UK is No 1 target for Russian cyberattacks since Trump's election
Government sources say there has been a surge in the number of Russian 'hybrid attacks' on Britain since January, which includes cyberattacks and attempts to sabotage key infrastructure.
A senior government official said Trump's warmer posture towards Putin compared with the previous US administration has led to a surge in attacks on British instead of American targets.
'It's been really evident from Russia's recent propaganda that we're target No 1,' the senior government official said. 'If only the British state was as powerful as they claim.'
UK spy chiefs have long warned that key pillars of the British economy and national infrastructure are under sustained attack from Russia and a host of state-supported agents.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
19 minutes ago
- Times
Trump ‘not encouraging killing' by asking if Zelensky could bomb Moscow
President Trump mentioned possible Ukrainian strikes on Moscow to President Zelensky before he approved US arms supplies, but he was 'not encouraging further killing', the White House has said. His spokeswoman was responding to media reports that he had asked Zelensky why Kyiv's forces had not hit Moscow and St Petersburg, Russia's biggest and richest cities. 'Volodymyr, can you hit Moscow? Can you hit St Petersburg too?' Trump had asked, according to the Financial Times, which cited sources familiar with the call. 'Absolutely. We can if you give us the weapons,' Zelensky replied. Trump says Zelensky should not target Moscow Trump is also reported to have said that Kyiv should make Russians 'feel the pain' to force President Putin to agree to a peace deal. Trump said on Tuesday that Ukraine should not strike Moscow. 'I'm on humanity's side,' Trump said when asked if he was on anybody's side in the war. 'I want the killing to stop.'
Metro
21 minutes ago
- Metro
Trump warns Zelensky not to fire missiles on Moscow
US President Donald Trump said he told his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky not to strike Moscow, after giving Russia a 50-day deadline to stop the war. Trump was asked outside the White House on Tuesday if Zelensky should fire missiles at the Russian capital. 'No, he shouldn't target Moscow,' Trump told reporters on the South Lawn. His remark comes after a Financial Times report claimed that Trump privately asked Zelensky if he could use long-range missiles supplied by the US on Moscow and escalate attacks. Trump insisted that he is 'on nobody's side' but on 'humanity's side' and that he wants to 'stop the killing'. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page.
Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Free speech under threat as Britons believe they can no longer speak their mind
Free speech is under threat because Britons feel they cannot speak out for fear of offending others over race, religion and immigration, a study has found. Nearly half of those polled (49 per cent) believe people are too easily offended, particularly if they speak out on race and immigration issues, according to research for the Commission for Countering Extremism, which advises the Government. The more outspoken people's views, the more likely they were to feel constrained by the risk of offending others. Older, white males without a university education are among the groups who feel the most restricted. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos to establish the state of free speech in Britain. It follows controversies such as the 2021 protests against a teacher in Batley, West Yorkshire, who received death threats and went into hiding after showing pupils a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed from Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical magazine, during a religious studies lesson. Similar concerns over the right to freedom of expression and protest have been raised in the aftermath of the Oct 7 Hamas terror attack on Israel and the ensuing Gaza conflict. More than a third (36 per cent) felt they had to hold back on expressing their views on race or ethnicity, while 32 per cent said they did not feel they could freely speak out on immigration or religious extremism. On asylum and Gaza, 31 per cent felt constrained, rising to 41 per cent for transgender issues. Groups that were predominantly white, male, older and non-graduate were more strongly in favour of free speech, regardless of the issue, but aat the same time felt more constrained in their ability to freely share their views about most topics. Nearly half of this group (48 per cent) said they felt they had to restrain their comments on race, far higher than the average of 36 per cent. The same was true on immigration, where 43 per cent felt they had to hold back on their views compared to an overall average among the public of 32 per cent who felt constrained. Christians were more likely to back the right to free speech, but also more likely than average to feel they had to hold back on expressing their views. Conversely, women, younger Britons and people from ethnic minorities or non-Christian religions tended to think that people needed to be more sensitive in the way they spoke. Just under a third (29 per cent) of all those polled agreed that people needed to be more sensitive. But this rose to 34 per cent amongst women, 45 per cent from ethnic minorities and 45 per cent for non-Christians. By contrast, men, people aged over 65 and those from white ethnicities and Christians were more likely to think that people are too easily offended. While on average 49 per cent felt people were too easily offended, this rose to 56 per cent of men, 54 per cent of those from a white ethnicity and 59 per cent for Christians. These were nearly double the rates for people from ethnic minorities and non-Christians. Race and ethnicity was the only topic overall where the balance of opinion was more towards avoiding offence rather than speaking freely (by 42 per cent to 34 per cent), according to the research. People predominantly held back from expressing their views to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. Forty-six per cent resisted expressing their views on any religious figure, text or teaching and just 35 per cent held back their political views to avoid causing offence. Some said they held back because of heightened concerns about their safety. For religious topics, 25 per cent said they restrained themselves because of safety fears, and 17 per cent over political views. The report said there was a group of people for whom free speech was a significant issue. They represented about 37 per cent of the total sample and were described by researchers as those who were most concerned about the pace of change. But they were also the group most likely to express 'heightened concerns' about their ability to speak freely about race, immigration, asylum and religious extremism. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'The Left's determination to shut down debate around immigration has created a chilling environment for free speech. In this context, a catch-all definition of Islamophobia would be a disaster, worsening the culture of fear that has spread throughout society.'
