The U.S. can't slash education funding and think it can compete with China
As the Trump administration threatens American universities, guts crucial research programs, slashes education spending and threatens to kill the Department of Education, Chinese leaders are steaming ahead to improve their vast nation's education standards and outcomes. And China is doing this with a laserlike focus on programs around science, technology, industrial innovation and AI.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon confused the abbreviation for artificial intelligence with A-1, the popular steak sauce brand. The contrast could not be more stark, and the consequences should worry all of us.
China graduates almost twice as many STEM-oriented Ph.D.s in science and technology programs than the U.S. — an estimated 77,000 versus 40,000 according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology. But those numbers don't tell the whole story. If you exclude international students from that count, then China outpaces the U.S. 3 to 1.
Their advantage doesn't end with science and technology Ph.D.s. China has also been forging ahead to create stronger undergraduate engineering programs and vocational engineering disciplines to create a massive workforce of factory and innovation, with workers that have mastered specialized hands-on technological, problem solving and math skills.
There is a 2015 video with Apple CEO Tim Cook that has been re-circulating recently that explains why China is so attractive to foreign manufacturers. Here's the newsflash: It's not just about cheap labor. In that interview with former Fortune executive editor Adam Lashinsky at the Fortune Global Forum, Cook spells out why China is so important to Apple's global supply chain for computers, iPads, iPhones and other products. He says, 'The popular conception is that companies come to China because of low labor costs…. but the truth is China stopped being the low labor cost country many years ago. That is not the reason to come to China from a supply point of view. The reason is because of the skill and the quantity of skill in one location and the type of skill it is.'
Cook said in that video that 'the products we do require really advanced tooling and … the tooling skill is very deep here. In the U.S., you could have a meeting of tooling engineers … and I am not sure you could fill the room. In China, you could fill multiple football fields. It is that vocational expertise is very deep, very very deep here, and I give the education system a lot of credit for continuing to push on that even when others were de-emphasizing vocational.'
He said workers there demonstrate an 'intersection of craftsman kind of skill and sophisticated robotics and sort of the computer science world, that intersection that is very rare to find anywhere.'
Trump defends his torrent of tariffs by promising that such economic saber rattling will bring American manufacturing roaring back. However, his team does not seem to have a plan to rebuild a new model of American manufacturing that is based on brains as much as brawn, as well as the ability to keep up with rapid technological and engineering changes that require precise skills and advanced training.
Whether companies are creating washing machines or weather instruments, the manufacturing models that have become so attractive in China (and also increasingly in places like Vietnam and Indonesia) are based on those advanced skills Cook was talking about. That requires prioritizing academics and investing more in education at all levels — pre-K, K-12, vocational programs and higher education. It also requires investing in the government research programs that partner with universities. But Elon Musk's DOGE brigade is enthusiastically ravaging the agencies and departments that support such partnerships.
Trump has been all bark and no long-term strategy. What's sad is that America could continue to be the greatest economic global powerhouse. The ingredients for success are here, but Trump and his team seem hell-bent in destroying the educational and research infrastructure that could insure growth and dominance in the economic sphere. It's like attacking the fuse box with a blow torch and expecting that the lights and the oven and the computers will all keep running.
It just doesn't make sense.
In truth, America's struggles with education predate Trump. Tuition rates have soared to levels that are hard to justify, and almost impossible for most families to finance without steep sacrifice. American students lag behind their international counterparts in several disciplines. A 2019 study conducted by the National Center for Education Statistics found that American 8th graders ranked 16th in math and 14th in science. As the Asia Times put it, our kids 'were outclassed by students from Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, Russia, South Korea, Canada, Dubai and several European countries.'
The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's 2018 Program for International Student Assessment found China to rank first — and far ahead of the U.S. — in reading, math and science, but even if we eliminate China's cherry-picked data, the Asia Times reported, 'the US still ranks 34th in math and 15th in science.' It rightly calls that 'an appalling result for a country with the world's best universities.'
Even though China has sometimes presented an overly flattering portrait of its students' academic achievements, the truth remains that the country has put muscle into building a world-class compulsory education program for young people at the lower rungs of the economic ladder. They're no longer primarily plowing the best resources into educating the social elite class at the expense of everyone else.
Kishore Mahbubani, the Singapore-based scholar and author of several books on Asia, including 'Has China Won?,' argues that the economic standoff between the U.S. and China will be won and lost in the heartland of both countries and that education is the thing that will make the biggest difference.
'At the end of the day, the outcome of the geopolitical contest between the US and China will not be determined by which society is doing a better job at taking care of its bottom 50 percent and by which society's kids can read, write and count,' Mahbubani argued in the Asia Times.
When you poll voters about what matters to them, they always put education high on the list, but our spending and strategic priorities as a nation don't reflect that. The education stories that break into the news cycle are more often about school shootings, book bans, restrictions on transgender athletes and debates over critical race theory.
