Scottish Labour MP red faced over grooming gang probe U-turn
Joani Reid voted against Tory proposals to launch a national inquiry into the scandal in January, months before the Prime Minister reversed his earlier opposition to a national probe.
After a report by Baroness Casey recommended a national inquiry, Keir Starmer (below) backed one – having previously accused those calling for the measure of jumping on a far-right bandwagon.
Reid then called for the national inquiry to include Scotland or for the Scottish Government to set up its own version.
She told the Daily Record: 'It is vital Scotland is fully engaged with any statutory inquiry.'
The East Kilbride MP added: 'If the Scottish Government does not intend to hold its own dedicated inquiry, we need clear reasons why – not the vague responses we've had so far.'
But it has since emerged that Reid voted against a national inquiry when one was proposed five months ago by the opposition.
READ MORE: Donald Trump shares fawning message from extremist US ambassador to Israel
The Tories tabled an amendment to Labour's Children and Wellbeing Bill, which urged the Government to work towards 'establishing a national statutory inquiry into historical child sexual exploitation, focused on grooming gangs'.
Reid was one of 350 Labour MPs who voted down that amendment on January 8 this year.
SNP MP Pete Wishart told The National Labour were 'all over the place when it comes to a grooming gang inquiry'.
He said: 'It is simply incredulous that a Scottish Labour MP insists that the Scottish government follow the example of the UK on a grooming gang inquiry when she herself was not prepared to support a UK wide inquiry when it was voted on in Parliament.
(Image: PA)
'Labour are all over the place when it comes to a grooming gang inquiry. First they opposed one, then they backed it, now they insist that we join in with whatever position they have adopted this week.'
The SNP have previously argued against holding a focused grooming gangs inquiry, saying the issue falls within the scope of the wider and ongoing Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry.
Wishart added: 'In Scotland we have our own Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry as well multi-agency Child Sexual Abuse and Exploitation Strategic Group. In Scotland it is also the case that all healthcare and education already have a duty to report child abuse. The First Minister has also said that mandatory reporting is securing active consideration.'
Reid was approached for comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
27 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Cutting personal independent payments: potentially devastating or justified?
As predicted (Starmer offers 'massive concessions' on welfare bill to Labour rebels, 26 June), an attempt has been made to salvage the welfare bill. Discontented MPs and disabled people alike will welcome the assurance that people currently receiving personal independence payments (Pip) or the health element of universal credit will be protected from changes. But the episode is damaging, has caused thousands of disabled people needless worry, and may come to be seen as pivotal in Keir Starmer's tenure. There is something deeply invidious about having two classes of benefit recipients – the protected current recipients, and those making future claims. At the same time, it is clear that the benefits system does need reform and, in particular, needs to support people into work rather than taking a punitive and brutal approach to cost saving. How Starmer has ended up in this position is fascinating, if it were not extraordinary for a government with such a majority and the potential to make radical and equitable change to be repeatedly wrongfooted. U-turns look weak and messy, and presenting them as a response to active listening is unlikely to convince anyone. Starmer claims not to be ideological, and there is the issue; policy is being shaped not by a coherent strategic vision and principle-driven aspirations for better lives, opportunities and genuine equality, but by economic necessity and caution. It's a flawed model, certain to intensify divisions between ministries, Labour members, taxpayers, benefit recipients and the wider electorate. There is major learning and reflection needed by the government; the optics have gone badly wrong, but the welfare reform chaos is a symptom of a much deeper political Melanie HenwoodHartwell, Northamptonshire I am a social worker and I support cutting Pips. I have encountered a number of young adults trapped in a cycle of welfare dependency, unemployment and chaotic lifestyles. They share a belief that the state must fund every aspect of life, and a lack of understanding that benefits come not 'from the government' but are redistributed from taxation of the population. Pip is often claimed on the basis of anxiety or depression, but the idea of working to support oneself, or seeking training or education to make work more attainable, is absent from their thinking. The answer? Probably a combination of education, early interventions and nudges towards culture change, including reducing the availability of Pip. In the long term the status quo won't help the young