Is Vitamin E Useful for Treating Psoriasis?
Psoriasis is a condition characterized by patches and scales that develop on the skin. These can also affect the scalp, nails, or joints, and can be itchy and painful. The patches can be red or pink, but may also appear purple on darker skin, while scales can be white, silvery, or even gray.
Psoriasis is a chronic, long-term condition, and the symptoms can be different for everyone. Some people may have periods of remission when they're not experiencing any symptoms, followed by flare-ups when their usual symptoms can return and be quite intense.
For some, psoriasis may be only a skin condition, but for others, it may also present with pain, tenderness, and swelling in their joints that may need additional treatment. This is called psoriatic arthritis.
The article will look at the evidence for vitamin E as potential treatment or additional supplement for psoriasis and its effectiveness.
Can vitamin E treat psoriasis?
Vitamin E is a fat-soluble vitamin, which means your body can store it in its tissues and use it later when necessary. Your body uses vitamin E for multiple purposes, including supporting immune function and protecting against oxidative stress. This helps maintain healthy skin, eyes, and joints.
In a 2021 study on chronic inflammatory diseases, researchers found that participants with vitiligo, psoriasis, or atopic dermatitis had lower levels of vitamin E than the participants in the control group who didn't have these conditions.
They also discovered that supplementation with vitamin E showed significant improvement of oxidative stress markers in the participants with psoriasis and vitiligo.
Researchers suspect this might be due to vitamin E's effect on antioxidant formation and lipid metabolism. However, more investigation is necessary on the exact mechanism of vitamin E levels in inflammatory skin diseases before this can be offered and recommended as a treatment.
A 2024 study also concluded that higher antioxidant intake, particularly higher vitamin E levels, was associated with a lower likelihood of psoriasis. More research is still necessary to explore how targeted dietary interventions could help manage the condition.
Research underscored the importance of nutrition and vitamin E intake for the management of psoriasis, but vitamin E supplementation is not currently a treatment method for the condition.
While current research has shown some of its benefits, vitamin E is still not recommended as a long-term treatment.
What are the treatment methods for psoriasis?
Many topical treatments for psoriasis are available over the counter. These include:
Coal tar shampoos, creams, ointments, or bath solutions: Coal tar can reduce redness, itching, and swelling. However, coal tar can also irritate the skin, so it's important to test it out first by applying it on a small patch of skin before covering any other areas affected by psoriasis.
Hydrocortisone creams and ointments: These can reduce inflammation and itchiness. Ointments can be more soothing than creams on dry or cracked skin.
Moisturizer: A daily moisturiser can seal in hydration and soothe the skin. It's important to choose a product that's appropriate for your skin and fragrance-free.
Scale softeners: These can help reduce swelling and remove the scales. Try products with ingredients like salicylic acid, lactic acid, or urea to soften and remove the scales. Salicylic acid can sometimes be irritating on the skin, so use it according to instructions.
Anti-itch products: Look out for products that contain the following ingredients to soothe the itch that may come with psoriasis:
calamine
camphor
hydrocortisone
menthol
Other treatments for psoriasis include phototherapy or systemic treatments. Healthcare professionals usually prescribe these for moderate to severe psoriasis and for psoriatic arthritis.
Reach out to a healthcare professional or dermatologist if you need more information about treatment methods for psoriasis and what would be most suitable for you.
Takeaway
Studies suggest a correlation between vitamin E levels and psoriasis. However, more research is necessary to investigate whether vitamin E can be a useful complementary therapy for the treatment of psoriasis.
