Indians biggest consumers of AI-generated news & most comfortable with it—Reuters Institute report
The Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2025—released on 17 June—is based on an online survey of 2,044 Indians with options to complete the survey in both Hindi and English. In total, 48 countries were covered in the survey including India.
In contrast, countries like the UK (11 percent), Belgium (10 percent), Finland (10 percent) are relatively less comfortable using AI. The usability of AI-generated news in the UK is as low as 3 percent.
Delhi: India is emerging as the biggest consumer of news using AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Google Gemini, globally. According to Digital News Report 2025, 'Almost a fifth (18 percent) of our Indian sample said they were using chatbots such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini to access news weekly, with comfort levels of 44 percent'.
YouTube remains at the forefront of online news consumption in India with 55 percent respondents using the platform to access news. Next is WhatsApp with 46 percent, although it declined by 2 percent from the previous year.
Whereas, among global respondents, Facebook at 36 percent remains the top source to access online news behind YouTube (30 percent) and WhatsApp (19 percent).
The preference of news consumption is shifting. Around 38 percent Indian respondents say they prefer to read news, which is less than the global average of 55 percent; and 40 percent of Indian respondents prefer to watch news, in comparison to 31 percent in average globally.
While in countries like the US, UK, Germany and Norway, the majority (over 50 percent) prefer to read news.
In terms of trust in news, 43 percent respondents in India have faith in news, highest in the last five years, while it was 40 percent on an average across 48 markets, unchanged from the last 3 years.
In context to India, the report states, 'When it comes to brand trust, legacy print titles and public broadcasters tend to enjoy higher levels of trust. However, brands that are either extremely critical or extremely uncritical of those in positions of power, tend to have lower trust scores in a polarised environment.'
Also read: To use or not, is no longer the question. From IITs to DU, universities are fighting unethical AI use
Indians are 'outliers' in news consumption
While global audiences remain broadly sceptical of AI-generated news, Indians appear to be the most comfortable with it—44 percent express ease with such content, and 18 percent already use chatbots to access news.
'Several Indian newspapers have launched YouTube channels using high levels of automation and AI presentation,' states the report.
However, the report also highlights that this phenomenon is prevalent in Asia where scepticism regarding AI generated news is less when compared to North America and Europe.
In terms of news consumption, 76 percent Indian respondents have strong preference for smartphones to get news, with social media platforms like YouTube, WhatsApp, Instagram and Facebook being the most famous among English speaking respondents.
With 55 percent respondents in India using YouTube for news consumption is highest globally. The primary reason given in this regard in the report is relatively cheap data charges and low levels of literacy levels.
Despite WhatsApp being the second most popular option of online news consumption in India, it is also the biggest source of misleading information.
The report states, 'Meta owned WhatsApp was cited by more than half of our Indian survey respondents (53 percent) as the channel that carried the biggest threat when it comes to false and misleading information, by far the highest score across markets.'
The report pegs India's internet penetration at 56 percent.
Global scenario on subscription model, social media and AI
The report highlights that even as publishers seek to diversify revenue streams, digital subscription models remain stagnant. Among respondents in the 20 wealthiest countries surveyed, only 18 percent pay for online news, with the majority still opting for free news offerings.
Norway, at 42 percent of the respondents, has the highest proportion of paid subscribers, while a large nation like the US is at 20 percent.
Similar to India, preference for video as a source of news continues to rise globally. 'Across all markets the proportion consuming social video news has grown from 52 percent in 2020 to 65 percent in 2025,' states the report.
Social media platforms are dominating the consumption patterns across all markets. Six online platforms—Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, WhatsApp, TikTok and X—now hold more than 10 percent weekly news content. It was 2 percent a decade ago.
'Around a third of our global sample use Facebook (36 percent) and YouTube (30 percent) for news each week. Instagram (19 percent) and WhatsApp (19 percent) are used by around a fifth, while TikTok (16 percent) remains ahead of X at 12 percent,' the report states on the use of social media platforms for news.
Globally, AI-generated news is still a relatively new phenomenon, but a growing one. The integration of AI chatbots into search engines to deliver real-time news is likely to accelerate this growth.
While only 7 percent respondents allude to using it, the share rises to 15 percent among those under the age of 25.
