Nassau County jail has held more than 1,400 migrants in 5 months under partnership with ICE
The migrants have been held at East Meadow jail under a partnership with the feds, announcxed by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman earlier this year.
The collaboration set aside 50 cells in the lock-up to help with the Trump administration's immigration crackdown.
4 Nassau County is holding migrants at East Meadow jail in an partnership with ICE.
Edmund J Coppa
'If they are committing crimes in the metropolitan area — they are a threat to Nassau County,' Blakeman told The Post about housing ICE's detainees.
Under the deal, migrants can be held in East Meadow jail for up to 72 hours before ICE either deports them or ships them off to a long-term detention facility, with the feds reimbursing the county for the cost of detaining them.
Nassau County cops have also already handed over at least 15 migrants to ICE since January after discovering they were undocumented during unrelated arrests.
The arrests involved charges ranging from grand larceny to endangering the welfare of a child, according to Nassau Detective Lt. Scott Skrynecki.
Meanwhile, Nassau County officials announced last week that 10 local police officers selected to be deputized as ICE agents under the partnership have now completed their training — and are ready to begin assisting in deportations once they get the green light from the feds.
4 ICE agents seen at Federal Plaza Immigration Court in Manhattan on June 8, 2025.
Michael Nigro
The expansion of Nassau County's partnership with the feds comes after neighboring Suffolk County was slapped with a $60 million fine when a judge ruled the county violated state law and the Fourth Amendment by holding hundreds of migrants past their release dates at ICE's request between 2016 and 2018.
However, Suffolk officials told The Post that many were held past their release dates because ICE failed to pick them up on time.
The suspects had been arrested on unrelated charges and were only identified as undocumented during routine booking, officials added.
4 Nassau County has set aside 50 jail cells for migrants to be held up to 72 hours.
Edmund J Coppa
In Nassau County, most of the migrants who have been held for ICE have been shipped out within the 72-hour window, officials said.
Still, immigration advocates and civil rights groups have raised red flags over the county's entanglement with federal immigration enforcement — warning that Nassau could face similar legal trouble.
Nassau County is already embattled in court cases over the partnership.
4 Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman said the agreement with the feds is 'legal and properly authorized.'
Dennis A. Clark
The New York Civil Liberties Union, which sued the county last month in an effort to block the ICE partnership, argues the program could lead to racial profiling and unlawful detentions if local cops begin acting as immigration agents on Long Island streets.
Blakeman has brushed off those concerns.
'We're confident that all measures taken to protect communities in Nassau County are legal and properly authorized,' he said last month.
In preparation for the partnership with ICE to expand, Nassau recently tweaked its controversial mask ban. The new executive order signed by Blakeman will let cops and federal agents wear face coverings during undercover operations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'I already want to cry.' Undocumented parents prepare for the unthinkable: Giving up their kids
Sonia's son has been anxious lately, crying and asking why their neighbor had been picking him up from preschool instead of his mom. She doesn't know what to tell him. At just 4 years old, he's too young to understand the truth. Sonia has lived in the U.S. without legal status for 25 years, harvesting squash, cilantro and tomatoes in the fields of Riverside County. But she can no longer risk leaving her house to pick up her child for fear of being detained or deported by federal agents. She has begun preparing for something far worse than a missed pickup — the possibility that their separation could become permanent. Last week, Sonia visited the offices of TODEC, a legal center in the Inland Empire serving immigrants and farm workers, to fill out the forms that will allow her sister to take over the care of her three American citizen children — ages 4, 7, and 10 — in the event that she and her husband are deported. "I already want to cry," said Sonia, who requested that her full name not be used to protect her. Since June 6 — when the Department of Homeland Security began widespread raids throughout the Los Angeles region — the number of immigrant parents making emergency arrangements for their children's care has skyrocketed. Parents have flooded legal rights organizations in person and on Zoom for help filling out the forms that will designate another adult to take over responsibility of their children, many of whom are citizens, if they are detained or deported. An estimated 5.62 million American children have an undocumented household member, and nearly 2 million of them are under the age of 6. More than half of these children do not have a parent with legal status, according to a report from the Brookings Institution. It is not clear how many parents have been detained or deported during the recent raids. Since 2018, however, about 60,000 parents of U.S. citizen children have been deported, according to data provided by ICE. Data on what happened to their children isn't readily available, but those who were American citizens most commonly stay in the U.S. if only one parent is deported, said Tara Watson, who directs the Center for Economic Security and Opportunity at Brookings. Read more: Will mom get detained? Is dad going to work? Answering kids' big questions amid ICE raids Parents who are detained by ICE are "asked if they want to be removed with their children, or ICE will place the children with a safe person the parent designates," Department of Homeland Security Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. "DHS takes its responsibility to