
Inflation is down but prices remain high: when will the cost-of-living crisis end?
That's the good news: things generally aren't getting more expensive at the same breakneck pace that they were a couple of years ago.
Then there's the bad news: the biggest inflationary shock in a generation has left Australia a much more expensive place than it was before the pandemic.
And it could take years for households to catch up.
The headline inflation measure we use is the percentage change in the price of a basket of goods and services, and when it's positive that means the price of things is still increasing.
So even though inflation is now 'back to normal', prices have generally remained at higher levels than usual and for the most part are likely to stay that way.
We're very unlikely to see prices go down across the board (this would be deflation and would mean that something quite bad is happening to the economy).
Sign up: AU Breaking News email
So if prices are much higher and are still rising, the question is: when will the cost-of-living crisis be over?
Enter wage growth.
For the higher prices to feel 'normal' again, we need enough growth in people's wages (and other forms of income) to compensate for all the inflation that occurred over the last couple of years.
Economists refer to this concept as 'purchasing power', or how much your dollar can buy.
One way to figure out how long this might take is to compare the cumulative increase in inflation (the change in the consumer price index, or CPI) since 2020 with the cumulative increase in the wage price index (WPI), and then make some assumptions about how much they might increase in the future.
Once cumulative wage growth overtakes the overall increase in consumer prices, then we're finally back to living costs feeling like they did in 2020.
So how long will this be? Well, if inflation averages 2.5% per year from now on (the midpoint of the Reserve Bank's 2-3% target range), and wage growth averages 3.5%, things won't feel normal for at least another three years:
You can change the assumptions in the chart for higher or lower values and see what you get, though the time series from the present onwards is capped at 10 years.
(Another way of doing this is to combine the two indices to get 'real wages'.)
However, the wage price and consumer price indices are just one narrow way to look at this issue.
WPI measures hourly wage and salary rates, so it doesn't capture other aspects of a worker's compensation like additional hours worked or promotions, according to Trent Wiltshire, an economist at the Grattan Institute.
Wiltshire says there are other measures, such as average weekly earnings, that can measure people's income in a more comprehensive way.
'There are broader measures [than WPI] that capture the fact that people can work more hours in a stronger labour market, and in a stronger labour market people are more likely to get promoted if they're switching jobs, or if firms are keen to keep workers,' he said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
'One of the great things we've seen since Covid is that unemployment has remained low, but it has taken a while for that to flow through to higher wages.'
Weekly earnings have increased faster than WPI over the past two years, meaning that if we index them to compare with CPI in a similar way, then they have just caught up.
And on the inflation side, the Australian Bureau of Statistics also publishes a better measure of cost of living than CPI, though it is less known. The selected living cost index series shows how price changes affect the living costs of different types of households.
The most notable difference is that the employee living cost index includes the impact of the change in mortgage interest rates, whereas CPI doesn't. So it has grown even more strongly than CPI, due to rate rises in 2022 and 2023.
Here, we can compare the higher living cost index to see how things have changed since 2020 and how much earnings would have to grow to catch up:
Even using these broader and more realistic measures of income and living costs, we end up with the same story: cost of living could remain a major issue for Australians until early 2029.
Of course, a lot can happen over the coming years to change this grim outlook.
The treasurer, Jim Chalmers, has switched his focus from getting inflation back under control to ways to boost growth – his economic reform roundtable later this month will hopefully create some good ideas to this end.
But reforms tend to take a while to bear fruit. In the meantime, Australians are likely to continue to feel under pressure.
CPI and WPI were indexed to 100 in December 2019.
Weekly earnings are the seasonally adjusted 'all employees average weekly total earnings' from the ABS, indexed to 100 in November 2019, then with 'missing' quarterly values between the biannual figures interpolated linearly.
