"Surfers Have a Powerful Activist Base": An Exclusive Conversation with Captain Paul Watson
In our first conversation with Captain Paul Watson, the anti-whaling activist talked through his recent five months in a Greenland jail, other brushes with the law in his 50 years of activism and his ongoing battles with the Japanese government. In the second installment of our chat, he discusses surfers' role in activism, his acrimonious split with Sea Shepherd in 2022, on playing the long game and what we can do to help."Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal in the United States officially labeled me a pirate in the 1980s. So when somebody calls you something like that, well, instead of denying it, I just embrace it. I said, 'If you want to call us pirates we'll be pirates.' I got myself my pirate flag logo and all that sort of thing. And also pirates are romantic characters, especially to young people, so we have to take advantage of that. There's the harsh reality of piracy, and then there's the romance of piracy, and we embraced the romance part of it."
"It's a long process, and I knew it was going to take a long time. We started opposing the killing of dolphins and pilot whales in the Faroe Islands in 1983. We've been opposing dolphin slaughter in Taiji since 2003. Look, slavery didn't end overnight. Women didn't get the right to vote overnight. You have to have patience to make a difference. But let's look at what has been accomplished since 1974 when I started this. Australia stopped whaling in 1977. Peru, Chile, South Korea and Spain followed soon after. As of 2019, all pelagic whaling was ended. So whaling is now confined to the waters in Norway, Iceland, and Japan, plus the Faroe Islands. The problem is Japan is now looking at returning to the Southern Ocean, and we know that because of the ship that they built, which is definitely too big and long-range to be going to for coastal whaling. So that is their ambition. So right now we have our ship the Bandero, in Melbourne to act as a guard to the entrance of the Southern Ocean. If Japan returns, we'll be there and we'll be prepared. Our other ship, the Jean Paul de Jore, is in Bermuda, and in June it will be heading to Iceland to go against the Icelandic whalers there. That's where the frontiers are now."
"In 2022, there was a hostile takeover of Sea Shepherd when I was illegally dismissed from the board of both US and Global. They took everything. They took the ships, the assets, the database, they took everything. But most grievously, they changed the objectives to go mainstream. They accused me of being too controversial and confrontational. And the reason they did that is the guys who did it, like the Managing Director Jeff Hansen in Australia, is because they have nice comfortable jobs and a lot of job security. I was too controversial and a risk to their precious positions.
I work now with the Captain Paul Watson Foundation. I never set Sea Shepherd up to be an organization. I set it up to be a movement. And so that's what we're continuing to do with the France and Brazil Sea Shepherd plus the Captain Paul Watson Foundation continuing the movement with the original objectives and the original strategies that I developed in 1977. ""We don't compromise to sell out to governments. The falling out I had with Sea Shepherd Australia was because they went into a partnership with Austral Fisheries. Austral Fisheries is 50% owned by the Maruha Nichiro Fishing Company in Japan, who had links with the Taiyo Whaling company that we went up against in the 1970s. So I never envisioned that Sea Shepherd would be in partnership with a company that was involved with killing whales, but that's exactly what happened.
But fortunately, a lot of the people who supported me when I was with Sea Shepherd have come over. John Paul DeJoria, the owner of the Paul Mitchell shampoo line and Patron Tequila, bought a ship that we named after him as well as another called The Bandero. So within 3 or 4 months of the Foundation starting we had our first ship and a lot of veteran crew members also came over. We've had so much support."
"Kelly Slater and Dave Rastavich have been actively involved as supporters and so many surfers have joined our crews. I've always looked on surfers, scuba divers, and sailors as ambassadors for the ocean. To me, the most alarming thing that we face today is that since 1950, there's been a 40% diminishment in phytoplankton in the sea, and phytoplankton provides up to 70% of the oxygen in the air we breathe and sequestered enormous amounts of CO2. And why is this happening? I think it's because of the diminishment of whales, seals, dolphins and seabirds. Whales are farmers in the ocean. They're just spreading manure across the crops of phytoplankton, and so they perform an extremely important ecological function. And the reality is that if phytoplankton disappears from the sea, we die. We don't live on the planet with a dead ocean. So the ultimate responsibility of every human being is to do everything we can to protect life diversity and interdependence in the sea.
