "It would be hard not to go there if everything is good. If she comes back and trains well that would be where we would go,' Arnold said. 'You don't know until you do it, but you would think seven furlongs is within her realm, so we will give it a try." Echo Sound improved to 6-5-1-0 with additional stakes scores in the Grade 3 Miss Preakness on May 16 at Pimlico Race Course and the Myrtlewood in October at Keeneland, as well as a runner-up effort in the Fern Creek in November at Churchill Downs. This story was originally reported by Paulick Report on Jul 5, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Contributor: We still rely on gasoline. Why is California adding to the cost and the pollution?
California is a state of contradictions. We lead the nation in environmental regulation, tout our clean energy goals with pride and champion a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. Yet despite this green image, our economy — and daily life — still very much run on oil and gas. Fossil fuels account for roughly 8% of California's $3 trillion economy — but that's the first 8%. 'If you don't get that first 8%,' I tell my students, 'You don't get the rest of our economy.' Oil powers everything from trucks to tractors to construction equipment. Without it, you can't build roads or bridges or get goods to grocery stores. Without refined petroleum products, you don't make cement, steel, plastics or even the lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Despite these realities, California energy policy is leading to the dismantling of the critical infrastructure that supports this essential system. Our state has lost more than 30 refineries in the last few decades. We are now down to just nine major gasoline-producing facilities, and two more are scheduled to close in the coming months, Phillips 66 in Los Angeles and Valero in the Bay Area. Those two plants represent 284,000 barrels of daily production and account for nearly 18% of the state's total refining capacity. California sits atop one of the largest untapped reserves in the world, the Monterey Shale. But because of policy and regulation, we import most of our oil — including from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Brazil, Guyana and Ecuador. California has also imported oil from Russia and Venezuela. Ironically, we have among the world's cleanest refining standards, but we import fuel from places with lower environmental and labor protections. All of this is enabled by a supply chain that's more vulnerable than most realize. We have no major pipelines bringing oil to California. We rely on ships — many from Asia — that take 30 to 40 days to deliver fuel. These foreign tankers pollute at staggering rates. Stunningly, because that pollution happens over international waters, it doesn't get counted by the California Air Resources Board. Closing a refinery in California and importing more fuel causes a net increase in pollution. And adding to our reliance on foreign oil is risky when global instability is rising. This isn't just a self-inflicted energy crisis in the making. It's also a national security issue. Military bases in California, Nevada and Arizona depend heavily on in-state refineries for specialized aviation fuel and other petroleum products essential to operations. As refineries shut down, the supply chain narrows, increasing reliance on imports from Asia and elsewhere. These gaps create unacceptable logistical and strategic risks for U.S. military readiness in the western states. And remember, there are estimated to be hundreds of millions of barrels of accessible oil under our feet. Yet we've built an energy model that depends on importing foreign oil and, now, a growing dependency on foreign-supplied gasoline. This isn't just unsustainable. It's also borderline irresponsible. California's energy transition is inevitable — but how we get there matters. We can't pretend fossil fuels are already gone. We still need them for the economy, for mobility, for national security and for the working people who can't afford a $60,000 electric vehicle or a solar roof. We have the tools, talent and resources to lead a responsible energy transition, one that leverages our in-state production, balances environmental stewardship with economic pragmatism and protects our most vulnerable communities along the way. But we have to be honest about where we are. And right now, fossil fuels still power the Golden State. Especially because of coming refinery rules and a new tax taking effect in July, Californians are set to pay the highest gas prices in the nation. Our prices are inflated by a web of taxes, fees and boutique regulations that has grown thicker and more expensive over time. Even if oil dropped to $0 per barrel and refining were free, Californians would still be paying about $1.82 a gallon at the pump — $1.64 of that from state taxes and fees, plus 18 cents in federal gas tax. According to CalTrans, Californians drive about 1,200 miles a month. If you're a working-class Californian and gas goes up 50 cents per gallon, that adds about $500 in annual fuel costs. And because you pay for that with after-tax dollars, you'd need to earn at least an extra $750 just to cover it. That matters to a construction worker commuting 60 miles a day in a pickup truck. It matters to a single mom cleaning homes across the city or a physical therapist driving to house calls. Most of these people can't easily trade in their vehicles for Teslas and dodge gasoline hikes. Consumer analysis as noted in CalMatters indicates that the majority of EVs are bought by higher-income Californians living in areas such as Atherton, Palo Alto, Sunnyvale and Mountain View. The people hit hardest by rising gasoline prices are the ones least able to afford alternatives. For most Californians, there is no viable mass transit available. People are just stuck spending more and more of their income on the gas-powered vehicles their lives depend on. Our state's policies punish people for not being able to adapt quickly enough to a green future that's not yet built. It's a regressive tax masquerading as environmental action. Until California realistically bridges the gap between aspirational climate goals and equitable policy execution, the state's lofty environmental vision will continue to rest uneasily on the shoulders of its most vulnerable. The new state excise tax adding about 2 cents a gallon went into effect July 1, and CARB is pushing for a new low-carbon fuel standard that could add and potentially major costs to the prices of gasoline and diesel fuel. No one knows exactly how much — not even the board proposing the rules. At a recent Assembly oversight hearing, CARB officials were asked if they analyzed their regulations for consumer impacts. Their answer: We don't calculate that. The room went silent. It was a stunning admission — regulators pushing policy without running the math. No wonder we're seeing an exodus of working families. By layering new and unclear costs on top of an already overstretched system, CARB and other regulators are creating what could become a self-inflicted economic shock. And for what? Not environmental progress. California will be forced to source more and more fuel from overseas — at greater environmental and economic cost. By relying on polluting sources and carbon-intensive shipping, we've simply outsourced our emissions to other countries. California is not reducing emissions. We are exporting them. If this sounds reckless, it is. But more than that, it's unjust. These policies are not burdening the wealthy. They're crushing the working class. They're forcing families to choose between gas and groceries, between job access and housing stability. They're also outsourcing jobs overseas. And they're being implemented by unelected bureaucrats who, by their own admission in testimony before California lawmakers, haven't calculated the real-world impact. The people of California deserve better than this. They deserve honesty, transparency and policy grounded in economic realism, not ideological fantasy and environmental dogma. If recent and coming changes become a tipping point, it won't be because of some unpredictable global event. It will be because we chose not to look before we leaped. The path forward demands a pause, a recalibration and a return to common sense. Otherwise, this summer could mark not just another price hike — but the day we began losing control of our energy future. Michael A. Mische is an associate professor at USC's Marshall School of Business. A former KPMG principal, he is the author of eight books on business and strategy. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
