Australia's youngest-ever senator Charlotte Walker has a lot to learn but says she is ‘not naive'
On election night, as the scale of Labor's victory was revealed, Charlotte Walker was blowing out the candles on her 21st birthday cake.
On Tuesday, she was officially declared a Labor senator for South Australia and became the youngest senator ever elected.
'I'm just taking it a day at a time,' she tells Guardian Australia as she prepares for Senate school in Canberra.
On 3 May Walker worked on polling booths then spent the night in the seat of Boothby, where Labor's Louise Miller-Frost held out against Liberal Rachel Swift. Amid the other celebrations, a colleague sorted her out with cake.
Walker says she loves her work for the Australian Services Union, and would be staying there if she wasn't off to Canberra.
Asked what makes her nervous about her parliamentary debut, she says she is 'not naive'.
'There's a lot to learn,' she says, but the support from her union and Labor colleagues has been 'amazing'.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Her youth, she says, will bring another perspective to parliament.
'I grew up in the regions,' she says of her childhood in Yankalilla and Normanville. 'I think we need our regions to also remain represented, so hopefully that complements my youth.'
She studied agriculture throughout school, is pondering committee work including on the education and employment committee, and mentions global unpredictability and the cost-of-living crisis as challenges facing the nation.
She describes herself as 'somewhere in the middle' of extraversion and introversion, as someone who is 'empathetic and understanding'.
'I like to have a bit of fun as well,' she says.
Walker takes the youngest-ever-senator mantle from the Western Australian Greens senator Jordon Steele-John, who was 23 when he was elected.
Before him, the South Australian Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young was elected at 25, and the Australian Democrats senator Natasha Stott Despoja, also from SA, was appointed at 26.
'It's wonderful to hand the baton to another young South Australian woman,' Hanson-Young says.
'There's plenty of older people in politics who don't listen, don't take good advice and make stupid mistakes. Age isn't a determining factor of a good politician – but knowing what you believe and being open to others' views certainly is,' she says.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'My main tip is to surround yourself with people who will give you honest advice. And to be true with yourself about what you know and don't know.
'It is impossible to know everything – and you don't need to – but the best skill is to be able to listen.'
The youngest elected parliamentarian was the Liberal Wyatt Roy, who was 20 when he was elected to the House of Representatives.
Walker's election means the Liberal senator David Fawcett, who had been in parliament for 20 years, lost his spot.
The Labor senators Marielle Smith and Karen Grogan, Liberals Alex Antic and Anne Ruston, and Hanson-Young were all re-elected in South Australia.
But Labor taking the sixth spot was entirely unexpected.
The electoral analyst Ben Raue says parties often use young people in elections to 'fill up numbers', or as a practice run for the future.
But Walker has a strong pedigree and is no spot filler. As well as her union work, she was the SA Young Labor president. She says she was raised with 'Labor values'.
'My mum really set me up well to make an informed decision,' she says. 'It wasn't like … 'you will vote Labor'. She gave me the tools I needed to make a good decision and I ended up with Labor.'
She says her mother was with her from her first job in politics and joining the party to now.