Surfers are in a better position to see right before their very eyes the changes that are escalating as far as climate changes and the effect of biological diminishment of diversity. Surfers and the surf industry have a powerful lobby and activist base. They need to use it."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
4 minutes ago
- UPI
G-7 agrees to exclude U.S. companies from 15% minimum tax
Leaders of the G-7 nations pose for a photo in Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, on Monday: (from left) Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, French President Emmanuel Macron, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, U.S. President Donald Trump, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. The G-7 announced the U.S. would be excluded from the 15% minimum tax on American companies. Photo via G7/UPI | License Photo June 29 (UPI) -- Group of Seven nations agreed to exempt U.S. companies from a 15% minimum corporate tax rate, the countries said in a joint statement. The nonbinding deal was announced Saturday but still requires approval from the 38-member Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development that established the 2021 agreement on taxing companies. G-7 nations are part of the OECED. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent had proposed a "side-by-side solution" for American-headquartered companies that would be exempt from the Income Inclusion Rule and Undertaxed Profits Rule "in recognition of the existing U.S. minimum tax rules to which they are subject." The massive spending bill now being considered in Congress originally included a "revenge tax" that would have imposed a levy of up to 20% on investments from countries that taxed U.S. companies. "I have asked the Senate and House to remove the Section 899 protective measure from consideration in the One, Big, Beautiful Bill," Bessent wrote in a multi-post thread on X on Thursday. The House has approved the massive legislation and the Senate is considering it. "It is an honorable compromise as it spares us from the automatic retaliations of Section 899 of the Big, Beautiful Bill," Italian Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti told local media. "We are not claiming victory, but we obtained some concessions as the U.S. pledged to engage in OECD negotiations on fair taxation," an unnamed French official told Politico Europe. The official called the "revenge tax" a potentially "huge burden for French companies." Trump has criticized this provision because he said it would limit sovereignty and send U.S. tax revenues to other countries. "The Trump administration remains vigilant against all discriminatory and extraterritorial foreign taxes applied against Americans," Bessent wrote Thursday. Trump has imposed a July 9 deadline for U.S. trading partners to lower taxes on foreign goods, threatening high duties on the worst offenders, including 50% on goods from the 27 European Union members. In April, a baseline tariff was imposed on most U.S. trading partners, with higher rates on certain companies and products. In 2021, nearly 140 countries agreed to tax multinational companies at the 15% minimum, regardless of where they were headquartered. In late April, the European Union, Britain, Japan and Canada agreed to exempt the United States from the 15% minimum tax on companies. "Delivery of a side-by-side system will facilitate further progress to stabilize the international tax system, including a constructive dialogue on the taxation of the digital economy and on preserving the tax sovereignty of all countries," the joint statement read. The agreement, according to the statement, would ensure that any substantial risks identified "with respect to the level playing field, or risks of base erosion and profit shifting, are addressed to preserve the common policy objectives of the side-by-side system." The G-7 includes Britain, France, Germany, Italy in Europe, as well as Canada, Japan and U.S. Before 2014, the group was known as the G-8 until Russia was expelled after annexing the Crimea region of Ukraine. The chairs of the House and Senate committees responsible for tax policy cheered the agreement. "We applaud President Trump and his team for protecting the interests of American workers and businesses after years of congressional Republicans sounding the alarm on the Biden Administration's unilateral global tax surrender under Pillar 2," Idaho Sen. Mike Crapo, chair of the Senate Finance Committee, and Missouri Rep. Jason Smith, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, said in a press release. The agreement also, however, has its critics. "The U.S. is trying to exempt itself by arm-twisting others, which would make the tax deal entirely useless," Markus Meinzer, director of policy at the Tax Justice Network, told Politico Europe. "A ship with a U.S.-sized hole in its hull won't float."
