Was it life? New findings raise questions about planet's mysterious signals
Who thought a distant planet could hold the secret to the universe? K2-18b, an exoplanet 124 light-years away, recently set the astronomy world abuzz. Astronomers spotted a faint signal - two molecules in its atmosphere, DMS and DMDS, both linked to life on Earth. Was this the evidence of extraterrestrial life we've all been waiting for?
Not so fast. The initial excitement quickly gave way to a wave of scepticism. Multiple research teams had a closer look at the original findings and found the evidence for these molecules wasn't nearly as solid as first hoped. The culprit? Noisy, imperfect data from the James Webb Space Telescope, which makes it incredibly tricky to tell one organic molecule from another. When you're peering across light-years, even the tiniest error can turn a potential biosignature into just another blip. When the data gets messy
Then came the temperature twist. Early studies painted K2-18b as a balmy, ocean-covered 'Hycean' world, but newer research suggests it might actually be far hotter, possibly too hot for life as we know it. That's the thing about exoplanets: just when you think you've got them figured out, they throw you a curveball.
The debate didn't stop at the data. Scientists dug into the modelling methods behind the original claims and found them a bit too narrow. When they broadened the models to include more potential molecules, the supposed evidence for DMS and DMDS faded away. Instead, they found molecules like ethane, which don't point to life at all, according to CNN. It's a bit like thinking you've found a rare bird, only to realise it was just a pigeon in fancy lighting. Models, molecules, and mayhem
The team behind the initial discovery hasn't given up; they've expanded their search to hundreds of molecules and are calling for even more rigorous proof. The rest of the research community is keeping them honest, demanding higher standards and more data before anyone starts celebrating.
So, are we any closer to finding life beyond Earth? Maybe, maybe not. But every twist in the K2-18b saga reminds us that the search for cosmic company is a journey full of surprises, setbacks, and the occasional glimmer of hope. And isn't that what makes it so thrilling?
First Published Date: 11 Jun, 13:09 IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
James Webb Telescope captures first direct image of possible exoplanet TWA 7 b
For the first time, NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has captured a direct image of what scientists believe is an exoplanet—TWA 7 b—orbiting a young star located about 111 light-years from Earth in the constellation Hydra. The discovery, published in the journal Nature, marks a significant milestone for the JWST, which until now had primarily confirmed or studied exoplanets using indirect methods. Unlike typical techniques that rely on the dimming of a star's light when a planet passes in front of it, this new detection used JWST's coronagraph to block out the overwhelming glare of the star TWA 7, revealing a faint source of infrared light in its surrounding debris disk. 'This is the first time Webb has directly imaged an exoplanet, and the result is incredibly exciting,' says Anne-Marie Lagrange, lead author and astrophysicist at the French National Center for Scientific Research. 'The planet's position aligns exactly with predictions based on previous observations of gaps in the debris disk.' The object, TWA 7 b, is estimated to have a mass similar to Saturn's and a temperature around 120 degrees Fahrenheit. It resides within one of the disk's three dust rings, about 50 times farther from its star than Earth is from the Sun. The odds of it being a background galaxy are slim—only 0.34%—making it a strong planetary candidate. What makes this discovery even more remarkable is that TWA 7 b is roughly ten times lighter than any exoplanet previously imaged directly. It may also be the first planet observed actively shaping its star's surrounding debris disk—an insight that sheds light on how planetary systems like our own form and evolve. To confirm their findings, Lagrange's team ran simulations of the TWA 7 system. The models mirrored the Webb images almost exactly, reinforcing their confidence in the planetary nature of the object. 'This discovery is a testament to the power of JWST's instruments,' says co-author Mathilde Malin of the Space Telescope Science Institute. 'It opens the door to studying exoplanets that were previously out of reach, both in terms of their mass and distance from their host stars.'