Plenty of treatments for psoriasis include topical therapies such as ointments and moisturisers that contain targeted ingredients such as coal tar or salicylic acid. Reach out to a dermatologist if you have questions or concerns about the condition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
The best personal blenders for all of your beverage needs
The best personal blenders we tested Best personal blender: Ninja Nutri Pro Compact Personal Blender Best personal blender runner-up: Our Place Splendor Blender Using one of the best personal blenders is a major time-saver in my day-to-day; I truly can't go a day without using one. Whether I'm whipping up a quick smoothie, making a small batch of sauce or just mixing pancake batter for one, it saves me from having to haul out my full-size blender. They're a great fit for my tiny kitchen, and the best ones I tested have earned a permanent spot on my counter. Unlike a larger, bulkier blender, a personal blender is a great tool for taking a shake or smoothie on the go, thanks to easier-to-carry sizing and portable lids. It makes mornings less chaotic, cleanup quicker and, oftentimes, hitting your health goals easier. I tested six of the top models on the market, evaluating how well each handled a variety of blending tasks. I also assessed their design, construction and, arguably most importantly, how comfortable and practical they were to drink from. After much blending, tasting, cleaning and even more testing, here are the devices that won me over. Related article The best air fryers to take your meals from frozen to goldenA post shared by CNN Underscored (@cnnunderscored) Ninja Nutri Pro Compact Personal Blender One thing about Ninja is that it will make an affordable and reliable appliance. I tested the Nutri Pro blender's 1,000-peak-watt motor and found it genuinely powerful enough to crush ice and whip up smoothies in seconds. With two Auto-iQ programs — one for smoothies and one for ice — the presets delivered consistent, hands-free results. Our Place Splendor Blender I tested the beautiful, Instagram-worthy Splendor Blender and thought it looked just as good as it worked. I was genuinely impressed by how efficiently it handled both everyday ingredients and tougher-to-blend items. The 1,000-watt motor, combined with ultrasharp blades and a smooth design, made blending ice, frozen fruit and tough vegetables look easy. It's no secret I love a Ninja appliance, but its Nutri Pro (with Auto-iQ) genuinely stood out within my testing pool thanks to its powerful blending capabilities and thoughtful design. The wide base with a powerful suction cup bottom gave it a sturdy, high-quality feel and kept it stable even when blending dense or frozen ingredients like frozen berries and fibrous mango chunks. It didn't budge or slide from my counter after whipping up smoothies or crushing ice either. Related article I'm replacing all my countertop cooking appliances with Ninja's indoor grill — here's why Of all the personal blenders I tested, the Ninja had the most intuitive control panel. The clearly labeled buttons made every blend feel straightforward, allowing me to start using it right out of the box (after cleaning it, of course). I believe you only need a smoothie and pulse button on a personal blender, because let's face it: You're only going to use it for a quick on-the-go beverage. The Ninja had all the settings I needed: Crush, Smoothie and Pulse — and each worked like a charm every time. What set this blender apart was its 1,000-peak-watt motor coupled with its presets. It handled everything I added to the 24-ounce cup, from rock-solid frozen pineapples and whole strawberries to leafy greens and tough ice cubes, without hesitation or the need for manual stirring or shaking. I thought the Pro Extractor Blades did a great job breaking down seeds, skin and thicker ingredients, consistently producing smooth, drinkable textures in a matter of seconds. Whether I was blending nutrient-dense green smoothies or protein shakes, the Ninja delivered fast, consistent results. Even with the Crush, Smoothie and Pulse modes, I found the most useful tool to be its Auto-iQ function. With two preprogrammed settings — again, one for smoothies and one for ice — it combines timed blending and pulsing patterns, then shuts off automatically when the cycle is complete. I was skeptical at first, but I ended up appreciating how hands-off it made the process. I could press a button and walk away knowing I'd come back to a properly blended drink. Of course, you can also stop the cycle manually at any time by hitting the start/stop button. To test its versatility, I used the blender to make smooth, grit-free protein shakes, all without (practically) having to lift a finger. It performed well with thicker blends like frozen berry smoothies, and it turned out slushy, well-textured frozen cocktails without over-blending the ice. For such a compact model, I was impressed with how many tasks it could handle beyond smoothies. The included travel lids were a bonus too. They screwed on cleanly and featured flip caps that stayed open while drinking and sealed securely when closed. And if you're into accessories, you can always purchase more on Ninja's website. But with two 24-ounce cups and two lids included in the box, it's a practical option for those cooking for one, couples or even households with multiple users. And in terms of cleanup, everything — including the blades, lids and cups — is dishwasher-safe, and I found cleaning by hand just as easy thanks to the wide openings and simple design. The only real downside is the blender's relatively large footprint. Compared to other personal blenders I tested, such as the Zwilling or Beautiful by Drew personal blenders, it takes up slightly (emphasis on slightly) more counter and storage space, which might be an issue for those who have smaller kitchens. That said, the sheer power and versatility more than make up for it. At around $100, the Ninja Nutri Pro is a worthwhile investment if you make smoothies, shakes or frozen cocktails regularly. And if you break it down, the price equates to about 10 to 15 smoothie shop visits (or even fewer blended cocktail orders) and, in return, you get a dependable, high-performance machine that makes the process easier from start to finish. I must admit, I was practically salivating when I unboxed the stylish Splendor Blender from Our Place. I had seen this beautiful appliance online and was eager to test this social media-beloved blender to see if it lived up to the hype. After testing it for several days, I found it to be a thoughtfully