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Powell and Lagarde Count Cost of Trump's Turbulence
(Bloomberg) -- The global economy's concussion from five months of Donald Trump's presidency is likely to feature when five of the world's leading central bank chiefs discuss monetary policy in public on Tuesday. Philadelphia Transit System Votes to Cut Service by 45%, Hike Fares US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs Squeezed by Crowds, the Roads of Central Park Are Being Reimagined Sprawl Is Still Not the Answer Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown From tariff-related trade ructions to oil-price gyrations caused by Middle East hostilities, the question of how to handle the fallout from White House decisions may loom large as Federal Reserve chief Jerome Powell speaks on a panel with peers from the euro zone, Japan, South Korea and the UK. The high-powered gathering at the European Central Bank's annual retreat in Portugal will be the first time that its president, Christine Lagarde, has shared a stage for a public discussion with her US counterpart since the same event in 2024. Back then, when they spoke alongside former Brazilian central bank chief Roberto Campos Neto, their discourse morphed into something resembling a group therapy session on the trials of setting interest rates at times of political stress — a premonition, in its own way, of the turbulence to come. One year on, and at the halfway point of 2025, global policy is almost paralyzed by the need to navigate risks posed both to inflation and growth in the wake of Trump's actions — a challenge highlighted by the Bank for International Settlements in a report on Sunday. Such a trade-off is faced by all the central bank chiefs who will speak on the panel in the hilltop resort of Sintra. Powell insisted on Tuesday that the Fed is in no rush to change rates, and earlier this month the Bank of England left borrowing costs on hold too. What Bloomberg Economics Says: 'Quickening core inflation and slowing spending will keep the Fed uneasy, fueling debate about the appropriate number of rate cuts this year.' —Stuart Paul, US & Canada economist. For full analysis, click here The ECB itself, having just delivered a reduction, isn't ready to do any more for now, and the Bank of Japan is widely expected to keep its benchmark unaltered at its July 31 meeting. The Bank of Korea is insisting on acting cautiously too. In a podcast before this week's retreat, ECB Chief Economist Philip Lane emphasized the panel as the highlight of the whole gathering, whose theme of 'Adapting to Change' seems something of an understatement. 'You do need to step back — rather than just talk about 'what are we going to do in July or September?' — to look at the underlying forces,' he said, before predicting that the central bank chiefs will deliver 'a very lively session.' Elsewhere, US jobs, Chinese business surveys and euro-zone inflation numbers will be among the highlights. Click here for what happened last week, and below is our wrap of what's coming up in the global economy. US and Canada Following fresh figures on Friday that showed American consumers are becoming somewhat fatigued, the US jobs report for June will offer clues about the strength of the labor market. Economists forecast employers added 113,000 jobs during the month, the fewest in four months yet still consistent with healthy labor demand. The Bureau of Labor Statistics report is due Thursday, a day earlier than usual because of the Independence Day holiday. It's also forecast to show the unemployment rate crept up to 4.3%. For a Federal Reserve awaiting more clarity on the potential inflationary impact from tariffs, any pronounced deterioration in the labor market would likely lead to more pressure on officials to lower interest rates. For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for the US So far, there have been only scattered signs of cracks in the job market, including the highest number of recurring claims for jobless benefits since late 2021. A Labor Department report on Tuesday is expected to show little change in May job openings from a month earlier. Canadian goods trade data for May will probably show a continued sharp decline in US exports, with shipments to other countries rising but not offsetting the loss of access to the American market. The first payments of Canada's digital services tax are due Monday, hitting major US tech firms with a 3% levy on their revenue from Canadian users above C$20 million. Trump cited the tax as the reason for the US ending trade talks with Canada on Friday. Asia The week in Asia features a slew of PMI reports that will shed light on how regional economies are coping with elevated US tariffs. China gets a pair of PMI releases, with the official gauge Monday expected to show that manufacturing activity remained contractionary for a third straight month in June as persistent deflation on top of trade tensions weighed on activity. The next day sees the release of PMI figures for South Korea, Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, Taiwan and China's Caixin gauge. The BOJ's Tankan survey, also on Tuesday, is forecast to show that large companies plan to boost capital investment by 10% this fiscal year. Business sentiment among large manufacturers is expected to stay relatively upbeat, albeit at a lower level, while the gauge for non-manufacturers is seen staying close to the 34-year high set in the previous period. May trade reports are due during the week from Australia, Indonesia, Thailand and Sri Lanka, while South Korea reports those figures for June. South Korea also publishes consumer price statistics for June that may keep the Bank of Korea on track for another rate cut. Indonesia June CPI is also due. Industrial output figures from South Korea, India and Japan, and Japanese household spending data will bookend the week. For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for Asia Europe, Middle East, Africa Inflation numbers will draw attention in the euro zone. Data on Monday may show consumer-price growth picked up in Germany and Italy, though not enough to worry the ECB. For the region as a whole, economists anticipate an outcome of 2% the following day, exactly at the goal targeted by policymakers. Other than price reports, clues on how the region's manufacturing sector is faring amid Trump's tariff squeeze will also emerge. German factory