Finance Division notifies austerity measures for FY26
The measures, approved by the Federal Cabinet on June 10, aim to curb non-essential expenditures across federal departments, state-owned enterprises, and regulatory bodies.
The notification issued by the division stated that the federal cabinet approved continuation of following austerity measures for the fiscal year 2025-26 as already notified by; (i) Finance Division during fiscal year 2024-25, dated 04-09-2024 in pursuance of cabinet decision dated 27.08.2024; (ii) Cabinet Division vide O.M. No. 7-1/2023-Min-I dated 28.02.2023 in pursuance of cabinet decision dated 22-02-2023; and (iii) Cabinet Division vide O.M. No. 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28-02-2023 in pursuance of cabinet decision dated 22-02-2023.
The notification further stated that the cabinet further approved that the austerity measures shall also be applicable mutatis mutandis during fiscal year 2025-26 in the case of all federal government attached departments, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and statutory bodies, including regulatory authorities: (a) Approved by the cabinet on 22-02-2023 and notified by the Cabinet Division vide O.M. No. 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28.02.2023; and (b) Approved by the cabinet on 27-08-2024 and notified by the Finance Division dated 04-09-2024.
Federal govt employees: MoF notifies 10pc ad hoc relief, 30pc DRA
In the case of SOEs, these austerity measures shall be considered a direction of the federal government under Section 35 of the State-Owned Enterprises (Governance & Operations) Act, 2023 and under the relevant sections of their respective organic laws in the case of statutory bodies.
It is pertinent to inform that the Finance Division notification, issued on September 4, 2024, stated that in pursuance of the cabinet's decision for case No. 232/28/2024 dated 27-8-2024, the following austerity measures are notified till further orders:-
i) There shall be a complete ban on the following expenditures with respect to the current budget. (a) Purchase of all types of vehicles with the exception of operational vehicles such as ambulances and other medically equipped vehicles, fire fighting vehicles, buses and vans for educational institutions, solid waste vehicles and motorbikes; (b) Procurement of machinery/equipment with the exception of those required for hospitals/laboratories/agriculture/mining/ schools; (c) creation of new posts including contingent paid / temporary posts; (d) Continuation of contingent paid / temporary posts beyond one year; (e) Treatment abroad at government expense; and (f) All non-obligatory visits abroad where government of Pakistan funding is involved.
(ii) The austerity measures notified by the Cabinet Division vide O.M. Nos. 7-1/2023- Min-I and No. 9-148/2002-Min-II dated 28-2-2023 will remain applicable unless modified or withdrawn by the Federal Cabinet.
(iii) All posts lying vacant for the last three years shall be abolished. Purchase of durables and creation of posts under PSDP-funded projects shall be exempted from the application of this ban.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
1H: loss-making SOEs incur Rs343bn loss
ISLAMABAD: The loss-making state-owned enterprises (SOEs) incurred a combined loss of Rs343 billion during the first half of fiscal year 2025, bringing the total accumulated losses of these loss-making entities to Rs5.893 trillion—a stark indicator of deep-rooted financial inefficiencies and the urgent need for turnaround strategies. Finance Division released bi-annual report on SOEs fiscal year 2025 (July 2024 to December 2024), which noted that National Highways Authority (NHA) recorded the largest loss of Rs153.3 billion, pushing its accumulated losses to Rs1,953.4 billion—a reflection of the unsustainable toll revenue model against massive road infrastructure expansion. Quetta Electric Supply Company (Qesco) and Sukkur Electric Power Company (Sepco) followed with losses of Rs58.1 billion and Rs29.6 billion, respectively, with accumulated losses of Rs770.6 billion and Rs473.0 billion, underscoring chronic inefficiencies and poor recoveries in the distribution segment. State-Owned Enterprises: CCoSOEs concerned over staggering losses Other notable contributors to the fiscal drain included Pakistan Railways (Rs26.5 billion loss, accumulated losses Rs6.7 billion), Peshawar Electric Supply Company (Pesco) with Rs19.7 billion loss (Rs684.9 billion accumulated), and Pakistan Steel Mills (PSM) reporting Rs15.6 billion in losses, raising its accumulated shortfall to Rs255.8 billion. Additionally, Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL) posted Rs7.2 billion in losses (accumulated: Rs43.6 billion), Pakistan Post Rs6.3 billion (Rs93.1 billion accumulated), and Utility Stores Corporation (USC) Rs4.1 