
Tate blames Brexit for slump in visitors
Maria Balshaw said leaving the European Union, and the Covid pandemic, had left the institution struggling to attract young European visitors.
Visits to London's Tate Modern and Tate Britain have fallen by 27 per cent since 2019 – a drop of 2.2 million visitors, according to the Association of Leading Visitor Attractions (Alva).
'The figures speak for themselves,' Ms Balshaw told the Art Newspaper, adding: 'Tate Modern alone welcomed 609,000 visitors from Europe, between ages 16 to 24 in 2019-20, but then 357,000 in 2023-24.
'And if you think about that age of person, they are profoundly affected by the combination of Brexit changing their educational and work opportunities and then Covid profoundly affecting the end of their studies and the way they choose to live their lives. They are, in general, also travelling less.'
Some critics of the Tate have blamed 'woke' curatorial decisions for underwhelming footfall in recent years. It attracted controversy with an 'inclusive' rehang in 2023, which sidelined prized landscapes and portraits for paintings linked to slavery and colonialism, complete with labels alerting visitors to historic injustices.
Ms Balshaw, who has led the institution since 2017, said the Tate's internal research, which is made up of exit surveys and data from its galleries, had shown domestic visitor numbers have recovered to 95 per cent of pre-Covid levels, but international visitors are at just 61 per cent.
Tate's internal research found the average number of visitors to Tate Modern, Tate Britain and Tate St Ives in the three financial years before the pandemic was 7.4 million. Of that, around 3.8 million were from the UK.
The average number of visitors for the first two full years post-Covid was 5.8 million, of which 3.6 million were domestic. The number of visitors from outside the UK has dropped significantly, from around 3.6 million to around 2.2 million.
The attendance figures come after Tate announced it would be firing 7 per cent of its workforce to plug a funding deficit left over from the pandemic.
Next year's programme includes exhibitions of the works of Tracey Emin and Frida Kahlo, while this November, Tate Britain will host a 'grand face-off' between Turner and Constable.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
Full list of 35 surnames that might mean you're related to the Royal Family
MyHeritage has identified 35 surnames that could suggest a link to nobility - and is giving you the chance to find out if you're related to the Royal Family for free Many of us are eager to explore our ancestry, family history and potential kin. The days of painstakingly sifting through heritage records and census data are long gone, thanks to numerous online platforms that make this process simple and accessible, including MyHeritage. At the moment, MyHeritage is offering a 14-day free trial, giving individuals the opportunity to chart their family tree, uncover new relatives and delve into billions of historical records. They've even put together a list of 35 surnames that could potentially indicate a link to royalty. The company suggests that certain surnames have traditionally been associated with nobility and could strongly hint at a Royal lineage. If users carry one of these 35 surnames, they might be in for a shock when it comes to their family tree. While having these surnames doesn't guarantee a link to the royals, it offers an excellent starting point for those fascinated by their heritage. To find out more, individuals simply need to visit MyHeritage and begin building their family tree using the platform's tools that allow users to input names, dates, photos and stories to share with other potential relatives, before exploring historical archives containing census data, birth and death certificates, as well as marriage documentation. The platform also offers DNA testing services, providing customers with insights into their ethnic heritage and connecting them with family members. For those not taken by this service, there are alternative DNA platforms available, such as Ancestry. This service offers DNA analysis from £79, helping to organise and link customers with their relatives whilst offering insights into family roots. Another option is 23andMe, which provides DNA testing featuring ancestry breakdowns, personalised health information and additional services starting from £89. Here's the comprehensive list of 35 surnames that could suggest you're distantly related to the Royals: Windsor: The current British royal family's surname since 1917. Tudor: The Welsh dynasty that produced monarchs like Henry VIII and Elizabeth I. Stuart: A Scottish house that ruled England and Scotland in the 16th and 17th centuries. Plantagenet: A royal house that provided England with monarchs from Henry II to Richard III. Capet: The dynasty that ruled France from 987 to 1328. Bourbon: A European royal house that ruled France, Spain, and other territories. Habsburg: A prominent royal house of Europe, known for ruling the Holy Roman Empire. Hanover: The British royal house from George I to Queen Victoria. Valois: A cadet branch of the Capetian dynasty that ruled France. Lancaster: A branch of the Plantagenet dynasty, known for its role in the Wars of the Roses. York: Another Plantagenet branch, also central to the Wars of the Roses. Bruce: A Scottish royal house, with Robert the Bruce being a notable king. de Valois: A French royal house that produced several kings. de Medici: An influential Italian family that produced royalty and popes. Savoy: A royal family that once ruled parts of Italy and France. Orange-Nassau: The Dutch royal family. Oldenburg: A European royal house that includes the current Danish royal family. Glucksburg: A branch of the House of Oldenburg, associated with Danish and Norwegian royalty. Romanov: The last imperial dynasty to rule