
Swiss Watchmakers Battle for Their Future
Since the pandemic-era luxury boom delivered three consecutive years of record revenues, the Swiss luxury watch industry has seen demand slump. In its June report, the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry (FHS) reported that watch exports of 2.1 billion Swiss francs in May were down 9.5 percent year-on-year, despite the well documented price hikes of the past 12 months. Volumes crashed too, down 13.4 percent for the month, equivalent to 180,000 units.
While exports this year are up 1.1 percent overall by value, the FHS report noted that sales figures were unlikely to show a similar uptick, with many sellers reporting swollen inventories as brands continue to apply pressure on retail networks to commit to orders.
The monthly fall was driven by the US, by far the industry's largest market, which recorded a decline in export values of 25.3 percent, a drop that was expected following a bumper April during which brands and retailers rallied to get ahead of President Trump's incoming trade tariffs, prompting a freak 150 percent surge in exports to the country.
ADVERTISEMENT
The picture was similarly bleak elsewhere. Japan, one of the industry's few bright spots over the past year, recorded a 10.5 percent year-on-year fall in May, while exports to the UK dropped 14.5 percent. China and Hong Kong continued a sustained period of market contraction, with export values declining a further 17.4 percent and 12.6 percent respectively. Singapore, the sector's sixth largest market, reported a milder drop of 3.4 percent.
Pascal Ravessoud, vice-president of the FHH told The Business of Fashion at last week's event that unless the slide was stopped, it posed a long-term threat. 'I'm very concerned with the loss of volumes and that we sell less and less watches, but more and more expensive,' he said. 'That's not good because at some point, you become so small that you're not relevant anymore.'
According to the FHS, over the past decade, volumes of Swiss watch exports have almost halved, while revenues have risen by around 25 percent. Ravessoud called for a rethink: 'Watch brands have been too inward-looking and too exclusive, because things were going too well,' he said. 'Every year was bringing double-digit growth, and now that's over they have to reinvent themselves. If you don't reinvent yourself when you fail your primary utility, then you're going to be dead at some point.'
Audemars Piguet chief executive Ilaria Resta agreed. 'Our goal should be to open our doors for greater visibility, to demystify a traditionally closed world, and to preserve our traditions while embracing innovation,' she said.
Audemars Piguet has been one of the industry leaders in immersing its brand product in mainstream culture over the past decade, with revenues climbing to 2.4 billion Swiss francs last year, according to estimates by Morgan Stanley.
Patrick Pruniaux, chairman and chief executive of Girard-Perregaux, also pointed to the relevance challenge. 'If we were doing a much better job, the industry would be five times what it is today,' he said at last week's event. 'There would be no question not to buy our watches all the time. We need to promote it better.'
The FHH, a non-profit part funded by around 35 watch brands and that operates on an annual budget in the range of 5 million Swiss francs, is hoping a series of fresh initiatives will help kick-start the industry.
The foundation was established 20 years ago by industry veteran Franco Cologni, backed by the Richemont Group (whose watch brands include Cartier, IWC and Panerai), Audemars Piguet and Girard-Perregaux. For the past two decades, its focus has been industry-facing, offering training and education programmes in support of Swiss watchmakers. In Geneva, it said it had so far trained 40,000 people and issued more than 15,000 certificates to watchmaking students.
ADVERTISEMENT
But at last week's event, the FHH said it would become more consumer-focused. It opened a free-to-access exhibition called Watch Makers in Geneva that it expects to draw in more than 12,000 visitors over the summer, and announced that its FHH Forum concept would be held outside Switzerland for the first time when it lands in New York later this year.
It also introduced FHH Boutique, an online platform offering paid-for access to its training programmes to members of the public for the first time. The course will cost 620 Swiss francs and result in a certification Ravessoud said was increasingly well recognised by industry employers around the world.
While Ravessoud admitted these initiatives were unlikely to lure back millions of lost watch buyers overnight, he said they were part of a long-term strategy to encourage enthusiasts, particularly women and Gen Z who he said were showing a growing interest in the category.
Ms. Resta agreed: 'New audiences are emerging and Gen Z is becoming the next wave of luxury consumers,' she said. 'And the influence of women as buyers and collectors is on the rise, alongside a growing demand for sustainable and responsible business practices. These shifts are not threats but opportunities.'
