Zero Waste Travel: The Ultimate Plastic-Free Packing List
There's no exact figure detailing plastic use during travel but travelers contribute significantly to plastic consumption, especially through bottled water and other single-use items. According to Adventure.com, 139 million metric tons of single-use plastic were produced in 2021, an increase of 6 million metric tons, or almost 5%, from 2019. The widespread use of disposable products, particularly plastic bottles, plays a major role in the amount of waste created during travel.
For sustainability-minded travelers, one of the easiest and most impactful changes starts before the trip even begins and that's during the packing process.
Traveling with zero waste, whether by airplane or on a road trip, requires forethought and planning but it's possible to significantly reduce your environmental impact. This guide breaks down practical, low-waste strategies to help minimize plastic use without sacrificing convenience while exploring the world and knocking out your bucket list.
For more travel tips, learn about the best way to pack a carry-on and the best time to book flights for the cheapest tickets.
BYO containers
Traveling with your own food and drink essentials is a simple yet impactful way to reduce waste while staying prepared. A collapsible, BPA-free water bottle from brands like HydraPak or Que Bottle offers a space-saving solution for staying hydrated without relying on single-use plastic. Bringing a compact travel utensil kit made from bamboo or stainless steel means you'll always have cutlery on hand, making it easy to skip disposable forks and knives when dining on the move.
For snacks and leftovers, reusable silicone bags or beeswax wraps provide a washable, eco-friendly alternative to plastic baggies. And whether you're grabbing coffee from a café or brewing tea in your hotel room, a compact travel mug or tumbler lets you enjoy your beverage without the waste that typically comes with takeout cups.
You might read these suggestions and think it's just too inconvenient to be worth it. I totally get it -- it's so easy to justify grabbing a plastic bottle or cutlery at the airport when you're tired, rushing or just forgot to pack your reusable items. But if you travel often, those little decisions really add up. A collapsible or lightweight bottle or small dinnerware set that lives in your luggage can make it way easier to stick with the habit.
Go solid, not single-use
When packing toiletries, choosing solid alternatives over single-use plastics can make a meaningful difference. Instead of relying on travel-sized bottles, consider shampoo and conditioner bars from eco-conscious brands like Ethique or HiBAR. These compact, spill-proof bars eliminate the need for liquid soap and come free of plastic packaging. If you need to bring liquids, choose refillable silicone travel bottles that can be used again and again.
Mrsdry
For oral care, toothpaste from companies like Bite and Hello offer a fresh, TSA-compliant option that comes in recyclable or compostable containers. For dental floss, seek out compostable options like those from Dental Lace, which are packaged in refillable glass containers designed with function and the environment in mind.
Shaving also can be made more sustainable by switching to a stainless steel safety razor or a refillable razor system, reducing waste and long-term costs.
Conserve water and reduce plastic by packing smarter
Choosing the right clothing and laundry essentials can significantly reduce your environmental footprint while keeping your travel routine simple and efficient. Fabrics like merino wool and other high-performance materials are naturally odor-resistant and quick-drying, meaning they stay fresh longer and require less frequent washing. This not only lightens your laundry load but also conserves water and minimizes detergent runoff into local ecosystems.
When it's time to do laundry, skip the bulky plastic detergent bottles and pack lightweight, plastic-free alternatives such as laundry sheets or natural soap nuts, which can be stored in a small reusable pouch.
Instead of relying on disposable hotel laundry bags, bring a reusable cloth bag for your worn clothes. This is an easy swap that keeps single-use plastic out of the waste stream.
Tech and accessories for a lighter footprint
BLAVOR
Traveling sustainably extends beyond toiletries and clothing -- it includes the tech and accessories we rely on every day. Investing in a durable solar charger or a reliable power bank not only keeps your devices powered but also eliminates the need to purchase low-quality chargers or disposable batteries on the fly.
For your phone, consider switching to a compostable case made from plant-based materials. Brands like Pela offer options that combine protection with environmental responsibility. To keep your cords and cables organized, skip the plastic zip bags and choose cloth organizers made from canvas or felt, which offer a more sustainable solution.
Eco-conscious packing from the inside out
Your choice of luggage and packing gear can make a big impact on traveling more sustainably. Choose suitcases or backpacks crafted from recycled plastics or organic materials, with brands like Paravel and Patagonia leading the way in durable options that prioritize the planet.
To keep your belongings organized, packing cubes made from recycled fabrics offer an efficient, plastic-free way to maximize space in your suitcase. And, instead of a traditional vinyl zip pouch for your toiletries, consider a clear-paneled bag made from washable materials like PEVA or silicone.
