Peterborough council approves new budget with cuts and tax rise
The agreed council tax increase equates to a rise of £1.59 a week for a Band D property.The budget also reduces the amount of community leadership funding received by each councillor, to be used to support schemes in their wards, from £3,000 to £1,000.The council hopes to save about £300,000 a year through several staffing reductions and changes across corporate services.It also proposed to increase cremation and burial fees by 10%.Following public outcry, plans to mothball the city's lido were reversed, meaning the facility on Bishop's Road will reopen in the spring, with the goal of attracting additional income.Other budget proposals, including closing loss-making cafes at the Lido, Flag Fen, Vivacity Premier Fitness, and the museum and art gallery, have been paused.
'Help for those who need most'
The council said in 2025/26 it would be spending more money on care for the elderly and vulnerable and supporting children and families. It said growth and regeneration of the city would also remain a priority, to attract better-paid jobs for residents and put more money into the local economy.The budget was passed with 21 votes in favour, 18 against and 11 abstentions.Labour's Dennis Jones, leader of the council, said: "We adapted our draft budget following feedback from the public, and we adapted our new updated corporate strategy following feedback during the Shaping Our City consultation."We will continue to keep listening, and engaging with residents, as we strive to achieve the priorities set out in our updated corporate strategy."
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Spectator
Starmer's Palestine U-turn shows how dangerous he is
We often think of Sir Keir Starmer as the dull bureaucrat, all at sea in politics – a Prime Minister who is elevated from the concerns of so many of his colleagues, and who just can't relate to them. Starmer is certainly a leader on the defensive: pushed around by his backbenchers, rather than the man who delivered a Labour landslide who has then plotted his government's direction of travel. But in any meaningful sense, the 'worthy but dull' caricature of the PM is plain wrong – and demonstrably so. Starmer may, for example, rightly, be seen as the U-turn PM, but when he performs his reverse ferrets he always (with one notable exception) ends up in the same anything-but-worthy and anything-but-dull place: pushing the policies of the Labour left. Because the point about Starmer that actually matters is a variation on the lawyer/bureaucrat caricature. It's that he has no political, principled or moral compass, which is why he folds so easily when he is pushed. And it's why he is far more dangerous as Prime Minister than the misleading caricature. Take recognition of a Palestinian state. Last Friday, Starmer's response to the letter by 221 MPs demanding immediate recognition was to reject it on the basis that recognition 'must be part of a wider plan which ultimately results in a two-state solution and lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis. This is the way to ensure it is a tool of maximum utility to improve the lives of those who are suffering – which of course, will always be our ultimate goal.' Given that Starmer always ends up doing the opposite of anything important that he announces, it was obvious that he would soon be announcing recognition. But this U-turn was swift even by Starmer's standards. Yesterday, just four days later, he announced a 'wider plan' – but it was a plan for recognition, in September, rather than one for the 'lasting security for Palestinians and Israelis' he had said was a pre-requisite in his earlier statement. Quite the opposite, in fact: in his announcement yesterday he used recognition as a form of punishment beating for the Israelis, saying that if they complied with his various conditions – one of which, a ceasefire, lies in the gift of Hamas – then he would not recognise a Palestinian state, but knowing that all the conditions are placed on Israel, and none on Hamas. It is, literally, a reward for terror: had Hamas not massacred 1,200 Jews on October 7 2003 there would be no Gaza war and there would be no immediate recognition of a (non-existent) Palestinian state. Worthy? Dull? More like amoral and unprincipled. There has been a similar lack of principle in his approach to welfare. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall was charged by Starmer with coming up with a plan that both saved money and restored the incentive to work, seeking to reduce the incentive to remain on benefits. Her plan was far from perfect, but it was a start – and it did what she was asked to do. But when he faced pressure from Labour MPs, he caved, humiliating Kendall and demonstrating to everyone that he has the backbone of a jellyfish. Even on a central tenet of his so-called mission for government, he has no principles. If he is pushed, he will fall in the direction of the strongest pushers – who always want to push him towards the left. Exactly the same happened over the winter fuel allowance. It may have been, as the wiseacres have said, politically unwise to stir that hornet's nest in the first place – but once he committed to ending it, folding when MPs protested was far worse. There is one notable exception to this pattern, although it remains an example of Starmer collapsing when pushed: grooming – or, more accurately, rape – gangs. For weeks he rejected the idea of a national inquiry, using spurious arguments and sophistry to hold the line that was favoured by the left of his party, for whom it is racist to examine the link between the assaults and the religion of the rapists. But that position was unsustainable in the face of an overwhelming national demand. So he collapsed and announced an inquiry. Politicians should be judged partly on their words, which matter. But their actions are far more important. If Starmer is judged on his actions, a damning picture emerges of a man incapable of sticking to any one position, lacking in basic principles, willing to do whatever it takes to save his skin and without any moral fibre. Far from being a passing figure who will leave no legacy, Starmer is all the more dangerous for who he really is.
