Iran regime escalates repression toward 'North Korea-style model of isolation and control'
According to Kasra Aarabi, director of IRGC research at United Against Nuclear Iran, the Islamic Republic is accelerating toward what he said is a "North Korea-style model of isolation and control."
"We're witnessing a kind of domestic isolation that will have major consequences for the Iranian people," Aarabi told Fox News Digital. "The regime has always been totalitarian, but the level of suppression now is unprecedented. It's unlike anything we've seen before."
Saudi Defense Minister Secretly Meets With Trump To Discuss Iran De-escalation, Israel: Sources
A source inside Iran confirmed to Fox News Digital that "the repression has become terrifying."
Aarabi, who maintains direct lines of contact in Iran, described a country under siege by its own rulers. In Tehran, he described how citizens are stopped at random, their phones confiscated and searched. "If you have content deemed pro-Israel or mocking the regime, you disappear," he said. "People are now leaving their phones at home or deleting everything before they step outside."
Read On The Fox News App
This new wave of paranoia and fear, he explained, mirrors tactics seen in North Korea — where citizens vanish without explanation and information is tightly controlled. During the recent conflict, Iran's leadership imposed a total internet blackout to isolate the population, blocking Israeli evacuation alerts, and pushed propaganda that framed Israel as targeting civilians indiscriminately.
"It was a perverse objective," Aarabi said, adding, "They deliberately cut communications to instill fear and manipulate public perception. For four days, not a single message went through. Even Israeli evacuation alerts didn't reach their targets."
The regime's aim, he said, was twofold: to keep people off the streets and erode the surprising bond that had formed between Iranians and Israelis. "At the start of the war, many Iranians welcomed the strikes," Aarabi noted. "They knew Israel was targeting the IRGC — the very forces responsible for suppressing and killing their own people. But once the internet was cut and fear set in, some began to question what was happening."
Dr. Afshon Ostovar, a leading Iran scholar and author of "Vanguard of the Imam: Religion, Politics, and Iran's Revolutionary Guards," said domestic repression remains the regime's most reliable strategy for survival.
What's Next For Iran's Terror Army, The Irgc, After Devastating Military Setbacks?
"Repressing the people at home is easy. That's something they can do. So it's not unlikely that Iran could become more insular, more autocratic, more repressive — and more similar to, let's say, a North Korea — than what it is today. That might be the only way they see to preserve the regime: by really tightening the screws on the Iranian people, to ensure that the Iranian population doesn't try to rise up and topple the regime," he told Fox News Digital.
Inside the regime's power structure, the fallout from the war is just as severe. Aarabi said that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) is facing an internal crisis of trust and an imminent purge. "These operations couldn't have taken place without infiltration at the highest levels," he said. "There's immense pressure now to clean house."
The next generation of IRGC officers — those who joined after 2000 — are younger, more radical and deeply indoctrinated. Over half of their training is now ideological. Aarabi said that these newer factions have begun turning on senior commanders, accusing them of being too soft on Israel or even collaborating with Mossad.
"In a twist of irony, Khamenei created these extreme ideological ranks to consolidate power — and now they're more radical than he is," Aarabi said. "He's struggling to control them."
A purge is likely, along with the rise of younger, less experienced commanders with far higher risk tolerance — a shift that could make the IRGC more volatile both domestically and internationally. With Iran's conventional military doctrine in ruins, terrorism may become its primary lever of influence.
"The regime's three pillars — militias, ballistic missiles, and its nuclear program — have all been decapitated or severely degraded," Aarabi said. "That leaves only asymmetric warfare: soft-target terrorism with plausible deniability."