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
James Webb captures first direct image of an exoplanet; key details inside
credit: In a groundbreaking moment for space exploration and technology, astronomers have captured the first-ever direct image of an exoplanet using the mighty James Webb Space Telescope. This is a significant achievement that marks a major leap in the ability of the world to study worlds beyond our solar system. There exists a more fascinating world, all waiting to be explored by us! The JWST has identified a faint source of infrared light in a disk of debris surrounding a young star, called TWA-7, approximately 34 light-years away from Earth. Their intelligent observations reveal that this planet is 10 times less massive than previous exoplanets to be directly observed with a telescope; the first was discovered back in 1992. But are we sure it is an exoplanet? What is the James Webb Space Telescope? Credit: canva JWST is one of NASA 's most powerful and advanced telescopes, launched back in December 2021. It doesn't orbit the Earth like other telescopes, but it orbits the Sun 1 million miles away from the Earth at what is called the L2 or second Lagrange point. Dr. Anne-Marie Lagrange, an astrophysicist at the French National Center for Scientific Research in Paris, quotes, 'The basic problem is that the star is bright and the planet seems to be a little faint.' Usually, the starlight outwits the planets, making them impossible to spot. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Adidas Three Shorts With 60% Discount, Limited Stock Available Original Adidas Shop Now Undo Dr. Anne, with all her colleagues, decided to focus on young stars that could be easily seen on the pole-on. The potential planet orbits roughly 50-52 times farther from its star than Earth is from the sun, and has a mass about one-third that of Jupiter's. Simulations of such an exoplanet in a dusty disk around a star produced images closely matching those from JWST. 'This was really why we were confident that there was a planet,' Lagrange says. What comes next? So, the team behind this magnificent discovery thinks that the JWST could soon be able to spot planets with just 10% of the mass of Jupiter, getting close to the size of Neptune. This groundbreaking discovery also gives scientists a roadmap for further space explorations and establishes ground-based telescopes that might detect even smaller and more Earth-like planets.
Time of India
11 hours ago
- Time of India
Was the colour of the sky blue during the dinosaur era?
When we gaze up at the sky, it's easy to assume it's always looked blue all through the years. After all, the sky's colour is such a consistent backdrop in our daily lives. But Earth's past is full of unimaginable changes, like shifting continents, evolving life, and even an ever-moving position of our galaxy in terms of the shifting universe. But was the colour always the same shade? A NASA research scientist, Jessie Christiansen, explained that the night sky, and possibly even the daytime one, may have looked a little different during the age of dinosaurs. The reason isn't just atmospheric changes but also the solar system's journey through the Milky Way galaxy. Was the sky during the dinosaur era a different colour from today's blue? The sky we see today is blue because of Rayleigh scattering. Sunlight contains all the colours of the spectrum, but shorter wavelengths, like blue and violet, scatter more when they hit air molecules. Our eyes are more sensitive to blue than violet, which is why the sky appears blue. However, during the time of the dinosaurs, which lasted for about 250 to 65 million years ago during the Mesozoic Era, Earth's climate and atmospheric conditions were quite different. Earth was generally warmer during this era, which meant more water vapor in the air. This didn't necessarily mean more clouds, since cloud formation depends on evaporation and saturation levels, but it could have impacted how the sky appeared. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Everybody Is Switching To This Enterprise Accounting Software [Take a Look] Accounting ERP Click Here Undo This means that while the physics of Rayleigh scattering still applies, the exact appearance of the sky may have shifted due to changes in humidity, temperature, and atmospheric particles. Closer to the end of the Mesozoic, it likely resembled the nearly-clear light blue skies we know today. The night also looked different than today! The sky's appearance also changed depending on where Earth was in the Milky Way galaxy. According to NASA scientist Jessie Christiansen, when dinosaurs such as Stegosaurus and Iguanodons roamed Earth during the early Cretaceous period, "our entire solar neighborhood was on the opposite side of the Milky Way galaxy that it is now." Christiansen explained that "the dinosaurs were around for 200 million years, give or take, so the sky might have looked different early on but more like today towards the end, about 65 million years ago," as reported by CNN. It is never possible to reach the same point that the Earth travelled years ago! Apart from that, Christiansen also said that "we're back to where we were between 200 to 250 million years ago" in terms of our position within the galaxy. But because everything in the galaxy, including stars and solar systems, is constantly moving and rotating around a central black hole, she clarified that "we've never really [been] back at the same absolute point in space because it's not possible." So, was the sky a different colour back then? The answer is probably yes, at least for some time. While it may not have been of a starkly different colour but probably of a slightly different shade of blue as per some reports. While the scattering of light works the same, Earth's shifting climate, atmosphere, and cosmic position likely made the sky appear a bit different at various points in dinosaur history. Photo: Canva