Ravessoud said he remained confident the industry would overcome its current challenges. 'Swiss brands have always been resilient,' he said. 'When it was needed, they knew how to turn around and cope with the new reality.'
But Cyrille Vigneron, Cartier's former chief executive and now the Parisian house's chairman of culture and philanthropy, said at the event that watchmaking should be wary. 'We are beyond function and we are beyond necessity,' he said. 'A watch has become a cultural object of sophistication, but if we think things are forever, they are never forever. Culture has to constantly reinvent, otherwise it can disappear.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's Japan Trade Deal Raises Fears He Gave Away Too Much
(Bloomberg) -- US industries and protectionists are raising alarms with President Donald Trump's pact with Japan, saying it risks undercutting his stated goals of rebalancing America's trading relationships and reviving domestic manufacturing. Trump Awards $1.26 Billion Contract to Build Biggest Immigrant Detention Center in US Why the Federal Reserve's Building Renovation Costs $2.5 Billion The High Costs of Trump's 'Big Beautiful' New Car Loan Deduction Salt Lake City Turns Winter Olympic Bid Into Statewide Bond Boom Milan Corruption Probe Casts Shadow Over Property Boom Trump and his top negotiators on Wednesday hailed the deal as a potential model for other countries hoping to win tariff concessions, citing Tokyo's pledge to create a $550 billion fund for US investments. The president's decision to grant Japan relief on automobiles, however, provoked criticism that the agreement wouldn't address the main source of the US's trade deficit with Japan even as it disadvantages Detroit's Big Three. Around 80% of the US-Japan trade gap is in cars and car parts. Tuesday's announcement marked the latest signal that Trump is willing to negotiate on industry-specific duties on products including chips and pharmaceuticals, potentially undermining the most durable pillar of his tariff strategy. The reaction underscores the risks of the president's transactional negotiating style. Industries that have championed much of Trump's trade strategy and stand to benefit from robust levies on foreign rivals could be left in the lurch as his plans shift. 'Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no US content than it does North American built vehicles with high US content is a bad deal for the US industry and US auto workers,' said Matt Blunt, president of the American Automotive Policy Council that represents Ford Motor Co., General Motors Co. and Stellantis NV. Trump defended his approach, which resulted in a deal to reduce Japan's country-specific rate to 15% and put US levies on cars and parts at the same level — lower than the 25% global charge on vehicles. 'I WILL ONLY LOWER TARIFFS IF A COUNTRY AGREES TO OPEN ITS MARKET. IF NOT, MUCH HIGHER TARIFFS! Japan's Markets are now OPEN (for first time ever!). USA BUSINESSES WILL BOOM!' Trump posted. His Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, argued in a Bloomberg Television interview on Wednesday that it was also ratcheting up pressure on South Korea and Europe to make additional concessions or risk their automakers being left at a significant disadvantage. And White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump's approach was breaking down barriers for US products abroad. 'Thanks to President Trump, these countries around the world are agreeing to open their markets to American-made products and goods for the first time, which will lead to a boom in sales and profits for American businesses right here at home,' she told reporters Wednesday. Even so, automakers and other industry stakeholders were crying foul Wednesday. They warned that giving Japan an unlimited reduction on auto tariffs undermines the use of those levies not just for cars, but also metals, semiconductors and other goods. 'Unlimited imports at tariff rates below existing Section 232 rates critically undermine the security objections' of the law and in many cases will actually encourage offshoring, said Jon Toomey, executive director of the Coalition for a Prosperous America, an advocacy group representing import-threatened industries that supports tighter trade controls. The provision on Japanese autos is far more expansive than the steel and aluminum tariff reduction Trump gave the UK, which allows a limited quota of imports to enter the US at a reduced rate. Industry-specific tariffs imposed under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act are seen as a more lasting tool than Trump's country-based tariffs for boosting the competitiveness of US-made goods, since they rest on stronger legal footing, and some have endured across multiple presidencies. Industry groups also say the product-specific rates provide certainty needed to drive investment in domestic manufacturing plants. Other countries already are clamoring for sectoral tariff relief, and the US-Japan trade deal sends a signal that they are up for negotiation, people familiar with the matter said. Two of those individuals predicted the agreement will also add leverage to the auto and oil industries' pleas for relief from steel duties. 