billion (Rs15.5 billion accumulated), revealing persistent operational and structural issues. Among power generation entities, the GENCOs (I-IV) together posted over Rs8.3 billion in combined losses: GENCO-II (Guddu) at Rs3.8 billion, GENCO-III (Muzaffargarh) at Rs3.1 billion, and GENCO-I (Jamshoro) at Rs1.3 billion. Neelum Jhelum Hydro Power Company posted Rs2.3 billion in losses (accumulated: PKR 58.2 billion). Collectively, 'All Other' loss-making SOEs added Rs2.7 billion to the burden, with their cumulative losses totaling Rs1,285.96 billion, bringing the total accumulated losses of these 15+ entities to Rs5,893.2 billion—a stark indicator of deep-rooted financial inefficiencies and the urgent need for turnaround strategies. The financial performance of Pakistan's power distribution companies (DISCOs) over the six-month period reveals a deeply concerning trend of escalating losses, significantly amplified once government subsidies are adjusted out of revenues. The total core operating actual loss for the period stands at Rs283.7 billion, with notable contributors including Qesco Limited (Rs92.65 billion loss), Pesco Limited (Rs53.68 billion), and Hyderabad Electric Supply Company (Hesco) Limited (Rs39.63 billion). Even DISCOs with positive EBIT before subsidy removal—such as Multan (EBIT Rs8.4 billion), Faisalabad (Rs52 billion), and Gujranwala (Rs20.9 billion)—turned loss-making after adjusting for subsidies, incurring actual losses of Rs35.17 billion, Rs13.12 billion, and Rs7.32 billion, respectively. Lahore, Islamabad, Sukkur, and Tribal DISCOs also showed EBIT gains or marginal losses but failed to stay profitable post-adjustments. Particularly, alarming is Quetta DISCO, with an EBIT loss of Rs60.36 billion and additional subsidies of Rs 32.30 billion still leaving a staggering net loss. Compounding these financial losses is the persistent 20 per cent technical and commercial loss of electricity units, pointing to deep-rooted inefficiencies in billing, recovery, and transmission infrastructure. These structural flaws push the 6-month average sectoral loss close to Rs300 billion, which extrapolates to Rs600 billion annually, underscoring an urgent imperative for transformational reforms. Without rapid overhaul—targeting governance, technology, privatization or concession models, and tariff realignment—the fiscal haemorrhaging will not only burden the national exchequer but also paralyze broader energy sector recovery and investment. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
TCP invites bids for import of 0.3m tons of sugar
KARACHI: In line with federal government directives, the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) has issued an international tender for the import of 300,000 metric tons of white refined sugar. In order to stabilise the rising prices of the commodity and avoid shortage on the domestic market, the federal government has decided to import 0.5 million metric tons of sugar. The Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) has already exempted customs duty on the import of 0.5 million tons sugar and also reduced sales tax rate from 18 percent to 0.25 percent and withholding tax up to 0.25 percent on the import of commodity by the TCP or private sector. Following the export of sugar during the last fiscal year, domestic sugar prices have been on the rise, reaching up to Rs 180 per kilogram compared to less than Rs 140 per kilogram at the time of export. In response to this sharp increase and to stabilize the local market, the government has decided to import sugar. Accordingly, on the directives of the government, state run grain trader has issued an international tender and invited sealed bids from the international white refined sugar suppliers/manufacturers, directly or through their local offices or representatives having capacity to supply 'White Refined Sugar' through worldwide sources, for supply of 300,000 metric tons (+/-5% More Or Less Seller's Option) of white refined sugar (bagged cargo) on CFR Karachi and/or Gwadar basis (in break bulk) including 50,000 metric tons of white refined sugar (bagged cargo) on delivered at place unloaded (TCP Pipri Godown) basis in containers only. The bids, prepared in accordance with the instructions in the tender documents, must be dropped on or before July 18, 2025, latest by 1130 hours. Bids will be opened on the same day at 1200 hours in the TCP's Board Room, in presence of the bidders or their authorized representatives who may wish to be present. As per tender, bids must be made for minimum 25,000 metric tons (+/- 5 percent MOLSO) on CFR Karachi and less than 25,000 metric tons for CFR (Break Bulk) and/or DPU (Containerized) will not be accepted. The validity of bids must for Eighty (80) hours from submission of bids and total quantity of white refined sugar must reach the designated