Russia. Baskerville: A noble family name with historical ties to English aristocracy. Darcy: A surname associated with medieval nobility and landowners in England and Ireland. Neville: A powerful English noble family with significant influence during the medieval period. Percy: An aristocratic English family known for their role in British history. Astley: A noble surname linked to the English peerage. Capell: A distinguished English family with historical ties to the aristocracy. Howard: A prominent aristocratic family in the UK, holding the title of Dukes of Norfolk. Seymour: The family of Jane Seymour, third wife of Henry VIII, with ties to the Dukedom of Somerset. Grey: Associated with Lady Jane Grey, England's nine-day queen. FitzAlan: A powerful medieval family, former Earls of Arundel. Courtenay: A noble family with connections to English and French royalty. Manners: The surname of the Dukes of Rutland, a high-ranking noble family. Russell: Connected to the Dukes of Bedford, an influential aristocratic lineage. Cavendish: The surname of the Dukes of Devonshire, a powerful British noble family. Talbot: A noble family holding the Earldom of Shrewsbury. Spencer: The family name of Princess Diana, tying it to the modern British royal family. MyHeritage boasts an impressive 4 out of 5 star rating on Trustpilot. One satisfied customer commented: "Immediate accurate statistics of my immediate family members." Another user said: "Regular updates of discoveries, positive results. This site is not just about the money, it is about genuine results for the family history researcher. "My family history has expanded and the format is easily understood. Changes are quick and easy. Thank you," another user remarked. However, not everyone was impressed, with one user expressing: "I don't fully understand it. I can't find a user guide, difficult to navigate, Help Center does not always understand my problems." However, another amateur genealogist described their use of the site as an 'enjoyable experience,' stating: "Finding related families and information relating to individuals has been a wonderful experience. MyHeritage has made it even easier to trace ancestors and verify relations." The DNA tests and platform can be accessed on the MyHeritage website.


ITV News
an hour ago
- ITV News
'Cities are being short changed': Council leader urges government for a tourism tax in Bath
Plans to introduce a tourism tax in Bath have moved a step closer after councillors voted unanimously in support of it. Councillors at Bath and North East Somerset Council voted in favour of being able to introduce a tourism tax during a meeting on 17 July. The vote was in support of the principle of a tax, not on actually introducing one or how it would work. But what is a tourism tax and why is it being voted on? What is a tourism tax? A tourism tax is a levy on short-stay accommodation in a local authority area. Also known as a 'transient visitor levy', a tax of this kind gives local councils the chance to charge people visiting the area. The tax has been introduced in cities with significant tourism economies across the world including Amsterdam, Barcelona, and Vancouver. It's usually charge per occupied bed or room per night which can change depending on the accommodation providers and time of year. What are councillors in Bath and North East Somerset voting on? Councils in England do not yet have the power to introduce such a measure but authorities in Scotland do after the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act 2024 was passed last year. Bath and North East Somerset Council leader, Kevin Guy, has written to local government secretary Angela Rayner urging the government to give England's historic cities the same power. Mr Guy (Bathavon North, Liberal Democrat) said in a council meeting: 'We are not acting along and all we are doing is asking is for the government to give us a fair deal because, at the moment, English cities are being short changed.' Bath has six million visitors per year, bringing in half a billion pounds in local economic benefit and supporting 8,000 jobs, proposer of the motion Michelle Doherty (Newbridge, Liberal Democrat) told the meeting. She said: 'This motion is not about discouraging tourism. 'We really value our visitors and we want them to continue coming but like many European cities, we think visitors should make a small contribution towards the cost of keeping our city clean and safe and welcoming." She added: 'This isn't about creating a new huge revenue stream — although a modest charge per night could bring in a couple of million pounds per year for the council which would make a real difference given the pressures on our budgets.' How would a tourism tax work? A tourism tax is expected to take the form of an additional charge on overnight stays paid by the visitor to the local council. The letter from Mr Guy and the leader of Cambridge City Council to the government spoke of 'a tourist levy associated with overnight stays.' The letter states: 'The revenue generated could be reinvested into the community, improving facilities and services for both residents and visitors.' Mr Guy said: 'Any levy should apply fairly across all types of accommodation, including short-term lets such as Airbnb.' Some supporters say it would help fund infrastructure and local services in tourist hotspots, including the upkeep of footpaths, public toilets, and waste collections. Critics argue the charge could put visitors off and add pressure to businesses already dealing with costs and staffing challenges. A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government said: "There are currently no plans to introduce a tourism tax in England. "Places can already choose to introduce a levy on overnight stays through working with their local tourism sector using the Accommodation Business Improvement District model."


