Top judges' body forms panel to address missing persons issue
Listen to article
The National Judicial Policy Making Committee (NJPMC) unanimously decided to address the issue of enforced disappearances, establishing a special committee to formulate an institutional response in collaboration with the executive.
Chaired by Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi, the body convened its 53rd meeting to discuss key judicial reforms on Friday.
The committee approved several initiatives aimed at enhancing the judicial system, including the establishment of a "Commercial Litigation Corridor" for faster resolution of business disputes and the introduction of "Model Criminal Trial Courts" for expediting criminal cases.
Also Read: Islamabad court suspends YouTube ban on prominent journalists, critics
It also endorsed the creation of a pilot system for Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and initiatives to standardise judicial procedures across districts.
A major focus was also placed on improving the inclusion of lawyers in the judicial process, including the development of a "Professional Excellence Index."
The committee further discussed the ethical implications of using Generative AI in court operations and tasked the National Judicial Automation Committee to draft a comprehensive ethical framework.
In terms of judicial infrastructure, the committee praised initiatives like the construction of women lawyers' bar rooms and daycare centers, along with health insurance for judges and their families.
Moreover, the committee decided that tax and financial-related constitutional cases would be handled by division benches in the High Courts instead of single benches.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
15 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Top court stays ADRC proceedings
The Supreme Court has ordered a stay on proceedings in all cases currently pending before the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committees (ADRCs), which function under the administrative control of the FBR to handle tax-related matters, especially those involving state entities. The order came from a division bench headed by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi, which issued a two-page directive. It noted that during proceedings, it was brought to the court's attention that the FBR, in consultation with the Ministry of Law and Justice, was in the process of overhauling the mechanism for appointing members to the ADRCs. The FBR's legal member submitted before the bench that the revenue body remains open to constructive suggestions regarding the ADRC proceedings as mandated by law. Taking note, the court observed it would be appropriate for the FBR to first examine the matter in detail. Accordingly, the bench directed the FBR to consult with Shahid Jamil, counsel for the petitioner (ZTBL), counsel for the respondent (FBR), amicus curiae Sultan Mazhar Sher Khan, the Attorney General for Pakistan and the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. The order further directed that the FBR must "duly consider the opinions and input" of these stakeholders before finalising the proposed framework for appointing ADRC members. "A report in this regard shall be submitted before this Court prior to the next date of hearing. In the meantime, proceedings in all cases currently pending before the ADRC shall remain stayed till 24.07.2025," the court stated. Shahid Jamil, counsel for ZTBL, maintained that transparency must be ensured in the appointment of ADRC members. However, legal experts remain divided on the current state of ADRCs and their role in dispute resolution. One lawyer representing a state-owned enterprise (SOE) argued that the ADRC mechanism has proven "destructive" for SOEs. "They are being crushed with taxation and have no remedy against the ADRC," he said, alleging that billions of rupees in taxes were forcibly recovered in June without the legally required notices, simply to meet revenue targets. "All profit-making SOEs are being destroyed," he added. Another lawyer contended that the ADRC should function independently and without FBR's influence to be credible. On the other hand, Hafiz Ehsaan Ahmad, who has represented the FBR in numerous cases, defended the institution. He explained that the FBR was legally empowered to constitute ADR committees for the settlement of tax disputes and to avoid prolonged litigation. However, he acknowledged that the ADR system in Pakistan has struggled due to several structural flaws, including the absence of qualified and independent arbitrators, a lack of transparency in ADRC composition, inadequate digital and institutional infrastructure and, most crucially, the limited binding nature and enforceability of ADR outcomes, particularly when they involve findings of fact.
Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
State-funded legal aid for poor launched
Judicial matters: Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi chairs a meeting of the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan in Quetta. Photo: APP Chief Justice of Pakistan Yahya Afridi said on Monday that a new initiative had been launched to provide assistance to poor litigants to hire legal representation at all levels of the judiciary at the state expense in order to ensure equitable access to justice for all citizens. Chairing a meeting of the Law and Justice Commission of Pakistan (LJCP) at the Supreme Court Branch Registry in Quetta, he said that a senior representative would be posted in the high courts to liaise with district bar associations and supervise the ongoing justice sector initiatives at the grassroots level. The LJCP meeting was held to review the institutional linkages between the bar associations in Balochistan and the LJCP with a view to strengthening justice delivery, said a press release issued here. During the meeting, the chief justice announced that under the auspices of the LJCP, a new initiative had been launched to provide assistance to poor litigants to hire legal representation, at the state expense, at all levels of the judiciary – from magistrate courts to the Supreme Court. Remuneration of up to Rs50,000 would be given through the District Legal Empowerment Committees, the press release said, adding that the bars might nominate qualified lawyers to the district judges, the high courts, and the Supreme Court in this regard. He also said that the LJCP had decided to post a senior level representative in every province, who would sit in the high courts. These representatives would maintain liaison to raise awareness among district bar associations and identify local priority areas and supervise initiatives at the grassroots level. On the occasion, Chief Justice Afridi urged bar representatives to sensitise their respective bar associations and proactively engage in judicial reform initiatives. He directed that the facilities extended to the bars by the government must be structured to ensure better cost for the money spent.
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Iranian Nobel laureate Mohammadi's life at risk
Iranian activist Narges Mohammadi, who won the 2023 Nobel Peace Prize for her fight for women's and human rights in Iran, has received death threats from Tehran, the Nobel Committee said Friday. As per AFP, Mohammadi, who has spent much of the past decade behind bars, was released from Tehran's Evin prison in December for a limited period on medical leave, with her legal team repeatedly warning that she could be re-arrested at any time. Norwegian Nobel Committee chair Jorgen Watne Frydnes said in a statement he had received an "urgent phone call" from Mohammadi, 53, who said her life was now in danger. "The clear message, in her own words, is that 'I have been directly and indirectly threatened with 'physical elimination' by agents of the regime'," he said. "The threats conveyed to Ms Mohammadi make it clear that her security is at stake, unless she commits to end all public engagement within Iran, as well as any international advocacy or media appearances in support of democracy, human rights, and freedom of expression," the statement added. The Committee said it was "deeply concerned" about the threats against Mohammadi and "all Iranian citizens with a critical voice, and call upon the authorities to safeguard not only their lives, but also their freedom of expression." Mohammadi has been repeatedly tried and jailed for her vocal campaigning against Iran's widespread use of capital punishment and its mandatory dress code for women. She won the Nobel primarily for her fight against the oppression of women in Iran. Her children collected the award on her behalf as she was in prison at the time. Mohammadi was quoted by the New York Times as saying she would never stop striving for democracy and equality, even if that meant staying in prison. "I will continue to fight against the relentless discrimination, tyranny and gender-based oppression by the oppressive religious government until the liberation of women," the newspaper quoted her as saying in a statement.