'It doesn't make sense to allow for unlimited vehicle imports at 15%, while charging rates of 25% on auto parts and 50% on steel,' Toomey added. It's also unclear how and when the $550 billion investment fund might come to pass — or if it will prove to be as illusory as investment pledges Trump secured during his first term from China in exchange for scaling down tariffs. Although Beijing promised in 2020 to buy $200 billion in additional US agricultural commodities and other goods, ultimately only 58% of those purchases materialized amid the pandemic, according to the Peterson Institute for International Economics. Trump administration officials cast the Japan deal, as well as frameworks with Indonesia and the Philippines, as incentive for other major partners, including the European Union and South Korea, to bring their best investment and purchasing pledges to the table. 'It spurs other deals along,' White House trade adviser Peter Navarro said in a Bloomberg Television interview. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent made clear the investment plan helped Japan secure its tariff reduction, telling Bloomberg Television: 'They got the 15% rate because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism.' Lutnick said on the network that under the arrangement Japan will serve as a financier providing equity, loans and other support for manufacturing plants, infrastructure and other projects in the US. Other countries will be under pressure to follow the investment model, said a senior administration official who asked for anonymity because details haven't been formally announced. The investment deals could prove especially attractive to Trump, who frequently extols planned spending in the US announced since his January inauguration. The president and top administration officials also regularly tout the surge in revenue from new tariffs, which have already brought in $113 billion this year, according to the Treasury Department. The US-Japan deal's emphasis on investment suggests the promise of more revenues has taken priority over the push to protect domestic industries, one person familiar with the matter said. While direct foreign investment in the US could help expand domestic manufacturing and artificial intelligence capacity, it won't necessarily make the country's exports more competitive on its own. And some analysts raised doubts about whether Japan's promises to open its markets to US products would prove meaningful. The administration cast Japan's concession to accept cars made to US federal motor vehicle safety standards instead of subjecting them to additional regulatory requirements as a boon for Detroit. Even so, a major impediment to US auto sales in Japan is the American designs themselves — not just trade barriers. Put simply, Japanese consumers are less interested in driving Fords and GMs than Americans are in Toyotas and Hondas. Japan sells the US about 84 cars for every one the US sells there. 'American cars that are big just don't comport well with the needs, desires and demands of the Japanese public' said Colin Grabow, an associate director at the Cato Institute's trade policy center. 'It's unclear what the payoff here is.' --With assistance from Keith Laing, Hadriana Lowenkron, Joe Mathieu, Tyler Kendall and Stephanie Lai. Elon Musk's Empire Is Creaking Under the Strain of Elon Musk Burning Man Is Burning Through Cash A Rebel Army Is Building a Rare-Earth Empire on China's Border What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Tom's Guide
12 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
Trump just announced a new AI plan that scraps Biden's rules — and gives Big Tech a green light
The White House has just released a sweeping new AI roadmap titled America's AI Action Plan, outlining how the federal government will try to supercharge AI development in the coming decade. The plan, backed by President Trump, prioritizes national security, infrastructure expansion and fewer regulations, which positions AI as the backbone of future U.S. economic and technological leadership. But this aggressive push for AI supremacy could come at a cost, particularly for states that aim to regulate AI more strictly, and other parts of the plan raise concerns about free speech. In short, the U.S. wants to build AI systems faster and export them under favorable terms, while locking down competitive advantages at home. At the heart of the plan are three pillars: One of the most controversial pieces of the plan is its deregulatory stance. The federal government wants to eliminate what it calls 'burdensome red tape' and may withhold federal AI funding from states that implement stricter AI oversight laws. That means if a state passes strong privacy or data transparency laws around AI, it could lose access to federal money intended to support AI development, workforce training or infrastructure. For consumers, this could translate to a boom in AI-powered tools: smarter assistants, faster services and more innovation reaching your devices. It also opens the door for AI to play a bigger role in everything from healthcare and education to smart homes and city planning. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. But the plan also raises concerns about data privacy, environmental impacts and lack of public oversight, especially as AI systems become embedded in daily life. The plan does acknowledge workforce disruption. It outlines new programs to retrain workers for AI-adjacent jobs, especially in trades like electrical work, HVAC installation and robotics maintenance. Unlike earlier federal tech plans, this one appears to focus less on white-collar upskilling and more on supporting the physical infrastructure of an AI-driven economy. Trump's plan places a unique emphasis on combating perceived 'ideological bias' in AI systems, an issue largely absent from Biden's formal policy language. The proposal accuses current AI models of being 'programmed by the radical left' and calls for the creation of standards to ensure political neutrality in outputs. This includes potential mandates requiring AI models to disclose training data sources and undergo third-party audits for viewpoint bias. The emphasis on ideological balance appears designed to resonate with conservative voters concerned about fairness in emerging technologies. However, how these measures would be implemented and whether they can be reconciled with First Amendment protections remains to be seen. The Trump administration's new America's AI Action Plan marks a major departure from the Biden-era playbook. One of Trump's first moves was scrapping Biden's 2023 executive order, which focused on putting guardrails around AI. Biden emphasized safety testing, algorithmic transparency and civil rights protections through agencies like the FTC and Department of Commerce, Trump has scraped all of that, leaning heavily into deregulation. The new order frames Biden's approach as too restrictive and instead aims to strip away what it calls 'burdensome' policies that could slow down AI innovation. Rather than requiring companies to prove their systems are safe or equitable, the emphasis is now on speeding up infrastructure development, including fast-tracking data centers and chip manufacturing plants. The America's AI Action Plan is a new roadmap for scaling U.S. AI capabilities, but it also sets up future legal and political battles over states' rights, privacy protections and AI accountability. As the federal government puts billions behind building the AI economy of tomorrow, the question remains if this will make our tech smarter and life easier or just less transparent.


USA Today
12 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump says he expects $20 million worth of ads, programs from '60 Minutes' settlement
WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said he expects to receive $20 million in advertising and programming from Paramount, the parent company of CBS, as part of a side deal connected to the company's $16 million settlement with him. Trump, in a post on his social media app Truth Social, said he received the $16 million payment on July 22, three weeks after Paramount agreed to settle a Trump lawsuit that claimed the CBS news program "60 Minutes" deceptively edited an interview with Democratic nominee Kamala Harris in the 2024 election. "We also anticipate receiving $20 Million Dollars more from the new Owners, in Advertising, PSAs, or similar Programming, for a total of over $36 Million Dollars," Trump said. "This is another in a long line of VICTORIES over the Fake News Media, who we are holding to account for their widespread fraud and deceit." He added that other the news media is "ON NOTICE that the days of them being allowed to deceive the American People are OVER. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" Paramount, asked about Trump's claim of an additional $20 million in promised advertising and programs, pointed USA TODAY to a July 2 statement in which the company disputed the assertion. More: Paramount agrees to pay $16M to settle Trump lawsuit over '60 Minutes' interview "Contrary to some news reports or media speculation, Paramount's settlement with President Trump does not include PSAs or anything related to PSAs," the company said. "Paramount has no knowledge of any promises or commitments made to President Trump other than those set forth in the settlement proposed by the mediator and accepted by the parties." In his lawsuit, Trump alleged CBS's editing of the Harris interview violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act, which makes it illegal to use false, misleading, or deceptive ads in commerce. Media advocacy groups have warned Trump's novel use of such laws against news outlets could circumvent legal protections for the press, which can only be held liable for defamation against public figures if they report something they knew or should have known was false. Paramount's settlement with Trump has drawn criticism from Democrats and other Trump critics, who have noted that it comes as Paramount is seeking the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's approval for an $8.4 billion merger with Skydance Media. More: Trump says he 'absolutely loves' that CBS canceled Stephen Colbert's 'Late Show' Democrats have also questioned the timing of CBS' recent cancellation of "The Late Show With Stephen Colbert," who has been an outspoken critic of Trump. Sens. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Ron Wyden., D-Ore., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., sent Skydance Media CEO David Ellison a July 21 letter that posed several questions including whether the company has any arrangements with Trump to provide " compensation, advertising, or promotional activities" that assist the president, his family, his future presidential library or other administration officials. "We write with questions about Skydance Media's reported secret side deal with President Trumpthat appears to be connected to Paramount Global's efforts to settle President Trump's lawsuitagainst CBS and secure approval for its mega-merger with Skydance," the senators said. Paramount has denied the claim, saying the lawsuit is "completely separate from, and unrelated to, the Skydance transaction and the FCC approval process." Contributing: Reuters Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.