These small choices, taken together, help ensure your packing is as thoughtful as the journey itself.
Pure Sage
Bonus tip: Offset your carbon footprint
Carbon offsetting is the process of compensating for the CO2 or other greenhouse gas emissions you produce in your daily life like when you drive, fly or use electricity. You can do so by participating in activities that reduce or remove an equivalent amount of emissions, including tree planting, conservation or contributing to other renewable energy projects.
Some airlines offer carbon offset programs or you can use third-party platforms like Cool Effect, Carbonfund.org and MyClimate to offset your travel emissions. If you're road-tripping, calculate your fuel use and offset accordingly. Look for reputable organizations that are certified Gold Standard, Verified Carbon Standard (VCS) or Climate Action Reserve when researching offset providers.
It's also best practice to look for hotels or Airbnb hosts that prioritize sustainability. Specifically, reusable toiletry dispensers, energy-efficient appliances and composting or recycling programs are all good signs.
You don't have to overhaul your packing routine overnight but each plastic-free swap is a small, tangible and impactful step toward traveling more consciously. With just a few simple adjustments, your suitcase can become a tool for sustainability, not just convenience, and your trip can become an eco-friendly tour.
Read more: Can AI Help Me Travel More Sustainably? I Put It to the Test
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Travel Weekly
44 minutes ago
- Travel Weekly
Don't let America's tourism marketing go dark: Why slashing Brand USA Is a costly mistake
As an executive at the former creative agency of record for Brand USA, I've seen firsthand how powerful a well-funded national tourism campaign can be. That's why the proposed 80% budget cut to Brand USA is both baffling and dangerous. This isn't just bean-counting; it's effectively pulling the rug out from under an entire sector of our economy. Dulani Porter is executive vice president and partner at Spark, a creative and strategy agency, which was recently the creative agency of record for Brand USA. Travel and tourism supports millions of American jobs and generates trillions of dollars in economic output. Gutting the nation's destination marketer would ripple far beyond lost ads; it would harm local businesses, cost jobs and diminish America's standing on the world stage. Brand USA is one of those rare public programs that more than pays for itself. Independent research has shown that its marketing efforts deliver some of the highest returns in the industry, translating into real dollars spent by international travelers. Since its inception, Brand USA's work has driven millions of additional visitors and helped inject billions of dollars into communities across all 50 states. These visitors don't just touch down in major cities; they fan out to small towns, mountain regions, coastal hideaways and desert parks. They fill hotels, dine in restaurants, visit attractions and shop on Main Street. In doing so, they help sustain tens of thousands of U.S. jobs every year, not only in hospitality but also in manufacturing, construction, finance and retail sectors that benefit indirectly from tourism. Let's dispel the myth that tourism marketing only helps big coastal cities or giant corporations. In truth, the vast majority of travel-related businesses in America are small businesses, from family-run outfitters in Alaska to B&B owners in Appalachia. These are the businesses that often lack any marketing presence abroad. Brand USA's storytelling is often the only megaphone they have on the global stage. Its campaigns have long encouraged travelers to go beyond the usual tourist hubs and explore hidden treasures, like a blues festival in Mississippi, a mountain town in Colorado or a barbecue trail in Kansas. In my work with Brand USA, I saw firsthand how highlighting these places helped spread visitor spending in meaningful ways. When international tourists venture off the beaten path, they're booking local tours, buying from local artisans and eating at local diners, spending money that might never have reached these communities otherwise. Now, imagine turning off this marketing engine. What happens if we stop telling America's story to the world? Unfortunately, we don't have to imagine: history offers a cautionary tale. In 1993, Colorado eliminated its state tourism promotion budget to save money. The result was an economic disaster: within two years, Colorado's share of U.S. tourism plummeted about 30%, costing the state over $1.4 billion in lost revenue annually. It took years for Colorado to claw back its reputation and visitor numbers. Fast forward to 2011, when Washington State became the only state in the nation with no tourism office due to budget cuts. Industry leaders practically begged them not to do it; Colorado's tourism director famously called Washington's decision "foolish," noting how badly his state had suffered when it made the same mistake. The lesson from these examples is laid out plainly: when you stop marketing, visitors stop coming. Once lost, travel demand is hard to rebuild, and the businesses that fold in the interim don't magically reappear when you realize the error. We must also consider the broader competitive landscape. Pulling 80% of Brand USA's funding is akin to unilateral disarmament in a global tourism battle. Rival destinations in Europe, Asia and beyond are spending aggressively to attract the very travelers we'd be ignoring. If America goes dark, we essentially concede market share to our competitors. Fewer people will choose the U.S. for their vacations if they aren't being reminded of what makes this country special. And those