Despite the regime's brutal turn inward, Aarabi insists this is a sign of weakness, not strength. "If the Islamic Republic were confident, it wouldn't need to crush its people this way," he said. "It's acting out of fear. But until the regime's suppressive apparatus is dismantled, the streets will remain silent — and regime change remains unlikely."Original article source: Iran regime escalates repression toward 'North Korea-style model of isolation and control'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sir Keir Starmer is caught between Trump, Macron and MPs over Palestine recognition
Parliament may have shut up shop for a six-week summer break, but MPs and the French president are turning up the heat on Sir Keir Starmer over the Middle East. More than one in three of all 650 MPs have written to the prime minister calling on the UK to recognise a Palestinian state at a United Nations conference next week. In response to the call, his answer is essentially: Yes, but not yet. That, of course, won't satisfy the 222 MPs backing an all-party letter to the PM penned by the Labour MP Sarah Champion. The majority of names on the letter, predictably, are Labour, Lib Dem and SNP MPs. But there are some Tory big hitters too, including Father of the House Sir Edward Leigh and former cabinet minister Kit Malthouse. Until now, the PM and foreign secretary David Lammy have argued that the gesture of recognising Palestine on its own won't end what Sir Keir himself calls "the appalling scenes in Gaza". But the pressure for recognition isn't just coming from MPs. French President Emmanuel Macron has said France will recognise a Palestinian state at the UN General Assembly in September. Read more: Might Mr Macron - whose bromance with the PM during his state visit to the UK could not have been warmer - persuade Sir Keir to do the same? Possibly. He's not ruling it out. But there's one big obstacle to Sir Keir bowing to the pressure from MPs and the French president. And that's the towering figure who's in Scotland this weekend: the golfing president of the United States. When Donald Trump was asked about President Macron's vow to recognise Palestine in September, his response was brutal and bordering on condescending. "What he says doesn't matter," the president told reporters at the White House as he headed for Air Force One. "He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight." Ouch! But the US president's unflinching support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu places Sir Keir in an awkward spot: Caught between the opposing stances of the French and US presidents. The PM is, therefore, also under pressure from President Trump, and he won't want to fall out with him when he meets him this weekend. Hence, his carefully worded statement responding to the letter from the MPs. Appearing to try and please the US and French presidents - and the large number of Labour MPs backing Sarah Champion's letter - Sir Keir said he's "working on a pathway to peace" in the Middle East. He spoke of "concrete steps" to turn a ceasefire into a lasting peace and said recognition of a Palestinian state "has to be one of those steps", adding: "I am unequivocal about that." And he concluded: "But it must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis. "This is the way to ensure it is a tool of maximum utility to improve the lives of those who are suffering - which of course, will always be our ultimate goal." Read more from Sky News: As well as his own statement, the PM issued a joint statement with President Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, both of whom have held talks with Sir Keir in the UK in the past fortnight. That statement was tough, beginning: "The time has come to end the war in Gaza." It went on: "The humanitarian catastrophe that we are witnessing in Gaza must end now." Yet there's little sign of either the war or the humanitarian catastrophe ending any time soon. And that means that throughout parliament's summer break, MPs will no doubt continue to turn up the heat on the PM.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's trade remarks: 3 takeaways ahead of China negotiations
President Trump says a China trade deal is taking shape ahead of next week's talks in Sweden. Asia Society Policy Institute vice president Wendy Cutler and Yahoo Finance Washington Correspondent Ben Werschkul discuss what the US may be pushing for and how upcoming tariff deadlines could shift. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. President Trump gave more details Friday about the state of trade negotiations. He said the US is nearing a trade deal with China and offered a range of messages on other nations facing his August 1st deadline. Trump's comments coming as US and Chinese negotiators are set to meet in Sweden next week. Joining us now, Wendy Cutler, vice president of the Asia Society Policy Institute and Yahoo Finance's Washington correspondent Ben Worshko. Um Ben, let's start with you. Give us the latest here on some of these comments that we heard from President Trump today. Yeah. So, this morning as President Trump headed for Scotland, he did about a 30-minute gaggle with reporters talking about a wide array of topics. On the financial side of this, which was one piece of this, there was kind of a mixed bag here for in terms of, in terms of of trade updates. The first one was kind of some tough words about the current talks. Um, he talked about these are the countries facing an August 1st deadline. He described the chances of making an EU a deal with the EU is not certain. At one point he described it as 50/50, at another point he described it a little better than that, but it's clear that there's a ways to go on that front, which is, which is of course, as a block, is America's largest trading partner. He talked, he had some negative words about Canada saying that the outcome with Canada on August 1st could be a tariff and not any more negotiations there. What he previously promised was a 35% tariff on Canada, our northern neighbor. And he also talked about more tariffs, uh, tariff letters coming next week. This is where he basically just dictates rates. I might take that with a grain of salt considering these are the final stages of negotiations and we're seeing a lot of negotiations from both sides including from the EU side about what happens if no deal is there, but some negative