McAfee Total Protection spots scams before they hit you—and your wallet
Starting today, McAfee is introducing Scam Detector—your first line of defense against text, email and video scams. It's the most comprehensive scam protection available, and it's included at no extra cost with all McAfee core plans, including McAfee+ and McAfee Total Protection.
Here's a look at McAfee's current deals and promotions:
McAfee is infinitely better at catching scams than most competitors and performs more than four billion AI threat scans daily. McAfee also provides cutting-edge, AI threat detection that's been developed by world-class researchers. They offer the world's first automated deepfake detector among online providers.
Shop McAfee plans
Get protection from scam texts before you even open a message. Scam Detector goes to work and lets you know which texts aren't safe and should not be opened. McAfee flags suspicious emails, so you don't have to worry if it's real or a scam. It even gives you an analysis of the email so you know exactly why it was flagged. Then, you'll be alerted automatically if they detect a potential video scam.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Pony AI Inc.'s (NASDAQ:PONY) last week's 5.9% decline must have disappointed individual investors who have a significant stake
Significant control over Pony AI by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions The top 4 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders own 23% of Pony AI Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Every investor in Pony AI Inc. (NASDAQ:PONY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 24% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk). While insiders who own 23% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$4.6b last week,individual investors took the most losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pony AI, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Pony AI Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices. Pony AI already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Pony AI's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pony AI. With a 17% stake, CEO Jun Peng is the largest shareholder. With 12% and 12% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan Board and Toyota Motor Corporation are the second and third largest shareholders. Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 50% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business. Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too. While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group. Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Pony AI Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$4.6b, and insiders have US$1.0b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders. The general public-- including retail investors -- own 24% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders. With a stake of 19%, private equity firms could influence the Pony AI board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public. It appears to us that public companies own 12% of Pony AI. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pony AI better, we need to consider many other factors. To that end, you should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Pony AI (including 1 which can't be ignored) . But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. — Investing narratives with Fair Values Suncorp's Next Chapter: Insurance-Only and Ready to Grow By Robbo – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: A$22.83 · 0.1% Overvalued Thyssenkrupp Nucera Will Achieve Double-Digit Profits by 2030 Boosted by Hydrogen Growth By Chris1 – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: €14.40 · 0.3% Overvalued Tesla's Nvidia Moment – The AI & Robotics Inflection Point By BlackGoat – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $359.72 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
3 hours ago
- Miami Herald
HF‑11 Hypercar Revs to 12,000 RPM and Swaps Between Gas and Electric
In a world dominated by hybrid hypercars built by billion-dollar conglomerates, the Oil Stain Lab HF‑11 is a welcome oddity. It's the creation of two Ukrainian-American brothers, Nikita and Iliya Bridan - ex-Honda, Cadillac and Genesis designers - who decided the only way to scratch their creative itch was to build a 12,000 rpm, dual-drivetrain, 2,000-pound hypercar out of sheer 25 will be made. Each one costs at least $1.85 million, or $2.3 million if you want both powertrains. The HF‑11 is about choice. Buyers can spec a 4.6-liter naturally aspirated flat-six making 600 hp, or step up to the unhinged 5.0-liter twin-turbo flat-six good for a staggering 1,200 hp - all mounted in the middle of a carbon monocoque and sending power to the rear wheels. Both are available with a six-speed manual or a seven-speed sequential box. That alone would be enough for most small-volume this isn't most Stain Lab is also building a fully electric version with around 850 hp, and here's the twist: thanks to a modular subframe system, owners can swap between the ICE and EV powertrains. That's right - one car, two wildly different personalities, depending on the day, track, or mood. Despite the turbocharged flat-six having "just" six cylinders, it's designed to scream all the way to 12,000 rpm. When combined with the car's 910 kg weight, the HF‑11 promises a power-to-weight ratio that puts it well ahead of the Bugatti Chiron