IPS, IAS officers challenge single judge order on ‘Bhoodan land'
2
Hyderabad: A group of senior IAS and
IPS officers
, along with their spouses, approached the Telangana HC Tuesday seeking a stay on a single judge's order that flagged their residential plots in Nagaram village in Rangareddy district as Bhoodan land.
The officers, who were served notices by the court earlier, argued that the land was lawfully purchased and not part of any Bhoodan endowment, as alleged. It can be recalled, the single judge heard a petition filed by Birla Mallesh of Maheswaram mandal and directed the state authorities to keep the land in survey numbers 181, 182, 194 and 195 under the prohibition list until further orders.
IPS officers Mahesh Bhagwat, Soumya Mishra, Swathi Lakra, Rekha Sharaf, wife of Umesh Sharaff, Tarun Joshi, Renu Goyal, wife of Jitender Goyal, and BK Rahul Hegde, along with Rahul Busireddy, son of former IAS officer and former TGPSC chairman B Janardhan Reddy, filed the pleas questioning the single judge order that termed the land as Bhoodan land.
They contended that this is a ryotwari land which they bought from the rightful owners. Citing an order from the Bhoodan board, they said land in survey number 194 is not being claimed by the board, and they bought land that fell within the purview of this survey number.
Businessman V Goutam Reddy, another recipient of HC notice, also filed an appeal against the single judge order.
The single judge had ordered notices to several officials, including principal secretary of revenue Navin Mittal, Rangareddy district former collector Amoy Kumar and several private persons. While police are already probing into some of the issues pertaining to this land, the HC in its order sought to know the stand of the CBI and ED on the plea of the petitioner seeking a deeper probe into the issue.
The bureaucrats and their spouses said in their pleas that the single judge went beyond the contents of the petition and sought a stay on his order. The case is likely to come up for hearing in a day or two.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
4 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Ajit Pawar in fix over NCP MLA Kokate's resignation for playing rummy in assembly
MUMBAI: Maharashtra deputy chief minister Ajit Pawar, led NCP, is divided over sacking agriculture minister and NCP MLA Manikrao Kokate over his playing online rummy during the state legislative assembly's monsoon session that recently concluded. The people close to DCM Ajit Pawar said that Mr Pawar this time decided to give reprieve to Agriculture Minister Manikrao Kokate as a last chance to improve his conduct as minister and avoid stoking the controversy further. 'Ajit Pawar has taken the feedback from Mr Kokate's department, and the majority of the staffers gave positive feedback about the minister and his warm and friendly style. Mr Kokate's led agriculture department was in the top five departments in the chief minister's 100 days program because of its several initiatives and schemes for the farmers. The chief minister, Devendra Fadnavis, is personally happy with Kokate's performance as minister and his work, but not happy with his controversial remarks. The minister has also started cleaning the system and bringing new ideas and innovations, such as the use of artificial intelligence on a larger scale that will not only reduce the input cost but also increase production as well. This AI will give multiple benefits to farmers,' said a person who requested anonymity. He further added Mr Kokate was only minister who sought IAS officer V Radha as secretary of his department. 'Mr Kokate has even wrote letter to chief minister getting V Radha as secretary of his agriculture department. Otherwise, most of the ministers asks for her transfer from their department because of her non nonsense approach towards the corruptions and malpractice. No ministers want the upright officer, but here Mr Kokate turned the exception. V Radha was given another assignment therefore she could join agriculture department. But this right approach of Mr Kokate is appreciated,'' said senior government officer adding in six months period, agriculture ministry has credited Rs 46,000 crore in 1.2 crore farmers bank account as financial assistance.
Hindustan Times
26 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
SC orders stay on felling of apple trees on forest land in Himachal
In a relief to apple growers in Himachal Pradesh, the Supreme Court on Monday stayed a high court order directing the removal of fruit-bearing orchards from encroached forest lands. Panwar said the HC in its July 2 order directed the forest department to remove the apple orchards and plant forest species in their place, with costs ordered to be recovered from encroachers as arrears of land revenue. (File) A bench of Chief Justice BR Gavai and justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria was hearing a plea of former deputy mayor Tikender Singh Panwar and activist Rajiv Rai, a lawyer. Appearing for Panwar, senior advocate P V Dinesh and advocate Subhash Chandran KR argued the HC had erred in its finding, which impacted lakhs of apple growers, especially in the monsoon season. Panwar said the HC in its July 2 order directed the forest department to remove the apple orchards and plant forest species in their place, with costs ordered to be recovered from encroachers as arrears of land revenue. 'The order is arbitrary, disproportionate and violative of constitutional, statutory and environmental principles, thereby necessitating the intervention of the Supreme Court to prevent irreversible ecological and socio-economic harm in the ecologically fragile state of Himachal Pradesh,' the plea said. Such large-scale tree-felling, particularly during the monsoon season, significantly heightens the risk of landslides and soil erosion in Himachal Pradesh, it added. Panwar said the high court order, mandating the blanket removal of apple trees without conducting a comprehensive environmental impact assessment (EIA), was arbitrary and in contravention of the precautionary principle -- a cornerstone of environmental jurisprudence. The plea argued the destruction of these orchards not only threatened environmental stability but also the fundamental right to livelihood enshrined under Article 21 of the Constitution. 'The HC's order lacked the requisite EIA to assess its environmental and socio-economic impacts, thereby violating the principles of reasonableness and proportionality as elucidated in cases such as Coimbatore District Central Co-operative Bank,' the plea said. The petitioners further argued that the felling of apple trees during the monsoon season exacerbated ecological risks, including landslides and soil erosion, contradicting judicial mandates for environmental assessments as seen in T N Godavarman Thirumulpad v. Union of India. The economic ramifications are equally severe, as apple cultivation is a vital component of Himachal Pradesh's economy, and its destruction threatens the livelihoods of small-scale farmers, thereby infringing upon their constitutional right to life and livelihood, the petitioners added. Panwar said as on July 18, reports indicated over 3,800 apple trees were felled in areas like Chaithla, Kotgarh and Rohru, with plans to remove up to 50,000 trees across the state. The apex court's decision was welcomed by farmer groups, who are planning to protest outside the Himachal Secretariat in Shimla on July 29. 'We are determined. Tomorrow's protest outside the Secretariat will not end in a few hours. If needed, we will sit there indefinitely. This is not an ordinary protest—it's a struggle for survival, for dignity, for justice,' said Sanjay Chauhan, Convener of the Himachal Pradesh Apple Growers Association. 'On July 2, the Himachal Pradesh HC passed an order directing the removal of apple trees on encroached forest and government land. But these trees are currently laden with fruit it's the apple harvesting season. This order was arbitrary and has caused enormous panic among farmers. We await the detailed order, but the initial communication has clearly instructed the state government to stop all ongoing tree felling immediately' he said. Chauhan claimed that approximately 4,500 apple trees had already been cut down, translating to a loss of 35,000 to 40,000 apple boxes, and an estimated economic damage of ₹400–500 crore. With inputs from HTC Shimla
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Karnataka government revokes suspension of 4 officers in stampede case
The Karnataka government on Monday revoked the suspension of four police officers, including three senior IPS officers, who were suspended after the June 4 stampede at the Chinnaswamy Stadium in Bengaluru claimed 11 lives and left several injured. A day after the stampede that killed 11 people, chief minister Siddaramaiah on June 5 had ordered the suspension of five officers PTI (PTI) In an order dated July 28, the Siddaramaiah-led government reinstated four top officers, including two IPS officers and two Karnataka State Police Service officers to duty, pending disciplinary proceedings against all four. However, the suspension of inspector general of police Vikash Kumar Vikash, stands as proceedings related to his case are currently underway in the Karnataka high court. As per the order, the suspension orders against additional director general of police (ADGP) B Dayananda and superintendent of police (SP) Shekar H Tekannavar were reconsidered and revoked. In addition, the suspensions of deputy superintendent of police (DSP) C Balakrishna and police inspector A K Girish were also lifted. In the official order, the department of personnel and administrative reforms wrote: 'In view of the facts and circumstances explained in the preamble, the Government of Karnataka, in exercise of the powers conferred under Rule 3(7)(c) of All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules 1969, hereby revokes the order of suspension of Sri. B Dayananda, IPS (KN: 1994) and Sri. Shekar H Tekannavar, IPS (KN: 2014) and reinstates into service with immediate effect.' The government stated that both the judicial commission headed by retired high court judge justice John Michael D'Cunh and the magisterial committee led by Bengaluru urban deputy commissioner Jagadish G completed their inquiries into the stampede and submitted their reports on July 10 and July 11, respectively. 'Since both the judicial commission and magisterial committee have completed their inquiry and submitted their reports, and the officers have also submitted representations requesting to revoke their suspension, the government has reconsidered the matter,' the order stated. The government clarified that the officers would continue to face disciplinary proceedings under Rule 8 of the All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969. Similarly, the suspension orders for C Balakrishna and A K Girish have also been withdrawn under Rule 5(5) of the Karnataka State Police (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules, 1965. The government order added that the reinstatements were effective immediately and the departmental inquiries would continue as per the provisions of the respective rules. The officers were earlier placed under suspension following the stampede, which led to a judicial inquiry and a magisterial probe. While details of the inquiry findings have not been made public, the government's action indicates that preliminary culpability may not have been established against the suspended officers. Prepared by retired high court judge John Michael D'Cunha, the report named the RCB team management, event firm DNA Entertainment Networks, the Karnataka State Cricket Association (KSCA), and senior police officials as responsible for the lapses that led to the stampede. 'There was a complete collapse of planning and coordination. Every agency involved — from the organisers to the police — ignored red flags,' said a senior official familiar with the contents of the report. The report also pointed out critical failures by the police. 'While around 79 personnel were posted inside the stadium, no force was deployed to manage the crowd outside. The Joint Commissioner of Police arrived at the scene only after 4 pm, and the city police commissioner was reportedly informed over two hours after the stampede occurred. 'The failure to act on early signs of overcrowding cost lives,' said a senior official familiar with the contents of the report.. 'There were opportunities to intervene, but no one responded until it was too late.' A day after the stampede, chief minister Siddaramaiah had ordered the suspension of five officers. '...it is found that there has been on the face of it substantial dereliction of duty by these officers,' their suspension order had said.