designed, well-performing personal blender with a few standout strengths and a few quirks. Like the Ninja personal blender, it has a powerful 1,000-watt motor that, paired with six ultrasharp stainless steel blades, handled everything I threw at it. Whether it was fibrous kale, frozen mango chunks or full-size ice cubes, the blender consistently produced smooth, even blends without the need to stop and stir. It also comes with just two blending modes — high-speed and pulse — that make it easy to switch between different textures. The high-speed setting created creamy smoothies in under 60 seconds, while the pulse function gave me more control when chopping ingredients or preparing chunkier blends, which is helpful for dishes like salsas or dips. It may seem odd to describe a personal blender as elegant, but the Our Place personal blender stands out for its elegance and design. The ergonomic shape of the blender base deserves all the kudos. The rounded, compact shape made it easy to store, although you'll probably want this on your kitchen countertop. However, I did find that the silicone, nonslip feet didn't keep the blender as steady as the Ninja during use. That said, when I tested it on a sleek, granite countertop, I did notice some slight movement during higher-speed blending. It wasn't a deal-breaker, but it's worth noting if you have similarly slick surfaces. On the plus side, the base has subtle ridges around the bottom that make it easier to grip and twist off the blending vessel. This also helped me avoid the awkward fumbles I've experienced with other blenders. Plus, the wire wraps into the base, which is always a plus for me. The 750-milliliter personal blending vessel was one of my favorite parts of the entire system. The wavelike design not only helps funnel ingredients toward the blades for better blending but also makes the cup comfortable to grip and easy to hold while drinking. The molded rim made it pleasant to sip straight from the vessel without needing a straw or extra cup. I also appreciated the included personal drinking lid, which fits both the 750-milliliter and smaller 450-milliliter vessels. It has built-in gaskets to prevent spills and leaks, and a sturdy carry handle makes it easy to take my smoothie on the go. This was one of my favorite features, especially when paired with the blender's sleek and colorful design, which genuinely adds a little personality and color to the kitchen. Cleanup was quite easy as well. Like many higher-end models, the Splendor Blender has a self-cleaning mode. I just added a few drops of dish soap and some water to the blending vessel, pressed the button and it cleaned itself in under 30 seconds. For deeper cleaning, the vessel, lid and blade assembly are all top-rack dishwasher-safe. And while the blades are incredibly sharp, the ribbed base makes it easier and safer to twist them off for cleaning or swapping between vessels. At $135, the Splendor Blender isn't the cheapest personal blender in my product pool, but I think the price is justified by its performance, thoughtful features and unmatched stylish design. It handled every test recipe I tried with minimal effort, and the portable design and easy cleanup made it even more appealing for everyday use. If you're looking for a personal blender that combines real blending power with smart, user-friendly features and a modern aesthetic, this one is worth considering. It's easy to brush off most personal blenders as being the same, but in my weeks of blending, tasting and cleaning, I discovered they're more varied than you might expect. To figure out which ones truly stood out, I tested each model across several key criteria, including overall performance, the ability to blend a variety of drinks and how easy and secure their travel lids were to use. After hands-on testing, I compared the results of each smoothie, shake and ice test and evaluated how each model measured up. From there, I narrowed it down and chose the two blenders I felt performed the best overall. User interface/ease of use: I took note of how easy (or difficult) the blender was to use. Were the controls and user interface intuitive and straightforward, or were they more confusing, requiring some practice? Versatility: How many blending modes did each unit offer? More doesn't always mean better, but it's good to know, especially if you know you're interested in a specific mode, such as Pulse or Low. Operation: How powerful was the motor? How quickly did the blades crush, blend or mix the ingredients in the cup? Did the blender struggle and need to be manually shaken for it to work effectively? Stability/sturdiness: While in use, did the blender stay securely in place, or did it wander or vibrate across the counter? This was especially important when it came to taller blenders with narrow bases. Capacity: How much liquid could the cup hold? Was it too large to be convenient for travel or too small to be useful? Accessories: Did the blender include any extra accessories or items like additional blades, shaker lids or cup sizes? Ease of cleanup: How easy was the unit to clean overall? Were the blades difficult to access, was the lid easy to wipe down and were there any design elements of the cup that made them particularly easy or difficult to keep clean? When I'm testing or shopping for a personal blender, I look for more than just a sleek design, although that is a considerable factor in my kitchen appliance hunt. I focus on what makes an appliance worth using daily, especially as someone with limited counter space. Here are the best things to consider when shopping for a personal blender. Size of the blender A personal blender's smaller footprint compared to full-size models with bulky pitchers is a huge plus for my limited counter space, and I appreciate how easily most personal blenders tuck away in a cabinet when not in use. They're ideal if you're mostly making single-serving smoothies, protein shakes or on-the-go meal replacements, especially since cleanup is minimal. I love when a model includes single-serve blending cups and a secure, locking travel lid — it means I can blend my drink, pop on the lid and head out the door to work or the gym without having to transfer it to another container. Ease of use and versatility Portability combined with ease of use makes personal blenders one of the most practical small appliances I own. Even if you're not blending post-workout shakes, these blenders can be a cost-effective alternative to $10 smoothies from a juice shop. Most of the top-rated models I've tested come in at or under $100, making them surprisingly