Russia fires over 100 drones at Ukraine as Kremlin dismisses transport chief after travel chaos
At least 10 civilians were killed and 38 injured, including three children, in Russian attacks over the previous 24 hours, Ukrainian officials said.
Russia recently has intensified its aerial strikes on civilian areas after more than three years of war. Over the past week, Russia launched some 1,270 drones, 39 missiles and almost 1,000 powerful glide bombs at Ukraine, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Monday.
Russia's bigger army is also trying hard to break through at some points along the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620 miles) front line, where Ukrainian forces are severely stretched.
The strain of keeping Russia's invasion at bay, and the lack of progress in direct peace talks, has compelled Ukraine to seek more military help from the U.S. and Europe.
Zelenskyy said on Saturday that Ukraine had inked deals with European allies and a leading U.S. defense company to step up drone production, ensuring Kyiv receives 'hundreds of thousands' more this year.
'Air defense is the main thing for protecting life,' Zelenskyy wrote on Telegram on Monday.
That includes developing and manufacturing interceptor drones that can stop Russia's long-range Shahed drones, he said.
Extensive use of drones has also helped Ukraine compensate for its troop shortages on the front line.
One person was killed in the southern city of Odesa, 27 were injured in northeastern Kharkiv and falling drone debris caused damage in two districts of Kyiv, the capital, during nighttime drone attacks, Ukrainian authorities said.
Russian short-range drones also killed two people and injured two others in the northern Sumy region, officials said. Sumy is one of the places where Russia has concentrated large numbers of troops.
Also, nine people were injured and seven killed in the eastern Donetsk region, regional Gov. Vadym Filashkin said. He didn't specify the type of weapons used.
Meanwhile, Russia's Defense Ministry said Monday that its troops shot down 91 Ukrainian drones in 13 Russian regions overnight, as well as over the Black Sea and the Russian-annexed Ukrainian peninsula of Crimea.
The Kremlin dismissed Transport Minister Roman Starovoyt on Monday, an order published on the Kremlin website said.
The announcement did not give a reason for Starovoyt's dismissal. Over the weekend, hundreds of flights were canceled or delayed at Moscow's Sheremetyevo and St. Petersburg's Pulkovo airports. Other airports in western and central Russia also faced disruptions because of Ukrainian drone attacks.
___
Associated Press writer Katie Marie Davies in Manchester, England contributed to this report.
___
Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
39 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump Promises More Weapons for Ukraine and Criticizes Putin
President Donald Trump said he'd ship more weapons to Ukraine, marking an apparent reversal after the Pentagon halted flows of some air-defense missiles and artillery shells to the country. 'We're going to send some more weapons,' Trump told reporters at the start of a dinner with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House on Monday evening. 'We have to. They have to be able to defend themselves. They're getting hit very hard now.'
an hour ago
Where things stand as Trump presses Netanyahu for Gaza ceasefire: ANALYSIS
As Israel i Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held meetings Monday with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Special Envoy for the Middle East Steve Witkoff and then President Donald Trump, here is the latest on where things stand with ceasefire negotiations -- and what's on the Trump administration's agenda when it comes to charting a course for the future of Gaza. What's on the table The deal on the table would see ten living hostages -- about half of the total amount of detainees believed to still be alive in Gaza -- and the remains of 18 more returned to Israel in five separate releases in exchange for a 60-day ceasefire, the release of some Palestinian prisoners, and a surge of humanitarian aid for Palestinians in the enclave. T he details of how that aid would be supplied and distributed are still under negotiation, according to an official familiar with the matter. The expectation is that U.S.-backed talks to permanently end the war would pick up during the truce, officials say. Where things stand Israel has signed off on the main tenets of the proposal as it currently stands. Hamas has indicated it sees potential but still has some outstanding issues. Officials familiar with the negotiations say that the biggest sticking point is consistent with failed talks in the past: Hamas wants assurances that a ceasefire will lead to a permanent end to war. It wants assurances that talks during the ceasefire on a permanent end to the war will continue beyond the 60-day window if it's necessary. Israel, meanwhile, is reluctant to sign on to any language that restricts military action. Israel is also adamant that Hamas can't be allowed to play any part in governing Gaza -- a term the Trump administration is aligned with. Both governments are wary of allowing for a situation similar to what existed in Lebanon with Hezbollah, where a civilian government is in place but the militant group holds significant control. Hamas also wants to see the controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) end operations and the U.N. plus other international organizations allowed to fully resume distribution. U.S. officials say they believe there is some room for compromise on this point, but don't foresee the U.S.