Ian Paterson: 'Patient's cause of death may be wrongly recorded'
Paterson was jailed for 15 years, later extended to 20 years, in 2017, after being convicted of wounding patients with botched and unnecessary operations, but will be eligible for release in 2027.Ms Worrall was one of 63 women who were treated for breast cancer by him and whose deaths are now being investigated.
'History of cardiac disease'
Carcinomatosis is a condition in which multiple carcinomas develop simultaneously, usually after spreading from a primary source.Paterson said he did not believe Ms Worrall had died of carcinomatosis and breast carcinoma, as two letters addressed to her GP by consultants in the weeks before she died made no reference to her being terminally ill."She had a long history of cardiac disease and it was not on her death certificate," he said."It could have been a cardiac event and breast cancer should have been down as entry two [for cause of death]."
Paterson made a similar claim during the inquest of Elaine Morris, whose cause of death he also believed was incorrectly recorded. Ms Morris had also had a recorded cause of death as carcinomatosis and breast carcinoma.Paterson told Ms Morris's inquest he was concerned she had died after an opiate overdose she received during hospice care.However, two oncologists acting as experts to the inquests disagreed with Paterson's claim as she had only been given "entry level doses" of two opioids for pain relief.This led Judge Richard Foster, the coroner for the Paterson inquests, to reject Paterson's theory she had died as a result of the overdose.
'Worrying new symptom'
While other inquests are determining whether Paterson's treatment of them led to their unnatural deaths Briony Ballard, counsel to this hearing, said it was not linking Ms Worrall's death to Paterson's treatment, but was instead looking at criticisms of the care he gave her.One of the concerns was that Ms Worrall should have undergone a diagnostic ultrasound as well as the mammogram that was performed on her.Paterson agreed the 85-year-old should have had an ultrasound, given her age and the "worrying new symptom" she was presenting with - nipple inversion and discharge."I don't think her assessment was complete enough in 1998 to assert there was no problem," he said.Paterson said an ultrasound should have been carried out by the consultant radiologist, Dr Kaushik Bhatt.The inquests continue.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
8 minutes ago
- BBC News
Covid Inquiry: 'Lessons can be learned' from care home lockdowns
Locking down care homes to protect residents from Covid was "one of the most difficult decisions" that had to be made throughout the pandemic, Northern Ireland's former commissioner for older people has told the UK Covid Lynch said his office heard distressing stories from families about loved ones whose conditions deteriorated due to not receiving family said he hoped lessons can be learned and that concrete changes can be made to how care homes will cope in the case of a future inquiry, sitting in London, is examining the impact of the pandemic on social care including people who lived in care homes and those receiving domiciliary care at home. Visitor ban consequences 'more serious than we initially expected' "I was aware of the impact that this was going to have on people, but at that stage it seemed like people's right to protect their lives trumped everything else," Mr Lynch told the inquiry that he had supported the visiting policy following advice from experts that fewer people going in and out of care homes from the community would reduce the risk for people in those care home he said that after a period of time he realised that the negative side of that policy was "very serious and probably more serious than we initially expected"."It was clear to me that for many older people that that system meant that they didn't see family members face to face for the last weeks or months of their lives."It was a very awful position to be in and I think in the future we need to weigh up the risk associated with contracting the virus and putting in place measures that allows continued social contact and direct human contact with family members," he added. Mr Lynch said that in those early stages of the pandemic care homes were in the firing line and it felt greater attention was being given to hospitals instead of care homes, when the care homes were clearly "more vulnerable". In March 2020, 23% of the population in Northern Ireland were older people, which is defined as those aged 60 years and former commissioner said from the outset of the pandemic he reminded officials that everyone needed to stop referring to care homes as buildings but instead as people's inquiry is examining how Northern Ireland dealt with personal protective equipment (PPE), testing and tracing the infection, discharge policy and Lynch said that in many of these areas "Northern Ireland played catch up" and testing could have been introduced at an earlier stage, but instead there was a feeling of "push back."He said, within the first couple of months, they knew the "devastating impact" the pandemic was having on care told the inquiry that experts were telling him that testing and tracing the virus was "critical" for care homes to get a handle on it, but that he felt testing was "far too slow in coming". Testing 'could have been done weeks earlier' When a testing programme was introduced by the Department of Health which became regular, Mr Lynch said he had " deep frustration" at the speed of that and what he saw was "a lack of urgency about how important that was in response to the pandemic".Mr Lynch claimed testing could have been introduced and ramped up earlier and that while resources may have been one of the issues, he did not believe it was entirely about said in the early stages there did not seem to be "a huge appetite" for testing, particularly in care home settings and that the roll out of testing could have been done weeks Lynch told the inquiry that the weaknesses of the social care sector for older people were "horribly exposed at the outset of the pandemic".He said that the pandemic had a devastating impact on older people and those with underlying health care problems who were at most risk."The nature of the virus was difficult to control once it got into those settings, " Mr Lynch asked about draft guidance that was issued by the DOH on 16 March 2020, Mr Lynch said the guidance was limited and there was little opportunity for others to influence it.