protect children seriously and will continue to work with federal law enforcement to ensure that children are safe and protected." McLaughlin said that parents in the country illegally "can take control of their departure" with a the CBP Home Mobile Application, an app with services provided by U.S. Customs and Border Protection. "The United States is offering illegal aliens $1,000 and a free flight to self-deport now," McLaughlin said. "We encourage every person here illegally to take advantage of this offer and reserve the chance to come back to the U.S. the right legal way to live the American dream. If not, you will be arrested and deported without a chance to return." Some families choose to take their children with them to their country of origin. One study estimated that from 2014-2018, there were 80,000-100,000 U.S. citizen children in Mexico as the result of parental deportation. Legal advocacy groups in California are encouraging families to prepare for the possibility of separation and are helping parents fill out the requisite forms that designate another adult to care for their children in their absence. Although some want to shift legal guardianship to another adult, that process can take several months, requires a judge's approval, and involves giving up their parental rights. Many more are instead filling out a simple form called a "Caregiver's Authorization Affidavit" that permits another adult to enroll their child in school and authorize medical care. Demand for help filling out these affidavits has increased exponentially. What used to be the occasional workshop for 20 parents has become a regular series of Zoom and in-person meetings that have reached more than a thousand, said Andres Cifuentes, an attorney at Bet Tzedek Legal Services, a nonprofit law firm in L.A. 'We've heard about children having nightmares about the possibility of being separated," he said. "We encourage parents to have this conversation in a very calm manner as if preparing for an earthquake or a flood." Luz Gallegos, executive director of TODEC, said most people are seeking help virtually because they are too afraid to leave their homes. And it's not just an influx of parents who are living in the country without legal status. For the first time, Gallegos said TODEC is seeing parents with DACA, green cards holders, and even naturalized citizens preparing for possible deportation. TODEC also runs a youth leadership and development program for the children of immigrant parents called "Monarcas Luchadoras," where they are learning how to help their families create preparedness plans and packing groceries for members of the community who are too afraid to leave their houses right now. TODEC recommends that parents pick someone who has citizenship or legal permanent residency, so they are not at risk. Gallegos said she has personally been asked by so many families to serve as caregiver that she has lost count. 'I feel like if you say yes to one, you have to say yes to all of them.' Instead, she tries to help parents think through their safety nets. Many families end up selecting teachers, child-care providers or people from their faith communities, rather than family members who are also likely to be immigrants. Susan, an immigrant from Guatemala who lives in L.A., has been a nanny for 18 years. She has a strong community of other immigrants but asked her former employer whose child she cared for during the pandemic and who is white, to be her three children's caregiver if she is deported. Susan requested that her full name not be used to protect her. "I know that her and her husband's word will be respected," Susan said. "If a Guatemalan citizen goes to fight for my children, obviously their rights won't be respected." Read more: Child-care providers brace for a painful scenario: What if ICE comes knocking? Susan, who is in her 30s, has lived in the U.S. for half her life, and her husband has been here for 30 years. During the pandemic they were essential workers, she said, providing child care, cleaning houses and doing construction. "And now we are criminals," she said. Signing the caregiver forms was "one of the most difficult decisions that I've had to make as a mom, because I feel like I am giving away my children. But I don't want them to be taken by the government if I have to go with immigration." But parents like Susan "understood that they were in the country illegally, and that this could potentially happen," said Ira Mehlman, spokesperson for the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which favors stricter immigration controls. "It is unfortunate that the kids are put in this situation, but like any other parent, they are responsible for the consequences of their decisions on their kids." He said parents of U.S. citizen children should not be given special leniency for exemptions from deportation. Mehlman favors the elimination of birthright citizenship, which President Trump called for in an executive order. A federal judge last week prohibited the order from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. Numerous studies have found that the deportation of a parent can have a profound impact on a child, including long-term developmental and behavior issues, depression and academic decline. "Following deportation of a family member, children demonstrate numerous emotional and behavioral challenges, such as eating and sleeping changes, anxiety, sadness, anger, and withdrawal," according to a 2018 policy statement from the Society for Community Research and Action, a division of the American Psychological Assn. "Even if the family is ultimately reunited, the consequences of their forced family separation often remain." For very young children in particular, separation from a parent is "tremendously traumatizing," said Sherry Berg, a clinical psychologist at Para Los Niños, which runs seven Head Start programs in Los Angeles County. Separation anxiety — the fear of being separated from the primary caregiver and something happening to them — is a normal part of early childhood development; a parent's actual deportation is "their worst