people I work and address supplied What is not being made clear in government statements and coverage of the cuts to disability benefits is the personal independence payment's relationship to work. Pip is paid to help with the additional costs arising from disability. It is paid to people in work and out of work. It is crucial in enabling people to stay in work, paying for technical and personal support, health needs, travel and other costs. It also enables people who cannot work full-time to work. What will happen to these working people when they can no longer afford the additional costs? It's clear the government does not understand the role of Pip in enabling BetteridgeManchester As we approach the parliamentary vote on the new welfare bill, spare a thought for the many Pip recipients who received the benefit when it was known as disability living allowance. I suspect, for many, the scars still linger from that government change to the system. What that revealed was that disability allowance was not directed to those most in need of it due to their disability. Rather, receiving the new benefit depended upon one's ability to fill out a 40-page form. Next, it depended on having the physical and mental resilience to challenge the result and take it to a tribunal. This was a protracted and stressful period of time. For many, who made it that far, the tribunal reversed the DWP scoring and people found that they had their old level of benefit reinstated. Just a shame that stress makes many medical conditions far worse for the individual. Many years ago, I believed that the DWP wanted to help those with serious disabilities. These days, I have as much faith in them as they appear to have in disabled people (DWP letters now seem to be written with a subtext of 'you're a fraud and we'll catch you').Name and address supplied Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Keir Starmer admits humiliating benefits U-turn WAS his fault after being ‘distracted' by Middle East and Nato
SIR KEIR Starmer accepts the humiliating u-turn on benefits was his fault – revealing he has been distracted by global events. The Prime Minister attempted to deflect attention away from top aides after 120-strong rebellion from Labour MPs were due to derail welfare reforms. 2 The admission comes as Sir Keir marks a year in Downing Street this Friday but has been dogged by policy u-turns in recent weeks on winter fuel payments and holding a grooming gang inquiry. Existing claimants of personal independence payments and universal credit will continue to receive their benefits costing the Treasury £3 billion. In an interview with The Sunday Times, Sir Keir said: 'I'd have liked to get to a better position with colleagues sooner than we did — that's for sure. He added: 'Would I rather have been able to get to a constructive package with colleagues earlier? Yeah, I would. [But] I believe in the world we live in, not the world we want to live in.' Sir Keir recognised that he has had a hectic time on the world stage in recent weeks heading to Canada for the G7 and then Nato in Holland for summits. Throughout this time, a growing rebellion appears to have caught many in government by surprise leading to the u-turn. The PM added: 'I'm putting this as context rather than excuse: I was heavily focused on what was happening with Nato and the Middle East all weekend. 'I turned my attention fully to it [the welfare bill] when I got back from Nato on Wednesday night. 'Obviously in the course of the early part of this week we were busy trying to make sure Nato was a success.' He also said: 'From the moment I got back from the G7, I went straight into a Cobra meeting. Keir Starmer 'to BACK DOWN' on benefits cuts as he faces major revolt from MPs 'My full attention really bore down on this on Thursday. At that point we were able to move relatively quickly.' Meanwhile, Health Secretary Wes Streeting hinted that there could be more concessions to rebels as a review of the Pip payments is held. He also appeared confident that the government will have the numbers to win the vote on Tuesday. The Cabinet Minister told the BBC: 'When things change and evolve as you bring in new systems, it does change sometimes from group to group, student finance being an example. He said "we've got to listen" when asked if further concessions could be made on Pip payments. Meanwhile, Unite general secretary Sharon Graham has called for the Ministers to start from scratch on the Bill saying the latest plans were "divisive and sinister". 2
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Wes Streeting challenged on plan to tackle obesity crisis
Health Minister Wes Streeting was questioned on Sky News by Trevor Phillips regarding new government plans to tackle the obesity crisis. Mr Phillips challenged Mr Streeting on how to prevent public discontent if people were restricted from buying unhealthy food. New government plans aim to encourage supermarkets to promote fruit and vegetables over less healthy options like burgers, chocolate, and crisps. Mr Streeting clarified that he is not interested in preventing people from buying specific items, instead outlining the government's broader 10-year health plan. Watch the video in full above.