words there. Where it was a little more mixed was on China. This is, this is another big focus of trade this week, or next week with Trump's teams set headed to Sweden to meet with Chinese officials. Trump describes that having the confines of a deal, but he didn't have any more details on what that meant. He's previously described a 90-day pause as a deal, quote deal. So it could just be a reference to that, but we'll see if that emerges to anything more there. One area with the China talks that jumped out of me this morning was Trump was asked about currency and had a lot of words there. I wrote about this this week about how the weakening dollar is a real sort of challenge and it is sort of dividing the Trump administration in terms of there's benefits of a weaker dollar for trade, and there's also disadvantages. Trump said that China, all they do is fight for a weaker currency, so that's clearly an issue for him in these China talks. We'll see if that comes up um, more. And then one final positive note from the president this morning was a lot of positive words for Jerome Powell. This came after his his high profile visit to the Fed last uh yesterday. He talked about how Powell's a very good man and even hinted that he thinks, we'll see if this happens, that Powell is going to look towards lowering rates as soon as next week, at least advocating for that if not actually lowering them. Yeah. We'll we'll see about that part. But let's talk more about the potential China deal. Wendy, I want to bring you in on this. What should we be watching for on this China deal? What developments do you think could come next week? So, again, next week is really, in my view, more of the launch of the China negotiations, right? It's taken us two or so months to make sure the deal that was reached in Geneva held up, particularly with respect to critical minerals. So I think when Beths and takes his team over and meets with China, it will all be all about trying to come up with a deal that could be announced during a potential Trump-Xi meeting um, around um, the APEC meeting, come late October. Interesting. What what would you want to see out of that deal, or what would you expect to see out of that deal when it comes that would be sort of most favorable to the US? Well, look, I think the president is going to be pushing for big purchases. We've seen that in other deals that have been announced so far. We've seen that during his first term and so I think that would be a feature that will be worked on. The Secretary of Treasury has also mentioned his concerns about Chinese exports of excess capacity goods. So I think that's another critical area that needs to be addressed. And look, there are a whole host of non-tariff measures, um and tariff measures that also could be on the table as well. Related Videos Trump Is on the Mind of the FOMC, Goldman's Kaplan Says Trump Says Powell May Be Ready to Recommend Lower Rates Trump Puts Odds of EU Trade Deal at 50-50 S&P 500 fresh record high, Trump & Powell, Intel: 3 Things Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
USAID, Reuters dismiss mountain of evidence showing Hamas steals humanitarian aid
The study's acknowledgment of severe limitations, combined with extensive documentation of Hamas aid diversion from multiple sources, raises serious questions about the reliability of its findings. A deeply flawed US government analysis, published by Reuters on Friday, astonishingly concluded there was no evidence of systematic theft by Hamas of US-funded humanitarian supplies. This finding directly contradicts overwhelming evidence and testimony, raising serious questions about the report's methodology and its challenge to the rationale for Israeli and US backing of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). The critical flaw? This unsound analysis conspicuously ignored a mountain of evidence demonstrating systematic aid theft by Hamas throughout the 600-plus-day war. The USAID Bureau of Humanitarian Assistance study, completed in late June and first reported by Reuters on Friday, examined 156 incidents of theft or loss reported by aid partners between October 2023 and May 2025. The analysis concluded there were "no reports alleging Hamas" benefited from US-funded supplies. However, the study's own acknowledgment of severe limitations, combined with extensive documentation of Hamas aid diversion from multiple sources, raises serious questions about the reliability of its findings. Study's acknowledged blind spots The USAID analysis itself candidly identified several critical limitations that may explain why it failed to detect what Palestinians on the ground describe as systematic theft: The study noted that because aid recipients cannot be vetted, supplies could have reached Hamas administrative officials without detection. Additionally, BHA staff lost access to classified intelligence systems during USAID's recent dismantlement, potentially missing crucial intelligence reports on Hamas diversions. Perhaps most significantly, the study relied entirely on self-reporting from aid organizations operating in what analysts describe as a "mafia-like" environment controlled by Hamas through violence and intimidation. "No organization wants to admit it handed over some aid to terrorists or mafia gunmen," noted a Jerusalem Post analysis in May. "But the organizations also know if they condemn Hamas, then they could be in danger." 'They're criminals, like ISIS' Just weeks before the USAID study was completed, Gaza residents were telling Israeli officials a dramatically different story. In recorded conversations released by the IDF, Palestinians described how Hamas systematically disrupts aid distribution to maintain control over supplies. "They don't want the people to receive aid, they want to foil the plan so that the aid will go to them, allowing them to steal it," one Gaza resident told a Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories (COGAT) officer in May. "They live on the aid... they want aid to come in through the United Nations and international organizations so they can steal it... I swear to you, they're criminals, like ISIS." Another civilian employed by World Central Kitchen provided direct testimony about theft: "When the supplies arrive, they try to steal." The testimonies also revealed the deadly consequences for Palestinians who attempt to bypass Hamas's control. "They