Spectator
7 minutes ago
- Spectator
Watch: Neville turns his guns on Starmer
Back to Gary Neville, the left-wing right-back who has never met a camera he didn't like. Just when we thought he'd disappeared from our screens for good, the lefty ex-footballer has reared his head again to take a pop at, er, Labour. That's a turnaround for the books! Speaking to Sky News this morning, the card-carrying Labour member decided to opine on some of the Treasury's decision-making of late. First caveating that he is very much in favour the government's choice to up the minimum wage – 'I honestly believe that people, to be fair, should be paid more', the millionaire pundit confessed – Neville turned his guns on Sir Keir Starmer: I did think that once there was a change of government and once there was some stability, that we would get something settling. But it's not settling locally in our country… I do think that the National Insurance rise, though, was a challenge accepting that we need to raise money for services. We all talk about the requirement of great transport, great education, great health service, great police and emergency services. We all want these things in our lives. We want these things in our country, and the money's got to come from somewhere. But I honestly don't believe that companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people. So I think the National Insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back, particularly in terms of the way in which the economy was. Oh dear. The former right-back tends to be more comfortable attacking the Tories. You know things are going badly for Starmer when even Neville is wading in… Watch the clip here:
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Gary Neville hits out at Rachel Reeves over national insurance hike
Gary Neville has hit out at Rachel Reeves for her national insurance hike, saying it has hampered employment and 'could have been held back'. The ex-Manchester United star said the chancellor has significantly increased the burden on businesses and that the national insurance increase was 'a challenge'. Mr Neville was a vocal backer of Labour at the last general election, at one point walking in the fells of the Lake District with Sir Keir Starmer for a video endorsing the party. But he has now joined business leaders and economists in attacking the chancellor's decisions since entering government. Critics say Ms Reeves and Sir Keir's doom and gloom in the wake of the election, as well as the chancellor's tax-hiking October Budget, held back the economy. Speaking to Sky's Business Live, Mr Neville, whose firms employ hundreds of staff, said: 'I honestly don't believe that, to be fair, companies and small businesses should be deterred from employing people. So, I think the national insurance rise was one that I feel probably could have been held back, particularly in terms of the way in which the economy was. 'It's been a tough economy now for a good few years and I did think that once there was a change of government, and once there was some stability, that we would get some settling. "But it's not settling locally in our country, but it is not settling actually, to be fair, in many places in the world either.' Mr Neville supported the chancellor's minimum wage increase, which has also piled pressure on some businesses. 'People, to be fair, should be paid more so I don't think that's something that you can be critical of,' he added. But he said: 'I do think that the national insurance rise, though, was a challenge.' The footballer's comments come months before the chancellor's second Budget, in which she is seeking to find billions of pounds of tax hikes and spending cuts to fill a hole left by Labour's chaotic winter fuel U-turn. Ms Reeves was left with a £5bn gap in her spending plans when Sir Keir abandoned his planned benefit cuts, and could need to find billions more due to the fallout from Donald Trump 's global trade war. The global body's latest World Economic Outlook said the economy would grow by 1.2 per cent this year, up from an earlier prediction of 1.1 per cent.