ports/destination in Pakistan in accordance with the shipment schedule given in the Tender Document. However, TCP has made it clear that the interested parties who have previously not fulfilled their contractual obligations with TCP shall not be eligible to participate in the bids, unless they clear their dues along with penalties or fulfil their contractual obligations in services and commodities with TCP, as the case may be, before tender opening date. Furthermore, those firms against which blacklisting procedures have been initiated by TCP shall not be eligible to participate in the tender. The supply/import of white refined sugar will be governed by the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1950, provisions of the Trade Policy in force, PPRA Rules 2004 and the orders/notifications issued there under; and shall be in accordance with the requirements/specifications laid down by Pakistan Standards Quality Control Authority (PSQCA), for imported white refined sugar. Successful bidder shall be required to furnish a Performance Guarantee, for due and satisfactory performance of the contract, equal to five percent (5%) of the value of the contracted goods (including +5% of MOLSO) within five (05) working days from award of contract, in the form of a Bank Guarantee in US Dollars from a minimum 'A' rated (PACRA/VIS) Bank in Pakistan or in the form of a Banker's Cheque in PKR (Equivalent to US dollars at the exchange rate on or a day preceding the date of opening of the tender. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
9 hours ago
- Express Tribune
LHC nullifies mining dues markup sub-rules
Lahore High Court (LHC) Justice Shahid Karim has struck down two sub-rules of the Punjab Mining Concession Rules related to imposition of markup on non-payment of royalty and annual rent. The court declared the sub rules ultra vires and illegal. The petitioners had challenged notices for payment, including markup calculated under Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 68 of the Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 2002 as well as a markup on outstanding rental and renewal dues under Sub-Rule (3) of Rule 73. The judge observed that the determination of rates did not mean that the provincial government was also vested with the powers to impose markup if a person had failed in its opinion to pay the amount of royalty or rent as required by Rule 68 or 73. "Certainly, the imposition of markup is strictly not covered by the power to determine rates by the provincial government and is in excess of that power," Justice Karim observed. The petitioners had challenged orders of the Punjab secretary for mines and minerals upholding orders issued by the director general on various dates. The legality of the rules was challenged before the lower forums but the secretary was of the opinion that they did not offend the primary enactment, the Regulation of Mines and Oil-fields and Minerals Development (Government Control) Act, 1948. The petitioners' viewpoint was that the act did not confer the power on the rule-making authority to impose markup in terms of rules 63(2) and 73(3). The dispute revolved around the payment of markup. The petitioners' counsel argued that Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 68 and Sub-Rule (3) of rule 73 were similarly worded and imposed a markup of one per cent per day on the amount or part thereof remaining unpaid from the due date until all outstanding amount was paid. The rules also compounded the payment of markup until all outstanding amount was paid. The essence of challenge of the petitioners related to the power to levy markup on any amount of royalty or rent unpaid by them. The respondents argued that the payment of markup would be covered by any matter ancillary or incidental to the matters set out in the other clauses of Section 2. Justice Karim observed that the phrase any matter ancillary or incidental to the matters set out in the clauses would not cover the imposition of markup in case of failure to pay the principal amount. These matters would perhaps have connection with the powers of the government to recover the amount of royalty or rent and for this purpose provisions have been made in rules 70 and 71, giving the power to the provincial government to recover the amount of royalty in case of failure by any person to make the payment. Clause (8) of Section 2 cannot be extended or interpreted to mean that by rule-making power an additional levy of markup can be imposed on a person whereas the primary enactment does not authorise such a payment to be made, he observed. Striking down Sub-rule (2) of Rule 68 and Sub-rule (3) of Rule 73 of The Punjab Mining Concession Rules, 2002, the court declared unlawful the impugned order and demands issued under the rules. The court also quashed the notices issued to the petitioners.