killed my cousin yesterday because he went to UNRWA," one resident was recorded saying in a January conversation, referring to Hamas's murder of civilians seeking aid outside their system. In response to inquiries from The Jerusalem Post, the IDF reiterated the military's coordination with humanitarian efforts while condemning Hamas's exploitation of aid: "The IDF operates, and will continue to operate, in accordance with the directives of the political echelon. Hamas is a brutal terrorist organization that starves the population and endangers it to maintain its rule in the Gaza Strip. Hamas does everything in its power to block humanitarian aid, directly harming Gazan civilians." The statement emphasized that the IDF has enabled the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to operate independently in distributing aid, while securing new distribution zones to facilitate orderly food deliveries, even as military operations continue. Since May 19, humanitarian transfers to Gaza have resumed through two primary channels: distribution centers run by the US-backed organization and UN-coordinated aid. According to internal figures shared with the Post by military officials coordinating aid operations, nearly 4,500 humanitarian trucks have entered Gaza since May 19, split evenly between distribution centers and supplemental routes. These deliveries included 1.5 million weekly family food parcels, 2,500 tons of infant formula, and bulk supplies for bakeries and kitchens. The GHF, established specifically to bypass Hamas control, has also faced severe retaliation. By June, GHF reported that 12 of its local staff had been murdered and others tortured. Hamas has repeatedly attacked GHF distribution sites, with witnesses reporting deliberate shooting at civilians attempting to collect aid. 'The warehouse is at full capacity' Israeli intelligence has also intercepted revealing Hamas communications. In September 2024, N12 broadcast that a Hamas terrorist was recorded discussing stolen humanitarian aid: "At this point, we have everything... The warehouse is at full capacity." Even Palestinian Authority officials have contradicted the USAID findings. In April 2025, PA President Mahmoud Abbas blamed Hamas for aid lootings in the Gaza Strip, with WAFA quoting a presidential statement saying that "it held Hamas-affiliated gangs primarily responsible." Abbas emphasized that all of the looting gangs were "known to the Palestinian public and will top the blacklist to be held accountable and brought to justice in accordance with the law at the appropriate time." Aid crisis deepens as Israel disputes USAID findings The urgency of the aid situation was underscored Thursday when UNICEF warned that "severe malnutrition is spreading among children faster than aid can reach them, and the world is watching it happen." The UN agency called for "unfettered aid access to children in need," highlighting the devastating humanitarian impact of the ongoing crisis. Yet the core question remains: why isn't aid reaching those desperate children? In a statement to thePost, David Mencer, spokesman for the Prime Minister's Office, offered a starkly different explanation than the USAID report: "Israel facilitates thousands of aid trucks into Gaza, but we know from multiple intelligence and international sources that Hamas diverts between 30% and 50% of that aid for its own use." This assessment directly contradicts the USAID findings and aligns with testimonies from Gaza residents and Palestinian Authority officials. "They steal food, fuel, and medicine meant for civilians, hoard it in their tunnels, and sell it on the black market to fund their war machine," Mencer added. "Hamas deliberately exploits the aid to starve their own people." The Israeli government's position suggests that the malnutrition crisis UNICEF describes isn't solely a matter of access, but rather a deliberate strategy by Hamas to weaponize humanitarian suffering - a claim supported by multiple Palestinian testimonies but notably absent from the USAID analysis. Also notably absent was any mention of the increasing number of truckloads of aid waiting for the UN and other international aid groups on the Gaza side of the border. The UN has blamed bureaucracy, but the GHF and the IDF have both separately attempted to offer solutions to the idling aid. A narrow scope While the USAID study noted 'no reports alleging Hamas' stole US-funded aid within the confines of the 156 incidents it reviewed, this exceedingly narrow finding stands in stark contrast to the overwhelming and documented broader reality in Gaza. The study's acknowledged limitations - including inability to vet recipients, loss of classified intelligence access, and reliance on organizations with strong incentives not to report Hamas involvement - suggest its findings should be viewed as incomplete rather than definitive. Yet despite these significant limitations, Reuters' reporting on the study came with a definitive headline proclaiming "no evidence of massive Hamas theft of Gaza aid" - a framing that obscures the report's narrow scope and methodological constraints. This pattern of transforming qualified findings into absolute declarations reflects a troubling trend in coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict, where complex realities are reduced to misleading soundbites. 'Reuters' claim that there's 'no evidence' Hamas has profited from aid ignores mounting documentation and misleads the public in ways that fuel both antisemitism and conflict.' Jacki Alexander, the Global CEO of media watchdog HonestReporting, told the Post. 'This push to absolve Hamas only prolongs the war and endangers civilians. 'The media has a responsibility to report facts, not push narratives that shield terrorists and shift blame onto their victims.' She added. As warnings of hunger mount in Gaza, the disconnect between the USAID report and the testimonies of Palestinians living under Hamas control highlights the challenges of delivering assistance in a territory where aid flows, but too often into the hands of terrorists rather than starving families. Ultimately, for the civilians of Gaza, who risk their lives simply trying to access food aid, the academic question of whether Hamas's systematic theft can be documented matters far less than the brutal reality they face attempting to get their next meal. Solve the daily Crossword