Instead of building America's world-class education system, President Trump spends his time picking fights with universities or threatening to withhold funding from schools that allegedly teach concepts like white privilege or have what he considers to be 'illegal DEI programs.' We have an administration that acts like America's educational infrastructure is more of a whipping post than a whopping piston of growth.
A country that wants to stay ahead of or even keep up with China doesn't treat its advanced education system with this kind of disdain and scorn.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
a few seconds ago
- NBC News
Smithsonian will again include Trump in impeachment exhibit in 'coming weeks'
The Smithsonian's National Museum of American History will include President Donald Trump in an exhibit focused on presidential impeachments after the removal of a placard noting Trump's two impeachments sparked concerns this week over the White House's influence on the institution. In a statement on Saturday, the Smithsonian detailed its decision to remove the Trump placard from the "Impeachment" section of an exhibit titled "The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden," saying the decision was not influenced by politics, but rather the conditions of the placard. "The placard, which was meant to be a temporary addition to a 25-year-old exhibition, did not meet the museum's standards in appearance, location, timeline, and overall presentation," the Smithsonian's Saturday statement read. "It was not consistent with other sections in the exhibit and moreover blocked the view of the objects inside its case. For these reasons, we removed the placard." The "Impeachment" section of the exhibit "will be updated in the coming weeks to reflect all impeachment proceedings in our nation's history," the Smithsonian said. The Washington Post was the first to report on the changes to the exhibit. According to the Post, the Trump references were removed from the exhibit after the Smithsonian undertook a content review following pressure from the White House and accusations of partisan bias. In its statement, the Smithsonian said "we were not asked by any Administration or other government official to remove content from the exhibit." 'The American Presidency: A Glorious Burden' exhibit was created in 2000 and hasn't been formally updated since 2008, a spokesperson for the Smithsonian told NBC News on Thursday. In lieu of an update, which the museum indicated would be costly, the Smithsonian in 2021 affixed a placard noting Trump's two impeachments to the exhibit. 'It was intended to be a short-term measure to address current events at the time, however, the label remained in place until July 2025," the spokesperson said Thursday. Because the exhibit, which also covers Congress and the Supreme Court, hadn't been updated since 2008, the museum decided to restore the 'Impeachment' section of the gallery 'back to its 2008 appearance," the spokesperson said at the time. The decision to remove the Trump label drew criticism from lawmakers, particularly as Trump has sought to exert his influence over the Smithsonian, which encompasses 21 museums, nine research centers and a zoo. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., on Friday accused Trump of attempting to "rewrite history." "He is censoring the American History Museum. It's Orwellian. It's downright Orwellian. It's something you'd see in an authoritarian regime," Schumer said. "Here's my message to the president: no matter what exhibits you try to distort, the American people will never forget that you were impeached not once, but twice." Trump has called for a reimagining of the Smithsonian, accusing the cultural institution in March of coming 'under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' and signing an executive order to 'restore the Smithsonian Institution to its rightful place as a symbol of inspiration and American greatness.' In that order, Trump directed Vice President JD Vance to work with the Smithsonian's Board of Regents to "remove improper ideology" from the museums. Trump also barred spending on exhibits or programs "that degrade shared American values, divide Americans based on race or promote programs or ideologies inconsistent with Federal law and policy." Last week, artist Amy Sherald said she withdrew her exhibit from the Smithsonian's National Portrait Gallery after concerns were raised about a portrait she featured of a transgender woman dressed like the Statue of Liberty. "I was informed by the National Portrait Gallery that concerns had been raised internally about the museum's inclusion of a portrait of a trans woman titled Trans Forming Liberty. These concerns led to discussions about removing the work from the exhibition," Sherald said in a statement. "I cannot in good conscience comply with a culture of censorship, especially when it targets vulnerable communities." A spokesperson for the Smithsonian refuted Sherald's characterization of the incident, arguing that that the artist was not asked to remove the painting, but rather the museum wanted to contextualize the portrait through a video featuring differing opinions of it. "The Smithsonian strives to foster a greater and shared understanding. By presenting and contextualizing art, the Smithsonian aims to inspire, challenge and impact audiences in meaningful and thoughtful ways. Unfortunately, we could not come to an agreement with the artist," the spokesperson said.


Fox News
a few seconds ago
- Fox News
Olivia Rodrigo Surprised Her Fans
Olivia Rodrigo surprised her fans, President Trump will have to make some decisions on celebrity pardons, and a new high profile couple seems to be emerging. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit FOX News Radio

Epoch Times
a minute ago
- Epoch Times
Beijing Pays Influencers in Africa to Spread Anti-US Messaging
By | Updated: JOHANNESBURG—Chinese and Russian agents are paying social media influencers in Africa to spread anti-U.S. messages worldwide, with the Trump administration being a top target, media experts say. Their research reveals that many influencers who use the TikTok platform are earning hundreds to thousands of dollars per month by disseminating misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda that benefits Beijing and Moscow. AD