'Audiences in most countries remain sceptical about the use of AI in the news and are more comfortable with use cases where humans remain in the loop.'
The report added, 'Across countries, they expect that AI will make the news cheaper to make (+29 net difference, i.e. more respondents agree than disagree), and more up-to-date (+16).' However, they also believe it will make the news less transparent (–8), less accurate (–8), and less trustworthy (–18).
(Edited by Zinnia Ray Chaudhuri)
Also read: 'If ChatGPT is Jab We Met's Aditya Kashyap, Grok is Kabir Singh'. Elon's chatbot sets off meme fest
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
34 minutes ago
- Mint
Productivity puzzle: Solow's paradox has come to haunt AI adoption
AI enthusiasts, beware: predictions that the technology will suddenly boost productivity eerily echo those that had followed the introduction of computers to the workplace. Back then, we were told that the miraculous new machines would automate vast swathes of white-collar work, leading to a lean, digital-driven economy. Fast forward 60 years, and it's more of the same. Shortly after the debut of ChatGPT in 2022, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology claimed employees would be 40% more productive than their AI-less counterparts. These claims may prove to be no more durable than the pollyannish predictions of the Mad Men era. A rigorous study published by the National Bureau of Economic Research in May found only a 3% boost in time saved, while other studies have shown that reliance on AI for high-level cognitive work leads to less motivated, impaired employees. We are witnessing the makings of another 'productivity paradox,' the term coined to describe how productivity unexpectedly stagnated and, in some cases, declined during the first four decades of the information age. The bright side is that the lessons learned then might help us navigate our expectations in the present day. The invention of transistors, integrated circuits, memory chips and microprocessors fuelled exponential improvements in information technology from the 1960s onward, with computers reliably doubling in power roughly every two years with almost no increase in cost. It quickly became an article of faith that computers would lead to widespread automation (and structural unemployment). A single person armed with the device could handle work that previously required hundreds of employees. Over the next three decades, the service sector decisively embraced computers. Yet, the promised gains did not materialize. In fact, studies from the late 1980s revealed that the services sector—what economist Stephen Roach described as 'the most heavily endowed with high-tech capital"—registered the worst productivity performance during this same period. In response, economist Robert Solow had famously quipped that 'we see computers everywhere except in the productivity statistics." Economists advanced multiple explanations for this puzzle (also known as 'Solow's Paradox'). Least satisfying, perhaps, was the claim, still made today, that the whole thing was a mirage of mismeasurement and that the effects of massive automation somehow failed to show up in the economic data. Others have argued that the failure of infotech investments to live up to the hype can be laid at the feet of managers. There's some merit to this argument: studies of infotech adoption have shown that bosses spent indiscriminately on new equipment, all while hiring expensive workers charged with maintaining and constantly upgrading these systems. Computers, far from cutting the workforce, bloated it. More compelling still was the 'time lag' hypothesis offered by economist Paul A. David. New technological regimes, he contended, generate intense conflict, regulatory battles and struggles for market share. Along the way, older ways of doing things persist alongside the new, even as much of the world is remade to accommodate the new technology. None of this translates into immediate efficiency—in fact, quite the opposite. As evidence, he cited the advent of electricity, a quicker source of manufacturing power than the steam it would eventually replace. Nonetheless, it took 40 years for the adoption of electricity to lead to increased worker efficiency. Along the way, struggles to establish industry standards, waves of consolidation, regulatory battles and the need to redesign every single factory floor made this a messy, costly and prolonged process. The computer boom would prove to be similar. These complaints did not disappear, but by the late 1990s, the American economy finally showed a belated uptick in productivity. Some economists credited it to the widespread adoption of information technology. Better late than never, as they say. However, efficiency soon declined once again, despite (or because of) the advent of the internet and all the other innovations of that era. AI is no different. The new technology will have unintended consequences, many of which will offset or even entirely undermine its efficiency. That doesn't mean AI is useless or that corporations won't embrace it with enthusiasm. Anyone expecting an overnight increase in productivity, though, will be disappointed. ©Bloomberg The author is professor of history at the University of Georgia and co-author of 'Crisis Economics: A Crash Course in the Future of Finance'.