nightmare." Sara, a Guatemalan immigrant from South-Central L.A., said she is thinking of self-deporting with her 9-year-old son, who is a citizen. They haven't left their apartment in weeks, except for the occasional errand to a grocery store and a quick trip to the post office to secure a passport for him. Her son does not want to move to Guatemala, a country he's never been to. "What he's told me is that in October when classes start, then hopefully the raids will have calmed for school," said Sara. In Riverside, Sonia said she's tried to shield her 4- and 7-year-old children from what is happening. But her 10-year-old has been asking about what's going to happen to his family. "Before summer vacation, the teacher called me and told me that she was going to have him evaluated, so that they could give him psychological help because he is very anxious," she said. Both she and her husband are from Michoacan, Mexico, a state fraught with drug cartel violence. She said they fear the conflict there, and work is hard to come by. If only one of them is deported, the other will stay in the U.S. to raise the children. If both are deported, she wants her children to stay in the U.S., where they are safe and have opportunities — at least until the parents figure out whether they can make a new life for the family in Mexico. Undocumented children whose parents are deported often stay under the radar by going to live with other family members, said Watson said. But those who come under the purview of ICE are often transferred to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, which may place them in institutional settings while looking for a sponsor. Maria, a home child-care provider in Highland Park with 20 years of experience, said she was recently asked by the mother of an undocumented 11-year-old at her day care if she would be willing to adopt her — permanently. 'I could feel her pain. She was saying, 'She's going to be yours. I'm not going to ask for her back," said Maria, who requested that her full name not be used to protect her. "I was speechless. It was a very drastic decision.' The mother was from Honduras, where her nephew was recently murdered, and she was terrified for her daughter's safety, Maria said. "I could see her fear in her eyes and her tears.' Maria had been caring for the girl for five years, and agreed to see a lawyer to discuss the options. But before they were able to go, she said the mother and child were picked up by federal agents. 'I was heartbroken," Maria said. "I would have adopted her." This article is part of The Times' early childhood education initiative, focusing on the learning and development of California children from birth to age 5. For more information about the initiative and its philanthropic funders, go to Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Miami Herald
32 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
‘Very Serious': Russia Says Trump Sent Signal to Ukraine
The Kremlin said U.S. President Donald Trump signaled to Ukraine that it should continue the war after he said he would send more weapons to Kyiv and threatened Russia with secondary sanctions unless it makes peace. Dmitry Peskov, spokesman for the Russian President Vladimir Putin, called Trump's statement "very serious" in his daily press briefing on Tuesday, July 15. Peskov said Putin would need time to analyze Trump's remarks, some of which were directed at him, and to decide whether to comment. Trump said he was considering a 100 percent secondary tariff on countries trading with Russia unless Putin makes peace in 50 days. He also said he would send more Patriot air defense missiles to Ukraine, and that European NATO allies would fund more "sophisticated" offensive American weapons for Kyiv. "For now, one thing can be said unequivocally: It seems that such decisions made in Washington, in NATO countries, and directly in Brussels, are perceived by the Ukrainian side not as a signal toward peace, but as a signal toward the continuation of war," Peskov said, originally in Russian. This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow. Related Articles Trump Raised Striking Moscow, St Petersburg in Zelensky Call: ReportsDonald Trump Changes His Tune on NATOTop Putin Ally Reacts to Trump's Big Ukraine MovesCan Trump's Patriot Missiles Help Ukraine Turn the Tide Against Russia? 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Newsweek
36 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert Face Uncertain Futures
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert are the liberal faces of their networks, Comedy Central and CBS, respectively. They've been fixtures on the television circuit for decades. But under the second Trump administration and ahead of Paramount's proposed merger with Skydance Media, their futures seem uncertain. Newsweek has reached out to representatives for Stewart and Colbert via email. The Context Stewart and Colbert are stalwarts of the television world. Stewart is the long-running host of The Daily Show on Comedy Central, which he hosted from 1999 to 2015. He hosted The Problem with Jon Stewart on Apple TV+ from 2021 to 2023 and returned part time to The Daily Show in 2024. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty Colbert has hosted the CBS talk show The Late Show with Stephen Colbert since September 2015. Prior to that, he hosted the Comedy Central news satire show The Colbert Report from 2005 to 2014. Stewart and Colbert are liberal and have long been critical of President Donald Trump. After Trump won the 2024 presidential election against former Vice President Kamala Harris, Colbert said on his show: "After a bizarre and vicious campaign fueled by a desperate need not to go to jail, Donald Trump has won the 2024 election" and added: "The deep shock and sense of loss is enormous." Stewart said during his U.S. election coverage, in part: "I promise you, this is not the end. And we have to regroup, and we have to continue to fight, and continue to work day in and day out to create the better society for our children for this world." An Uncertain Future The media has long been populated with liberal voices—Colbert and Stewart are far from the only high-profile television figures to have spoken out against or criticized Trump. So why is the future specifically uncertain for the liberal faces of CBS and Comedy Central? It comes down, in part down to the Paramount-Skydance merger, and Paramount's recent settling of a lawsuit with Trump. Paramount Global agreed to pay $16 million to settle the lawsuit, which stemmed from a claim made by Trump that 60 Minutes unfairly edited a video with Harris to make her look better and bolster her election chances. CBS denied the claims and said that the edits were routine. Paramount, which owns CBS, settled the suit and said that the money will go to Trump's future presidential library and to pay his legal fees. It did not apologize or express regret. The deal was announced prior to a meeting with shareholders, according to the Associated Press. It has been reported that the company sought to put the issue to bed. It seeks the approval from the Trump administration for the merger with Skydance. News of the merger came in July 2024, when it was announced that the two companies would merge in a deal valued at $8 billion and form a new entity known as "Paramount Skydance Corporation." The transaction is ongoing and is expected to close on or before October. The deal requires approval from the Federal Communications Commission, which is led by Brendan Carr, a Republican and Trump supporter. Skydance was founded by David Ellison in 2006, and his father, Larry Ellison, co-founder of the Oracle Corporation, is also involved in the operation of the company. Larry Ellison is investing $6 billion into the merger and is putting up a majority stake in the deal, according to a 2024 report from The Hill. Both men are Trump supporters. Shifting Media Landscape Newsweek spoke with Matt Navarra, a news personality and social media consultant, about the shifting media landscape and the potential implications on Stewart and Colbert. Navarra said in a voice message shared with Newsweek that both men are "iconic voices in political comedy," but that as Skydance edges in, "Their future does hinge on a new leadership's appetite for their brand of satire." Newsweek also spoke with Rodney Benson, a professor in the Department of Media, Culture, and Communication and an affiliated faculty member of the Department of Sociology at New York University. He said that "In a future company controlled by Skydance, it's easy to imagine that Stewart's and Colbert's shows could be short-lived." "Whether as a matter of principle or to defend the consistency of their brand and to maintain the loyalty of their audience, neither host is going to suddenly start kowtowing to the Trump administration if that's the condition of staying," Benson said. "Stewart has already positioned himself as fearless," Navarra said, pointing to Stewart's discussion of the lawsuit on The Daily Show on July 7. In it, Stewart joked: "So the implication is you don't get your $8 billion you give me a tremendous amount of money.... I'm obviously not a lawyer, but I did watch Goodfellas—that sounds illegal." "It doesn't feel like scrutiny on news networks—it feels like fealty," Stewart continued on the show, adding, "That they are being held to a standard that will never be satisfactory to Donald Trump. No one can ever kiss his ass enough." He also described the settlement as "Flat-out protection money." Navarra said that "he's doubled down on the idea that media integrity matters more than corporate appeasement." Of Colbert, Navarra said, "He's more entwined with CBS' legacy of the late-night structure. "They have to have what it takes to succeed independently, but not if it relies on old structures." So, what could be an alternative to these old structures? "The thing to watch for is them signing first-look deals with Netflix, HBO or Audible, places that value strong, editorial voices," Navarra said. "Voices like Stewart and Colbert either have to find sanctuary off network, thinking like streaming, nonprofits or tone down their edge if they're gonna stay within big media." Navarra added: "I think we can expect fewer barbs on air, more nuanced comedy and soft-pedaled critiques, until independent platforms thrive." He said that he thinks the next wave of left-leaning media may "emerge outside legacy platforms funded by subscribers rather than sponsors." Navarra also pointed to "podcasts, streaming or independent media," where "permissionless speech will thrive." Benson, meanwhile, said that"It's possible to imagine that either show might find a home at Comcast's cable spinoff Versant, either as part of MSNBC or another channel. But Versant may not be particularly eager to be next in line to face the full-scale political wrath of this administration." "No one wants to risk a protracted legal struggle and the threat this could pose to their bottom line. "There is a real audience and a market for what they [Stewart and Colbert] have to offer, both creatively and politically," Benson continued. However, "Their audiences are aging and declining (or at best holding steady), and this older audience is less likely to find the shows if they relocate to podcasts or other online platforms." Benson also pointed to Stewart and Colbert finding a place on a major streaming service, noting that if they are unable to do that, the hosts may struggle to attain the same audience reach. How their futures develop may also raise questions about the future of media. "The question for me is, what is the future of independent reporting and commentary? Beyond the urgent civic need for such media in a democracy, there will also continue to be an audience and a market," Benson said. "The future of independent media—whether left, center or non-Trumpian right—will be subscription-based and mostly behind a paywall. As such, independent media critical of Trump certainly won't disappear, but it could have less of an impact." What Happens Next The deal regarding the Skydance-Paramount merger has been extended to October. The transaction is under review by the Federal Communications Commission.