'So I think it's been a bit of a whirlwind for her as well,' she says. 'But I hope she's feeling proud.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
4 hours ago
- The Independent
Freedom Flotilla activists say they were ‘brutalised psychologically' by Israeli military after aid boat boarded
Two Australian activists have claimed they were 'brutalised psychologically' by the Israeli military, strip-searched and shackled, after their Freedom Flotilla boat was intercepted. Journalist Tania Safi and activist Robert Martin were detained while onboard the Handala, which was seeking to deliver aid to Gaza as part of the Freedom Flotilla Coalition. After their arrest alongside 19 other activists on Sunday, the pair were transported to Israel and spent days in Israeli custody, where they allege they were manhandled and treated like criminals. The Handala was carrying 21 civilians representing 12 countries - including the UK - with parliamentarians, lawyers, journalists, environmentalists, and other human rights defenders among them. It was carrying aid including baby formula, nappies, food, and medicine for the Gaza strip, where a starvation crisis has prompted international outcry after dozens of Palestinians died from hunger-related causes in recent weeks. Experts, the UN, and other countries say Israeli blockades caused the crisis. The Israeli government says Hamas is at fault and has accused the Palestinian militants of stealing food from aid trucks. The two Australian activists landed back in Sydney on Friday morning, where they spoke to reporters about their ordeal. Ms Safi said at least 30 IDF members boarded Handala when it was intercepted, and claimed all were armed, some with four guns. 'They knocked me in the leg with one of their machine guns,' Ms Safi said of the moment around 30 IDF soldiers boarded the Handala after it was intercepted, speaking to The Guardian. After being taken to the port of Ashdod south of Tel Aviv, the group was taken to interrogation rooms. Ms Safi supported earlier allegations by the group that Chris Smalls, the former president of the Amazon Labour Union who was onboard the Handala, was physically assaulted by IDF troops. 'Chris was pinned down by seven or eight men,' she told the outlet. 'When I asked about him they came into the room and dragged me out by my arms, I'm still bruised from it. 'They pulled me out and threw me down on the floor, they made me take off all my clothes, they strip-searched me right there, made me squat up and down … they treated us like we were criminals.' Ms Safi, who said she witnessed 'the soullessness and the cruelty and brutality' of Israeli detention, added that soldiers would 'handcuff me and grab the handcuffs and just throw me against the wall'. She said the military tried to get the Handala activists to sign documents which said they had entered Israel illegally, which Ms Safi says is 'not true… we were taken completely against our will and brutalised psychologically in every way'. Mr Martin alleged he was not allowed any of the medication that he required, nor was he allowed to make any phone calls to loved ones and 'anybody else' - despite the Australian government demanding to Israel that they were allowed to do so. They were eventually transported to Jordan, where they were assisted by the Australian embassy and taken to hospital, he added. The Handala incident came nearly two months after the Madleen, a Freedom Flotilla with Swedish activist Greta Thunberg on board, was intercepted by the Israeli army on 9 June. The IDF has been contacted for comment. In a statement on X after the boat was seized, the Israeli Foreign Ministry said the military had prevented the boat from 'illegally entering the maritime zone of the coast of Gaza'. It added: 'The vessel is safely making its way to the shores of Israel. All passengers are safe. Unauthorized attempts to breach the blockade are dangerous, unlawful, and undermine ongoing humanitarian efforts.' Regarding the alleged assault on Mr Smalls, the Israeli foreign ministry told The Guardian on Thursday: 'Contrary to the claims made, the passenger violently resisted. This was a planned provocation intended to create media attention.'
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Adani promised Australia billions from its Carmichael mine but it hasn't paid a cent in tax. How did we get here?
It was entirely foreseeable, and has resulted in billions of dollars in forgone revenue for Australia. But just how did policymakers fail to extract a single cent in company tax from Adani's Carmichael coalmine, even though it opened during the start of a commodity price boom? To understand how it came about, you must first rewind to 2010, a period that coincided with a sharp escalation in the climate wars that would eventually tear through the political corridors of Canberra. Against that backdrop, the Indian conglomerate proposed a coalmine to extract up to 60m tonnes per year, for 150 years, making it one of the world's biggest. It would also open up the untapped Galilee Basin, ushering in a new period of resources prosperity, especially for central Queensland. The economic promise was enticing. At its peak, such an operation would create more than 10,000 full-time jobs, according to an Adani consultant's report published in 2013. The then head of Adani mining, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, said the Australian operations would deliver $22bn in taxes and royalties to be invested 'right back into frontline services'. The '10,000 jobs [and] $22bn in royalties and taxes' pledge became a mantra that was even featured in Adani TV advertisements. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It would be a win-win for the state and federal governments – royalties would flow to the state and company tax to the commonwealth – both of which needed to issue approvals. The Carmichael emissions would, of course, be colossal, producing 4.7bn tonnes of CO2-equivalent over its lifetime, once the mine, its operations and the burning of its coal were taken into account, according to analysis by the Australia Institute at the time. Annual emissions would be double the average produced by Tokyo, and three times that of New Delhi. The ensuing battle between environmentalists and the coalminer divided communities; but Adani's jobs and economic benefit pledge seemed irresistible – until it changed. In 2015, conservationists went to the Queensland land court, seeking a recommendation that Adani's applications for an environmental approval and mining lease for Carmichael be refused. The research director at the Australia Institute, Rod Campbell, says 'Adani's lawyers realised that the 10,000 jobs claim was unsupportable, so they bit the bullet'. Campbell, who provided economic analysis for the proceedings opposing Adani, says the coalminer changed consultants and argued in court for a more modest jobs claim 'but otherwise sang the praises of the mine'. The new economic models brought the expected job numbers down to fewer than 1,500. By 2015, the anticipated tonnes coming out of the mine had also reduced, from 60m a year to 40m; it would later reduce to 10m. But the projected corporate tax take still appeared strong, with the project forecast to generate about $400m a year under the new forecasts. Adani's modelling was broadly accepted by the court, even though critics pointed out it didn't account for tax minimisation strategies. By 2017, Adani's bid for a subsidised commonwealth loan was unravelling, and global banks were concerned about the economics and reputational damage of funding the new coal project. The mine's supporters doubled down, led by industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), which called on policymakers to back the project. The MCA chief executive, Tania Constable, said in 2018 the Queensland and Australian economies would benefit from thousands of new regional jobs. 'And through mining taxes and royalties, the Carmichael mine will generate billions of dollars for taxpayers over decades to fund nurses, teachers, police, hospitals, roads and other services and infrastructure for Queensland families and communities,' Constable said. The MCA was contacted for comment. Adani would go on to finance the project itself, although it would be a smaller project than it had envisaged, given the lack of external funding. 'The coal will be sold to customers in the Asia-Pacific region at index adjusted pricing, which means all taxes and royalties will be paid here in Australia,' Adani said in late 2021, after assembling its first shipment of thermal coal at the port. The Indian conglomerate couldn't have timed the project any better. In late 2021, prices for energy commodities had started to surge in line with the rising tension between Russia and Ukraine. Coal prices then spiked to record highs after the Russian invasion in early 2022. In its first few months of operation, Adani's mine generated more than $32.5m in revenue, according to accounts lodged with the regulator. But it recorded an operating loss after costs, leading to zero tax payable. This pattern would repeat, even as revenue increased. In the 2025 reporting period, it earned $1.27bn in revenue, but once again recorded a paper loss, as various related-party transactions and interest payments erased profits. Tim Buckley, a former investment banker and the director of Climate Energy Finance, describes Adani's finances as an 'extremely complex, opaque corporate structure'. Jason Ward, the principal analyst at the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, says the volume of related-party transactions is 'pretty unprecedented' and that it is set up to never pay tax. 'Every page of their financials is like, 'bing, bing, warning bells going off',' says Ward. Adani has paid royalties – payments made to governments to extract state-owned minerals – with a $78.6m payment in the 2025 accounts, and $83.5m in 2024. Its most recent accounts list just 84 direct employees at the mine, however it uses a mining services provider to hire other workers. A spokesperson for Adani's Australian mining business, which is branded Bravus Mining and Resources, says Adani has invested more than $2.5bn into Australia's economy. 'Today, more than 1,200 Queenslanders are employed at the Carmichael mine in full-time operational roles to produce high-quality thermal coal for the export market,' the Bravus spokesperson says. 'Developing nations in the Asia-Pacific region use coal from the Carmichael mine alongside renewables to provide reliable and affordable energy solutions that help reduce poverty and power growth.' While there is no suggestion Adani has acted illegally, several politicians have expressed frustration that a large resources company can pay less company tax than a low-paid worker pays in income tax. The independent senator David Pocock said on X: 'Why on earth do successive [governments] keep allowing giant multinational companies to reap super profits from the sale of our resources without paying tax?' Independent MP Zali Steggall says Adani is a 'cautionary tale', and that policymakers should reform the approvals process to place conditions on miners to meet their stated promises. She says companies invariably overstate project benefits which 'magically disappear once the operations commence, especially when you're talking about foreign-owned corporations'. 'Time and time again, we see state and federal ministers and governments approve projects on flimsy assurances that don't come true,' says Steggall. 'It's time there was proper accountability for Australian resources so that we stop giving it away in the manner we are at the moment.' Jonathan Barrett is Guardian Australia's business editor