Hans India
38 minutes ago
- Hans India
Retail sector gaining momentum, growth expected to reach 9-10 pc soon: RAI
New Delhi: The Indian retail sector, currently valued at $900 billion, is showing signs of strong recovery and is expected to grow at a faster pace in the coming months, according to the Retailers' Association of India (RAI). The sector, which is currently growing at a rate of 5 per cent, is likely to soon pick up speed and reach a growth rate of 9 to 10 per cent. RAI's CEO Kumar Rajagopalan said that right after the pandemic, the retail sector had bounced back strongly with a 20 per cent growth rate. "However, in the last one year, the growth slowed down to around 5 per cent. Now, with the markets stabilising, consumers spending more, and the right consumer base in place, the sector is once again showing signs of faster growth," he added. Meanwhile, as per RAI's 62nd Retail Business Survey, retail sales across India grew by 7 per cent in May 2025 compared to the same month the previous year. This marks a significant improvement after months of moderate growth ranging between 4 to 5 per cent. Region-wise, southern India led the way with a 9 per cent growth in retail sales in May. Western India followed with 7 per cent, while northern and eastern regions recorded growth of 6 per cent and 4 per cent, respectively, as per the report. Among the different segments, quick service restaurants (QSR) showed the highest growth at 10 per cent. Consumer durables and electronics, along with furniture, also performed well with an 8 per cent rise each. Rajagopalan said this increase shows that people are now more willing to spend, especially on non-essential or discretionary items. Looking ahead, the RAI CEO expressed optimism about the upcoming festive season. He said that the improving consumer sentiment could further boost retail sales and bring the sector closer to double-digit growth in the near future.
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Running a family business with loans or gifts? Know the tax rules
I have two questions regarding laws around investments, business and loans applicable to an HUF: a) can money be lent to an HUF and the same money can be invested? Will income from such investment be taxed in the HUF's hands while the principal remains debt? b) Can an HUF start a business using gifts or loans? Will clubbing apply? Yes, a Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) can accept loans, and this is one of the most effective ways to introduce funds into the HUF without triggering adverse tax implications—provided the loan is genuine and properly documented. It should clearly state the repayment terms and, if applicable, the interest payable. If an HUF borrows money and invests those funds (for example, in shares, mutual funds, or fixed deposits), any income earned from such investments—such as interest, dividends, or capital gains—is taxable in the hands of the HUF. The original loan continues to be shown as a liability on the HUF's books. Moreover, if the borrowed funds are used in a business or to earn taxable income, the interest paid on the loan can be claimed as a deduction, as long as it meets the standard tax rules for expense eligibility. However, caution is advised when the loan is from members of the HUF. If the loans are frequent, large, interest-free, or never repaid, the Income Tax Department may recharacterize such funds as indirect gifts. This could result in clubbing of income—i.e., taxing the income from such funds in the hands of the lender member instead of the HUF. To second the second question: Yes, an HUF can own and operate a business. It is recognised as a separate legal entity under Indian law. However, it cannot engage in professions or services that depend on personal skills or qualifications—since it is not a natural person. For example, an HUF cannot be a lawyer or a doctor. When it comes to starting a business, the source of funds becomes crucial from a tax perspective: Gifts: If the business is funded through gifts from members or third parties, the ₹ 50,000 threshold under Section 56(2)(x) of the Income Tax Act applies. Since the HUF has no 'relatives' under the gift tax definition, even gifts from members may be taxable if the value exceeds ₹ 50,000 in a year. Loans: Loans from members or outsiders are permissible and preferable, as long as they are properly documented. Loans don't attract tax liability for the HUF as long as the transaction is genuine and repayable. Member's Personal Funds or Assets: If a member—including the Karta or any coparcener—contributes personal funds or assets to start or run the HUF business, clubbing provisions under Section 64(2) of the Income Tax Act come into play. This means that any income generated from such funds may be taxed in the hands of the member, not the HUF. This clubbing continues even if the funds are converted into another form or reinvested. Given these legal and tax implications, funding a business through properly structured loans is generally more tax-efficient and compliant than using gifts or personal contributions from members. Documentation and intention must be clear to avoid income being clubbed back to the contributor. CA Vijaykumar Puri, partner at VPRP & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants
