logo
Woman Constantly ‘Forgets' Wallet When Dining Out with Friend, Then Gets Mad When They Refuse to Pay Her Bill

Woman Constantly ‘Forgets' Wallet When Dining Out with Friend, Then Gets Mad When They Refuse to Pay Her Bill

Yahoo15 hours ago
The woman finally put her foot down, but her friend claims she "embarrassed her" and "made her feel small"NEED TO KNOW
Taking to Reddit, a woman wanted to know if she was in the wrong for refusing to pay for a friend's meal
The woman explained that her friend has a habit of forgetting her wallet
Before meeting up for a meal, the poster told her friend she wouldn't be able to pay for her, but the pal showed up without money anywayA woman is feeling taken advantage of by a friend who keeps conveniently forgetting her wallet when they go out for dinner.
In a recent Reddit post, the 26-year-old explained that her 27-year-old friend is someone she's "known for years."
"She's someone I care about deeply, but lately, I've started to feel taken advantage of," the poster explains. "This isn't the first time she's 'forgotten' her wallet, it's probably the fifth. Every time, I've covered it without saying much because I didn't want to make her feel bad."
However, the poster admits that "it does make [her] feel bad," as she is "not made of money" and also "struggling" financially, "just more quietly, I guess."
Before their recent dinner outing, the poster warned her friend that she couldn't afford to pay for two meals and would only be paying for herself.
"She said that was fine. But when the bill came, she looked at me like she expected me to fix it again," she writes. "And when I said I couldn't, she got cold and upset, ended up calling her boyfriend to pay. Later she messaged me saying I embarrassed her and made her feel small."
While the poster "wasn't trying to be mean," she felt like caving would signify that it "was okay to keep being treated like my boundaries didn't matter."
"I feel awful for how it played out… but I also feel like I needed to stand up for myself," she ends, asking other Redditors if she was in the wrong.
In the replies, most commenters rushed to assure the woman that she had made the right decision and was not wrong to stand up for herself.
"Your 'friend' is using you as an ATM. You set a clear boundary. She ignored it and tried to guilt you," one person replied. "The only person who embarrassed her was herself by assuming your money was hers to spend. Real friends don't weaponize 'kindness' to avoid responsibility."
Multiple users wrote that she was prioritizing "self-respect" instead of sacrificing for the sake of pleasing her friend.
"If saying no ends a friendship, it wasn't a friendship—it was a transaction," one person wrote, with another agreeing and writing, "Choosing self-respect over people-pleasing is like setting a boundary 🔒, and if a 'friendship' can't handle that, then it wasn't really about friendship 💔. Transactions aren't relationships 😎. Love that perspective!"
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer​​, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
One user even had some advice for the woman moving forward: "Make it clear going further if she does try to make you pick up her tab. You will request it back to be paid or expect to be covered in full by her next time."
"Even in the past you should have asked her to reimburse you for every single time you had to pay for her without consent," the commenter continued.
"Good on you for standing up for yourself," they added.
Read the original article on People
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

D-Day veteran and TikTok star 'Papa Jake' Larson dies at 102
D-Day veteran and TikTok star 'Papa Jake' Larson dies at 102

Associated Press

time8 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

D-Day veteran and TikTok star 'Papa Jake' Larson dies at 102

PARIS (AP) — D-Day veteran ″Papa Jake″ Larson, who survived German gunfire on Normandy's bluffs in 1944 and garnered 1.2 million followers on TikTok late in life by sharing stories to commemorate World War II and his fallen comrades, has died at 102. Tributes for 'Story Time with Papa Jake' poured in from followers across the United States, where he had been living in Lafayette, CA., and from towns around Normandy still grateful to Allied forces who helped defeat the occupying Nazis. 'Our beloved Papa Jake has passed away on July 17th at 102 years young,' his granddaughter McKaela Larson posted on his social media accounts. 'He went peacefully and was even cracking jokes til the very end.″ 'As Papa would say, love you all the mostest,' she wrote. Born Dec. 20, 1922, in Owatonna, Minnesota, Larson enlisted in the National Guard in 1938, lying about his age since he was only 15 at the time. In January 1942, he was sent overseas and was stationed in Northern Ireland. He became operations sergeant and assembled the planning books for the invasion of Normandy. He was among the Allied troops who stormed the Normandy shore on D-Day, June 6, 1944, surviving machine-gun fire when he landed on Omaha Beach. He made it unhurt to the bluffs that overlook the beach, then studded with German gun emplacements that mowed down American soldiers. After D-Day, he fought on through the Battle of the Bulge. In recent years, he made repeated trips to Normandy for D-Day commemorations. 'We are the lucky ones,' Larson told The Associated Press at the 81st anniversary of D-Day in June, speaking amid the immaculate rows of graves at the American cemetery overlooking Omaha Beach. 'They had no family. We are their family. We have the responsibility to honor these guys who gave us a chance to be alive.'

Contributor: Kids in camp? Nope. Got a summer schedule? Nope. Cue the mom guilt
Contributor: Kids in camp? Nope. Got a summer schedule? Nope. Cue the mom guilt

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Contributor: Kids in camp? Nope. Got a summer schedule? Nope. Cue the mom guilt

'How's your summer?' a mom asked from across the living room at a baby shower in June. She was standing with a small group of other moms of my daughter's classmates whom I hadn't seen since school ended almost a month earlier. 'It's the best thing that's ever happened to me,' I replied, honestly. From across the coffee table, their eyes widened, and their mouths skewed into disbelieving shapes. I understood the sentiment. The moms on the other side of the table all work year-round full-time jobs that necessitate puzzling together child care for 11 weeks while school is out. For them, that care usually looks like a conglomeration of scattered camps that drastically increase their weekly mental load with challenges of transportation, different start and stop times, and clothing and supply lists for each kid and every camp. As one mom at the party described this stress, her eyes filled with tears, and she wasn't even addressing the ridiculous monetary cost of keeping her kids supervised while she and her husband worked. 'You didn't sign up for any camps, right?' another mom eventually asked. 'No.' I didn't. I'm spending every day with my 5-year-old and 6-year-old. Our only planned activity is an hour of swim team three mornings a week that is run by a local college's swim program and still feels exorbitantly expensive. While recent headlines and TikTok videos about kids forgoing camp to 'rot' or go 'wild' or regress to the perfect ''90s summer' focus on outcomes, my family's conversation was really about the cause: the financial realities of parenthood. Like those moms, I made my summer plans primarily for financial reasons. They need camp so they can go to work; as a teacher, I have flexibility during the summer and don't need child care so I can work — and camp would have cost more than my salary, anyway. This past school year I returned to the classroom for my first full-time job since my oldest child was born in 2018, but I also continued my gig work as a freelance journalist. While my 8-3 job guaranteed a regular paycheck in this unreliable media landscape and matched my kids' school hours, so we wouldn't need to pay for additional child care, freelancing was still the bulk of my income. Thus, I found myself employed but still participating in an 'infinite workday' as I filled my late nights and early mornings with writing. By the time the first camp registrations opened in January, I'd proven that I could meet deadlines outside of normal working hours, and camp for two kids was unjustifiably expensive. My husband agreed with my plan to forgo camp, and I tried to quiet the guilt that my kids would be missing the art or athletic enrichment. Five months later, I was exactly one week into our unscheduled time when the Cut asked, 'Why not let your kids have a 'wild' summer?' The article argued for the benefits of leaving these months unplanned, 'giving kids space to feel dreamy, inspired, excited, or nothing at all.' A week later, the New York Times followed up with its own question: 'Is it OK for your kids to 'rot' all summer?' In its examination, the article goes so far as to declare that summer is 'a parenting Rorschach test' revealing if a parent has a relaxed approach to raising kids as opposed to a focus on 'skill-building and résumé-padding.' pointed out that an unscheduled summer is impractical for working parents. "Good Morning America" argued that such boredom can be beneficial for this generation of overscheduled kids. The Cut ran a counter-argument to its original column that pointed out how taxing 'screen management' can be at home, and Slate bemoaned the pressure that comes with planning "summer de-escalation." At the beginning of July, Vox even questioned if kids are capable of experiencing the "delirious boredom" of a '90s summer. Much of this discussion has been out of touch. From the thorny linguistic implications of the phrase "rot" to the ludicrous notion that every aspect of parenting needs to have merit (even, ironically, doing less), it's all missing the point that most parents don't have the luxury of time for this level of analysis nor for the 'best practices' that such analysis might suggest. They just feel the weight of judgment for failing to have that spare capacity. It also should not go unnoticed that these articles are all written by women and quote women, which mirrors a universal truth about summer: Moms are surely more likely to be both the schedulers of camp and the caretakers of the children not attending them because they are managing about 71% of the planning, organizing and scheduling within their household. After I told those other mothers that this summer was 'the best thing that's ever happened to me,' I immediately felt 'mom guilt.' Not because I think the empty time my kids fill catching dragonflies in the backyard or squirrelling away to their rooms to listen to audiobooks or cuddling with me in bed to watch an afternoon movie — all done amid constant bickering and wrestling — is more or less valuable than time spent in camp, but because my mental load is currently lighter than those of the other moms who were at the shower. This — not whether your kids are at camp or not — feels closer to the real problem. Modern society isn't built to support modern families. From agrarian-based school years to a lack of affordable child-care options and support for parents who are caretaking, every parent is doing the best they can within a system that is failing them in every season. (When the viral load surges this winter, I'm sure we'll be back to talking about parents missing work to care for sick kids.) Summer is just a three-month microcosm of the larger issues facing parents and, more specifically, moms who are desperate for a lessening of their mental load. Ultimately, I think that's what all these articles are really arguing for when you read between the lines. Returning to the idealized '90s summer of my childhood is less about what kids are doing and more about what parents aren't doing. Maybe the one thing each perspective has in common is that parents, especially moms, are justified in wanting to do less cultivating and scheduling of their children, because we all deserve a brief foray into the seemingly endless summers of our childhood before this summer, like all summers, ends. Sarah Hunter Simanson is a parent, teacher and freelance writer in Memphis. If it's in the news right now, the L.A. Times' Opinion section covers it. Sign up for our weekly opinion newsletter. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store