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Air ambulance called to Ozzy Osbourne's home before he died
An air ambulance was called to Ozzy Osbourne's country home before he died, it has emerged. The helicopter landed in a field close to Welders House, the Black Sabbath singer's Grade II listed house in Jordans, Buckinghamshire, on Tuesday morning. Urgent calls from the house had led the emergency services to believe Osbourne's life was in danger, MailOnline reported. The singer's death at the age of 76 was announced in a statement by his family on Tuesday night. Police officers are not thought to have attended the property, and the death has not been referred to the county's coroner. The helicopter was reportedly dispatched from the Thames Valley ambulance base at RAF Benson in Wallingford, Oxfordshire, 27 miles from Osbourne's home. It was seen landing at 10.30am before taking off again at around 12.30pm. The crew were airborne for around 15 minutes before landing in the grounds of the house. They were with Osbourne for around two hours, it was reported. One resident, who did not wish to be named, told MailOnline: 'I went out to have a look and saw that it was landing close to Ozzy's house. 'All of us were talking about it and wondering what had happened. We immediately feared it may be for him as he was known to be in fragile health.' A spokesman for Thames Valley Air Ambulance said: 'We can confirm that our helicopter was dispatched to provide advanced critical care at an incident near Chalfont St Giles yesterday.'
Telegraph
17 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The truth behind the autism curve
In the year 2000, autism was considered a very rare condition, affecting just 1 in 150 British children. Now it's seen as common. According to a 2021 estimate from Newcastle University, as many as one in 57 British children are on the autistic spectrum. Those figures don't even touch on the number of people who have been diagnosed with autism in adulthood, or have come to the conclusion that they are autistic without having an official diagnosis. In March 2024, there were 89,531 open referrals for autism diagnoses for adults on the NHS, demonstrating just how dramatically perceptions of this condition have changed. Are people actually more likely to be autistic today than they were 25 years ago, or are they simply just more likely to be diagnosed as such? It's complicated, says Professor Gina Rippon, a neuroscientist at Aston University in Birmingham and a world-leading expert on autism. In the US, but also in Britain, there's 'a lot of self-diagnosing going on', she believes, which skews the picture: 'You don't need to register [in official statistics] to proclaim that you have autism on social media.' But when you look at how autism has been diagnosed in previous decades, it should be no surprise that some people have claimed the label for themselves, she says. 'Lots of autistic people have gone undiagnosed for years, many of them women and girls, because of fixed views of what autism is,' says Rippon. In recent years 'the idea of what autism is has become much more inclusive, but at the same time, it has also become much harder to pin down'. How has our understanding of autism changed? Today, autism is defined as 'a developmental disorder characterised by difficulties in social interaction, communication, and repetitive patterns of behaviour', according to the ICD-10, the diagnostic manual used in Britain and many countries around the world to assess people for autism and ADHD, as well as most health problems. But in the past, doctors – like many people outside the profession – had a fixed expectation of what constituted autism in a patient. It was typically thought of as a disability that severely impeded communication, which would mean that people with it needed to attend special needs schools and could never live independently. Cases of 'high-functioning' autism believed to be rare. These people would often be highly intelligent, but they would struggle to make eye contact, be uninterested in socialising and have few friends, and have little empathy for others – and inevitably, they'd be male. In Britain in 2000, four men were diagnosed as autistic for every one woman. When Rippon first began her work, in the 1970s, when it came to autism, 'people weren't looking at women,' she says. 'They couldn't find any to study who had been diagnosed, or at least there were too few to make up a reasonable sample for research.' Modern science suggests that there may be nearly as many autistic women as men, however. Rippon says previously girls might have been diagnosed 'with eating disorders or anxiety'. 'There is some recent research to demonstrate that women are making up the bulk of adulthood diagnoses,' she adds. These days, some experts like Rippon believe that adult women display a type of autism that is less easy to spot under the current diagnostic criteria. 'Autistic women are often desperate to be social and really want to belong, but they don't have the same social instincts as other people and struggle to understand social rules,' she explains. Women with autism may also be more likely to 'mask' their symptoms than men, which can take a toll emotionally. 'It's not that these are two different conditions, and it's also not a prescriptive rule,' Rippon notes. Some autistic men, many of whom might be highly intelligent and successful, display these behaviours too, and may also not have been diagnosed as children. The decision to fold Asperger's into Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) Asperger's syndrome used to be a diagnosis of its own, within the umbrella of autism, but the two were merged in 2013 to create a single diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Though Asperger's is often thought of as 'mild' or high-functioning autism, it was formally defined as 'autism without any delay in language abilities,' says Geoffrey Bird, a professor of cognitive neuroscience at the University of Oxford. In practice, 'no one was using Asperger's correctly as a diagnosis, so it got thrown out,' he says. On top of that, autism has only been conceptualised as a 'spectrum' since the 1990s. The idea that autistic people can have a range of symptoms is also relatively new. 