accessible. While they can't always replace a full-size blender or food processor, I've found that a powerful personal blender (one with at least 600 watts and well-designed blades) can do more than you'd expect. I've used them to make soups, salsas, batters and salad dressings, and some models even come with separate blades for grinding seeds or chopping dry ingredients. If you're wondering whether a particular unit has that kind of versatility, you can usually find the manual online and check before buying. Blending performance Performance-wise, I prioritize strong motor power, quality stainless steel blades and useful controls. At minimum, I want both a high-speed mode for silky, fully blended smoothies and a pulse function for chunkier blends. The best personal blenders also have smart design details: silicone, nonslip feet for added stability (especially helpful since some models tend to shift during blending), BPA-free materials and dishwasher-safe components. Thoughtful design I also look for a blending vessel that feels comfortable in hand; some of the best have wavelike curves that help circulate ingredients during blending and also make the cup easier to grip. I also appreciate features like a soft rim for comfortable sipping and a carry handle on the lid. So, in a nutshell, a great personal blender is compact, efficient and easy to clean, but it also needs to be one you'll actually reach for again and again. Ninja Blast Portable Blender The Ninja Blast stands out as a rare cordless personal blender, making it especially convenient for travel or small spaces. I can see this as a great option for a gym rat or traveler, aka someone who needs a quick shake, fast. At just $45, it offers solid portability with a comfortable hinged carry handle and an easy-open sip lid so you can blend and drink from the same vessel without needing extra parts. However, it's not as powerful as other personal blenders I've tested. I tested the Ninja Blast cordless blender and, while I appreciated the convenience of its compact, portable design, I was underwhelmed by its actual blending performance. Despite its 'Blast Technology' and cordless power (comparable to Ninja's corded models), it struggled with even soft ingredients. Bananas didn't fully break down, and when I added frozen fruit for a basic smoothie, the blades barely made a dent. Smoothie after smoothie resulted in chunky and uneven disasters. The Manual Blend function gave me more control, but it still wasn't enough to achieve a truly smooth consistency. That said, it does have some thoughtful design elements. The 22-ounce Twist & Go vessel detaches easily from the motor base with a single twist, which makes it extremely lightweight and easy to carry once blended. The sippy-cup lid features a silicone carry handle and a flip top that could be convenient for the gym or even on a walk. There's also a dedicated power button to prevent accidental blending and a battery life indicator that shows exactly when it needs to be recharged. A full charge takes about three hours, and during my testing, I was able to get several short blends on a single charge. One of the blender's strong suits is its easy cleanup. The lid and vessel, which have a built-in CrushBlade, are top-rack dishwasher-safe. I mostly used the self-cleaning method by blending water and a drop of dish soap, and it worked well for such a small appliance. While the Ninja Blast didn't hold up to smoothie-making tasks, I think it could work well for simpler blends like protein shakes, powdered supplements or other drinks that don't rely on tougher or frozen ingredients. At $45, it's affordable, but I'd recommend it more as a travel-friendly mixer than a replacement for a true personal blender. Zwilling Personal Blender Zwilling's personal blender features an interesting razor-sharp cross blade with "piranha serration" that blends all sorts of food quite well. I liked that the LED display stays hidden when powered off for a clean look. The 20-ounce Tritan jar is breakproof and BPA-free, and the included drinking lid transforms it into a spillproof to-go cup, perfect for quick mornings or meals on the move. I found the Zwilling blender to be a thoughtfully designed, well-built powerhouse that felt more elevated than others in this category. Its sleek, stainless steel body and clean design immediately stood out on my counter, and unlike most personal blenders I've tried, it actually blends sleek design and function without compromising either. The jar is made of BPA-free plastic and holds 20 ounces (just enough for a single smoothie or sauce). Better yet, the drinking lid turns it into a spillproof to-go container, which I found especially helpful on rushed mornings. The 500-watt motor is not as powerful as the Ninja or Our Place blender, which is why it didn't rise in my ranks. However, paired with razor-sharp, cross-style blades, the Zwilling blender had no problem powering through greens, frozen fruit and even tougher ingredients like dates. I used both speed settings, Smoothie and Pulse, and found them intuitive and effective. The Smoothie mode ran just long enough to produce a creamy texture, while the Pulse option gave me more control when I wanted chunkier results, as in a salsa or salad dressing. The safety features are smart too; the blender won't start unless the lid is locked in place, and it shuts off automatically when the lid is removed, which made me feel more comfortable using it in a small kitchen space. I appreciated that there were no rubber seals to remove or tiny pieces to misplace, so I could rinse the blades and jar in seconds after each use. If you're looking to level up your recipe game, this blender also comes with access to Zwilling's Culinary World app — a solid collection of recipes tailored to the blender. Though the Zwilling Enfinigy is more of a splurge at its price point, I appreciated the overall quality, design and smart features enough to say it's worth it, especially if you want a blender that looks just as good as it performs. Beautiful Personal Blender Beautiful by Drew features some of the most, well, beautiful kitchenware I've seen. Naturally, the brand's personal blender is, as expected, one of the most stylish appliances I've had on my counter. The soft matte finish and clean, minimal design make it feel more elevated than most compact blenders in its price range, and the range of colors is to die for. That said, as much as I appreciated the aesthetic, I was more impressed by the Our Place blender's design and power. When it came to performance, the Beautiful Personal Blender didn't fully deliver. The