and toe-to-toe with the Gordon Murray claims remain vague - understandable for a car still in development - but 0–60mph in the low 3s seems conservative. Top speed? Unofficially, well beyond 200mph. Step into the HF-11 and you'll find a cockpit that looks like it was designed by a watchmaker having a nervous breakdown inside an F1 wind tunnel. The entire cabin is draped in carbon weave, from the exposed monocoque to the sculpted centre console - not just for weight savings, but sheer visual drama. There's no touchscreen, no voice assistant, and certainly no cupholders. What you get instead is a bank of heavy-duty toggle switches, rotary dials, and knurled metal knobs straight out of a Cold War fighter shifter itself is a skeletal work of art: part titanium sculpture, part ballistic missile trigger. Above it, the triple-pod analogue dash recalls classic Porsche GT racers, but everything else feels raw, functional, and unapologetically mechanical. Even the starter switch appears to be mounted inside a billet aluminium pod held together with titanium struts. It's less interior, more suede where you need it and structure where you don't. The HF-11 doesn't try to coddle you. It tries to connect you - to the drivetrain, to the chassis, and to the road. If you want ambient lighting and a Spotify playlist, look elsewhere. This thing was built to be felt, not filtered. The HF‑11's styling feels familiar but alien. It riffs on classic Porsche silhouettes - there are shades of Carrera GT, 962, even 917 - but everything is dialed up to 11. Giant rear diffusers, razor-edge front wings, and track-ready aero components all scream performance. Yet, inside, it's raw, stripped-back, and mechanical. Think Group C meets bespoke hot rod. What makes the HF‑11 more than a concept car with delusions of grandeur is the pedigree behind it. The Bridan twins were involved in cars that sold in the millions, but they're chasing purity now. Their mission: build the "ultimate human-scale hypercar," one with minimal electronics, obsessive focus, and mechanical already made waves with the viral Half-11, a chopped-up Porsche homage that earned cult status. The HF‑11 is its spiritual evolution - faster, crazier, and far more isn't just an ambitious spec sheet. It's two engineers turning decades of experience and design frustration into an unfiltered, track-ready love letter to speed. And whether it sells out or implodes spectacularly, it deserves to be noticed. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
New York Post
5 hours ago
- New York Post
Trump can't give up the fight against foreign meddling in US tech
President Donald Trump last month got Canada to kill a blatantly unfair tax on US-based companies, but the fight against foreign meddling in America's tech industry has a long way to go. Canada's Digital Services Tax was set to slap companies like Google, Meta, Amazon, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users — until Trump canceled trade talks over what he rightly slammed as an 'egregious' move. Prime Minister Mark Carney promptly nixed the fee hours before it would've kicked in. Good: The tax was a shameless cash grab at the expense of American companies — and it was retroactive, demanding US-based tech firms fork over a whopping $2 billion. Note that the Biden administration also opposed the tax, and even whined that it might violate the USMCA trade agreement — but did nothing to actually stop it. Making Carney back down is fresh proof that Trump's big-stick trade tactics can work — and work to protect cutting-edge knowledge-based industries, not just brick-and-mortar manufacturing. It also shows that, despite all the ink spilled over Elon Musk's tiff with Trump, the tech industry still has plenty of reason to stay friendly with the administration. Especially since, as the prez pointed out on TruthSocial, Canada was just seeking to copy the European Union, which shamelessly uses its Digital Markets and Digital Services Acts to fill its coffers and bend US tech to its will. Six of seven tech companies the European Commission has highlighted as 'gatekeepers' to be reined in are American: Google, Apple, Meta, Amazon, Microsoft and The EU has already hit Apple and Meta this year with massive fines for allegedly breaking the Digital Markets Act's antitrust rules. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Far worse: The Digital Services Act chills free expression by threatening steep financial repercussions against companies that allow speech that the EU considers 'disinformation,' 'hate speech' or threats to 'civil discourse' — concepts so nebulous that it's hard to see how companies can comply without stomping on the First Amendment. It's beyond unacceptable for Brussels to determine what Americans can say on American–owned sites. The EU's legal harassment of US-based tech firms is so egregious that Trump aide Peter Navarro slammed it as 'lawfare' in April. These 'fines' are basically tariffs by another name — milking successful American companies by creating strict regulations that target them especially. Canada clearly meant to get its own slice of that pie, only for Trump to slap down Ottowa's grasping hand. Making the Europeans back off should be high on the president's agenda as he starts his next tariff offensive. Don't let America's trade partners reap the benefits of our thriving, innovative tech industry while spitting on the free-speech and free-market ideals that make it possible.