who do still come might stick to the obvious attractions, bypassing the smaller cities and rural areas that no longer have a national campaign spotlighting them. This would hurt thousands of communities that rely on tourism dollars. The U.S. Travel Association warned that not funding Brand USA would "effectively end international travel promotion for regions that simply can't afford to reach global travelers on their own," especially hurting non-metropolitan areas that need those jobs the most. Even before this proposal, America's share of global long-haul travel was shrinking -- not due to lack of appeal, but because other countries are out-marketing us. Slashing Brand USA now would pour gasoline on that fire, just as worldwide travel is rebounding. It's a formula for losing visitors, losing revenue and losing our competitive edge. The timing couldn't be worse. The next few years will bring the U.S. onto some of the biggest stages imaginable. These are moments we've been planning for and dreaming of. In 2026, the United States will co-host the FIFA World Cup, with matches in cities across the country. And we'll commemorate America's 250th birthday with a yearlong semiquincentennial celebration in all 50 states. Just two years later, in 2028, Los Angeles will welcome the world for the Summer Olympics. These events will thrust America into the global spotlight and have the potential to draw millions of international visitors. Brand USA has been gearing up by developing campaigns, partnerships and itineraries to capitalize on the surge of interest. To pull the plug on funding now, on the eve of these bonanza events, is strategically incoherent. It would be like hosting a huge party but ditching the invitations and welcome signs. If we underfund our marketing at this critical moment, we risk squandering the tourism windfall these events should bring. The world will literally be watching us; we want them booking trips, not just watching from afar because we failed to make the case to visit. Finally, consider the intangible stakes. Tourism is a form of public diplomacy. When we invite someone from abroad to discover America, we're also shaping their perceptions of our country. Every traveler who hikes in our national parks, chats with locals at a farmers' market or attends a jazz festival in New Orleans goes home with their own small understanding of what America is really about. That kind of person-to-person connection is invaluable. Brand USA's mission from the start has been not only to fuel our economy through tourism but to "enhance the image of the United States worldwide." In an era when misinformation and geopolitical tensions often skew how nations perceive each other, welcoming visitors is one of the most effective, organic forms of soft diplomacy we have. I've watched Brand USA craft campaigns that celebrate our diversity and warmth, essentially countering negative stereotypes by letting people experience the true fabric of America. Pulling back on these efforts would forfeit tourist visits and diminish America's voice in the global conversation. It's telling the world that we don't care to reach out, that maybe we're closed off. That is the opposite of what made America a beacon for generations of travelers and admirers. The budget bill passed by the Senate reduced funding by 80%, but the House of Representatives must reject this draconian cut for what it is: a penny-wise, pound-foolish move that undermines a proven economic engine and America's brand all at once. Brand USA has a proven track record of success, boosting visitation, creating jobs and generating a return on investment that private companies would envy. It helps ensure that small businesses thrive, that all regions share in the tourism pie and that the American story is told by us, not by our competitors. With so much at stake, from a once-in-a-lifetime convergence of global events to the livelihoods of workers in travel, hospitality and creative industries, now is the time to double down on Brand USA, not to abandon it. The cost of cutting Brand USA far outweighs any short-term savings. In fact, it's not really savings at all - it's forfeited revenue, forfeited jobs, and forfeited influence. As someone who has spent a career sharing America's wonders with the world, I can say confidently: this is an investment worth protecting. Let's keep the welcome mat out for the world and keep Brand USA doing what it does best - inviting travelers to experience the United States, and in turn, keeping America's economy and spirit open for business. ___________________________________________________________ Travel Weekly accepts opinion pieces on subjects of interest to the travel industry and, most importantly, to travel advisors. Forums should be 550 words and must be exclusive to Travel Weekly; no part of the writing can have been published anywhere else. Forums must not be self-promotional and should be submitted with the understanding that Travel Weekly reserves the right to edit the content for length, style, spelling, clarity, structure, etc. Submissions, along with a high-resolution headshot and a short bio, should be emailed to editor in chief Arnie Weissmann and deputy managing editor Gerry Bourbeau.
Washington Post
2 hours ago
- Washington Post
The 50 best airports in America
By The Way - Travel The 50 best airports in America July 3, 2025 | 2:48 PM GMT What makes an airport special? We analyzed what passengers love most for our own definitive ranking.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Activist Investor Starboard Builds 9% Stake in Tripadvisor
Starboard Value LP has built a 9% stake in Tripadvisor Inc. and intends to engage with the travel booking and review site on how to unlock value. The activist investor disclosed the holding in a filing.