'A statistic that's always quoted is that autism diagnoses have risen by 787 per cent since 1998,' says Rippon. The decision to fold Asperger's into ASD was 'slightly political', she believes, and it also coincided with widespread internet use and the much greater awareness of autism that came with it. 'People in general, but especially teachers, have become much more aware of autism without intellectual disabilities, so children might be more likely to be referred for autism assessments and adults might be more likely to seek them out,' Bird says. Diagnosing autism is complex Unlike Rippon, Bird doesn't believe that autistic women 'tend to have a specific type of autism that previously we've been bad at spotting', though he agrees with Rippon that 'it might be the case that clinicians were previously biased against diagnosing women, which I think has changed'. More than anything else, he says, autism has become much less stigmatised, which is a positive for people with the condition, but can occasionally prove unhelpful for clinicians. On one hand, 'people who ought to have been diagnosed in the past are now seeking diagnosis and receiving support,' he says. On the other, 'I've heard from at least two clinicians that some patients who might better suit a different diagnosis, like borderline personality disorder, refuse to engage with clinicians when they are labelled in this way, but will engage once they're diagnosed with autism, as they feel that it's a less stigmatised label,' Bird says. 'I've also worked with HR professionals who have found that people suddenly produce autism diagnoses after they are accused of misconduct,' he adds. 'There are a million things that could make you behave in a way that looks like you're autistic, and it's very easy to fake. Certainly there are people who are being diagnosed with autism who shouldn't be, as well as many who should.' Every person with autism is different It isn't that rogue doctors are handing out labels to help people get away with bad behaviour. Rather, even world-leading experts disagree on what autism actually is and can find it hard to formally diagnose. The famous 'mind in the eyes test', developed by the Cambridge University Autism Research Centre, which asks people to guess another person's feelings from a picture of their eyes alone – something that autistic people were assumed to find hard, or even impossible – has been used for years to explain what autism is and who has it. It is based on the theory that autistic people struggle to read others' minds. But struggling to read others' emotions, to hold eye contact and empathise with other people, ' is actually a separate condition in itself, called alexythymia,' Bird says. Just half of autistic people display alexythymia, he believes, and non-autistic people can have it too. Professor Jen Cook, from the University of Birmingham, believes that autism could also have a lot to do with our bodies as well as our brains and how we empathise with others. 'There's a mathematical principle called the minimum jerk equation, which says that humans move in the most fluid way possible, and we used to believe that this applied to everyone. Now there is evidence that autistic people tend not to move in this minimally jerky way,' Cook says. 'In adults with autism, a lot of clinicians comment that their movements look similar to how people move when they have Parkinson's disease.' In future, she believes, assessments of how autistic adults move could be used as a diagnostic tool. This feature of the condition could even underlie some symptoms, 'as autistic people often struggle to imitate how other people move, or their facial expressions, which could be to do with the same mechanisms that cause them to move differently,' Cook explains. 'But that's not to say that all autistic people move in this way – just that it's common,' she adds. This is an example of the huge challenge that comes with diagnosing autism in children and adults alike: modern research increasingly points to the fact that it's a condition with no single symptom common to everyone who has it. There is also no blood test or brain scan that can be used to reach an objective conclusion. 'There are many ways that you can come to an autism diagnosis,' says Cook. This process can currently include assessments of everything from a person's ability to empathise, to the intensity of their personal interests, to how much rapport a clinician feels with them. Where one clinician might think that someone is clearly autistic, another would let them go without a diagnosis. Should autism be diagnosed in adults? Now that we understand the true scope of what autism can be, is it worth diagnosing the condition in adulthood at all? 'I've been overwhelmed by the number of people who have told me that finally having a diagnosis has been life-changing in a positive way,' says Rippon. 'It's not that people are waking up and wanting to adopt a label that they think is fashionable. Often, it's a way to make sense of life – and for people who are diagnosed in their thirties, forties or fifties, often those are lives that have been very difficult without that self-knowledge.' As for why there seem to be more autistic adults these days than there were in previous decades, 'I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that autism itself is becoming more common,' says Bird. 'I don't buy claims that it's all down to vaccines and chemicals in our water' and he also does not find the arguments that screen time or food additives cause autism to be convincing. The condition has a large genetic component, with almost 800 genes believed to be involved in determining whether someone is autistic. In a family where one child has been diagnosed with autism, the chance that one of their siblings will also be autistic is 20 per cent, much higher than the best estimate for the rate of autism in the general adult population, which is believed to be between 1 and 3 per cent globally. Perhaps the increase in awareness of autism in recent years, and the improved treatment of autistic people that has come with it, simply means that 'more autistic people are finding happy relationships and having children as a result,' Bird says. Surely that is no bad thing.