stainless steel blade system is supposed to handle blending and grinding, but in my testing, it struggled with frozen fruit. Even with a relatively small amount, the blender couldn't fully break it down, and the results weren't as smooth as I'd hoped. Despite a claimed peak of 285 watts, the motor just didn't have the power to create consistently smooth textures, especially for thicker blends. Where it did better was with soft ingredients and lighter tasks, handling things like protein shakes just fine. I also appreciated the range of accessories that came in the box: three different cups — 13.5 ounces, 16 ounces and 6 ounces — plus multiple lids for travel, sipping, shaking and storage. The flexible No Drippy Sippy straw lid was a nice touch, and the lip rings made drinking from the blending cups more comfortable. It was also convenient that all the jars and lids are BPA-free and dishwasher-safe, which made cleanup easier after testing a few recipes back-to-back. In the end, I think this blender works best for someone who wants a chic-looking appliance for lighter kitchen tasks like blending a small sauce, mixing protein shakes or grinding spices. But if smoothies or frozen fruit blends are part of your routine, I'd recommend something more powerful. Even though I loved how it looked, the blending performance didn't quite match the design. SMEG Personal Blender I love all things SMEG and can't get over the retro-style design of the brand's appliances — and the SMEG Personal Blender is no exception. Although I appreciated its iconic design and brand legacy, the performance didn't quite justify the price, especially considering it was the most expensive personal blender I tested. Even though SMEG is known for combining vintage aesthetics with modern engineering, I would recommend the Our Place blender over this nearly $200 appliance. SMEG truly can't be beat when it comes to logo appeal. The curved silhouette, shiny finish and chrome accents make it a beautiful match with other SMEG countertop staples. It certainly makes a design statement, and if you're building a matching SMEG collection, this blender fits the vibe perfectly. In terms of function, the 250-watt motor is quiet and handled soft ingredients like yogurt, berries and milks without issue. Although the most expensive blender in my testing pool, the SMEG blender was one of the least powerful when considering motor strength. The two included 600-milliliter (20-ounce) Tritan travel bottles are BPA-free, and to me, they looked like baby bottles, which might feel strange to carry around. Nonetheless, they are convenient for grabbing a smoothie on the way out the door. But when I tried blending anything more demanding — such as frozen mango or thick, leafy greens — the motor struggled. The texture of my smoothies wasn't as smooth as I expected, and it took longer to get everything fully blended, even when I cut the ingredients into smaller pieces. At this price point, I would expect more power and more versatility. Overall, if you care most about having a visually cohesive kitchen and you're already invested in SMEG's product line, the Personal Blender will blend right in. But if you're looking for performance to match the price, there are stronger, more capable options, especially for blending tough ingredients or making smoothies regularly. The SMEG blender is beautifully made, but in my testing, it wasn't the most practical or powerful choice. What personal blender is best for smoothies? What personal blender is best for smoothies? You'll want a personal blender with a smoothie setting. Typically, a powerful personal blender should be over 500 watts to break down frozen fruits with ease. How do you use a personal blender? How do you use a personal blender? It should be as easy as measuring your ingredients, filling up your blender and pushing a button, depending on the personal blender you choose. Refer to the user manual for any lingering questions. How to clean a personal blender? How to clean a personal blender? Add a drop of dish soap and warm water into your blender and pulse to clean all the creases and blades. Some components may also be top-rack dishwasher-safe, but consult the user manual to be sure. Be careful not to touch the sharp blades if you disassemble the blender too. CNN Underscored's writers and editors thoroughly review all the products in our testing guides and provide full transparency about how we test them. We have a skilled team backed by many years of product testing experience to ensure each article is carefully edited and products are properly vetted. We talk to subject matter experts where necessary and ensure we speak about the pros and cons of products. For this article, associate testing writer Carolina Gazal spent weeks blending ice and making smoothies to observe the range of personal blenders. This entailed several rounds of whirring, blending and drinking all sorts of beverages. Gazal loves to get her hands on the latest kitchen appliances and has tested everything from the best blenders to the best air fryers to the best coffee grinders.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Junk Food for the Mind
I'm generally optimistic about all the ways artificial intelligence is going to make life better — scientific research, medical diagnoses, tutoring and my favorite current use, vacation planning. But it also offers a malevolent seduction: excellence without effort. It gives people the illusion that they can be good at thinking without hard work, and I'm sorry, that's not possible. There's a recent study that exposes this seduction. It has a really small sample size, and it hasn't even been peer reviewed yet — so put in all your caveats — but it suggests something that seems intuitively true. A group of researchers led by M.I.T.'s Nataliya Kosmyna recruited 54 participants to write essays. Some of them used A.I. to write the essays, some wrote with the assistance of search engines (people without a lot of domain knowledge are not good at using search engines to identify the most important information), and some wrote the old-fashioned way, using their brains. The essays people used A.I. to write contained a lot more references to specific names, places, years and definitions. The people who relied solely on their brains had 60 percent fewer references to these things. So far so good. But the essays written with A.I. were more homogeneous, while those written by people relying on their brains created a wider variety of arguments and points. Later the researchers asked the participants to quote from their own papers. Roughly 83 percent