The living cost index is the employee living cost index from the ABS Selected Living Cost Indexes publication, indexed to 100 in December 2019.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Some in BOJ saw scope to hike rates if trade friction eases, June minutes show
TOKYO, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Some Bank of Japan policymakers saw scope to resume interest rate increases once trade friction caused by U.S. tariffs eased, minutes of the bank's June meeting showed, a sign Tokyo's recent trade deal with Washington cleared a key hurdle for more hikes. At the June meeting, many members said the central bank must keep interest rates steady due to downside risks to the economy from U.S. tariffs, the minutes showed on Tuesday. But they also saw inflation overshooting expectations, with some warning that recent rises in food costs could affect public perceptions on future inflation, the minutes showed. "Given high uncertainties, the BOJ would likely pause rate hikes for the time being. But it also must respond flexibly and nimbly, and return to a rate-hike phase depending on U.S. policy developments," one member was quoted as saying. Another member said the BOJ might need to raise rates decisively even when uncertainty remained high, given the fact inflation remained higher than expected. "As wages had been solid and prices had been slightly higher than expected, the Bank would likely shift away from the current wait-and-see approach and consider resuming rate hikes, if trade friction de-escalates," a few members were quoted as saying. The remarks highlight the board's growing attention to upside inflation risks, which led the BOJ to signal its readiness to keep raising rates even as U.S. tariffs clouded the economic outlook. At the June 16-17 meeting, the BOJ kept interest rates steady at 0.5% and decided to decelerate the pace of its balance sheet drawdown next year, signalling its preference to move cautiously in removing remnants of its massive stimulus. The impact of U.S. tariffs was the focus of debate at the June meeting, which was held before Japan clinched a trade deal with the U.S. in July and won cuts to hefty tariffs. While one member cautioned that it would take some time to gauge the impact of U.S. tariffs on corporate earnings, some said the hit to growth from the higher levy could be smaller than initially expected, the minutes of the June meeting showed. Japanese companies appear to have shed their long-held view that wages and prices must be kept low, one member said, adding the focus would be whether firms would keep hiking pay even if their profits are squeezed by U.S. tariffs. "I'm paying attention to the fact we're seeing home-made inflation emerge, as seen in rising wages driven by labour shortages," another member was quoted as saying. In deciding on next year's bond taper plan, some in the board also saw the need to scrutinise the desirable size of the BOJ's balance sheet in the long run, the minutes showed. While one member said it was desirable for the BOJ to eventually reduce monthly bond buying to zero, another said a cut to around 1 trillion yen ($6.8 billion) would suffice, the minutes said. The central bank is currently tapering bond buying so that monthly purchases slow to around 3 trillion yen by March 2026. In an extended taper plan decided in June, the BOJ expects monthly purchases fall to around 2 trillion yen by March 2027. The BOJ kept interest rates steady at a subsequent meeting on July 30-31. But it revised up its inflation forecasts and offered a less gloomy outlook on the economy, keeping alive the possibility of a resumption in rate hikes this year. ($1 = 146.9900 yen)


Reuters
40 minutes ago
- Reuters
Australian job ads fall 1% in July, ANZ-Indeed data shows
SYDNEY, Aug 5 (Reuters) - Australian job advertisements fell in July, dragged down by the education and retail sectors, but that only partly offset the rise in the previous month and suggested the labour market is easing gradually. Data from Australia and New Zealand Banking Group ( opens new tab and employment website Indeed on Tuesday showed the number of job ads fell 1% in July from June, when they rose by a downwardly revised 1.6%. Job ads in July were 0.1% higher than a year earlier, and remained 14.4% higher than pre-pandemic levels. "Still, elevated levels in our job ads series suggest a substantial loosening of the labour market is unlikely," said Aaron Luk, an economist at ANZ. "The series remains within a tight 114–117 range and has largely been tracking sideways since mid-2024." The Reserve Bank of Australia still judges the labour market to be close to full employment, although there are fears the job market may be showing some cracks after the economy added fewer than expected jobs in June and the unemployment rate rose to 4.3%. The central bank is widely expected to cut interest rates by a quarter-point to 3.6% next Tuesday after the closely watched quarterly inflation data surprised on the low side. That followed a shock decision in July to hold rates steady when the market had priced in a cut.


Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Huge change to Qantas Frequent Flyer points - so what does it mean for you?
Millions of Aussies will see their Qantas Frequent Flyer points devalued from today after huge changes were made to the program for the first time in six years. Qantas has increased the number of points required for most reward seats, with business and first class redemptions going up by 15 to 20 per cent. Fees and surcharges are also rising, with the airline justifying the move by claiming they are essential to 'sustain and expand the program'. For business class domestic flights, like Sydney to Melbourne, there will only be a five per cent increase. While the Sydney to London points cost rose by 15 per cent, the fees increased from $473 to $648, or 37 per cent. A Sydney to Melbourne business class seat will go from 18,400 points, plus $55, to 19,300 points, plus $76. A Sydney to London economy purchase will rise from 55,200 points, plus $263, to 63,500 points, plus $263. The good news is Qantas Frequent Flyers will earn up to 25 per cent more points on Qantas domestic flights. Qantas will roll out up to one million additional Classic Reward seats through new deals with Hawaiian Airlines, Finnair, Air France, KLM and Iberia. Qantas Loyalty CEO Andrew Glance said: 'These adjustments will ensure we can continue to invest in enhancing the program for the long term and continue to grow the levels of Classic and Classic Plus Reward seat availability for members year on year.' The value per point is better in premium cabins than in economy. Daniel Sciberras, from Point Hacks - a guide to maximising frequent flyer points and credit card bonus offers – told Daily Mail the changes were fair when put into context. 'No-one likes to see points go up, but the last time Qantas increased their points cost was back in June 2019, so that's a good six years ago now,' he said. 'I don't think they're unreasonable increases because they're in line with the two to three per cent inflation increase every year. 'A lot of these frequent flyer changes get a lot of heat because they don't go up at all for a number of years, then they do one big increase.' Mr Sciberras claimed there was a good reason for infrequent increases. 'I think part of that is IT issues. They're very complex in the way these programs are set up, so that's why I suspect they don't change them frequently,' he said. 'It's a lengthy process when they change the figures.' Mr Sciberras said the changes to the program didn't affect the strategy Aussies should use to get the most out of their points. 'You'll still get the best bang for your buck by redeeming your points for long-haul international premium seats,' he said. 'That will always get you more value than redeeming points for an economy flight between Sydney and Melbourne.' Before this week's changes, one Qantas Point for Classic Rewards translated to around two cents for economy flights and eight cents for business flights. The Qantas Frequent Flyer program has more than 16.5million members and is Australia's largest loyalty program.