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Joyce and Canavan call for new coal plants to replace renewable energy projects
Barnaby Joyce and other leading opponents of net zero by 2050 want Australia to build new coal-fired power plants, focus on gas and nuclear energy and abandon all efforts to cut carbon emissions. As the former Nationals leader pushes a private member's bill to block net zero – sparking new divisions within the Liberals and Nationals this week – he said any long-term emissions reduction from renewables would not make a meaningful difference to the climate and would cost households too much. 'If you want net zero, then nuclear can give you net zero at a vastly more affordable rate than intermittents [renewable energy],' Joyce told Guardian Australia, arguing countries including China were not cutting emissions. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I absolutely disagree if the rest of the world's not doing it, if it has no global effect, then it's a self-written economic suicide note.' China's emissions dipped for the first time in 2025, down 1% from their peak, amid huge government investments in renewables projects. The country is the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, but is also the world's biggest supplier and installer of clean energy technology. The share of coal in China's power mix has dropped to the lowest level since 2016, to just over 50%. Joyce's bill is scheduled for debate in August when parliament returns for another sitting fortnight. Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan is leading the party's review of net zero policies in the wake of the 3 May election. He said Australia should build new coal-fired power stations, like developments happening in China, the US, India and Indonesia. 'I think we should put Australians first because nothing we do is going to change any temperature of the globe one iota by not building a coal-fired power station,' Canavan said. 'But if we do build some new cheap coal-fired power stations, we just may save manufacturing jobs in this country, bring down the cost of energy and bring down the cost of everyday goods for Australians.' According to the CSIRO's 2024-25 GenCost report, renewables, firmed by gas and backed by transmission, remain the cheapest new form of electricity generation technology. Nationals leader David Littleproud said on Thursday the party would have a settled position within 'a couple of months'. Net zero underpins Australia's participation in the Paris climate agreement. Independent authorities, including the CSIRO, say failing to stem carbon emissions will lead to changes in weather including extreme heat, heavy rainfall, coastal inundation, bushfires and drought, while exacerbating health and wellbeing problems and causing destruction of ecosystems and species. Joyce has teamed up with his former rival and another ex-Nationals leader, Michael McCormack. McCormack said emissions should not be curbed at the expense of manufacturing, farming or food supply. 'By constructing tens of thousands of kilometres of transmission lines across rural and regional Australia in pursuit of a false ideology, the government is industrialising fertile rural farmland on a massive scale,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion During their 48-hour split with the Liberals in May, the Nationals included nuclear energy policy as a key demand for reuniting the Coalition. Many of the opponents of net zero are advocates for nuclear being included in Australia's energy supply. The shadow energy and emissions reductions minister, Dan Tehan, confirmed this week his review for the Liberal party would take nine to 12 months. 'The key focus between now and Christmas is going to be on gas,' he said in a press conference with the opposition leader, Sussan Ley. 'We need to bring more gas on to the system, but also we need to explore carbon capture and storage.' Coalition frontbencher Andrew Hastie helped win support for an anti-net zero motion at last weekend's Western Australia Liberal state conference. He did not respond to requests for comment from the Guardian about alternatives to net zero, but said in an email to supporters his opposition 'reflects a growing concern from mainstream Australians about our expensive energy bills, unreliable supply, and the erosion of our national sovereignty'. Former prime minister Tony Abbott is cheering on anti-net zero moves from outside parliament, including in an Institute of Public Affairs podcast this week. 'If we are in favour of net zero, all of these economy-damaging measures are justified. If we want to avoid the economy-damaging measures, perhaps we do need to make that very symbolic act of saying, 'well, actually, we're not committed to net zero,'' he said. In an interview with former Canadian conservative politician Derek Fildebrandt in June, Abbott said Australia should continue to rely on fossil fuels. He said cutting emissions would cause 'us to live like the Amish, or worse'. 'If climate change is approached as a moral issue, the left wins. If climate change is approached as an economic issue, the right wins,' he said. 'Yes, I accept that climate does change, that mankind does make a difference, and that we should do what we can to reduce emissions, but I would always add this critical rider – but not if it costs you your job, costs us our industries, and puts up your cost of living.'