of the large language model, or L.L.M., users had difficulty quoting from their own paper. They hadn't really internalized their own 'writing' and little of it sank in. People who used search engines were better at quoting their own points, and people who used just their brains were a lot better. Almost all the people who wrote their own papers felt they owned their work, whereas fewer of the A.I. users claimed full ownership of their work. Here's how the authors summarize this part of their research: The brain-only group, though under greater cognitive load, demonstrated deeper learning outcomes and stronger identity with their output. The search engine group displayed moderate internalization, likely balancing effort with outcome. The L.L.M. group, while benefiting from tool efficiency, showed weaker memory traces, reduced self-monitoring and fragmented authorship. In other words, more effort, more reward. More efficiency, less thinking. But here's where things get scary. The researchers used an EEG headset to look at the inner workings of their subjects' brains. The subjects who relied only on their own brains showed higher connectivity across a bunch of brain regions. Search engine users experienced less brain connectivity and A.I. users least of all. Researchers have a method called dynamic directed transfer function, or D.D.T.F., which measures the coherence and directionality of the neural networks and can be interpreted in the context of executive function, attention regulation and other related cognitive processes. The brain-only writers had the highest D.D.T.F. connectivity. The search engine group demonstrated between 34 percent to 48 percent lower total connectivity, and the A.I. group demonstrated up to 55 percent lower D.D.T.F. connectivity. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PhenQ Updates 2025 Formula With Strongest OTC Appetite Suppressant Profile and Clinically Studied Craving Support Ingredients
Now Reformulated With InnoSlim®, α-Lacys Reset®, and Capsimax® to Support Multi-Pathway Metabolic Function Without a Prescription Austin, July 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Section 1 – Introduction As public discourse around weight management increasingly centers on metabolic wellness and lifestyle sustainability, interest in ingredient transparency and multi-pronged dietary support has grown significantly. Search trends across wellness communities indicate a shift from short-term diet strategies to long-view approaches that integrate energy regulation, appetite balance, and metabolic efficiency. Consumers are more likely to seek out formulas that address more than one aspect of weight control—especially those that avoid extreme stimulant profiles or single-function targeting. This behavioral shift has coincided with broader public interest in natural compounds supported by nutritional research, such as amino acids, botanicals, and metabolism-supporting minerals. In particular, ingredients that can be framed within the context of thermogenesis, satiety, and nutritional synergy are gaining traction. As a result, consumer demand continues to evolve toward formulations that offer multi-targeted mechanisms using non-synthetic, generally recognized as safe (GRAS) compounds. In response to these developments, formulations that were once labeled 'fat burners' are being reevaluated under broader criteria—namely, how they fit into non-clinical, whole-body support frameworks without promising weight loss as a singular outcome. Brands operating in this space are adjusting messaging and formulation strategies to meet heightened scrutiny around claims, sourcing, and ingredient function transparency. For more information about PhenQ's updated formulation and full ingredient profile, visit the official website Section 2 – Product Announcement or Update PhenQ has announced an updated 2025 formulation of its non-prescription weight management system, designed to align with shifting consumer expectations for ingredient integrity and multi-mechanism nutritional support. This latest version of the product reinforces its core structure around five key wellness pathways: thermogenic activation, fat storage moderation, appetite regulation, mood support, and metabolic energy balance. The proprietary blend remains anchored by α-Lacys Reset®, a patented compound combining alpha-lipoic acid, magnesium, and cysteine base. Recent research continues to frame this ingredient as a catalyst for thermogenic activity and metabolic responsiveness, without relying on excessive stimulant content. The brand's decision to retain α-Lacys Reset® underscores a science-forward approach to addressing metabolic function using nutritionally supported compounds. Additional adjustments to the formulation include expanded concentrations of traditional metabolism-assisting agents such as Capsimax® powder, natural caffeine, and chromium picolinate. These ingredients have remained popular within weight management circles not for their standalone impact, but for their role within comprehensive nutritional strategies that prioritize satiety, energy production, and micronutrient replenishment. The updated formulation also introduces InnoSlim®, a patented blend of ginseng and astragalus, which is gaining visibility for its role in supporting glucose metabolism and carbohydrate absorption. Together with iodine, B-vitamins, and L-carnitine fumarate, these additions provide nutritional diversity intended to complement modern wellness habits without necessitating disruptive lifestyle changes. PhenQ continues to frame its positioning within the non-clinical category, emphasizing that its formulation is not a treatment protocol but rather a supportive approach to general metabolic wellness. In line with current market preferences, the updated product contains no synthetic fat-blockers, no hormonal agents, and no ingredients classified as controlled substances. It is manufactured in GMP-certified facilities in the U.S. and U.K., using raw materials that meet quality assurance and regulatory thresholds applicable to the nutritional supplement category. This update reflects PhenQ's broader effort to participate in the global transition toward transparent, non-promissory wellness solutions that emphasize functional synergy over one-dimensional outcomes. Section 3 – Consumer Trend Overview Over the past several years, consumer search behavior surrounding weight management supplements has steadily migrated toward holistic, ingredient-conscious products. This shift reflects a broader interest in addressing multiple factors influencing body composition, such