orders, along with French and Spanish industrial production, will be published on Friday. Aside from its Sintra seminars, the ECB itself will offer plenty of other news. The results of its strategy review are due on Monday, followed by the institution's own measure of inflation expectations the next day. On Thursday, an account of its June policy meeting will be released, revealing more on the decision to cut rates. Beyond Sintra, ECB officials will be out in force at another economic gathering later in the week in Aix-en-Provence, in southern France. On Monday, the Swiss National Bank will reveal how much foreign-exchange intervention it carried out during the first quarter. Switzerland's latest inflation numbers are scheduled for Thursday and may also draw interest from traders focused on the franc. Economists anticipate that consumer prices fell from a year earlier for a second month in June. In the UK, a full breakdown of gross domestic product for the first quarter will be published on Monday. Appearances by BOE Governor Andrew Bailey in Sintra and Aix-en-Provence will also be highlights. Away from Europe, South Africa's Bureau for Economic Research will release its second-quarter inflation expectations survey on Wednesday. The report will be closely monitored by the central bank, which uses the two-year-ahead measure to inform its decisions. The bank aims to anchor expectations at the 4.5% midpoint of its target range, but is currently in discussions with the National Treasury to revise it lower. In Turkey on Thursday, annual inflation is forecast to slow slightly to 35.2% in June from 35.4% the prior month. That may persuade the central bank to lower its main policy rate by at least 300 basis points to 43%. For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for EMEA It's a quieter week than usual for monetary decisions, but some are still on the diary: In Ethiopia, policymakers will likely leave their rate unchanged at 15% on Monday as inflationary pressures begin to build because of subsidy reforms. On Wednesday, the Polish central bank is likely to borrowing costs on hold, followed by Governor Adam Glapinski speaking at a news conference the next day. Latin America Argentina will publish activity data for April on Monday, with the result in focus after first-quarter growth data showed that the economy expanded significantly slower than expected early in 2025. Chile will follow with economic activity data for May on Tuesday, a reading that will follow weekend primary elections for center-left candidates hoping to succeed President Gabriel Boric in a race for the country's top job later this year. The data also comes after Chile's central bank kept its rate unchanged in mid-June, with policymakers saying that while domestic activity has exceeded expectations, they remain vigilant about an unpredictable global economy. The monetary authority will publish the minutes to that decision on Thursday, with analysts looking for clearer signals about when policymakers may start cutting rates after signaling that more monetary easing is coming. Later that day, Colombia's central bank will publish minutes to its decision to hold rates steady on Friday. The Andean nation has been roiled in recent weeks by the government's decision to suspend its fiscal rule, a move that along with a worsening debt burden led both S&P Global Ratings and Moody's Ratings to downgrade the nation's credit last week. For more, read Bloomberg Economics' full Week Ahead for Latin America --With assistance from Andrew Langley, Vince Golle, Mark Evans, Laura Dhillon Kane, Travis Waldron, Monique Vanek, Brian Fowler, Beril Akman and Mark Schroers. (Updates with BIS report in fifth paragraph) America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


New York Times
6 hours ago
- New York Times
The Population Bust Won't Solve the Climate Crisis
We've all heard that human overpopulation is a crisis. In 2017, Bill Nye warned us about the planet's 'people problem,' and that same decade David Attenborough told us that 'we are a plague on the Earth.' Project Drawdown, an environmental nonprofit, lists slower population growth among its top climate solutions. And now, fertility rates everywhere are falling. In most of the world, the birthrate is already below the average of two births per two adults needed to stabilize the population. By the 2080s, according to United Nations projections, the global population will be declining. Then change could come fast: a population that shrinks by two-thirds each century. That's what would happen in a future in which, for every two adults, there were 1.5 kids. Depopulation might seem welcome. It is true that people caused today's environmental problems. And it is right to prioritize the challenges of climate change, global poverty and inequality. In our careers, we've worked for aggressive decarbonization, reproductive freedom, caste and gender equity and better public health and health care. But falling birthrates are not the answer to our world's problems. Confronting climate change requires that billions of people live differently. It does not require that billions of future people never live. Over the past few decades, there has been important progress on environmental priorities like particulate air pollution, stratospheric ozone depletion and acid rain. In each case, progress came from ending or changing the destructive activity part of people's destructive activity. Not the people part. Take China's smog crisis. In 2013, with the country's population growing and economy industrializing, particulate air pollution from fires, coal plants and vehicles darkened the sky. Newspapers around the world called it the 'airpocalypse.' The U.S. Embassy gave the air quality in central Beijing a rating of 755 — on an air quality scale that ran from 0 to 500. In the decade that followed, China grew by roughly 50 million people — more than the entire population of Canada. But air pollution didn't scale up as the population grew; it declined by half. Leaders and the public in China decided that the smog was unacceptable. The authorities put into effect new regulations and requirements on coal-fired power plants and heavy industry. The government devoted new resources to monitoring and enforcement. Many polluting factories and power plants adopted cleaner technologies already in use elsewhere. Others were shut down. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.