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Stirling hotel manager voices support for tourist tax if funds are used wisely
Stirling Council is currently seeking feedback on the draft Visitor Levy scheme for the area, after it launched a public consultation on the issue last month. The manager of one of Stirling's most popular hotels has suggested that the city's proposed ' tourist tax ' on overnight stays could be beneficial, provided the funds raised are used appropriately. Stirling Council is currently seeking public opinion on the draft Visitor Levy scheme for the area, following a public consultation launched last month. Under new powers granted by the Visitor Levy (Scotland) Act 2024, the draft scheme proposes a five per cent levy on overnight stays across all forms of paid visitor accommodation within the Stirling Council area. The scheme would include several exemptions specific to Stirling, including residents of Stirling Council, those receiving carers' allowance and visitors staying more than seven nights (through reimbursement), as well as a site exemption scheme for charitable and educational organisations, where the trip's primary purpose is charitable or educational. Barry Makin, the general manager of Sir Andy Murray's Cromlix Hotel, in Kinbuck, believes the move could be positive – provided the money is "well spent" and used locally. Speaking to the Stirling Observer, Mr Makin said: "I think the theory behind the levy is good in principle, if the money is spent well locally to improve things for visitors and also for local people." He further commented: "I've seen how it can work successfully in other European countries. In my opinion it's essential that the levy charge is clear to bookers at the point of booking and not just on the final bill so it's clear that this isn't a cost added by the hotel, but is something all travellers to Stirling would encounter." Local residents and other interested parties are invited to share their thoughts on the draft scheme via an online survey, with paper versions also available in Stirling Council libraries, until October 12. Businesses, accommodation providers, locals and tourists alike are also encouraged to provide feedback on the proposals at drop-in sessions scheduled across Stirling in September. The sessions include: Stirling's Albert Halls on September 9, from 11am-6pm; The John McLintock Hall, Balfron, on September 11, from 10am–6pm; Drymen Village hall on September 17, from 10am-6pm; Killin's McLaren Hall on September 23, from 10am-6pm; and Callander Youth Project Trust on September 29, from 10am-6pm. Last month, Stirling Council Leader, Cllr Gerry McGarvey, urged everyone, from accommodation providers to residents and visitors, to provide feedback on the scheme to ensure it reflects the needs of all of Stirling. If approved, the 'tourist tax' would come into effect from June 1, 2027, and would apply to bookings made on or after January 1, 2027. In May, we reported that a hospitality trade body had warned that the proposed 'tourist tax' could potentially damage tourism in the region. Leon Thompson, Executive Director of UK Hospitality Scotland, said: "Hospitality and tourism is so important to Stirling, as a major employer and driver of the local economy. "That economic and social contribution to our communities must be protected and we fundamentally believe that introducing a visitor levy could harm tourism in Stirling. "That's why Stirling Council should carry out a detailed impact assessment to understand the potential impact on visitors, tourism and the economy, before it embarks further on potentially introducing a levy." That came after the Association of Scotland's Self-Caterers (ASSC) said last December that the introduction of a visitor levy scheme on tourists in Stirling would mean that small businesses could become "de-facto unpaid tax collectors". Fiona Campbell, ASSC chief executive, said the implementation of the tax must "be done right". In April, a campaign group against the proposals warned the move could see the city's hospitality sector left with high levels of cancellations. The Back British Holidays campaign has issued a warning that up to 21% of potential holidaymakers might cancel their trips due to the extra tariff. They also stated that another 21% would cut back on their spending during their holiday. The council previously estimated that a five per cent levy could generate as much as £7.5million.