as appetite cues, metabolic output, and emotional resilience during calorie-restricted phases. Data drawn from digital wellness communities, search engine queries, and public forums suggest that buyers are placing greater emphasis on transparency and ingredient credibility than on dramatic claims or isolated outcomes. As skepticism grows toward overstated weight loss advertisements, conversations have increasingly focused on understanding what individual ingredients do within the broader context of metabolism. This includes a move away from traditional fat-burning stimulants toward botanical compounds and cofactor nutrients that support the body's natural energy processes without pushing physiological extremes. One emerging theme within consumer discourse is the demand for formulas that consider long-term sustainability. For instance, users are more likely to engage with products that support thermogenesis, mood balance, and fatigue reduction as part of a lifestyle plan rather than isolated 'quick fixes.' These preferences are especially prominent among wellness-oriented audiences who value dietary autonomy, ingredient traceability, and scientific support over trend-based marketing. PhenQ's 2025 update appears aligned with these evolving expectations. The decision to highlight ingredient functionality—without centering outcomes or guarantees—places it within the emerging category of non-clinical metabolic support formulations. Rather than categorizing weight management through a purely physical lens, the updated structure acknowledges psychological and behavioral components such as cravings, motivation, and energy consistency. This trend-centric positioning avoids reliance on transactional language and instead contributes to a more nuanced public understanding of how multi-mechanism supplements may complement existing wellness routines. As more consumers seek out metabolic support rooted in credible nutrition science, the demand for well-rounded, stimulant-moderated solutions is expected to continue growing. Consumers seeking detailed ingredient sourcing, manufacturing practices, and research references may visit official website for additional information. Section 4 – Ingredient or Technology Spotlight The 2025 PhenQ formulation is structured around a series of recognizable and increasingly studied natural ingredients, each selected for its contribution to multi-pathway metabolic support. Central to the formula is α-Lacys Reset®, a patented compound combining alpha-lipoic acid (ALA), magnesium, and cysteine base. This ingredient has been examined in placebo-controlled clinical contexts for its potential to activate thermogenesis and influence body composition markers within the parameters of non-prescription supplementation. α-Lacys Reset® is joined by Capsimax® powder, a highly bioavailable form of concentrated capsaicinoids derived from chili peppers. Research surrounding this ingredient highlights its role in increasing thermogenic efficiency and metabolic expenditure, while also providing digestive tract tolerance compared to raw pepper extracts. Its use has become widespread in formulations that seek to support heat production without relying on high doses of stimulants. Another key component is chromium picolinate, a trace mineral with a long-standing presence in dietary supplements. While not associated with weight loss as a standalone agent, chromium is often cited in nutrition literature for its involvement in glucose metabolism and its reported influence on carbohydrate-related cravings. Its inclusion in PhenQ's formulation supports the product's emphasis on appetite regulation and micronutrient synergy. The updated version of PhenQ also includes InnoSlim®, a proprietary blend of Panax notoginseng and Astragalus membranaceus. Recent studies have framed this ingredient as a potential modulator of AMPK pathways and carbohydrate absorption rates. InnoSlim® is becoming a frequent addition to formulas positioned within blood sugar awareness and metabolic health categories. Additional ingredients such as nopal cactus and L-carnitine fumarate contribute to the formula's nutritional profile. Nopal, a fibrous cactus traditionally consumed in various cultures, has been associated with satiety and lipid-binding activity in digestive contexts. L-carnitine, an amino acid compound found in red meat and plant-based sources, is commonly used in nutritional protocols aimed at supporting energy metabolism and recovery. Collectively, these ingredients reflect a formulation philosophy that prioritizes synergistic activity and scientific credibility over bold outcome promises or single-compound dependence. Section 5 – User Journey Narrative / Market Reception As metabolic health continues to receive attention in digital wellness spaces, public curiosity around multi-action supplements like PhenQ has remained steady. Social media forums, community discussion threads, and independent blogs reflect an ongoing interest in products that aim to simplify the experience of managing appetite, mood, and energy — all without the complications associated with pharmaceutical interventions or overly stimulant-heavy alternatives. What distinguishes PhenQ's market positioning is its communication style, which avoids exaggerated results and instead centers around science-informed transparency. Across various digital channels, users frequently raise questions about ingredient sourcing, manufacturing integrity, and whether a given formula complements modern wellness routines — particularly for those pursuing health improvements without restrictive diet regimens or clinical oversight. The company's updated formulation and messaging strategy appear to resonate with these inquiries. Rather than promoting a singular path to weight loss, the updated formula is structured to reflect broader consumer themes, including the desire for satiety support, energy normalization, and formulation diversity. The addition of ingredients such as InnoSlim® and B-vitamins addresses increasing demand for micronutrient optimization and support for metabolic pathways often disrupted by caloric deficit or lifestyle changes. In discussions around natural supplements, audiences increasingly prioritize how a product fits into a larger picture of emotional consistency and sustainable energy, especially in contrast to 'quick burn' formulations that rely heavily on caffeine or unverified compounds. The fact that PhenQ includes commonly understood ingredients like L-carnitine, magnesium, and caffeine — but in modulated, complementary concentrations — contributes to its positioning as an