Sens. Warren, Sheehy team up on bipartisan military bill backed by Trump administration
Warren and Sheehy are introducing legislation on Tuesday that would give the Department of Defense the "right to repair" its own military equipment — a policy that could save the Pentagon money, resources and, most critically, time. The legislation, called "The Warrior Right to Repair Act", has bipartisan support and is expected to be included in the upcoming National Defense Authorization Act, which approves funds and policy for the DOD.
Traditionally, defense contractors who provide the U.S. military with equipment often restrict the DOD's ability to conduct its own repairs, leading to higher costs, delays and waste.
Warren and Sheehy pointed to instances where the Navy had to fly contractors out to sea to perform routine fixes or Marines in Japan had to send engines back to the U.S. for repair instead of on site, and Marines in Korea having to choose between violating contracts or delaying training exercises because machinery was inoperable. And, they said, in some instances, the Army can't write its own training manual without sign off from a contractor.
The senators also note the exorbitant costs of repair by a contractor compared to that by a service member, and that many defense contracts prohibit sharing intellectual property and technical data with the DOD that would enable service members to repair their own equipment.
Warren and Sheehy both sit on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and are concerned about the impact on military readiness and flexibility as well as on national security. And each has a unique approach to the policy.
Warren has long advocated for this change, and views it as fighting against consolation and for more competition. Warren pushed the issue during Army Secretary Dan Driscoll's confirmation hearing, and he agreed with her concerns.
In April, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth directed the Army to include right-to-repair provisions in all new and existing contracts.
"To build a leaner, more lethal force, the Army must transform at an accelerated pace by divesting outdated, redundant, and inefficient programs, as well as restructuring headquarters and acquisition systems," Hegseth wrote in a memo to Pentagon leadership.
The Secretary of the Navy has also expressed support for a similar policy.
The Warren-Sheehy legislation would not only codify that into law, but would also apply across military branches.
"It's common sense for members of our military to be able to fix their own weapons. Sen. Sheehy and I are fighting to improve military readiness and save taxpayers billions," Warren said in a statement to CBS. "It's about time we stand up to Pentagon contractors that are squeezing every last cent from us at the expense of our national security."
Sheehy is a former Navy SEAL officer, who deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan and earned the Bronze Star and Purple Heart. He approaches the issue as having served on the battlefield.
"For decades, American service members have been forced to rely on a broken status quo to repair equipment on the battlefield, threatening our readiness and costing taxpayers billions," he said. "Our warfighters – and the American public – deserve better, and I'm proud to lead this bipartisan legislation to streamline bloated bureaucracy, increase competition, and provide our warfighters with the quality and quantity of equipment they need to win the next fight."
Driscoll, the Army Secretary, also supports the legislation.
"Over the last few decades, the Army has signed away its ability to repair its own equipment. Through the Army Transformation Initiative we are going to ensure that every contract going forward will enable our soldiers to repair their own equipment," he said in a statement. "Doing this will save taxpayer dollars and get equipment back on the battlefield faster. I'm thrilled this important issue has bipartisan support in Congress."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This 'Then And Now' Picture Of The Oval Office Is Going Viral And Says So, So Much About The Trump Administration
Anna Moneymaker / Getty Images Donald Trump has completely transformed the Oval Office into his own gaudy, gold fantasy land. Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images It's A LOT. Andrew Harnik / Getty Images You've got the gold crown molding. Bloomberg / Bloomberg via Getty Images The fireplace is cluttered with gold statues. Chip Somodevilla / Getty Images He's got gold coasters. SAUL LOEB / AFP via Getty Images And then there's a TON of these gold squiggly things all over the picture from the White House really shows how many gold accents have been added to the Oval Office. This is how it looked last year: michellelprice/Twitter: @michellelprice From this: To this: Look at all that gold!!! Well, since then, Trump has SOMEHOW managed to add even more gold. @JoeMyGod posted this "then and now" picture that is going super viral: From this: To this: "It's like the Dollar Tree version of Versailles," one person joked. "Which one seems more fiscally responsible...." another person asked. And this person said, "I hope that lovely fireplace can be restored with no damage." Thoughts on the renovations?! Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
19 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bipartisan Outrage Over Epstein Is Just What America Needs
The controversy over the mysterious ' Epstein Files,' which President Donald Trump's administration first pledged to release and then decided not to, has Democrats back in touch with one of America's great political traditions: anti-establishment conspiracy theories. Not only is this good for the party, it is also — dare I say it — healthy for US politics. Theories of this type differ from the more extreme Russiagate allegations against Trump (or Trump's infamous charges that Barack Obama was secretly born in Kenya) in that they are not narrowly partisan. As such, they are especially appealing to the kinds of people who are disengaged from politics and alienated from mainstream institutions. In other words, just the kinds of people who've flocked to Trump's banner over the past decade.
CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
CNN Poll: Americans largely oppose Trump's ramp-up of deportations
Americans largely oppose recent efforts by Donald Trump's administration to scale up its deportation program, a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS finds, with a rising majority saying the president has gone too far in carrying out deportations. In the latest survey, 55% say the president has gone too far when it comes to deporting immigrants living in the US illegally, up 10 points since February. Opposition among Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents has risen in that time from widespread to nearly universal: Ninety percent of Democratic-aligned adults now say that Trump's deportation policy has gone too far, while just 15% of Republican-aligned adults say the same. A 57% majority also say they oppose plans to build new detention facilities capable of holding up to 100,000 undocumented immigrants, while 53% oppose increasing the budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement by billions of dollars — two White House priorities reflected in the sweeping policy bill that Trump recently signed into law. Nearly 6 in 10 oppose efforts to end birthright citizenship, another Trump priority. The courts are reviewing the president's executive order seeking to bar birthright citizenship for children born on American soil to parents who were in the country unlawfully or who were there lawfully but temporarily. Overall, just shy of half, 46%, say Trump's immigration policies have made the country safer, and 42% say the federal government has been careful about following the law in carrying out deportations. Both figures are largely unchanged since April. The president's approval ratings are around 40% for his handling both of immigration in general and deportations specifically In CNN's poll, 59% of Americans oppose arresting and detaining undocumented immigrants who have resided in the United States for years with no criminal record. That echoes a theme seen in much immigration polling this year — support for immigration enforcement tends to erode when pollsters specify that people without criminal records or longtime residents will be among those affected. A CNN review of government data found that most immigrants taken into ICE custody between last October and May had no serious criminal convictions. While only about one-quarter of Republicans and Republican-leaners are opposed to arrests aimed at this group, just shy of half — 47% — offer outright support, far below the 83% who approve of his handling of deportations overall. 'The most important issue is how ICE is focusing on immigrants with no criminal history,' wrote one California woman polled, who stood among the minority of Republicans who thought Trump had gone too far with his deportation campaign. 'They should research on immigrants that pose a huge threat the country.' Even as views of Trump's second-term immigration platform have soured, support for specific policies can vary depending on how they're described. In CNN's poll, 16% of Americans who said they were opposed to increasing the budget for ICE also said, in a separate question, that they viewed the increase in spending on 'border security, enforcement of immigration laws and detention of those charged with entering the country illegally' as a reason to support Trump's recently passed spending bill. There's also relatively muted opposition to punitive ideas Trump has advanced against those who do have criminal records regardless of their current citizenship status. Americans are closely split on whether they'd favor or oppose Trump carrying out threats to send US citizens convicted of violent crimes to detention in a foreign country (37% would support this, with 39% opposed and the rest offering neither opinion). And there's narrow support, 43% to 35%, for efforts to prioritize revoking US citizenship from naturalized citizens convicted of certain crimes — the only positive reading on any policy tested. By contrast, Americans overwhelmingly say, 71% to 12%, they'd oppose Trump acting on his threats to deport high-profile critics of the administration's policies, even if they live in the US legally and have not been convicted of any crimes. Asked in the same survey to name the issue they consider most important, 20% of Americans mention immigration, ranking it second only to economic concerns. While that's similar overall to January, the partisan dynamics of the issue have shifted somewhat. At the start of the year, Republicans and Republican-leaning independents were 26 points likelier than those aligned with the Democratic Party to mention immigration. Now, while it's still a more potent issue among Republicans than Democrats, that gap has narrowed to 10 points amid the rising Democratic opposition to Trump's deportation policies. The poll also finds more support than backlash for protests against the Trump administration's deportation policies. Americans say, 55% to 45%, that the protests of the Trump administration's deportation policies have been mostly justified. And by a 9-point margin, 47% to 38%, they say they're more concerned that the government will go too far in cracking down on protests rather than fearing that the protests themselves will get out of hand. There's particularly strong backing for the protests among Democratic-aligned adults (78% of whom call them justified), adults younger than 35 (63%), and people of color (59%). Most Americans, 59%, say they oppose Trump using National Guard troops, who are typically controlled by state governors, in response to immigration protests even if a state's governor does not support the use of those troops. The CNN poll was conducted by SSRS from July 10-13 among a random national sample of 1,057 US adults drawn from a probability-based panel. Surveys were either conducted online or by telephone with a live interviewer. Results among all adults have a margin of sampling error of ±3.5 percentage points.