-backed GHF being fully pushed out. Daniel Dannon, Israel's ambassador to the U.N., told reporters last week he could foresee some "combination" of GHF and the U.N. administering aid in a "day-after" scenario for Gaza. Israeli and Hamas officials are holding indirect proximity talks in Doha to try to resolve some of the differences, and the White House said earlier Monday that Witkoff would travel there this week. Witkoff's involvement is seen as a promising sign for the prospect of reaching an agreement, but also as an indication that it will take more high-level engagement from the U.S. to get it over the finish line. Where things go next Officials are very much looking at President Trump and other key Cabinet member meeting with Netanyahu as working engagements, because even though Israel sees eye to eye with the U.S on the major terms of the ceasefire agreement, the administration is looking to Netanyahu as it attempts to work out an endgame and settle on objectives for the "day after" in Gaza. Trump has largely focused on expanding the Abraham Accords, an agreement in his first term that led to normalization of relations between Israel and some Arab nations. He's also proposed a relocation plan for Gaza's two million Palestinians, which Netanyahu endorsed at the time. An expansion of the Abraham Accords and a "day-after" proposal for Gaza are both seen as needing broader regional buy-in from influential Arab States, like Saudi Arabia. Many of them are insistent the PA should play a role in governing Gaza, which Israel has opposed. Working-level discussions on Gaza with those Middle Eastern governments are happening on a continuous basis. Trump is seeking a big win in Gaza -- and momentum on Iran Trump is seeking a "victory with a capital "V" during Netanyahu's visit, said Dana Stroul, a former deputy assistant secretary of defense for the Middle East from 2021 to 2023. The president, who has said he'll measure the success of his presidency by the wars he's ended, will look to ride off of the ceasefire he brokered in Iran with a ceasefire in Gaza. He "not only has leverage, but has built up goodwill" with Netanyahu after the U.S. joined Israel's war in Iran, Stroul said. "President Trump has put resources in the game, not just words. And so he has leverage at this moment in time to tell Netanyahu, it's time to wind down the wars in Gaza," she said. While it's not clear what diplomatic outcome the U.S. is seeking in Iran after its strikes there, the president could try to deposit his goodwill and "make clear [to Netanyahu] how he wants to move forward on the Iran file." "It certainly has the makings of a grand bargain," Stroul said. But a ceasefire would only temporarily halt fighting before a broad "day-after" agreement for Gaza -- and the region -- can be negotiated.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
More than three out of five people think Starmer does not respect them
More than three in five people think Sir Keir Starmer does not respect them, a poll has found. While in opposition, Sir Keir sought to make the concept of 'respect' central to his pitch to voters, and research from UCL suggested this played a key role in convincing the public to back him and the Labour Party. But a survey from More In Common and the UCL Policy Lab, published on Tuesday, suggested 63% of the public now thought the Prime Minister did not respect people like them, almost twice the 32% that thought so before the 2024 election. And while 41% of the public thought Sir Keir did respect them before the election, that figure has fallen to 24%. The poll also suggested that a perceived lack of respect from political elites was driving support for Reform UK, with supporters of that party more likely to think politicians as a whole disrespect them. Some 85% of Reform supporters said they thought politicians did not respect their contribution to society, while 86% thought politicians did not respect their values. But while Reform leader Nigel Farage scored more highly than the two main party leaders on respecting the public, 50% of those surveyed still said he did not respect people like them. That compared to 56% for Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch and 63% for Sir Keir. And just 33% thought Mr Farage did respect them, compared to 24% for both Mrs Badenoch and Sir Keir. Tuesday's poll has been published alongside a report from More in Common and the UCL Policy Lab examining how public opinion has changed since the general election. It found 77% of people still thought it was time for change, while the most popular answer to the question of what had changed since Labour came to power was 'nothing'. Marc Stears, director of the UCL Policy Lab, said: 'What voters want to know most of all is: who does this Government stand for? What kind of people does it most respect? Whose interests does it put first? 'A lot of the electorate thought they knew the answer to that one year ago. Now they're not so sure.' The joint poll surveyed more than 7,000 people in May and June this year.