integrative rather than transformative option. This framing, combined with a formula that does not require a prescription and is manufactured under GMP conditions, continues to support its relevance among consumers seeking nutritional autonomy. Rather than emphasizing a transactional promise of transformation, PhenQ appears to contribute to a more moderate and sustainable public dialogue on wellness supplements that support—rather than replace—healthy lifestyle practices. Interested individuals can find formulation disclosures and regulatory information via PhenQ's official website. Section 6 – Availability and Transparency Statement PhenQ's updated formulation is available through its official platform, where consumers can review detailed ingredient information, third-party sourcing disclosures, and manufacturing standards. The product is manufactured in facilities that meet current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) certification standards in both the United States and United Kingdom, with raw ingredients selected according to internal quality assurance protocols. As part of its transparency commitment, PhenQ provides accessible documentation for its trademarked compounds such as α-Lacys Reset® and InnoSlim®, along with references to publicly available nutritional research supporting the inclusion of individual ingredients. The company emphasizes that its supplement is intended for informational and lifestyle-support purposes only and does not position the product as a treatment or replacement for medical supervision. Individuals interested in metabolic wellness strategies are encouraged to explore educational materials hosted on the PhenQ site, which outline general formulation philosophy, frequently asked questions, and links to peer-reviewed research. No prescription is required for purchase, and the product is available exclusively through the company's designated online retail channels. Section 7 – Final Observations & Industry Context The 2025 update of PhenQ arrives at a time when the supplement industry is undergoing renewed scrutiny and transformation, particularly within the weight management category. As consumer expectations shift from single-purpose diet products to multi-functional wellness solutions, brands are reassessing both how they formulate products and how they communicate ingredient purpose. This evolution marks a broader move away from direct weight loss promises toward formulations that acknowledge the interconnected nature of energy, appetite, and motivation. Across the wellness landscape, ingredients once considered niche—such as alpha-lipoic acid, nopal cactus, and botanical extracts like astragalus—are gaining mainstream attention. The increasing presence of these compounds in consumer conversations suggests a growing interest in plant-based and functional ingredient science, especially when backed by human trials and documented safety profiles. PhenQ's approach reflects a maturing sector that recognizes the importance of transparency, nuanced messaging, and sustainable lifestyle support. Rather than offering a singular solution, the formulation aims to complement a growing range of consumer wellness behaviors, including mindful eating, energy balancing, and non-clinical supplementation. As demand for transparency and scientific literacy rises, the presence of products structured like PhenQ—multi-pathway, non-prescription, and disclosure-focused—signals the industry's broader direction. This includes higher consumer literacy, diversified expectations, and an evolving standard of what constitutes a trustworthy supplement. Section 8 – Public Commentary Theme Summary Public discussions surrounding PhenQ's formulation have generated a range of observations reflecting both interest and critical inquiry. A recurring theme across digital wellness communities is the product's emphasis on combining multiple known ingredients into a single formula, which some individuals view as a time-saving approach to general metabolic support. Others have noted the appeal of stimulant moderation—citing the inclusion of moderate levels of caffeine and an absence of harsher synthetic additives—as aligned with preferences for less disruptive daily routines. Among individuals actively comparing non-prescription supplements, the presence of clinically referenced ingredients such as α-Lacys Reset® and chromium picolinate has been identified as a point of interest. These components, frequently mentioned in scientific literature for their roles in energy metabolism and appetite regulation, are often viewed as more familiar or trusted compared to newer or lesser-known compounds. Conversely, some users have raised questions about the realistic scope of results when using non-clinical supplements. There is ongoing discourse around the limitations of over-the-counter solutions, with particular attention paid to the importance of maintaining lifestyle consistency, including diet and physical activity. This reflects a broader caution in the wellness space—an understanding that no standalone product can substitute for foundational health behaviors. Additionally, public commentary has reflected a desire for more transparent sourcing data, third-party testing disclosures, and clearer long-term usage guidelines. These requests are in line with increasing consumer expectations for traceability and safety, especially in products used over extended periods. Overall, discussion themes suggest that PhenQ is being evaluated primarily for its formulation logic, ingredient familiarity, and alignment with wellness-focused—not outcome-promising—weight management strategies. About PhenQ PhenQ is a U.S.- and U.K.-based wellness brand specializing in non-prescription formulations designed to support metabolic health through ingredient transparency and multi-mechanism nutritional design. Since its initial launch, PhenQ has developed a science-informed product portfolio focused on integrating botanical extracts, essential minerals, and amino acid complexes into accessible, non-clinical supplements. The company's mission centers on empowering individuals to make informed wellness decisions through evidence-aligned formulation and educational transparency. PhenQ does not provide medical treatment or diagnostic services. Its products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease, and should be used only as part of a broader wellness routine that includes professional healthcare consultation where appropriate. Contact: PhenQ Email: info@ Website: CONTACT: PhenQ Email: info@ Website: in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
